Houston pays tribute to the late US Rep. Sylvester Turner as he lies in state
Turner, 70, died on March 5, just weeks into his first term in the House and only hours after attending President Donald Trump 's address to Congress in Washington. His family said he died at his home following health complications.
Residents observed a memorial at Houston City Hall, where Turner served as mayor for eight years before being elected to Congress in November. Houston Mayor John Whitmire made brief remarks to mourners and the Houston Symphony performed while visitors paid their respects.
'Sylvester knew each and every community, and he treated everyone with equality and inclusion," Whitmire said. "That's what made him really special. He brought that public service and that message across not only our great city, but our great state.'
Turner had filled the House seat held by longtime Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, who died in July. Prior to becoming mayor, Turner served as a legislator in the Texas House of Representatives for 27 years.
Turner is also scheduled to lie in state at the Texas Capitol beginning Thursday. His funeral is scheduled for Saturday in Houston.
Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has not yet announced when a special election will be held for Turner's seat.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
'Independence first, everything else later' is doomed to fail
In their view, Scotland should focus purely on achieving a Yes vote, leaving all questions about what an independent Scotland would look like to be settled afterwards. But that's a losing strategy, one that kept us stuck in a self-destructing UK back in 2014 and is keeping us stuck there now. In 2014, the campaign's instinct was to avoid scaring voters. We were told to 'reassure', to keep the pitch narrow, and avoid anything controversial. The hope was that by keeping our plans bland, we would make independence a safe, neutral choice. It didn't work, we offered a technical case (Scotland's Future publication) without painting a compelling enough vision of what life would be like after independence. The Yes campaign lacked any vision for radical change even though most independence supporters had their own personal vision founded on their personal core beliefs but we've been conditioned to be scared to share it, when speaking from the heart is what makes the difference. READ MORE: UN case will determine who is entitled to call an indy referendum We've got to stop trying to run the most conservative independence campaign in political history. Believe in Scotland is publishing the results of our 2025 Big Indy Survey. We posted that 92% of 7200+ Yes supporters want Scotland to be a republic, many commented that it harmed the cause to say so, as we need to stick to the 'independence first, everything else later' mantra. Wrong: in December we commissioned a poll by Norstat and the standard Yes/No question came back 54% Yes. When we asked the same respondents the Yes/No question if independence meant Scotland becoming a republic, Yes rose to 59%. The evidence for going big on key policies SINCE 2014, we've tested different messages and the evidence is clear. When we combine independence with bold, popular policies, independence support rises. A Republican Scotland: Polling shows that independence support increases 5% when tied to the promise of becoming a republic. This is because it's not just about removing the monarchy, it's about building a modern democracy, a society based on wellbeing and merit and not one headed up by inherited political power and massive wealth by birthright. Rejoining the EU: Brexit has been a disaster, and a clear majority in Scotland wants back in the EU. Linking independence directly to rejoining turns it from a vague change into a concrete route back to freedom of movement, cooperation, and prosperity. Thought to be worth 5% to the Yes cause as most new indy supporters cite Brexit as the reason for their change of heart. Wellbeing Economy and Wellbeing pension: A wellbeing economy, one that measures success by health, happiness, and fairness and not just GDP speaks directly to people's concerns. Coupling that with a wellbeing pension, protected from Westminster cuts, older voters will see that independence improves their standard of living. These policies connect to voters' real hopes and fears. They make independence a means to an end, not an end in itself. Takes independence support to 66%, (+12%). The trap of process-only politics SOME argue that adding specific policies now will 'divide the movement.' They fear alienating potential Yes voters who disagree on one or two points. But the truth is the opposite. A 'vote Yes, then we'll decide' approach alienates people by asking them to commit without knowing what they're signing up for. By refusing to commit to a bold vision now, we risk signalling that independence might just be the status quo with a saltire on top. That's not inspiring, the undecided will just see a set of Westminster politicians they don't trust, losing powers to a set of Holyrood politicians they don't trust – big deal. Breaking out of the deadlock BREAKING the deadlock means making independence the delivery vehicle for the radical changes that people desire for Scotland. We are selling a new Scotland so our campaign must be a campaign for a better Scotland and not just for a technical exercise in constitutional change. A winning vision – based on the will of the people. Building it with the people is the solution and that's why Believe in Scotland is campaigning for a Scottish Citizens' Convention. The Citizens' Convention is key to engaging the public in a new national conversation just as we did in 2014 when grassroots supporters moved the polls by sharing their hopes and dreams for a better, fairer, prosperous Scotland. It's a democratic process bringing together civic Scotland and citizens' voices from across Scotland to design the type of Scotland we want. Workers, communities, businesses, academics, and campaigners all have a seat at the table. And you will absolutely find that if we get the nation dreaming of a better Scotland that they will dream of an independent Scotland. READ MORE: Could Scotland challenge hotels housing asylum seekers? A legal expert explains This is how we co-create a credible, inclusive vision with the people. And here's the crucial part: the outcome can be put back to the people as a manifesto for independence. Because more than 80% of what the people will say they want can't be delivered without independence. That makes independence not just a political pitch, but a nation in agreement on what independence will deliver from day one. It should also lead to a festival of democracy– a series of confirmatory referendums on the key issues, such as joining the EU etc, so the people can say yes to the bigger picture but reject individual parts of it if they want to. The cost of timidity IF we stick with 'independence first, everything else later,' we risk another 2014. We'll be cautious when we need to be bold, defensive when we need to be visionary, on the backfoot in every debate like we were in indyref1. And we could lose again, not because independence isn't the answer but because we refused to give independence a moral purpose, and failed to give them a reason to believe. The stakes are too high, we are not just fighting for some academic technical constitutional change. We are fighting for the chance to transform Scotland into a fairer, greener, happier, healthier and more democratic place to live and work. That transformation must be built into the case for independence from the very start and the Citizens' Convention is the best tool to do that. Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp is an economist, the CEO of Business for Scotland, the founder of the Believe in Scotland campaign consisting of 143 local and national Yes Groups, and the author of Scotland the Brief
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Prince Andrew on alert as US set to release Jeffrey Epstein files in Congress hearing
The US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Accountability is set to begin receiving the first batch of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case on Friday Prince Andrew has been advised to "brace himself" as explosive US government files concerning his paedophile associate Jeffrey Epstein are set to be disclosed within days. The disgraced Duke of York, already tarnished by years of scandal, could find his name splashed across official US documents as Congress prepares to unveil confidential papers linked to the billionaire sex offender. On Friday, Congress will start receiving the initial batch of documents from the Department of Justice. They have committed to making the files public once victims' identities and other sensitive material have been redacted, just a week after Andrew's biographer declared Trump's fate in the Epstein scandal decided. A spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee confirmed to the Mirror: "The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims' identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted. The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations." This move heightens the pressure on Andrew, whose ties to Epstein - including allegations he repeatedly slept with the financier's 'teen sex slave' Virginia Giuffre - have left his Royal reputation in tatters. Andrew has consistently and vehemently denied all wrongdoing. An Epstein victim has cautioned that the forthcoming public disclosure of court documents will leave numerous high-profile men, including the Duke of York, feeling anxious. "Andrew should brace himself," the survivor said. "When these files are finally made public, countless men, some of whom may have never been named before, will have to answer for their friendship with Jeffrey. Survivors like me have had to live with the shame and trauma while men in power carried on as if nothing happened." The woman, now 38 and a beneficiary of compensation from the Epstein victim fund, went on: "If your Prince's name is there, then he must answer for it. No amount of royal privilege, no titles, no lawyers should protect him from the truth. He should be ready, because the world will see exactly who was mixed up with Jeffrey and what they chose to ignore." The expected publication of the documents follows prominent US lawyer Gloria Allred's recent comments to The Mirror that Andrew, aged 65, should appear before American legislators to give testimony about his understanding of Epstein. The barrister, who acts for multiple victims of the paedophile, stated: "All I can say is, now more than ever, he should come forward, and he could volunteer to testify publicly." Congress is said to be acting rapidly, with sources indicating the initial disclosures could surface "in days rather than weeks." Committee chairman James Comer announced the documents would finally illuminate a saga the Trump administration has been accused of concealing. This comes after the Justice Department's July announcement that "no further disclosures" regarding Epstein were required - a decision that enraged victims, campaigners, and the President's MAGA supporters alike. The US leader had promised during his White House campaign to make all government Epstein documents public. For years, America has remained obsessed with the so-called "Epstein files" amid rampant speculation that the financier kept a secret list of powerful associates who engaged in the company of underage girls. The FBI and DOJ insist no such list exists. Nevertheless, earlier this year, former Attorney General Pam Bondi pledged to release the files when she announced, "It's on my desk." Donald Trump, who enjoyed a close friendship with Epstein spanning over three decades, was regularly seen at events in Palm Beach and Manhattan alongside him and now faces awkward questions himself. Epstein, once a globe-trotting financier with connections to presidents, royalty and billionaires, died in his New York prison cell in August 2019. Officially ruled as suicide, his unexpected demise has sparked years of conspiracy theories - with many believing he was silenced to prevent him from revealing damaging information. These speculations continue, especially now that the US government is being forced to disclose files that could potentially sully numerous wealthy and famous individuals. For Prince Andrew, the threat is clear. His disastrous BBC Newsnight interview, where he asserted he didn't sweat and denied ever meeting his accuser Giuffre, remains one of the most humiliating episodes in Royal history. Despite settling Giuffre's New York civil lawsuit with an alleged payment of £12 million, he has consistently refuted any wrongdoing.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's new White House portrait criticised for 'Satanic theme'
A fresh image of Donald Trump has been unveiled in the Oval Office - but it's already causing a stir online, with many branding it as "too accurate" A controversial new portrait of Donald Trump has sparked fierce criticism over its alleged 'Satanic themes'. Sebastian Gorka, the deputy assistant to the president, revealed a fresh image of Trump, which is now displayed in the Oval Office. The artwork shows Trump striding through rows of American flags with an orange glow behind him - compared to flames by critics - and was teased as just "one of the new" Trump-themed artworks decorating the White House. The new portrait comes amid reports of how Trump's Ukraine plans has prompted a Pentagon peace summit with UK military chiefs. The new portrait was created by Vanessa Horabuena, a self-described Christian worship painter. the Express. Not everyone was impressed with the portrait, with some branding it as "too accurate" and others as "too orange." Project Liberal questioned, "Why is the country on fire behind him?". This feeling resonated with many, as another user remarked, "fits. America is on fire in the background and Trump walks away." Others pointed to Trump's collection of self-portraits in the White House, especially after reports last week that portraits of Obama and Bush have been moved to a rarely-used stairwell, reports the Mirror US. Ignited uproar "The man can't get enough of himself," one user slammed. Another added: "As per usual, it's all about his ego." Another person slated the portrait's poor resemblance to Trump's real appearance. "Did you request the portrait to appear 60 lbs lighter than reality?" an X user questioned. The Mirror reached out to both the White House and the artist for a response, but none was immediately available. Trump's portraits and paintings displayed around the White House have previously sparked controversy, and a recent attempt to showcase them to other world leaders didn't go as smoothly as Trump had hoped. Assassination attempt His iconic photo from the Butler assassination attempt, featuring him with his fist raised in the air, is also a source of pride for the president, who often shows it off to visitors. Before a meeting in the East Room yesterday, the seven European heads of state gathered for a photograph with Trump and Zelensky in the Grand Foyer of the White House. As they stood together, the president gestured towards a painting depicting his bloodied ear following an assassination attempt during his 2024 campaign in Pennsylvania. "That was not a good day. Not a great day. See the picture?" Trump said, pointing to a wall on the group's right where the large painting is hung. However, not all the leaders shared Trump's enthusiasm for the image. Patriotic portraits Some of the leaders briefly glanced over, appearing to show minimal interest, while others, like French President Emmanuel Macron, continued to look straight ahead. The Republican leader has been giving the White House a makeover, including refurbishing the Rose Garden and adding numerous gold accents throughout the Oval Office. A substantial portion of these changes includes swapping out portraits of his predecessors. In a recent snap shared on X, Trump's patriotic portrait is proudly showcased between former First Lady Laura Bush and another first lady, nabbing the spot previously held by his long-standing adversary, Hillary Clinton. This comes after Joe Rogan revealed a startling new conspiracy theory about a potential assassination attempt on Trump in 2024.
