logo
US Supreme Court backs South Carolina effort to defund Planned Parenthood

US Supreme Court backs South Carolina effort to defund Planned Parenthood

Al Jazeera6 hours ago

The United States Supreme Court has cleared the way for South Carolina to strip the nonprofit healthcare provider Planned Parenthood of funding under Medicaid, a government insurance programme.
Thursday's ruling was split along ideological lines, with the three liberal justices on the nine-member court dissenting.
The ruling overturned a lower court's decision barring Republican-governed South Carolina from preventing Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, a regional branch, from participating in the state's Medicaid programme.
Republican leaders in South Carolina have objected to Planned Parenthood because it provides abortions.
The Supreme Court's decision bolsters efforts by Republican-led states to deprive the reproductive healthcare provider of public money.
The case centred on whether recipients of Medicaid may sue to enforce a requirement under US law that they may obtain medical assistance from any qualified and willing provider. Medicaid is administered jointly by the federal and state governments, and it is designed to provide healthcare coverage for low-income people.
Since the Supreme Court in 2022 overturned its landmark Roe v Wade ruling that legalised abortion nationwide, a number of Republican-led states have implemented near-total bans on the procedure. Some, like South Carolina, prohibit abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic operates clinics in the South Carolina cities of Charleston and Columbia, where it serves hundreds of Medicaid patients each year, providing physical examinations, screenings for cancer and diabetes, pregnancy testing, contraception and other services.
The Planned Parenthood affiliate and a Medicaid patient named Julie Edwards sued the state in 2018. A year earlier, in 2017, Republican Governor Henry McMaster had ordered officials to end Planned Parenthood's participation in the state Medicaid programme by deeming any abortion provider unqualified to provide family planning services.
The plaintiffs sued South Carolina under an 1871 law that helps people challenge illegal acts by state officials. They said the Medicaid law protects what they called a 'deeply personal right' to choose one's doctor.
The South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom conservative legal group and backed by President Donald Trump's administration, said the disputed Medicaid provision in this case does not meet the 'high bar for recognising private rights'.
A federal judge previously ruled in Planned Parenthood's favour, finding that Medicaid recipients may sue under the 1871 law and that the state's move to defund the organisation violated Edwards's right to freely choose a qualified medical provider.
In 2024, the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, also sided with the plaintiffs.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on April 2.
The dispute has reached the Supreme Court three times. The court in 2020 rejected South Carolina's appeal at an earlier stage of the case. In 2023, it ordered a lower court to reconsider South Carolina's arguments in light of a ruling the justices issued involving the rights of nursing home residents.
That decision explained that laws like Medicaid must unambiguously give individuals the right to sue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How big is Zohran Mamdani's win in New York primary?
How big is Zohran Mamdani's win in New York primary?

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

How big is Zohran Mamdani's win in New York primary?

The democratic socialist candidate's victory in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor shocks US politics. A political earthquake, say the headlines. A stunning victory. A wake-up call for the Democratic Party in the United States. Zohran Mamdani's win in New York City's mayoral primary has sent the news media into overdrive. But what's behind his win, and how significant is it for US politics? Presenter: Adrian Finighan Guests: Linda Sarsour – Palestinian-American activist and political strategist in New York Joi Chaney – Democratic political strategist in Washington, DC Omar Rahman – Political analyst and fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs in New York

US Secretary of Defense attacks media for questioning Iran strikes
US Secretary of Defense attacks media for questioning Iran strikes

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Secretary of Defense attacks media for questioning Iran strikes

US Secretary of Defense attacks media for questioning Iran strikes NewsFeed US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth used a press briefing to berate the press, attacking the media for questioning the supposed success of US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Video Duration 02 minutes 33 seconds 02:33 Video Duration 00 minutes 30 seconds 00:30 Video Duration 02 minutes 00 seconds 02:00 Video Duration 01 minutes 11 seconds 01:11 Video Duration 02 minutes 15 seconds 02:15 Video Duration 00 minutes 35 seconds 00:35 Video Duration 03 minutes 05 seconds 03:05

US Supreme Court backs South Carolina effort to defund Planned Parenthood
US Supreme Court backs South Carolina effort to defund Planned Parenthood

Al Jazeera

time6 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Supreme Court backs South Carolina effort to defund Planned Parenthood

The United States Supreme Court has cleared the way for South Carolina to strip the nonprofit healthcare provider Planned Parenthood of funding under Medicaid, a government insurance programme. Thursday's ruling was split along ideological lines, with the three liberal justices on the nine-member court dissenting. The ruling overturned a lower court's decision barring Republican-governed South Carolina from preventing Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, a regional branch, from participating in the state's Medicaid programme. Republican leaders in South Carolina have objected to Planned Parenthood because it provides abortions. The Supreme Court's decision bolsters efforts by Republican-led states to deprive the reproductive healthcare provider of public money. The case centred on whether recipients of Medicaid may sue to enforce a requirement under US law that they may obtain medical assistance from any qualified and willing provider. Medicaid is administered jointly by the federal and state governments, and it is designed to provide healthcare coverage for low-income people. Since the Supreme Court in 2022 overturned its landmark Roe v Wade ruling that legalised abortion nationwide, a number of Republican-led states have implemented near-total bans on the procedure. Some, like South Carolina, prohibit abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic operates clinics in the South Carolina cities of Charleston and Columbia, where it serves hundreds of Medicaid patients each year, providing physical examinations, screenings for cancer and diabetes, pregnancy testing, contraception and other services. The Planned Parenthood affiliate and a Medicaid patient named Julie Edwards sued the state in 2018. A year earlier, in 2017, Republican Governor Henry McMaster had ordered officials to end Planned Parenthood's participation in the state Medicaid programme by deeming any abortion provider unqualified to provide family planning services. The plaintiffs sued South Carolina under an 1871 law that helps people challenge illegal acts by state officials. They said the Medicaid law protects what they called a 'deeply personal right' to choose one's doctor. The South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom conservative legal group and backed by President Donald Trump's administration, said the disputed Medicaid provision in this case does not meet the 'high bar for recognising private rights'. A federal judge previously ruled in Planned Parenthood's favour, finding that Medicaid recipients may sue under the 1871 law and that the state's move to defund the organisation violated Edwards's right to freely choose a qualified medical provider. In 2024, the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, also sided with the plaintiffs. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on April 2. The dispute has reached the Supreme Court three times. The court in 2020 rejected South Carolina's appeal at an earlier stage of the case. In 2023, it ordered a lower court to reconsider South Carolina's arguments in light of a ruling the justices issued involving the rights of nursing home residents. That decision explained that laws like Medicaid must unambiguously give individuals the right to sue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store