Formerly Secret Spy Data Centre To Open Soon In West Auckland
A tailor-made data centre for the country's most secret and sensitive public sector information is expected to open soon in West Auckland.
The $300m facility at the air force base in Whenuapai is a partnership between the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) spy agency and the Defence Force.
It was especially designed to meet New Zealand's 'unique environment', the GCSB has said previously.
Begun in 2022, but announced only in 2023 'after security milestones had been achieved', the centre will provide extra secure storage for core information across government agencies.
It was on track to begin operating by the middle of the year, the spy agency said.
A main driver has been to get 'additional protection against malign actors', official papers showed.
A lot of public agency data is held in data centres in Australia run by big US tech companies.
'The data centre is neither modelled on nor linked to an Australian centre,' the GCSB said in 2023, in response to a request made under the Official Information Act.
'We did however seek to draw learnings from selected international partners about their data centres, given this is the first instance where we have built such a facility, noting we have a unique environment and different requirements than international partners.'
A 'non-sovereign' option offshore, or in a centre with offshore ownership, was ruled out early on.
Planning dated back almost a decade, when a Cabinet committee in 2016 agreed on setting money aside following a security resourcing review.
'The facility needed to be within New Zealand, preferably on existing Crown land,' the GCSB said. 'Value for money was a strong factor, as was geographical diversity and resiliency.'
The centre would 'shore up the resilience of our secure data storage for at least another 25 years', the spy agency said in a statement.
The GCSB's appropriation in Budget 2025 of $262m was about a fifth lower than what it spent last year. There was 'volatility from year to year as capital projects start and finish', it said.
Successive governments' policy of pushing to the 'cloud' had propelled a lot of agencies to switch from storing and processing data on-site, to using services and servers run by Microsoft, Amazon and Google, in Australia. The former two have been building large data centres in this country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
19 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Homeowners could be left with costs after consent changes
A property lawyer says homeowners could be left vulnerable to costs when building projects go wrong under changes to the building consents regime. The government is moving to a proportionate liability system for the Building Act, so each party is liable for the share of work they carry out. It says councils have been reluctant to sign off building consents because they're liable for defects, causing unnecessary delays in the construction process. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the government would be exploring mechanisms to protect homeowners, such as indemnity insurance or home warranties. Property lawyer James Wollerman told RNZ it was not clear how that would work. Under joint and several liability a homeowner could claim full compensation for a botched building project from the council, he said. Under the new scheme of proportionate liability - if the council and builder were sharing liability by 50 percent each - the homeowner would be left carrying that 50 percent if the builder went missing. He said there was an option of an insurance scheme, but it was not clear who would underwrite that insurance. "We've seen that insurers are not generally prepared to insure for weather-tightness defects. "So there's a big question out there as to what the government's going to be able to put forward in terms of an insurance scheme that would provide some sort of protection for homeowners." Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said Australia had had a proportionate liability scheme since the 1990s. He said it made sense to shift liability away from councils, which was creating high rates for ratepayers and a risk-averse culture in construction. "If you're a council, and you know that you can end up liable for an entire project, then you get increasingly stressed and often obstructive, when it comes to allowing more innovative building materials, more innovative techniques. "And as a result, we end up with high rates and little innovation in building and high building costs," Seymour said. He said the shake-up of the building consents regime would cut delays and costs for construction projects. "Moving to a regime where the various people involved, those who provide the materials, those who do the work, perhaps those who do the design, and those who do the consent, have liability when things go wrong, is not a scary or different thing. "It takes us to where most of the world is." Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins told RNZ the current rules were introduced in the early 2000s during the leaky home saga. "Are they slowing things down? Yes they probably are. So I think the government are making the right steps, you know they are heading in the right direction. "The issue will be getting consumer protection right." Hipkins said that the government believed if it pushed house prices up the economy would be fixed. "House building sure creates jobs but the housing market is not the totality of our economy."
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Homeowners could be left with costs under building consents changes
Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A property lawyer says homeowners could be left vulnerable to costs when building projects go wrong under changes to the building consents regime. The government is moving to a proportionate liability system for the Building Act, so each party is liable for the share of work they carry out. It says councils have been reluctant to sign off building consents because they're liable for defects, causing unnecessary delays in the construction process. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the government would be exploring mechanisms to protect homeowners, such as indemnity insurance or home warranties. Property lawyer James Wollerman told Morning Report it was not clear how that would work. Under joint and several liability a homeowner could claim full compensation for a botched building project from the council, he said. Under the new scheme of proportionate liability - if the council and builder were sharing liability by 50 percent each - the homeowner would be left carrying that 50 percent if the builder went missing. He said there was an option of an insurance scheme, but it was not clear who would underwrite that insurance. "We've seen that insurers are not generally prepared to insure for weather-tightness defects. "So there's a big question out there as to what the government's going to be able to put forward in terms of an insurance scheme that would provide some sort of protection for homeowners." Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said Australia had had a proportionate liability scheme since the 1990s. He said it made sense to shift liability away from councils, which was creating high rates for ratepayers and a risk-averse culture in construction. "If you're a council, and you know that you can end up liable for an entire project, then you get increasingly stressed and often obstructive, when it comes to allowing more innovative building materials, more innovative techniques. "And as a result, we end up with high rates and little innovation in building and high building costs," Seymour said. He said the shake-up of the building consents regime would cut delays and costs for construction projects. "Moving to a regime where the various people involved, those who provide the materials, those who do the work, perhaps those who do the design, and those who do the consent, have liability when things go wrong, is not a scary or different thing. "It takes us to where most of the world is." Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins told Morning Report the current rules were introduced in the early 2000s during the leaky home saga. "Are they slowing things down? Yes they probably are. So I think the government are making the right steps, you know they are heading in the right direction. "The issue will be getting consumer protection right." Hipkins said that the government believed if it pushed house prices up the economy would be fixed. "House building sure creates jobs but the housing market is not the totality of our economy."
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Fire in commercial building on Auckland's Dominion Road
Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Firefighters have put out a fire in a commercial building on Auckland's Dominion Road. Emergency services were called to the two-storey property on the busy throughfare at 5:50am. The blaze was contained to the building's ground floor and fire crews were dampening down hot spots. Bus services on Dominion Road had earlier been diverted, but the road had since reopened.
