
What is the 'Matilda Effect'? How science became a man's world by dominance, not by merit
Matilda Effect
, a term that names the injustice of women's scientific contributions being overlooked, ignored, or credited to their male counterparts.
#Operation Sindoor
The damage done at Pak bases as India strikes to avenge Pahalgam
Why Pakistan pleaded to end hostilities
Kashmir's Pahalgam sparks Karachi's nightmare
This isn't just a historical oversight—it's a deliberate distortion. The dominance of men in science has long been treated as natural or inevitable. But the truth is far more uncomfortable: it was orchestrated. From scientific discoveries to academic publishing, from career advancement to Nobel Prizes, women have been systematically pushed to the margins, not because they lacked merit, but because the system was never designed for them to succeed.
The Forgotten Matildas of Science
The Matilda Effect takes its name from
Matilda Joslyn Gage
, a 19th-century suffragist and writer who railed against the exclusion of women inventors and scientists. In an 1870 essay,
Woman as Inventor
, she dismantled the myth that women lacked creativity or scientific aptitude, arguing that tradition and prejudice—not ability—had kept them out of recognition. But it was only in 1993 that historian Margaret Rossiter gave Gage's observations a name and academic legitimacy. Since then, the term has become a rallying cry for scholars and activists working to unearth the buried legacies of
female scientists
.
— TheAttagirls (@TheAttagirls)
Consider the case of
Lise Meitner
, a physicist whose work was central to the discovery of nuclear fission. In 1945, her colleague Otto Hahn received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the breakthrough. Meitner, exiled and working in Sweden, got no mention. Letters between them later revealed Hahn's limited grasp of the physics involved—yet history remembers his name, not hers. This wasn't an isolated incident. In fields from biology to astronomy, women like Esther Lederberg and Jocelyn Bell Burnell made landmark discoveries, only to watch the accolades go to men.
You Might Also Like:
Stuck in a heated philosophical debate? Here is how 'Straw Man' and 'Steel Man' might just save the conversation
Journalist Katie Hafner, producer of the podcast
Lost Women of Science
, describes this as 'a tragedy,' one that isn't confined to award snubs. 'It's about not being named in a study; to be just an asterisk or a footnote,' she says. The effect, she argues, has robbed generations of women of their due, while also denying the public a fuller understanding of how science actually works: as a collaborative, cumulative enterprise—not the solitary genius of the Great Man.
Why Representation Still Matters
While the 20th century saw major advances in women's education, their representation in STEM fields still lags significantly. According to UNESCO, women make up only 15% of students in computer science and 30% in engineering and construction. Even in more balanced sciences, like biology, the gender gap widens at higher levels of academia. In Spain, for instance, while women account for 49% of science students and 41% of researchers, few reach leadership positions or win major scientific awards.
Part of the problem, according to Maite Paramio, president of AMIT (Association of Women Researchers and Technologists), is visibility. 'Girls don't aspire to what they can't see,' she explains. Without role models in textbooks or classrooms, young women lose interest in STEM fields by the time they reach higher education. Her organization runs initiatives like
Una ingeniera en cada cole
('An engineer in every school'), where real-life female engineers meet students to share their journeys and dismantle the myths that still shape career choices.
Paramio also leads the #NoMoreMatildas campaign, aimed at rewriting textbooks and correcting the historical record. The goal isn't just to honor the past, but to shape the future. 'It's about persistence,' she says. 'Insisting and resisting. The change is in our hands.'
— WomenNewsVzla (@WomenNewsVzla)
You Might Also Like:
From stairs to restrooms: How a Palestinian-American designer's iconic symbols helped us make sense of the everyday modern world?
More Than Just a Prize: The Gender Citation Gap
Even today, the Matilda Effect seeps into academic publishing and citations. A growing body of research shows that papers authored by women are less likely to be cited than those by men, even when controlling for quality and topic. This citation gap affects career progression, grant approval, and public visibility—all essential ingredients in building a scientific legacy.
This is where modern institutions can either perpetuate or dismantle the pattern. Joana Frontela, head of R&D at energy company Cepsa, notes that change must start early: 'If children grow up seeing women scientists and engineers, they'll choose more freely.' Cepsa, in partnership with the Fundación Cepsa and the Inspiring Girls Foundation, supports mentorship programs, school visits, and STEM campaigns to promote gender inclusion.
A Future Worth Fighting For
Progress is real—but slow. According to the UN, gender parity in science could still be two centuries away at current rates. But unlike the past, the barriers are now being named—and challenged. The Matilda Effect is not just a critique of history; it's a call to action. By confronting how science was shaped by patriarchy, we can begin to rebuild it with fairness at its core.
Because when girls see themselves not just in the margins of the textbook, but in its central chapters, the world of science changes—for the better.
You Might Also Like:
What is the 'Michelangelo Phenomenon' in a relationship? The biggest green flag you should look for in your partner
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
6 days ago
- New Indian Express
Special session on space success in House likely
NEW DELHI: A special discussion may be held during the ongoing Monsoon Session to celebrate the success of India's space mission to the International Space Station (ISS), which marked a historic milestone with the participation of Indian astronaut Captain Shubhanshu Shukla. According to an official, the proposal is being actively considered, and the debate may take place next week or after India's Independence Day on August 15, depending on the parliamentary schedule. It is likely to be held along the lines of the 16-hour debate in both Houses on the success of Operation Sindoor. When asked whether Capt. Shukla would be present in Parliament during the discussion, the official stated that his participation has not yet been confirmed, although it is also under consideration. India's involvement in the ISS mission comes as part of broader partnerships with global space agencies, including NASA and ESA, and follows sustained efforts by ISRO to strengthen the country's human spaceflight capabilities. The discussion will likely underscore the role of public-private partnerships in advancing space technology.


India.com
6 days ago
- India.com
Pakistan launches remote sensing satellite with China's help, it will keep an eye on..., to help Pakistan get clear images of..., name is...
(Representational image) Pakistan, with help from China, has successfully launched a new satellite named PRSS-01. This satellite was sent into space from China's Xichang Satellite Launch Center. On July 31, Pakistan's Foreign Ministry shared the news on social media platform X (formerly Twitter). The ministry said that this satellite will help Pakistan get clear, high-resolution images 24 hours a day. It will also help keep an eye on important projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). In an official press release, the Foreign Ministry said: 'This is a big achievement for Pakistan in the space field. The satellite will help us monitor many areas including city planning, infrastructure development, disaster management, farming, food security, environmental protection, and water resources.' 🔊PR NO.2️⃣2️⃣2️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣ Pakistan Successfully Launches Remote Sensing Satellite. 🔗⬇️ — Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) July 31, 2025 China-Pakistan friendship grows stronger The partnership between Pakistan and China continues to grow. China has already invested in many areas of Pakistan's economy, and this satellite launch further deepens their strategic friendship. Various media repots also suggest that during India's Operation Sindoor, China provided notable support to Pakistan. What is CPEC? China and Pakistan are also working together on a massive infrastructure and trade project known as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). CPEC is part of China's global Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which aims to boost regional trade, transport links, and economic cooperation. It's a key part of both countries' long-term partnership.


The Hindu
30-07-2025
- The Hindu
Letters to The Editor — July 31, 2025
NISAR satellite mission We must congratulate Team ISRO and NASA for the successful launch of the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite. It is a milestone in the realm of collaborative satellite missions. Surely, such joint missions will foster peer-learning and exposure to cutting-edge space technologies. Further, in the context of climate change imperatives, having uninterrupted all-weather data insights from the satellite will be of relevance. G. Ramasubramanyam, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh ISRO's success is also on a day when the attempt to send Australia's first rocket into space, on Wednesday, ended in failure, just seconds after its launch in Queensland. One wishes both countries success in their space programmes. V. Subramaniam, Chennai Debate in Parliament The jury is still out on the debate in Parliament, on Operation Sindoor. Is it not time that we focused on more pressing issues facing the nation than engaging in political blame games in Parliament? While it is natural for political differences to arise, prioritising genuine discussions on real challenges is crucial for the progress of our country. This shift towards constructive dialogue and actionable solutions is not just a necessity but also a responsibility we owe to our nation. Let us ensure that Parliament becomes a platform for meaningful change. Mohammad Asad, Mumbai Rising chess star Young talent Divya Deshmukh etched her name into chess history by defeating Grandmaster Humpy Koneru. Ms. Deshmukh's victory is more than a personal triumph. It reflects India's deep talent pool and growing stature in women's chess. It also underscores how sustained focus on nurturing female talent is beginning to pay dividends. Her journey, from an underdog to India's newest Grandmaster, will inspire a generation. R. Sivakumar, Chennai The integrity of Ayurveda I write this letter as Guru, Rashtriya Ayurveda Vidyapeeth, Ministry of AYUSH, New Delhi and Director, Sunethri Ayurvedashram, Thrissur, Kerala. The Editorial page article, 'The Medical Boundaries for AYUSH Practitioners' (July 29, 2025), raises pertinent concerns about the limits of practice and legitimacy in traditional systems such as Ayurveda. While the article rightly warns against cross-practice and unregulated medical claims, what emerges between the lines is an unsettling conflation of Ayurveda with religious nationalism and an implicit dismissal of its independent theoretical foundations. This perspective risks obscuring the integrity of Ayurveda as a distinct, time-tested knowledge system and reducing it to a political or pseudo-scientific artifact. Ayurveda is a comprehensive and autonomous system of medicine that operates on a distinctive epistemology rooted in centuries of observation, reasoning, and experiential knowledge. Far from being a proto-scientific or incomplete version of modern biomedicine, Ayurveda encompasses its own diagnostic frameworks, therapeutic logics, and philosophical foundations. Its inclusion of physical, metaphysical, and philosophical dimensions constitutes its depth and originality, rather than any epistemic deficit. The current discourse surrounding the boundaries of AYUSH practice, particularly the increasing attempts to integrate Ayurveda with modern medicine or to conflate the roles of traditional and allopathic practitioners, poses significant concerns. Cross-practice, particularly the unauthorised prescription of modern pharmaceuticals or the performance of biomedical procedures by practitioners trained in Ayurveda, not only violates legal boundaries but also undermines the credibility and internal coherence of both systems. Respecting the integrity of medical systems entails acknowledging their differences, not forcing synthetic alliances that erode clarity, safety, and methodological strength. Equally concerning is the political appropriation of Ayurveda as a tool for cultural or religious identity assertion. Attempts to tether Ayurveda to ideological constructs such as Hindutva distort its historical evolution and universal relevance. Ayurveda is neither a religious doctrine nor an emblem of any particular political vision; it is a knowledge tradition that has evolved through inclusive inquiry, critical debate, and clinical application across diverse cultural contexts. What Ayurveda requires today is not artificial elevation through political symbolism, nor validation through superficial integration with biomedical frameworks. Instead, it demands rigorous scholarship, authentic practice, and research grounded in its own paradigms. Preserving the integrity of Ayurveda involves respecting its uniqueness, protecting its epistemic foundations, and fostering its growth through transparent, ethical, and context-sensitive engagement. The future of Ayurveda lies not in mimicry or politicisation, but in the revitalisation of its core principles, its education systems, and its capacity to respond meaningfully to contemporary health challenges — on its own terms. Dr. M. Prasad, Thrissur, Kerala