logo
In-laws crashing honeymoons? New travel trend blurs lines between awkward and familial

In-laws crashing honeymoons? New travel trend blurs lines between awkward and familial

Honeymoon is the first chapter in a married couple's life, kickstarting their journey with a dreamy, romantic getaway. But this much-anticipated trip is getting turned into a full-blown family vacation with in-laws and even siblings tagging along. Instead of intimate couples massage therapies, honeymoons are slowly becoming awkward with uncomfortable dinner table conversations and day sightseeing with family. Honeymoon is meant for a private moment for the married couple. But when parents crash honeymoon, it leaves no space for intimacy.(Shutterstock)
ALSO READ: Sleeping in separate beds as a couple? Relationship expert shares what it really means
White Lotus anyone?
HBO's White Lotus series, which follows the staff and guests at a luxury resort, taps into a similar shock factor: the big punch in the gut when Rachel Patton's mother-in-law, Kitty Patton, shows up uninvited on honeymoon to surprise them. The mother was so obsessed with her son, Shane, that she crashed their honeymoon. Redditors shared their experience on r/WhiteLotusHBO about how they, too, experienced or witnessed a similar awkward situation.
Recounting the awkward horror story, one user commented, 'My first wedding was in Vegas and I kid you not, at the hotel my MIL (mother-in-law) was somehow assigned not only the room next door, but an adjoining room - as in there was direct access from one room to the other.'
Again, it is not just parents, but siblings too, as they unexpectedly come along. One user wrote,'I was 5 months pregnant on my honeymoon so we only went to the coast for a few days but my husband invited his brother so they could go fishing.'
Sometimes, the couple is also helpless, as another person recalled their naighbour's experiece, 'I had a neighbor whose Mother-in-Law and Father-in-Law went on their honeymoon with them. They felt they could because they gifted the couple their honeymoon to Hawaii. Such a strange, odd, family.' This shows the unexpected obligation that can come with accepting grand gestures, like funding the honeymoon, but at the cost of personal time and space.
Why is this harmful?
This is a particularly harmful concept when couples are not fully in agreement about having parents in. Sometimes they do it out of obligation or feel pressured. A report of Fox News Digital covered the insights of Thea Gallagher, a psychologist and the wellness programs director at NYU Langone Health in New York City, who called it an 'interesting concept'.
She said, 'I think it probably depends on your relationship with your parents and your agreement with your partner. Obviously, it would be important for both of you to be in agreement that this is the good choice.'
Further, Gallagher explained that in-laws tagging along can cause several issues, from overstepping boundaries with no personal space to unsolicited advice. It also causes loyalty conflicts where one partner feels conflicted about whom to spend time with their newly married spouse or parents. She also added that cultural gaps and poor communication escalate the tension, making it a task for the couple to spend time peacefully.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did Duncan kill the show? Jonathan Cake blamed for ending And Just Like That after one bold scene with Carrie
Did Duncan kill the show? Jonathan Cake blamed for ending And Just Like That after one bold scene with Carrie

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Did Duncan kill the show? Jonathan Cake blamed for ending And Just Like That after one bold scene with Carrie

And Just Like That is officially ending after Season 3, and fans are still trying to catch their breath. While showrunner Michael Patrick King insists the story has reached a 'natural' stopping point, actor Jonathan Cake, who plays newcomer Duncan, has another theory, and it is absolutely hilarious. Reason behind why And Just Like That ended In a cheeky Instagram post, Cake wondered aloud if his one night in bed with Sarah Jessica Parker's iconic Carrie Bradshaw was the death blow. 'Did I just kill And Just Like That?' he joked, posting a shirtless picture of himself as Duncan in bed, yes, that bed scene. Duncan's debut might have been too steamy for HBO Max Duncan, a brand-new addition in Season 3, quickly went from grumpy neighbour to full-blown love interest for Carrie after her failed attempt at rekindling things with Aidan. Apparently, one night of passion was all it took to shut down the entire show. Cake even poked fun at his own looks, joking about his 'surprisingly small head' and wondering if something else was 'a little underwhelming.' He tagged nearly the entire cast and creative team, calling the experience a 'very hot minute' and thanking them for letting him be a part of it. Carrie Bradshaw's chaotic love life reason behind the end? Sarah Jessica Parker took to Instagram herself to reflect on her 27-year journey with the character. She called Carrie her 'professional heartbeat,' saying she probably loved her most of all. Showrunner King claimed the decision to end the series was mutual and planned, but fans are not buying it, especially given the show's dwindling viewership, backlash over plot holes, and that Che Diaz drama. From Big dying in episode one to the Che-induced identity crisis, And Just Like That was no stranger to chaos. The show tried to juggle nostalgia, new characters, and a more 'woke' vibe, but it often stumbled. The final episode airs on August 14. Whether or not Duncan truly killed it, one thing's for sure: Carrie Bradshaw's love life continues to leave a trail of emotional (and now, fictional) destruction.

'Hottest' ad out there: Trump jumps into row, backs Sydney Sweeney; takes surprise jibe at Taylor Swift
'Hottest' ad out there: Trump jumps into row, backs Sydney Sweeney; takes surprise jibe at Taylor Swift

Time of India

time19 hours ago

  • Time of India

'Hottest' ad out there: Trump jumps into row, backs Sydney Sweeney; takes surprise jibe at Taylor Swift

US President Donald Trump has thrown his full support behind actress Sydney Sweeney and her controversial American Eagle jeans advertisement, calling it the 'HOTTEST' ad currently on the market and praising her for being a registered Republican. 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Go get 'em Sydney!' Sweeney, known for her roles in Euphoria and White Lotus, has become the centre of political and cultural debate after her denim campaign stirred controversy over perceived racial implications and the use of wordplay involving 'genes' and 'jeans.' Public records confirm that she registered with the Republican Party in Florida in June 2024, which Trump cited as a reason for endorsing her. During a stop in Pennsylvania on Sunday, Trump had said: 'If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' Trump contrasted Sweeney's campaign with what he called 'disasters' from other brands, writing: 'On the other side of the ledger, Jaguar did a stupid, and seriously WOKE advertisement, THAT IS A TOTAL DISASTER!' He claimed the CEO had resigned 'in disgrace' and compared the fallout to Bud Light's infamous backlash after a marketing misstep, adding, 'BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SO FOOLISHLY LOST.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Live Update: The Strategy Uses By Successful Intraday Trader TradeWise Learn More Undo He didn't stop there. Trump took also took a fresh swipe at pop star Taylor Swift, sayin, 'Just look at Woke singer Taylor Swift. Ever since I alerted the world as to what she was by saying on TRUTH that I can't stand her (HATE!). She was booed out of the Super Bowl and became, NO LONGER HOT.' He concluded his post with a potshot at the democrats: 'The tide has seriously turned — Being WOKE is for losers, being Republican is what you want to be.'

In-laws crashing honeymoons? New travel trend blurs lines between awkward and familial
In-laws crashing honeymoons? New travel trend blurs lines between awkward and familial

Hindustan Times

timea day ago

  • Hindustan Times

In-laws crashing honeymoons? New travel trend blurs lines between awkward and familial

Honeymoon is the first chapter in a married couple's life, kickstarting their journey with a dreamy, romantic getaway. But this much-anticipated trip is getting turned into a full-blown family vacation with in-laws and even siblings tagging along. Instead of intimate couples massage therapies, honeymoons are slowly becoming awkward with uncomfortable dinner table conversations and day sightseeing with family. Honeymoon is meant for a private moment for the married couple. But when parents crash honeymoon, it leaves no space for intimacy.(Shutterstock) ALSO READ: Sleeping in separate beds as a couple? Relationship expert shares what it really means White Lotus anyone? HBO's White Lotus series, which follows the staff and guests at a luxury resort, taps into a similar shock factor: the big punch in the gut when Rachel Patton's mother-in-law, Kitty Patton, shows up uninvited on honeymoon to surprise them. The mother was so obsessed with her son, Shane, that she crashed their honeymoon. Redditors shared their experience on r/WhiteLotusHBO about how they, too, experienced or witnessed a similar awkward situation. Recounting the awkward horror story, one user commented, 'My first wedding was in Vegas and I kid you not, at the hotel my MIL (mother-in-law) was somehow assigned not only the room next door, but an adjoining room - as in there was direct access from one room to the other.' Again, it is not just parents, but siblings too, as they unexpectedly come along. One user wrote,'I was 5 months pregnant on my honeymoon so we only went to the coast for a few days but my husband invited his brother so they could go fishing.' Sometimes, the couple is also helpless, as another person recalled their naighbour's experiece, 'I had a neighbor whose Mother-in-Law and Father-in-Law went on their honeymoon with them. They felt they could because they gifted the couple their honeymoon to Hawaii. Such a strange, odd, family.' This shows the unexpected obligation that can come with accepting grand gestures, like funding the honeymoon, but at the cost of personal time and space. Why is this harmful? This is a particularly harmful concept when couples are not fully in agreement about having parents in. Sometimes they do it out of obligation or feel pressured. A report of Fox News Digital covered the insights of Thea Gallagher, a psychologist and the wellness programs director at NYU Langone Health in New York City, who called it an 'interesting concept'. She said, 'I think it probably depends on your relationship with your parents and your agreement with your partner. Obviously, it would be important for both of you to be in agreement that this is the good choice.' Further, Gallagher explained that in-laws tagging along can cause several issues, from overstepping boundaries with no personal space to unsolicited advice. It also causes loyalty conflicts where one partner feels conflicted about whom to spend time with their newly married spouse or parents. She also added that cultural gaps and poor communication escalate the tension, making it a task for the couple to spend time peacefully.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store