
Gold Reserve Provides Update on Responses to Objections to the Special Master's Final Recommendation in the CITGO Sale Process
The parties that filed memoranda or statements in response to the objections are as follows:
The Special Master;
Gold Reserve;
Rusoro Mining Ltd.;
Koch Minerals Sàrl and Koch Nitrogen International Sàrl;
Siemens Energy Inc.;
Crystallex International Corporation;
the ConocoPhillips companies;
OI European Group B.V.;
the 'Venezuela Parties' (the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, PDVSA, PDVH and CITGO); and
Black Lion Capital Advisors.
Under the Court's schedule, further briefing on the objections is to take place on August 13 and August 16, in advance of the August 18, 2025 Sale Hearing.
A copy of the filings will be posted shortly here.
A complete description of the Delaware sale proceedings can be found on the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system in Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, 1:17-mc-00151-LPS (D. Del.) and its related proceedings.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking statements
This release contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of applicable U.S. federal securities laws and 'forward-looking information' within the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial and territorial securities laws and state Gold Reserve's and its management's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. They are frequently characterized by words such as "anticipates", "plan", "continue", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", "may", "will", "potential", "proposed", "positioned" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements relating to any bid submitted by the Company for the purchase of the PDVH shares (the 'Bid').
We caution that such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other risks that may cause the actual events, outcomes or results of Gold Reserve to be materially different from our estimated outcomes, results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: the discretion of the Special Master to consider the Bid, to enter into any discussions or negotiation with respect thereto; the Bid will not be approved by the Court as the 'Final Recommend Bid' under the Bidding Procedures, and if approved by the Court may not close, including as a result of not obtaining necessary regulatory approvals, including but not limited to any necessary approvals from the U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control ('OFAC'), the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission or the TSX Venture Exchange; failure of the Company or any other party to obtain sufficient equity and/or debt financing or any required shareholders approvals for, or satisfy other conditions to effect, any transaction resulting from the Bid; that the Company may forfeit any cash amount deposit made due to failing to complete the Bid or otherwise; that the making of the Bid or any transaction resulting therefrom may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; that, prior to or as a result of the completion of any transaction contemplated by the Bid, the business of the Company may experience significant disruptions due to transaction related uncertainty, industry conditions, tariff wars or other factors; the ability to enforce the writ of attachment granted to the Company; the timing set for various reports and/or other matters with respect to the Sale Process may not be met; the ability of the Company to otherwise participate in the Sale Process (and related costs associated therewith); the amount, if any, of proceeds associated with the Sale Process; the competing claims of other creditors of Venezuela, PDVSA and the Company, including any interest on such creditors' judgements and any priority afforded thereto; uncertainties with respect to possible settlements between Venezuela and other creditors and the impact of any such settlements on the amount of funds that may be available under the Sale Process; and the proceeds from the Sale Process may not be sufficient to satisfy the amounts outstanding under the Company's September 2014 arbitral award and/or corresponding November 15, 2015 U.S. judgement in full; and the ramifications of bankruptcy with respect to the Sale Process and/or the Company's claims, including as a result of the priority of other claims. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company's forward-looking statements. For a more detailed discussion of the risk factors affecting the Company's business, see the Company's Management's Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024 and other reports that have been filed on SEDAR+ and are available under the Company's profile at www.sedarplus.ca.
Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Gold Reserve or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this notice. Gold Reserve disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, subject to its disclosure obligations under applicable rules promulgated by applicable Canadian provincial and territorial securities laws.
For further information regarding Dalinar Energy, visit: https://www.dalinarenergy.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
TikTok staffers worry about teens' mental health in unsealed video: ‘You never want to leave'
TikTok staffers have raised concerns over the wildly popular app's impact on young people's mental health – despite the company's claims that it's safe for teens, according to newly unsealed videos. Current and former TikTok employees shared their unease with the China-owned app's algorithm and its potential to push unhealthy content to kids – including 'soft disordered eating behavior,' according to videos submitted as evidence in a major legal case brought by multiple states. 'Unfortunately, some of the stuff that people find interesting are not always the most healthy,' Nicholas Chng, who worked on risk detection at TikTok before leaving last year, said in a compilation of videos presented as evidence in a North Carolina lawsuit. 4 The internal TikTok meetings were included in a video compilation as evidence in the North Carolina lawsuit. Drobot Dean – 'We do, in a way, encourage some of this content being put up just because of the way the platform is designed. And sometimes I worry about that.' Brett Peters, TikTok's current head of creator advocacy, said the platform pushes 'lofty goals of getting people to be on the app longer.' 'Literally, that's like why we're all here is to help continue to diversify the content ecosystem, to make TikTok a place where you can get so much different types of content that you never want to leave,' Peters said. The videos were obtained during an investigation after North Carolina's then-Attorney General Josh Stein and a group of other state attorneys general sued TikTok last year. In the complaint, they argue TikTok was designed to be 'highly addictive to minors,' and that the company has been deceiving parents and children about safety risks. 4 Two young school children, with one on a smartphone. Christopher Sadowski TikTok, owned by Beijing-based ByteDance, had been aiming to keep the video sealed, arguing it was necessary for its employees' privacy. But North Carolina Superior Court Judge Adam Conrad on Tuesday ruled that the video should not be sealed from public view, and denied TikTok's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Conrad wrote that 'the employees' association with the case may entail some embarrassment, but that alone does not outweigh the public's right of access.' 4 During internal meetings, current and former TikTok employees shared their unease with the app's algorithm. REUTERS 'These clips clearly show that social media companies know they're designing their apps to hook our children even at the expense of their health. That's why the company fought so hard to keep the video out of the public eye,' North Carolina's current attorney general Jeff Jackson told The Post. A TikTok spokesperson argued that the platform has rolled out several safety features in recent years, like privacy settings for teens, disabling late-night notifications and a guided meditation that interrupts scrolling time. 'Since the launch of the app, we have steadfastly created a robust trust and safety track record, with 70+ features and settings designed specifically to support the safety and well-being of teens and families on TikTok, which the AG has chosen to deliberately ignore,' the spokesperson told The Post in a statement. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The lawsuit comes as TikTok stares down a potential ban in the US, after earlier this year going dark for just one day as President Trump pushes ByteDance to sell the app to an American entity. The lawsuit is seeking financial penalties and a court order banning TikTok from 'engaging in the unfair or deceptive acts and practices' described in the complaint. The complaint alleges that TikTok fails 'to tell young users and parents what their executives and employees know about the harms caused by increased screen time … that it 'interferes with essential personal responsibilities like sufficient sleep, work/school responsibilities, and connecting with loved ones.'' 4 A TikTok spokesperson argued that the platform has rolled out several safety features in recent years. REUTERS In the video, Alexandra Evans, who led TikTok's safety public policy team in Europe before leaving in 2022, said that 'the reason why kids watch TikTok is that the (algorithm) is really good.' 'It's not because we've tried to do anything horrible, but I think we need to be cognizant of what it might mean for other opportunities. And when I say opportunities, I literally mean sleep and eating and moving around the room and looking at somebody in the eyes.' Ashlen Sepulveda, who worked in trust and safety before leaving TikTok in 2021, said it 'keeps me up at night' to know 'that our algorithm pushes content to users based off of what it thinks they're interested in.' 'The more that a user looks up things about, like fitness or like diet, it turns into losing weight, and then, soon enough, the entire feed of this user is like soft disordered eating behavior that is being discussed by their peers with no opportunity to remove themselves from that,' she said. Peters, the app's creator advocacy lead, added: 'We have these expectations and goals, and they're not necessarily congruent with good mental health.' Meanwhile, the White House launched an official account on TikTok this week.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump $464 Million NY Civil Fraud Penalty Vacated on Appeal
(Bloomberg) -- A New York appeals court struck down a $464 million fraud fine against President Donald Trump and his company, handing him a victory over the state's attorney general. In a decision issued Thursday, the Manhattan appellate court still found that Trump broke the law by inflating the valuation of assets like Mar-a-Lago and his Trump Tower penthouse, but it said the massive penalty was unconstitutionally 'excessive.' Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Neom's Desert Ski Resort Strains Saudi Prince's $1.5 Trillion Plan We Need a Reality Check on Crime, Safety and Transit The long-awaited ruling by an intermediate state appeals court wipes out one of Trump's biggest financial liabilities. It also puts fresh pressure on New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has become the focus of a federal probe into whether her lawsuit violated Trump's legal rights. The politically charged decision resulted in the five-judge panel issuing three separate opinions. The majority ultimately concluded that Trump violated the law by inflating his assets, but nevertheless threw out the massive fine. Most of Trump's legal woes melted away after his election victory. The Justice Department dropped two federal criminal cases against Trump, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. While Trump was convicted in his hush money case in Manhattan, a judge sentenced him to no jail time at a hearing 10 days before his inauguration — following a US Supreme Court ruling that gave the president broad immunity. James filed the case against Trump and his sprawling real estate company in September 2022, more than two years before his successful bid to retake the White House. She won the case after an 11-week trial. The development raises questions about whether James, a Democrat and staunch critic of Trump, will seek to reinstate the penalty by appealing the decision to the state's highest court in Albany. Trump argued that his method of valuing his real estate was typical of the industry and that disclaimers on his financial statements advised banks they should do their own valuations anyway. One of his biggest defense arguments was that no banks lost money on his loans, and the state didn't dispute that. On Aug. 8, people familiar with the federal probe into James' civil lawsuit against Trump said Justice Department officials had convened a grand jury and sent subpoenas to James's office. The subpoena also seeks information on James's case against the National Rifle Association, said one of the people. The probe is being run out of Albany, New York. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for James, said at the time that the investigation is a 'blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump has long criticized James as well as Justice Arthur Engoron, who oversaw the non-jury trial, calling both of them biased against him because he's a Republican. Trump has also appealed his conviction in the hush money case, seeking to erase his criminal record. He has also appealed two civil jury verdicts against him in lawsuits brought by E. Jean Carroll, who sued him for sex abuse and defamation and won nearly $90 million in total damages. Trump has maintained innocence throughout. (Updates with more context on the ruling starting in paragraph 3.) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined Volkswagen EVs Outsell Tesla in Europe a Decade After Dieselgate What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Court monitor says it doesn't support Hudson's Bay plan to sell leases to Ruby Liu
TORONTO — The court-appointed monitor overseeing Hudson's Bay's creditor protection case says it's against landlords being forced to accept a B.C. billionaire's plan to buying more than two dozen of the retailer's leases. In a new court filing made overnight, Alvarez & Marsal says it does not agree that landlords should be forced to accept Ruby Liu as a tenant even while it says it supports the sales process that ended with her chosen to buy 28 of the Bay's leases. Liu purchased three Bay leases at her own B.C. malls for $6 million, but her deal to buy the other 25 for $69.1 million has faced opposition from one of the retailer's biggest lenders and most of its landlords. They say the leases don't allow for the dining, entertainment and recreational spaces Liu has talked about opening within the department stores she will operate in the properties. They also say Liu's timelines and budgets are too unrealistic given the amount of work and repairs their properties need. Liu says she doesn't think the spaces need all of the repairs landlords are demanding because the Bay was operating in the spaces without the renovations. If they are necessary, she says her company will do them, even if they exceed her current budget. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 21, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data