US agency investigates former special counsel Jack Smith over handling of Donald Trump cases
Donald Trump
before he returned to office, following a request by a Republican senator.
The Office of Special Counsel confirmed on Saturday that it had opened an investigation into Mr Smith for a possible violation of the Hatch Act, a law that prohibits federal workers from using their government jobs to engage in political activity.
Senator Tom Cotton had asked the agency to investigate on the premise that some of Mr Smith's actions, such as seeking quick trial dates in the two criminal cases against Trump, were designed to influence the 2024 election.
The investigation, which was first reported by The New York Post, is unusual in several respects. First, the most severe penalty possible for a Hatch Act violation is dismissal from federal employment, and Smith left the government at the start of the year. Second, the type of prosecutorial decisions criticised by Mr Cotton, Mr Trump and others are far different from the type of cases the office typically handles. It traditionally investigates and addresses violations of federal rules about the civil service.
[
Donald Trump indicted over attempt to overturn 2020 election
Opens in new window
]
[
'We have one set of laws in this country': Special Counsel in Trump documents case
Opens in new window
]
The investigation comes at a time when lawyers representing fired or demoted federal employees have complained that under Mr Trump, the office is not fulfilling its traditional role.
In February, the US president dismissed the agency's head, Hampton Dellinger, despite a federal law saying that person can only be fired for 'inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office'.
At the time, Mr Dellinger had been arguing for the reinstatement of thousands of probationary workers who had been fired by the new administration.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times
2025 The New York Times Company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Russia and China begin war games in Sea of Japan after Trump nuclear threat
Though pre-planned, the joint naval exercises that began yesterday came a day after Donald Trump moved US nuclear submarines closer to Russia in response to inflammatory comments from Russia's former president Dmitry Medvedev. The Joint Sea-2025 drills were launched in waters near to Vladivostok, Russia's largest port on the Pacific Ocean, according to a statement from China's Defence Ministry. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, will be participating in the three-day exercises. This will include 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat', followed by naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'. Russia and China, which signed a 'no-limits' strategic partnership shortly before Russia went to war in Ukraine in 2022, conduct regular military exercises to rehearse coordination between their armed forces and send a deterrent signal to adversaries. Though Russia and China have both said that no third country is being targeted by their military cooperation, Japan has objected to the drills. It said that greater strategic coordination between Beijing and Moscow poses a 'strong concern' for its national security. Announcing the drills on Wednesday, Zhang Xiaogang, a spokesman for Beijing's defence ministry, criticised US Air Force drills with Japan and others in the western Pacific. 'The US has been blindly flexing its muscles in the Asia-Pacific region and attempting to use military drills as a pretext to gang up, intimidate and pressure other countries, and undermine peace and stability in the region,' Mr Zhang claimed. China and Russia have held military exercises together for more than two decades, with 'Joint Sea' exercises beginning in 2012. However, their cooperation, which was once sporadic, has deepened considerably over the past decade, with Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping having met more than 40 times. Mr Trump said his submarine order was made in response to what he called 'highly provocative' remarks by Mr Medvedev about the risk of war between the nuclear-armed adversaries. Russia and the US have by far the biggest nuclear arsenals in the world. It is extremely rare for either country to discuss the deployment and location of its nuclear subs.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Democrats leave Texas in bid to block redistricting vote
Democratic lawmakers in Texas said they were leaving the state to deny Republicans the quorum needed to redraw the state's 38 congressional districts, a move Republicans are seeking to protect their narrow US House majority in next year's midterm elections. President Donald Trump has championed the redistricting plan, telling reporters he expects the effort to yield as many as five additional House Republicans. Republicans hold a narrow 220-212 majority in the House of Representatives, with three Democratic-held seats vacant after members' deaths. In a video shot in front of an airport, Democratic Representative James Talarico said the redistricting plan amounted to "rigging" the 2026 elections. "If you're seeing this video, my Democratic colleagues and I have just left our beloved state to break quorum and stop Trump's redistricting power grab," Mr Talarico said in the video posted on X. Several other Texas Democrats said on X they were headed to Illinois, whose governor is Democrat J.B. Pritzker. Republican Governor Greg Abbott said in a statement late yesterday that any Democrat House member who did not return would be removed from the Texas House. "Democrats hatched a deliberate plan not to show up for work, for the specific purpose of abdicating the duties of their office and thwarting the chamber's business", the Governor said in his statement, adding that leaving amounted to an abandonment of the office. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the UD Census but the Texas map was passed just four years ago by the Republican-dominated legislature. While mid-cycle redistricting occasionally takes place, it is usually prompted by a change in power at the legislature. Republicans have pursued redistricting in a special legislative session that will also address funding for flood prevention in the wake of the deadly 4 July flash flooding that killed more than 130. Under the current lines, Republicans control 25 seats, nearly two-thirds of the districts in a state that went for President Trump last year by a 56% to 42% margin. Redistricting experts have said the plan could backfire if Republicans try to squeeze too many seats out of what is already considered a significantly skewed map.
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop
When Donald Trump ordered two US nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia over the weekend in response to online nuclear threats from Russia's former president, Dmitri Medvedev, a global, collective frisson of fear was understandable. The US President's move came as part of a verbal exchange with Moscow over a new 10-day deadline to Vladimir Putin to commit to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face 'secondary sanctions' against countries that buy Russian oil. And yet, the strategic significance of the deployment is unclear – Trump did not clarify whether the submarines were nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed, and, even if the latter, how their redeployment would enhance the ability they already have, wherever they are, to deliver their deadly payloads against Russia. This symbolic act is thus largely a rhetorical reminder to the Russian President of the US president's newfound, belated determination to pursue some form of peace in Ukraine and his expectation that Putin will fall into line. So far the Russian president has shown no intention whatsoever to do so. READ MORE The respective nuclear postures, however, remain an important and dangerous backdrop to the confrontation between the superpowers. Both Russian and US thresholds for the use of nuclear weapons, particularly their first-use, have long been deliberately ambiguous – a very Trump-like ambiguity. Unlike a no-first-use policy, which commits a country only to retaliate in response to a nuclear attack, ambiguity, it is argued, forces adversaries to consider the possibility that any aggression could provoke a devastating nuclear response, even in a non-nuclear conflict. A first-use option, it is said, deters conventional aggressors who may believe that their superior non-nuclear forces could succeed. Both the US's and Russia's nuclear doctrines, the latter revised as recently as last year, do not limit their options to responses to nuclear attack by others .The US doctrine allows considerable latitude. It says: 'The US would only consider the use of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the US or its Allies and partners.' The Russians reserve the right to employ nuclear arms 'in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation involving the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is under threat.' Russia is also reported to have in place a automatic system to launch nuclear missiles if the country's leaders have been killed by a strike from another state. And both leave the ultimate decision to press the nuclear button not to parliaments, but to their two presidents , Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
