EU Urged To Act On Forests' Faltering Absorption Of Carbon
Forests, which cover 40 percent of the European Union's territory, are expected to play a crucial role in efforts to meet targets for overall reductions of the bloc's emissions of planet-warming gases.
But human and climate pressures, from logging to extreme weather and insect attacks, means their ability to absorb CO2 is "rapidly declining", according to an article, led by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre.
"Reversing the decline in European forests' ability to store carbon is essential -- and still possible -- with bold, science-based action today," said co-author Giacomo Grassi, who is a member of the UN's IPCC expert task force on greenhouse gas inventories.
Solutions include rapid reductions in carbon emissions, combined with efforts to improve management to make forests more resilient to climate impacts, and comprehensive monitoring.
Many European countries still rely on periodic inventories, which cannot keep up with rapid changes to forest health.
The authors emphasize the need to better understand forest dynamics.
They call in particular for better measuring of carbon flows between the soil, vegetation, and atmosphere, as well as improving predictions of how extreme weather will affect carbon sinks in the future.
The research looked at official 2024 data showing that the amount carbon absorbed by Europe's forests, ecosystems and changes to land use plummeted by around a third in the 2020 to 2022 period, compared to 2010 to 2014.
The authors said 2025 figures "suggest an even steeper decline".
"This trend, combined with the declining climate resilience of European forests, indicates that the EU's climate targets, which rely on an increasing carbon sink, might be at risk," the authors said.
Earlier this week another study in the Nature journal Communications Earth & Environment found that land accounts for a quarter of global emissions reductions in countries' climate plans and warned that a lack of funding and conservation focus was putting these in jeopardy.
Piers Forster, Director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University, who was not involved in Wednesday's study said it underscores the urgent need to slash emissions across the board.
"We can't bet our future on carbon removal -- either from planting more trees, from protecting forests, or from emerging technologies such as direct air capture and storage -- without understanding what is already happening to the land and natural systems," he said.
Scientists have warned that it is still unclear how carbon sinks might behave as the planet warms in future, and exactly how much heat-trapping carbon dioxide they might soak up from the atmosphere.
In April, research by Climate Analytics, a policy institute that independently assesses countries' climate plans, warned that major economies are overstating how much carbon their forests can absorb in a climate accounting fudge that could allow them to use even more fossil fuels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
8 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Major Climate-GDP Study Under Review After Facing Challenge
A blockbuster study published in top science journal Nature last year warned that unchecked climate change could slash global GDP by a staggering 62 percent by century's end, setting off alarm bells among financial institutions worldwide. But a re-analysis by Stanford University researchers in California, released Wednesday, challenges that conclusion -- finding the projected hit to be about three times smaller and broadly in line with earlier estimates, after excluding an anomalous result tied to Uzbekistan. The saga may culminate in a rare retraction, with Nature telling AFP it will have "further information to share soon" -- a move that would almost certainly be seized upon by climate-change skeptics. Both the original authors -- who have acknowledged errors -- and the Stanford team hoped the transparency of the review process would bolster, rather than undermine public confidence in science. Climate scientist Maximilian Kotz and co-authors at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), published the original research in April 2024, using datasets from 83 countries to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation affect economic growth. It became the second most cited climate paper of the year, according to the UK-based Carbon Brief outlet, and informed policy at the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, US federal government and others. AFP was among numerous media outlets to report on it. Yet the eye-popping claim that global GDP would be lowered by 62 percent by the year 2100 under a high emissions scenario soon drew scrutiny. "That's why our eyebrows went up because most people think that 20 percent is a very big number," scientist and economist Solomon Hsiang, one of the researchers behind the re-analysis, also published in Nature, told AFP. When they tried to replicate the results, Hsiang and his Stanford colleagues spotted serious anomalies in the data surrounding Uzbekistan. Specifically, there was a glaring mismatch in the provincial growth figures cited in the Potsdam paper and the national numbers reported for the same periods by the World Bank. "When we dropped Uzbekistan, suddenly everything changed. And we were like, 'whoa, that's not supposed to happen,'" Hsiang said. "We felt like we had to document it in this form because it's been used so widely in policy making." The authors of the 2024 paper acknowledged methodological flaws, including currency exchange issues, and on Wednesday uploaded a corrected version, which has not yet been peer-reviewed. "We're waiting for Nature to announce their further decision on what will happen next," Kotz told AFP. He stressed that while "there can be methodological issues and debate within the scientific community," the bigger picture was unchanged: climate change will have substantial economic impacts in the decades ahead. Frances Moore, an associate professor in environmental economics at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in either the original paper or the re-analysis, agreed. She told AFP the correction did not alter overall policy implications. Projections of an economic slowdown by the year 2100 are "extremely bad" regardless of the Kotz-led study, she said, and "greatly exceed the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilize the climate, many times over." "Future work to identify specific mechanisms by which variation in climate affects economic output over the medium and long-term is critical to both better understand these findings and prepare society to respond to coming climate disruption," she also noted. Asked whether Nature would be retracting the Potsdam paper, Karl Ziemelis, the journal's physical sciences editor, did not answer directly but said an editor's note was added to the paper in November 2024 "as soon as we became aware of an issue" with the data and methodology. "We are in the final stages of this process and will have further information to share soon," he told AFP. The episode comes at a delicate time for climate science, under heavy fire from the US government under President Donald Trump's second term, as misinformation about the impacts of human-driven greenhouse gases abounds. Yet even in this environment, Hsiang argued, the episode showed the robust nature of the scientific method. "One team of scientists checking other scientists' work and finding mistakes, the other team acknowledging it, correcting the record, this is the best version of science." Researchers AFP spoke to said the effects of heat on economies of countries near the tropics is magnified, like the riverbank dwellers carrying banana produce in northern Brazil AFP
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Scientists search for climate clues in ancient ice – DW – 08/04/2025
Scientists drilled thousands of meters into the Antarctic ice sheet to retrieve the world's oldest ice sample. They hope it could provide insight into today's climate crisis. Scientists in Germany are studying a 1.2-million-year-old ice core retrieved from Antarctica after years of planning and months of drilling in temperatures of -35 degrees Celsius (-31 Fahrenheit). International teams reached depths of 2,800 meters (1.74 miles) into the Antarctic ice sheet to claim the oldest continuous ice core to have ever been drilled. The scientists are now hoping it will unlock vital information about the Earth's climate. "Ice cores are climate archives, so they tell us something about the climate history of the Earth," said Maria Hörhold, glaciologist at the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), where one of the samples is being studied. The core contains air bubbles allowing scientists to measure the quantities of greenhouse gases, like CO2, held in the atmosphere over the last 1.2 million years. They hope the ice core could help scientists better understand climate change by shedding more light on the connection between the carbon cycle and the temperatures on the planet. In past ice core samples, researchers were able to see alternating hot periods with cold, or glacial periods, that took place approximately every 100,000 years. But looking further back, the cold temperatures occurred more frequently — around every 40,000 years. "This is mainly driven, for example, by planetary features, like how the Earth is positioned towards the Sun," Hörhold told DW. "But people do not really know why we shifted from a 40,000-year cycle at say 1.5 million years ago to what we have today." By extending the 800,000-year-old ice core record and figuring out why the cycle changed, researchers hope to "improve predictions of how Earth's climate may respond to future greenhouse gas increases," said Liz Thomas of the British Antarctic Survey. "There is no other place on Earth that retains such a long record of the past atmosphere as Antarctica," added Thomas in a statement. "It's our best hope to understand the fundamental drivers of Earth's climate shifts." Scientists already know that concentrations of greenhouse gases, like CO2, were lower during colder periods on Earth. While during warmer times, a build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere prevented heat from escaping. "The idea is that you understand how the climate internally interacts, so how do atmospheric patterns interact, how does ice sheet elevation interact with sea level, and so on," she told DW, adding that studying the ice core would hopefully improve their understanding of those interactions. However, she added that even during previous warm periods in Earth's history, CO2 concentrations were much lower than they are today. The current high levels are primarily the result of human-driven global warming, caused by the burning of fossil fuels like oil and gas. The pan-European ice core study is part of the Beyond EPICA – Oldest Ice project. The ice sample has been cut into one-meter length pieces. These have now been delivered for processing into smaller sub-samples at organizations including AWI polar and marine institute in Bremerhaven, Germany, and the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, UK. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video But Hörhold said it will take at least a year for the first findings to be published, while other discoveries would likely take longer. Still, for scientists like Hörhold, who have been part of the Oldest Ice project for years, the retrieval of the ice core is an exciting new chance to discover more about the Earth. "For every one of us, this was very special; to have that ice in our hands and to know that this is really old and an unprecedented ice core record," said Hörhold. "It's a real honor for us to be responsible for processing here."
Int'l Business Times
3 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Rwanda Bees Being Wiped Out By Pesticides
The use of pesticides in East Africa, some sold by European firms despite being banned in the EU, is killing off bees in large numbers and threatening whole eco-systems, scientists say. Joseph Ruzigana, of Muhanga district in southern Rwanda, woke up one morning to find all the bees in his 20 newly constructed beehives had died. "Fellow beekeepers have also lost plenty of bees to these dangerous pesticides. It looks like we won't get any honey this season," he told AFP. Ruzigana said many beekeepers, who number more than 100,000 in Rwanda according to officials, were giving up. "The few bees left are very weak and unproductive... I used to get up to 25 kilogrammes (55 pounds) of honey from one beehive in a month-long season, my family was well taken care of, but all that has collapsed," he said. Changing climate conditions are part of the problem: longer rains this season were not favourable to beekeeping. But the main issue is pesticides, say locals and experts. Bees pollinate crops including coffee, tea, avocados, mangoes, beans and tomatoes -- making them key to an agricultural sector that accounts for 30 percent of GDP and 70 percent of employment in Rwanda. It is the same across the region. Uganda, Ethiopia, Tanzania and Kenya have all reported increasing bee mortality rates due to pesticides, according to the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology in Nairobi. Rwanda is a poor and landlocked country striving to feed its people through improved maize and rice cultivation, and pesticides help control pests like armyworms. But many pesticides affect bees' navigation and reproduction, and have been linked to colony collapse disorder, when worker bees abandon a hive. Rwanda grows large amounts of pyrethrum, a flower that could be used to make a natural pesticide, but exports all its pyrethrum liquid. Instead, Rwandan farmers use imported synthetic pesticides. A 2022 study by Turkey's Ondokuz Mayis University found that 72 percent used Rocket, containing profenofos, which is highly toxic to bees. Jeanne Nyirandahimana, part of a women's beekeeping cooperative, said average earnings have fallen from around 250,000 Rwandan francs ($178) per season to around 30,000 ($21). "It is pesticides like Rocket killing our bees, every day we find many bees dead on roofs and some die in beehives," she said. An earlier study by the University of Rwanda found that 22 percent of farmers around Lake Kivu used malathion, also deadly to bees. Despite being banned for use in the EU, malathion is still exported by Denmark, France and Germany -- 12.5 tonnes in 2023, according to the European Chemicals Agency. Jean Claude Izamuhaye, head of crop production at the Rwanda Agricultural Board, said the body was working on the problem. "They are our natural pollinators, and it is of critical importance that bees are saved," he said, adding that the board was looking into increasing the use of less harmful "bio-pesticides". The continued sale of toxic pesticides by EU companies can also mean they end up in the food that is sold back to Europe. A study released this month by Foodwatch, an advocacy group, found that more than half the food imported into the EU from Rwanda contained traces of "highly hazardous" pesticides that are banned in Europe. EU countries sold 81,615 tonnes of 41 banned pesticides to other countries for agricultural use in 2022, according to the Pesticide Action Network.
