logo
Australian values, ineffective Coalition central to election win

Australian values, ineffective Coalition central to election win

The Australian05-05-2025

On Saturday, Australians comprehensively rejected every single aspect of the Coalition's attempt to win government.
The Coalition parties didn't just shoot themselves in one foot, they shot themselves in both feet, arms and torso – it was a total bloodbath.
In what will now be known as the worst election campaign in Australian history, the Coalition failed to sell a single policy to Australians and paid the ultimate price.
In Victoria, seats heavily targeted by the Liberals, including Aston, Deakin, Menzies and McEwen, all went to Labor – some dramatically, particularly the loss of Liberal MP Keith Wolahan, who was one of the party's best backbenchers.
He is someone I have high respect for and who, I believe, the Liberals could have built a more centrist party around.
Kudos must be given to Anthony Albanese and to ALP national secretary Paul Erickson for running a tight ship throughout the whole election.
Even when Labor was in the polling doldrums at the end of last year, the Prime Minister stuck to his guns.
He had a plan to win seats, not just to hold ground. And he was right. And to my former colleagues in the Labor caucus, they maintained their iron discipline they have exhibited since May 2022.
Australians also outright rejected the feral scaremongering the Greens piled on.
The party's projected wipeout in Queensland, and the fact that Greens leader Adam Bandt, a very tough campaigner, is hanging on by a knife's edge in Melbourne, is testament to that.
I'm pleased to see the warrior from Wills, Peter Khalil, is hanging on despite the ugliest campaign by the Greens and their far-left allies that I've ever seen.
Watching the election from outside the bubble for the first time in nearly 20 years was like an out-of-body experience for me, but as the two campaigns rolled out there was never a doubt in my mind Labor would not win.
The cost of living was the key election issue and the Coalition hoped for a grievance election based on an opinion poll of the government.
Once Donald Trump's shadow loomed people wanted to know who had the better plan.
In my opinion, the moment Peter Dutton flirted with Trump, he completely misread the Australian identity, which instinctively recoils from extremism from the far left and far right.
Like our great mates in Canada, Australians voted to reject any semblance of a Trump-esque (or Trumpet) style of government.
People wanted a safe option and Labor offered stability writ large.
The Coalition did not have a single alternate policy and this was glaringly exposed when it was forced to drop its Trump-style strategy within weeks of the campaign beginning. The cringe-worthy moment Dutton's 'Department of Government Efficiency' elect, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, donned a MAGA cap should have been the moment every newspaper editor in Australia knew the election result was a fait accompli.
It was a campaign that exposed how far removed the Coalition is from modern Australia. In what can only be described as the bizarre revival of Soviet economics, the Coalition was going to create a nuclear industry based on government ownership of the means of energy production. This contradicted core free-market values. It didn't just have a hole in its finances, it dug quarries with its own financial recklessness.
Rather than reaching out to help Australians battling the cost of living, the Coalition went on the attack.
The scare campaign on people who work from home, which is a major factor for women and families, was embarrassingly wrong-footed and chauvinistic. But it also showed that not having to pay for extra tolls and childcare is a strategy families use to help ease cost-of-living pressures and manage mortgage stress.
Everyone – from immigrants, Chinese-born Australians, people born after 1981, women and people who have any connection with the public service in this country – was targeted for existing.
There was nothing in it for young people to vote for the Coalition – climate change wasn't addressed and there was no help offered to pay off university debts. In fact, to my amazement, the Coalition was going to scrap the $300 prac payments for people studying nursing at the University of Canberra and other universities.
The Liberals also have a problem with people who live in metropolitan Australia, which doesn't leave them with a lot of votes left to win. At the end of the day, the buck stops with the party and the Liberals got everything wrong this time round, not just Dutton.
He did make a lot of mistakes, but, on a personal note, it's important for him to remember people were voting for Peter Dutton as opposition leader, not Peter Dutton the human being.
When he goes home to see his family, he needs to take that armour of opposition leader off and realise that all the slings and arrows coming at him are about what people see in his job, and he can't afford to take it personally.
He needs to rebuild and reconstruct himself, and he cannot afford to let his job as opposition leader define the bloke he sees in the mirror, otherwise he'll go crazy.
Ultimately, the result shows us that Australia is a centrist country and Labor has no competition in the middle right now. It's in the best interests of the Liberal Party, and Australia, for it to move to the centre.
On a final, positive note, as I stood in the queue to vote as an ordinary citizen, I marvelled at the fact that right around Australia 18 million people turned up to vote peacefully, which shows, despite all our moans about politics and politicians, we are doing something right in this country.
Bill Shorten was the leader of the Labor Party from 2013 to 2019. He is vice-chancellor and president of the University of Canberra.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Germany's Merz survives Trump test, despite Ukraine differences
Germany's Merz survives Trump test, despite Ukraine differences

News.com.au

time31 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Germany's Merz survives Trump test, despite Ukraine differences

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz came through his Oval Office encounter with Donald Trump relatively unscathed Thursday -- despite differences over Ukraine as the US president said it might be better to let Moscow and Kyiv fight it out like children. A month into his job, Merz unleashed a charm offensive on the 78-year-old Trump, presenting him with a framed copy of the birth certificate of his grandfather Frederick, who was born in Germany in 1869. Merz also hailed Trump as being the "key person in the world" when it came to ending the Ukraine war, saying the US leader could "really do that now by putting pressure on Russia." It was a backhanded way of urging Trump to overcome his aversion to putting sanctions on Russia over its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, as the more than three-year-old war grinds on. The polite meeting showed that the conservative German leader had done his homework as he sought to avoid ambushes like those that Trump unleashed on Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa's president. But they did not see eye to eye on everything. - 'Fighting in a park' - Trump -- who spoke to Russian leader Vladimir Putin a day earlier -- said it might be better to let the two sides fight it out, comparing the war that has left thousands dead and swathes of Ukraine in ruins to a children's brawl. "Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy. They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart," Trump told reporters. "Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while." Trump said however that he had urged Putin not to retaliate after Ukraine launched daring drone attacks on its airbases, destroying several nuclear capable bombers. "I said 'don't do it,'" Trump told reporters, adding that Putin had told him he had no choice but to respond and it was "not going to be pretty." Trump did make a series of off-color references to the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II -- still a deeply sensitive subject in modern-day Germany. Praising Merz for Germany raising its defense spending in line with his demands for NATO members to cough up, Trump said he was not sure World War II US general Douglas MacArthur would have agreed. Then, referring to the upcoming 80th anniversary of the allied D-Day landings that led to the end of the war, Trump said: "That was not a pleasant day for you?" Merz, 69, calmly replied: "This was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship. We know what we owe you." - Tariffs deal possible - Merz avoided other possible pitfalls as Trump spent much of his time on a lengthy discourse against his billionaire former advisor Elon Musk. Topics like US tariffs on the EU and the prospect of a trade deal barely came up, with Trump saying he believed a deal was possible. On Trump's threat to hammer the European Union with sharply higher tariffs, Merz, leader of the bloc's biggest economy, had earlier argued that it must be self-confident in its negotiations with Washington. Nor did Trump confront Merz over free speech issues in Germany as US media had reported he might -- a bugbear the administration has repeatedly brought up with European leaders despite its own record. Merz told reporters in Washington ahead of the meeting that if Trump brought up German domestic politics "I will state my opinion very clearly if necessary." Trump and some in his administration have given vocal support to the far-right and anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which came second in February elections. US Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and former Trump adviser Elon Musk have all weighed in in support of the AfD, which in Germany is shunned by all other political parties. Despite the tensions, Merz had said earlier that he was "looking forward" to his first face-to-face meeting with Trump. The German chancellor is believed to have studied videos of previous Oval Office ambushes and learned how to stay calm and let Trump talk.

Trump 'disappointed' by Musk criticism of tax-cut bill
Trump 'disappointed' by Musk criticism of tax-cut bill

West Australian

timean hour ago

  • West Australian

Trump 'disappointed' by Musk criticism of tax-cut bill

US President Donald Trump says he is "disappointed" by Elon Musk's public opposition to the sweeping tax-cut and spending bill that is at the heart of Trump's agenda. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump said in the Oval Office. "He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm, I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot." Trump also asserted that Musk's days of blistering attacks on the bill were motivated by the proposed elimination of consumer tax credits for electric vehicles. Musk, the CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla, has said he opposes the bill because it will increase federal deficits. Trump suggested that Musk, who received a praise-filled send-off from Trump last week after overseeing his federal bureaucracy cost-cutting campaign, was upset because he missed working for Trump. "He's not the first," Trump said. "People leave my administration ... then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile." As Trump was speaking, Musk wrote on X, "Slim Beautiful Bill for the win," a reference to the bill's official title, the "Big Beautiful Bill Act". Musk followed that up with another post, saying he was fine with the cuts to electric vehicle credits as long as Republicans removed what he called a "mountain of disgusting pork" in wasteful spending from the bill. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," the billionaire said in a subsequent post. Musk came into the government with brash plans to cut $US2 trillion ($A3.1 trillion) out of the federal budget. He left last week having achieved far less than that, having cut about half of one per cent of total spending. Musk has been a powerful Trump ally, spending about $US250 million to boost Republicans in the 2024 election and then overseeing Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. His work eliminating thousands of federal jobs and cutting billions of dollars in foreign aid and other programs caused disruption across federal agencies while prompting widespread protests at Tesla outlets in the US and Europe. Shares of Tesla extended losses after Trump's criticism of Musk, falling more than eight per cent on a day otherwise devoid of news for the electric car maker. with AP

Bromance over: tensions between Trump and Musk erupt into open warfare
Bromance over: tensions between Trump and Musk erupt into open warfare

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Bromance over: tensions between Trump and Musk erupt into open warfare

Washington: Tensions between Donald Trump and his former 'first buddy' Elon Musk have erupted into open warfare, with the US president suggesting Musk has a version of 'Trump derangement syndrome', and the world's richest man insisting he won the election for Trump. The friendship has crumbled swiftly since Musk officially left his White House post on Friday and proceeded to unleash a campaign against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which extends Trump's first-term tax cuts and raises the US debt ceiling by trillions. The breakdown in the relationship, while predicted by some from the outset, is significant because of the Tesla chief's continued reach and influence and his clear desire to tank Trump's top domestic priority. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday (Friday AEST). 'He was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval [Office] desk ... He said wonderful things about me. He's worn the hat, 'Trump was right about everything'. And I am right about the great big beautiful bill.' Trump said he was surprised by Musk's barrage of criticism, but asserted the Tesla chief was upset because the bill cuts a Biden-era electric vehicle mandate which was a boon for his business. 'All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed a problem when he found out we were going to have to cut the EV mandate,' Trump said. 'I can understand that, but he knew every aspect of this bill, he knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store