UN Calls On Taliban To End Repressive Policies
Adopted with 116 votes in favour, 12 abstentions and 2 against (Israel and United States), the resolution highlighted the multifaceted crises confronting Afghanistan nearly four years after the Taliban's return to power, calling for greater international support for the Afghan people and a renewed push for human rights, peace and stability.
It emphasised the need for a coherent approach among humanitarian, political and development actors, and raised alarm over the 'grave, worsening, widespread and systematic oppression' of all women and girls in Afghanistan, calling on the Taliban to swiftly reverse policies that exclude them from education, employment and public life.
The text further called for adherence to Afghanistan's obligations under international law, including human rights and humanitarian principles.
Security and economic concerns
The 193-member General Assembly reiterated its 'serious concern' over continuing violence and the presence of terrorist groups such as Al-Qaida, Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL/Da'esh) and their affiliates ISIL-Khorasan and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, and 'demanded' that Afghanistan not be used as a safe haven for terrorist activity.
Beyond security, the resolution stressed Afghanistan's severe economic collapse, widespread poverty and spiralling humanitarian crisis, urging Member States and donors to scale up principled, sustained assistance.
It also highlighted the growing threat of natural disasters such as floods and droughts, which worsen food insecurity and economic fragility.
' Sustainable and lasting peace can be achieved only through long-term social, economic and political stability, which requires full respect for civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights as well as commitment to inclusive and representative governance,' the resolution stated.
Needs surge amid refugee returns
The resolution comes at a time of intensified strain on Afghanistan's overstretched humanitarian system.
According to UN agencies, waves of returns from Pakistan and Iran – including both refugees and those in refugee-like situations – have increased pressure on services, especially in border provinces ill-equipped to absorb new arrivals.
These returns, many of them involuntary or under duress, have heightened protection risks and left thousands of families in urgent need of food, shelter and basic services.
The 2025 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan for Afghanistan – which seeks $2.4 billion to assist nearly 17 million people – is only 22 per cent funded as of early July, raising concerns among aid officials about maintaining life-saving programs in the months ahead.
The resolution called on all donors and stakeholders to 'reconsider any decisions that may lead to reductions in such assistance, taking into account the potential adverse humanitarian consequences for the most vulnerable populations.'
Governance and accountability
The Assembly also reiterated concern over the lack of political inclusion since the Taliban takeover in August 2021.
It raised alarm over extrajudicial punishments, such as reprisals and summary executions, enforced disappearances and arbitrary detentions, including those targeting former members of the security personnel.
While the Assembly acknowledged the Taliban's limited steps to reduce opium cultivation, it stressed the need for comprehensive counter-narcotics measures and efforts to combat organized crime and illicit arms trafficking.
A call for collective responsibility
The resolution expressed appreciation to major refugee-hosting countries – particularly Pakistan and Iran – and called for more equitable burden-sharing and international cooperation to support displaced Afghans and the communities that host them.
It underlined the importance of creating conditions for the safe, dignified and voluntary return of refugees and internally displaced persons, as well as their sustainable reintegration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Forced Deportation Of Afghans Demands NZ Government Refugee Support
World Vision is urging the New Zealand government to increase this year's intake of refugees from Afghanistan through the refugee quota system, in response to Afghans being 'forcibly relocated' from Pakistan and Iran. The call comes four years since the Taliban regained power (August 15), and as nearly 2.5 million people have been forcibly returned to Afghanistan from Iran and Pakistan in the past 18 months. Pakistan introduced the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan in late 2023 to deport Afghans who did not have valid documents, even though many were born in Pakistan. This year, Iran took similar action and since January more than 1.2 million people have returned from Iran, with many now living in makeshift refugee camps at the border. World Vision's Head of Advocacy and Justice, Rebekah Armstrong, says New Zealand is in a position to offer a lifeline to Afghans. "Refugees from Afghanistan have been resettling in New Zealand through our refugee quota system for many years, building strong and established communities. The New Zealand Government already works to support Afghan resettlement and could easily expand this intake to address the growing humanitarian need in the region.' 'These are desperate circumstances in which children and families are being forced to leave the only communities they've ever known to return to a country which is in crisis. 'We're calling on the New Zealand government to increase the refugee quota to enable 200 additional Afghans to resettle here,' she says. World Vision is currently working at the border with Pakistan and Iran to help returnees where 27,000 people are returning every day, but the organisation's National Director in Afghanistan Thamindri De Silva says it's a dire situation. 'Children arrive looking dazed, disoriented and distressed, unsure what or where home is. It is heartbreaking. We need urgent support for families, but providing the essentials has been difficult due to ongoing aid cuts. 'At border crossings, like Islam Qala, needs far exceed the available support. Facilities can accommodate only a few hundred people per day; however, thousands are arriving daily. Shelters are overcrowded and lack basic amenities, including waste management and proper sanitation facilities,' she says. De Silva says Afghanistan's poverty, food insecurity, fragile infrastructure, job scarcity and climate shocks have driven many to seek better opportunities in Pakistan and Iran. She says in some parts of the country, such as west Afghanistan, there are communities with almost no men aged 13 or over because they are all in Iran working. De Silva says nearly two-thirds of people in Afghanistan already require humanitarian support just to survive. She says many families struggle to get enough to eat and around six million people are on the brink of famine. 'The hardest part for many people returning will be starting from scratch in the communities that struggled to sustain them in the first place. Without investment in basic support in Afghanistan, already-inadequate services will simply collapse, multiplying humanitarian need,' she says. Armstrong says the scale of the global refugee situation means that New Zealand needs to show leadership and responsibility and do more help. 'New Zealand has a special relationship with Afghanistan and has provided humanitarian support since the Taliban takeover in 2021, including resettling Afghans with links to our defence force. 'We're urging the government to step-up as a compassionate global leader and offer a small group of those affected safety and security from a truly desperate situation,' she says New Zealanders who want to support World Vision's work in Afghanistan can do so here:
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Afghanistan: International Community Must Reject Taliban's Violent And Authoritarian Rule, Say UN Experts
Geneva, 14 August 2025 UN experts* today called on the international community to reject the Taliban's violent and authoritarian rule and resist any moves towards normalising the de facto authorities' regime, four years after the group seized power in Afghanistan. 'For four years the people of Afghanistan, especially women and girls, have endured a relentless and escalating assault on their fundamental rights and freedoms,' the experts said. 'Operating without legitimacy, the Taliban enforces an institutionalised system of gender oppression, crushes dissent, exacts reprisals, and muzzles independent media while showing outright contempt for human rights, equality and non-discrimination.' In the past year, the Taliban has continued to impose so-called laws, edicts, and decrees while maintaining previous draconian restrictions on women's and girls' rights to education, freedom of movement, work, health, freedoms of expression and of association, and participation in cultural and public life. 'The Taliban's institutionalised system of gender discrimination and oppression is so severe that it amounts to the crime against humanity of persecution on grounds of gender,' the experts said, welcoming the recent arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders issued by the International Criminal Court. 'We support all efforts to hold those responsible to account.' The experts also highlighted concerns about other, wide-ranging human rights violations, including a disturbing surge in public executions and corporal punishments, arbitrary arrest and detentions, extrajudicial executions, acts tantamount to enforced disappearances, torture and ill-treatment in detention, the obliteration of civic space and crackdown on human rights defenders, restrictions on the rights to freedom of religion or belief, increasing numbers of internally displaced persons, the targeting of ethnic and religious minorities, discrimination against LGBTQ+ persons, and violations committed on national security and counter-terrorism grounds. 'The situation in Afghanistan is dire but it must not be regarded as a lost cause. The international community must resist the narrative that the current situation under Taliban rule is inevitable or irreversible. Another future is possible,' they said. The experts said that countering the Taliban's increasing repression requires an 'all-tools' approach. This approach should combine principled international advocacy and pressure with international accountability, including the establishment of an additional, complementary investigation mechanism with a comprehensive mandate. It should also include the codification of the crime of gender apartheid, strengthened support for civil society—especially women-led organisations—and increased funding for humanitarian assistance and realisation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Greater support and protection for Afghan refugees, internally displaced persons, and those in exile is also essential. 'This protection is particularly urgent as countries such as the Islamic Republic of Iran and Pakistan continue to return large numbers of Afghans, directly exposing them to the very persecution from which they fled,' the experts said. 'The people of Afghanistan, especially women and girls of all ages, must be actively involved in efforts to improve the situation in the country,' they said. 'We firmly believe that change in Afghanistan is best led by its people. But they cannot do it alone. International support – principled, focused, sustained, and rooted in solidarity – is essential,' the experts said. 'Every day without action strengthens the Taliban's oppressive grip. Standing side by side with the people of Afghanistan is both a moral imperative and a human rights responsibility. It is in the interest not only of the Afghan people, but the global community.' *The experts: Richard Bennett, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan; Dorothy Estrada Tanck, Ivana Krstić, and Haina Lu, Working group on discrimination against women and girls; Nahla Haidar, Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Graeme Reid, Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; Alexandra Xanthaki, Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; Nazila Ghanea, Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; George Katrougalos, Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order; Cecilia M. Bailliet, Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity; Morris Tidball-Binz, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; Alice Jill Edwards, Special Rapporteur on Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; Ben Saul, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism; Gabriella Citroni (Chair-Rapporteur), Grażyna Baranowska (Vice-Chair), Ana Lorena Delgadillo Pérez, Aua Baldé and Mohammed Al-Obaidi, Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances; Ganna Yudkivska (Chair-Rapporteur), Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; Margaret Satterthwaite, Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; Mary Lawlor, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders; Gina Romero, Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association; Irene Khan, Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression; Surya Deva, Special Rapporteur on the right to development; Tlaleng Mofokeng, Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; Paula Gaviria Betancur, Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons; Siobhán Mullally, Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children; Tomoya Obokata, Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery; Claudia Mahler, Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons; Mai Sato, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran; Carlos Duarte (Chair), Geneviève Savigny, Uche Ofodile (Vice Chair), Davit Hakobyan (Vice Chair), and Shalmali Guttal, Working Group on the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas;
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Slaying And Censoring The Journalists: The Murder Of Anas Al-Sharif
'Assassination,' wrote George Bernard Shaw in The Shewing-Up of Blanco Posnet, 'is the extreme form of censorship'. Such extremism visited Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues in Gaza City late on August 10. Resting in a tent located outside the main gate of Gaza City's al-Shifa Hospital, he was killed alongside Al Jazeera correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa, and freelance reporter Mohammed al-Khaldi. Palestinian journalist Wadi Abu al-Saud recalls the drone attack taking place at 11.22pm. Having entered the tent opposite, he had raised his phone to make a call when an explosion occurred. 'A piece of shrapnel hit my phone. I looked back and saw people burning in flames. I tried to extinguish them. Anas and the others had died instantly from the airstrike.' In two subsequent videos, al-Saud vows to 'return to my life as a citizen. The truth has died and the coverage has ended.' IDF international spokesman Lt. Colonel Nadav Shoshani, straining verisimilitude, claimed that intelligence obtained prior to the strike proved that 'Sharif was an active Hamas military wing operative at the time of his elimination'. The reporter must have been frightfully busy then, able to juggle his tasks with Al Jazeera, filing news bulletins while playing the ambitious militant. But distinctions are meaningless for Shoshani, who went on to accuse the slain journalist of receiving 'a salary from the Hamas terror group and terrorist supporters, Al-Jazeera, at the same time.' Evidence is typically sketchy, but the Lt. Colonel was untroubled, as the 'declassified portion of our intelligence on al-Sharif' was merely small relative to the whole picture. That picture, the IDF contends, revealed Sharif's credentials as leader of a rocket-launching squad alongside membership of the Nukhba Force company in Hamas's East Jabalia Battalion. This proved far from convincing to Muhammed Shehada, analyst at the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, who made the solid, pertinent observation that al-Sharif's 'entire daily routine was standing in front of a camera from morning to evening.' Particularly troubling in this killing is that the IDF seemed to be laying the groundwork for justified assassination last month, when army spokesman Avichai Adraee reshared a video on social media making the accusation that al-Sharif was a member of Hamas's military wing. This proved chilling for the United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of expression, Irene Khan. 'Fears for al-Sharif's safety are well-founded as there is growing evidence that journalists in Gaza have been targeted and killed by the Israeli army on the basis of unsubstantiated claims that they are Hamas terrorists.' The Committee to Protect Journalists was suitably perturbed by Adraee's remarks to issue a demand last month that the 'international community' protect al-Sharif. 'This is not the first time Al-Sharif has been targeted by the Israeli military, but the danger to his life is now acute,' said CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah. 'Israel has killed at least six Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza during the war. These latest unfounded accusations represent an effort to manufacture consent to kill Al-Sharif.' The other journalists killed in the strike are not deemed worthy of mention by the IDF, affirming the tendency in Israeli military doctrine to kill those around the designated target as a perfectly tolerable practice. Again, the rulebook of international humanitarian war is discarded in favour of a normalised murderousness. The rulebook has also been abandoned regarding journalists working in Gaza, conforming to a pattern of indifference to distinctions between militants or civilians in Israel's sanguinary targeting. By December 2023, the Committee to Protect Journalists was already declaring that the war in the Strip had been the deadliest ever recorded by the organisation for press members. (The number currently stands at over 190; the global total for 2020-23 was 165.) 'Israel is murdering the messengers,' concludes Qudah. 'Israel wiped out an entire news crew. It has made no claims that any of the other journalists were terrorists. That's murder. Plain and simple.' In a statement, Al Jazeera Media Network described the killings as 'yet another blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom.' The order to kill al-Sharif, 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists, and his colleagues, is a desperate attempt to silence the voices exposing the impending seizure and occupation of Gaza.' The murder of al-Sharif and his colleagues by Israeli forces constituted the effective wiping out of Al Jazeera's team, one of the few able to offer consistent, unsmothered coverage about the IDF's remorseless campaign in Gaza. Since the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas, Israel has prohibited foreign reporters from entering Gaza except under strict invigilation by the Israeli military. Those accompanied by the IDF have been at the mercy of Israeli selectiveness as to where to go and barred from speaking to Palestinians. In a note to be published in the event of his death, al-Sharif stated that he 'lived the pain in all its details', tasting 'grief and loss repeatedly'. This did not deter him from conveying 'the truth as it is, without distortion or misrepresentation, hoping that God would witness those who remained silent, those who accepted our killing, and those who suffocated our very breaths.' He also reflected on what images of sheer barbarity had failed to do, with 'the mangled bodies of our children and women' failing to move hearts or stop massacres. In dying along with his colleagues, al-Sharif had been butchered in a climate of hyper normalised violence, thinly veiled by the barbaric justifications of Israeli national security.
