Investigation underway after environmentalists 'sickened' by tree felling video in Jersey
An investigation is underway to see if the felling of woodland on private land in Jersey was lawful.
It comes after a video was shared on social media of trees being cut down at a property in Fliquet, which has since been removed.
The island's former Climate Change Minister and Chair of Environment, Housing and Infrastructure Scrutiny Panel, Deputy Hilary Jeune, told ITV News:
"My first response is aghast at how aggressive it is, including with the music over the top - it seemed to be promoting it as a really a good thing, that there were big machines scouring the earth and taking away not only the trees but any wildlife has completely gone.
"As an environmentalist, I felt completely sickened by it."
She added that this is not the first case of it's kind and "the risk has always been there, and been brought up many times."
The Infrastructure and Environment Department have said they need to "discover the facts of the case and see if there have been any breaches under any relevant laws - before any action can be taken."
In Jersey, there are no laws explicitly preventing the felling of woodland in these kinds of areas if they are on private land.
People can apply to the Planning Department to protect individual trees, but due to the length of the process, very few trees are actually protected.There were attempts to tighten tree protections by the previous States Assembly but these have since been withdrawn.
Jersey's Wildlife Law protects nesting birds as well as many trees and plants. Planning permission is also required for the removal of some trees.
Environmentalist, Sheena Brockie, says the protecting biodiversity on the island is crucial.
"Granted there was damage from Storm Ciarán, however there was still standing trees, standing deadwood's really important.
"The fact that every single blade of grass, every single shrub, the majority of trees - they're covered in ivy and those kind of trees support so much wildlife.
"The soil biodiversity, the birds that depend on it, the bats that depend on it - these are protected under the legislation."The Environment Minister, Deputy Steve Luce, added the islands greenery needs to be looked after.
"I see sites that are developed and trees are still being felled where I feel that's unnecessary and consequently, since I've been minister we've formed a tree advisory board and that group of people are coming forward with certain recommendations about varieties we might want to grow in the future, and about protection."
ITV News Channel tried to speak to people inside the property, but no one would answer.Planning are now carrying out an investigation to see if there has been any breaches of the law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
7 hours ago
- ITV News
Conversion therapy: First British person paid damages by church for exorcism of ‘gay demons'
ITV News UK Editor Paul Brand spoke to Matthew Drapper who was put through conversion therapy and received a five-figure compensation from the church. A man has been paid compensation for an exorcism which attempted to rid him of 'gay demons' in what is believed to be the first legal settlement of its kind in the UK. Speaking on camera for the first time, Matthew Drapper told ITV News he was led to believe demons had left his mouth during the intense prayer session at St Thomas Philadelphia Church in Sheffield in 2014. "They said that one of the reactions you'll have is that when people are praying for you to get rid of the demonic influence, you'll want to stop. And that's a sign that you should carry on and that you should push through. And they said you might have a physical reaction", he said describing the prayer session. Following an independent report by Barnardos in 2023 which upheld complaints by Mr Drapper, the church has now paid him a five-figure sum in compensation for the harm caused by the exorcism. Since ITV News first investigated conversion practices in 2018, successive governments have promised to ban them. But despite repeated pledges no law has yet been brought forward. ITV News has been told the Labour government still has no timeframe for outlining a bill to ban conversion therapy, after committing to one in both its 2024 manifesto and last year's King's Speech. ITV News also understands the Prime Minister recommitting to a ban at a reception in No10 to celebrate Pride, but no details were given. Campaigners for a ban hope Mr Drapper's case will act as another form of deterrent, with the potential for many more legal cases to be brought against churches which practice conversion therapy. Richard Scorer, who represented Mr Drapper, told ITV News that the win would "lay down a marker that if people are harmed as a result of practises like this, then there is the potential to take action and seek accountability for that". ITV News understands that a bill drafted by civil servants and the Equalities Minister Dame Nia Griffith has reached No10 for consideration, but hasn't progressed any further. It is understood that sticking points remain around religious freedoms, the question of whether someone can 'consent' to conversion therapy, as well as what role parents should be allowed to play in the case of children who may be questioning their sexuality or gender identity. It is also understood the government is carefully considering the recent Supreme Court judgement on the definition of a woman before proceeding with a ban, as well as requesting more evidence of current conversion practices. Speaking on Thursday, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds insisted the Government would sill deliver a ban. Much of this frustrates campaigners, who argue these points have already been considered at length by previous governments, causing unnecessary delay. But those who oppose a full-scale ban on a variety of grounds believe a ban could have unintended consequences, such as stifling freedom of religion or preventing constructive conversations about gender identity with parents and teachers.
ITV News
8 hours ago
- ITV News
'Transformational milestone': Indian industries welcome free trade agreement with UK
The signing of the UK–India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) marks a major moment in Britain's post-Brexit trade strategy and signals a deepening partnership with one of the world's fastest-growing economies. Finalised after years of negotiation, the deal has drawn strong support from Indian policymakers and industry leaders who see it as a springboard for greater trade, investment, and strategic cooperation. Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the agreement 'a blueprint for shared prosperity", adding that it would not only improve market access for Indian goods such as textiles, footwear, jewellery, seafood and engineering products but also unlock new opportunities for young people and in other areas including agriculture, food processing and small business. India's top business body, the Confederation of Indian Industry, hailed the deal a 'transformational milestone'. Industry leaders said the FTA would enhance India's global competitiveness while making the UK a stronger partner in innovation, digital trade, and clean technology. Gaitri Issar Kumar, former Indian High Commissioner to the UK, who helped shape early phases of the deal, told ITV News the FTA had remained a top-level priority since 2020. 'The negotiations were personally monitored by our Commerce Minister and successive UK Trade Secretaries, with clear targets and timelines," she said. "That, to my mind, contributed greatly to the successful outcome.' She added that consultations with Indian industry leaders ensured that key interests were protected and practical solutions found. Sunil Bharti Mittal, Chairman of Bharti Enterprises and Co-Chair of the India–UK CEO Forum, described the agreement as 'modern and forward-looking', saying it would 'stimulate innovation, ease market access, and foster investment' across sectors. While optimism runs high, another former Indian envoy to the UK, Ruchi Ghanashyam, offered a note of caution. 'Both sides have used terms like 'historic' and 'landmark' to describe this agreement," she said. "But for the FTA to reach the desired goal, businesses on both sides will need to examine the possibilities emerging out of the agreement and follow up. "Implementation will really be the key.' Analysts estimate the FTA could increase bilateral trade by up to US $34 billion annually, with particular benefits for sectors such as textiles, marine exports, agriculture, engineering goods, and processed food. One of the agreement's standout features is its social security clause, which will allow Indian professionals working in the UK to continue contributing to India's pension system for up to three years - addressing a long-pending request from Indian trade bodies. Currently, over 970 Indian companies operate in the UK, employing more than 1.1 million people and contributing roughly £1.17 billion annually in taxes. The two countries aim to double trade to $120 billion by 2030. In a recent column in The Indian Express, strategic affairs analyst Dr. C. Raja Mohan wrote that the FTA gives both countries a chance to build 'a pragmatic, forward-looking partnership' amid global volatility. 'With an assertive China and an unpredictable United States, deeper ties between India and the UK can serve as a stabilising force,' he noted. 'This is not just a trade deal, but a timely geopolitical recalibration grounded in trust, ambition, and shared democratic values.' As the UK and India look beyond the signing ceremony, the spotlight now shifts to execution - and to ensuring the agreement delivers on its promise of shared growth and mutual benefit.
ITV News
8 hours ago
- ITV News
Sadiq Khan defends plans to shut Met Police station front counters, despite election promise
Sir Sadiq Khan has defended plans to shut police station front counters across London, despite an election promise he made last year. The Metropolitan Police Service wants to cut the number of police stations open to the public 24 hours a day in a bid to save money. The force is facing what it called 'tough choices' after government spending plans left it a £260m budget shortfall. There are 32 police stations open 24/7 - one in each London borough. But the proposals would see just eight front counters staffed around the clock - one for every three boroughs. Eleven of the 32 stations would switch to reduced opening hours but 13 would shut their front counters. Sir Sadiq pledged in his 2024 election manifesto: 'I'll continue to ensure the Met is able to effectively respond to the public, including maintaining a 24-hour police front office counter in every borough.' But today he told ITV News: "The commission's got three criteria when it comes to front counters - resources, funding, and the demand of the front counts. "Some front counters will stay open 24 hours a day in some boroughs in London where there is a demand, resources and funding. "Some boroughs, frankly speaking, nobody uses the front counters after office hours, they'll stay open during office hours, but after office hours there will be other ways." The Met said there was no decision yet on which police stations will lose their front counters. A spokesperson said: 'Just five per cent of crimes were reported using front counters last year, with the vast majority of Londoners doing it over the phone, online, or in person with officers elsewhere. "Given the Met's budget shortfall and shrinking size, it is no longer sustainable to keep all front counters open.' But the proposed cuts were criticised by the Conservative rival Khan defeated in the election. Susan Hall, leader of the Greater London Authority Tories, said: "Sadiq Khan is keeping Londoners completely in the dark about which police counters will be axed from their communities. 'This secrecy is utterly unacceptable when people are genuinely worried about losing this vital lifeline to report crimes and access police services. The Mayor has broken his manifesto promise and now he won't even have the decency to tell 'Londoners which areas will be worst hit by his failures. We will fight these closures tooth and nail, but we can't do that whilst Khan continues to hide behind this wall of silence. What does he have to hide? What wasn't he told? This is a disgrace."
