logo
Minns government's environmental integrity condemned as ‘nonexistent' amid 40% surge in land clearing

Minns government's environmental integrity condemned as ‘nonexistent' amid 40% surge in land clearing

The Guardian6 days ago
The Minns government has lost its way on environmental policy, according to the New South Wales opposition, the Greens and a member of the crossbench, after government data revealed a 40% surge in land clearing across the state.
The report is the latest headache for a state government under pressure over conservation concerns, including continued logging in a promised koala park in the state's north and the failure of a koala translocation project in the state's south.
'Where is Chris Minns on the environment? He hasn't delivered, he's had two years,' the NSW Greens environment spokesperson, Sue Higginson, said.
Higginson said the government 'rode to power' on a promise to do better for nature but habitat destruction had continued, adding there had been no discussion about changing 'disastrous' native vegetation laws introduced by the former Coalition government.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
'Right now Labor's environmental integrity is nonexistent as we are still waiting for the establishment of the Great Koala national park and it is still being logged at an industrial scale,' she said.
The 2023 land-clearing data, published Monday afternoon, shows 66,498 hectares of native vegetation was cleared for agriculture, infrastructure and forestry in 2023, which the Nature Conservation Council of NSW said was 'equivalent to bulldozing Sydney's Royal national park four times over'.
Land clearing in the state has increased over several years as a result of John Barilaro-era laws introduced in 2017 that relaxed regulation of native vegetation clearing.
In the years since, clearing across the state exploded, at one point reaching levels close to 100,000 hectares per year. While the 2023 data does not show clearing of that scale, the destruction of habitat increased significantly after a brief dip in 2022.
Clearing of woody vegetation was up 55%, with 32,847 hectares cleared in 2023, compared with 21,137 hectares in 2022. Agriculture was responsible for 77% of all clearing, and the state's west and north-west, including the Cobar and Bogan shire council areas, were clearing hotspots.
In June, the NSW State of the Environment report showed the trajectory of conservation indicators including the extent of native vegetation, the condition of habitat and the number of threatened species was getting worse.
The Coalition environment spokesperson, James Griffin, said he was open to talks with the government about reforms to land-clearing regulations. Higginson said the Greens were also prepared to work with the government to rein in clearing.
Griffin accused Labor of spending its time in opposition attacking the Coalition for its environmental performance, and since winning government in 2023, 'not only are these problems not being solved, they're getting worse'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'I'm passionate about the environment and this is an outrageous situation we find ourselves in,' he said.
'The key indicators on the state of the environment are going backwards, there's no marine conservation program to speak of and there is a complete lack of ambition on fundamental environmental issues,' he said.
'I have a great degree of sympathy for [environment minister] Penny Sharpe. I think she has been completely sidelined by Chris Minns who sees zero political benefit in the environment and so simply doesn't care.'
The independent MP for Pittwater, Jacqui Scruby, said both major parties had failed.
She said while Griffin criticised Labor, 'the reality is, his government chose to accelerate this disaster, tearing up the Native Vegetation Act in 2016 and unleashing a bulldozer bonanza that has only accelerated'.
'Labor promised to fix the mess – but nearly two years later, native forests are still being logged and critical habitat is still being destroyed,' she said.
Scruby said she had recently visited parts of the proposed Great Koala national park on the mid-north coast.
'I saw fresh koala scratchings on trees just metres from clear-felling. It was gut-wrenching. These forests are supposed to be part of a koala sanctuary – but they're being logged while we continue to wait for Labor to act,' she said.
In a statement, the NSW minister for the environment, Penny Sharpe, said her government would 'continue to work with the Natural Resources Commission and with farmers' on land clearing.
'Before the Coalition came into power, land clearing was down to around 10,000 hectares a year. The Coalition let this blow out,' she said.
'This will take time to work through, but we are committed to reducing excessive land clearing.'
On Friday, the government took a step towards delivering one of its environmental commitments by formally gazetting the first 962 hectares of a promised national park for koalas on the Georges River in south-western Sydney.
The new park, called Warranmadhaa (Georges River Koala national park), is located between Long Point and Appin.
'This new national park is one of the most important in the state for koala conservation, protecting almost 1,000 hectares of vital koala habitat in south-west Sydney and delivering on our promise to safeguard this iconic species,' Sharpe said.
'$48.2m has been committed to establish and manage this park, ensuring long-term protection for the south-west Sydney's koalas.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In Ecuador, environmentalists worry Noboa is unwinding nation's green reputation
In Ecuador, environmentalists worry Noboa is unwinding nation's green reputation

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

In Ecuador, environmentalists worry Noboa is unwinding nation's green reputation

When Ecuadorians voted two years ago to block oil drilling in Yasuni National Park, it was a triumph for environmentalists seeking to protect one of the most biodiverse places on Earth. And it was in character for a country that was first to enshrine the 'rights of nature' in its constitution and is home to parts of the Amazon rain forest and the Galápagos Islands. But recent moves by President Daniel Noboa have alarmed environmentalists and Indigenous leaders who say the country's green reputation — and its protections for civil society — are unraveling. Noboa's administration has moved to scrap the country's independent Environment Ministry. It's pushing legislation ostensibly aimed at choking off illegal mining, but which critics fear will devastate nonprofits. The National Assembly — pressed by Noboa — approved a law last month allowing private and foreign entities to co‑manage conservation zones that critics say weakens protections and threatens Indigenous land rights. And Ecuador just signed a new oil deal with Peru that could accelerate drilling in sensitive areas. Natalia Greene, an environmental advocate with the Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature, said Noboa's decision to fold the Environment Ministry into the Ministry of Energy and Mines will speed up mining just as Ecuador is grappling with a surge in illegal gold mining tied to organized crime. She called it 'like putting the wolf in charge of the sheep.' 'The government's intention is very clear — to be a machine gun of extractivism,' she said. Noboa has defended the ministry moves and other changes as necessary to cut costs, reduce bureaucracy and address Ecuador's financial crisis. Officials argue that consolidating ministries will make decision‑making more efficient. Neither the Ministry of Energy and Mines nor Noboa's office responded to questions from The Associated Press. Indigenous rights at risk In July, Peru and Ecuador signed a deal for Ecuador's state oil company to sell crude directly to Petroperu and link its southern Amazon reserves to Peru's Norperuano pipeline, with drilling eyed for January 2026. Environmental groups say it could fast‑track drilling in sensitive areas while skirting safeguards and Indigenous consultation. Peru's Achuar, Wampis and Chapra nations denounced the plan in a public letter, saying it would gut long-standing protections that require communities be consulted before projects move forward on their lands. They warned the pipeline already averages 146 spills a year and that expanding it would be 'a grave threat to the Amazon and to Indigenous livelihoods.' 'They are going to violate all our rights to enter our territories and extract the resources they want," said Nemo Guiquita, a Waorani leader with the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of the Ecuadorian Amazon. She said Indigenous communities fear a surge of oil and mining projects across ancestral lands, threatening both ecosystems and livelihoods. 'There will be a weakening of environmental protection,' she said. 'There will be a lot of deforestation, contamination of rivers and destruction of the ecosystem, which is vital for our existence as Indigenous peoples.' Ricardo Buitrón, president of the Quito‑based environmental group Accion Ecologica, noted that the changes come just months after Ecuadorians voted to keep oil in the ground in Yasuni, a decision the government has yet to fully enforce. 'We have gone back decades,' he said. 'A development model is being prioritized that does not care about protecting ecosystems, but about extracting natural resources to the maximum.' Fears that proposed law will harm non-governmental organizations The proposed law that has alarmed nonprofits is formally called the Organic Law for the Control of Irregular Capital Flows. But activists call it the 'anti-NGO' law, saying it could impose heavy burdens on nonprofits and force many to close. The measure applies to more than 71,000 organizations nationwide, giving them six months to re‑register with the government, submit detailed financial records and disclose foreign funding sources. The government says the law is needed to prevent money laundering and political destabilization. Critics warn it could instead silence dissent by placing organizations under sweeping controls. Noboa submitted the bill to the National Assembly on July 29, giving lawmakers until Aug. 28 to act before it automatically becomes law. 'This has been hard for us,' Guiquita said. 'Practically, Indigenous organizations live mostly from donations and NGOs. The government is weakening us in every space.' 'It represents a threat because they could dissolve us under any pretext,' Buitrón said. 'This reminds us of what we already lived through a decade ago, when they tried to shut down some organizations in the country.' Regional and global stakes Kevin Koenig of Amazon Watch, a U.S.-based nonprofit that advocates for Indigenous rights and environmental protection in the Amazon, said the country's changes are part of a wider rollback. 'We are seeing a sweeping package of regressive reforms that are rolling back environmental protections, Indigenous rights guarantees, and threatening basic civil liberties like the freedom of speech and assembly,' he said. 'What it suggests is the massive expansion of oil and mining, particularly in the Amazon region.' Koenig said the changes send troubling signals ahead of COP30, the United Nations climate summit set for Brazil later this year. Similar trends are unfolding in Peru and El Salvador, where governments have limited environmental oversight, and in Brazil, where licensing for Amazon projects has been weakened. Mobilizing resistance Civil society groups are mobilizing against the changes. Greene said organizations have reactivated the Asamblea Nacional Socioambiental, a national coalition of environmental and social movements, and are planning legal challenges, demonstrations and appeals to international bodies. Many fear Ecuador's role as a global green pioneer is unraveling. 'Our only crime here has been protecting our territory, protecting our traditions, protecting our way of life,' Guiquita said. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

To compare Donald Trump to Teddy Roosevelt on nature protection is absurd
To compare Donald Trump to Teddy Roosevelt on nature protection is absurd

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

To compare Donald Trump to Teddy Roosevelt on nature protection is absurd

Simon Jenkins' article (He may talk rubbish but Trump has an eye for beauty, and that is a breath of fresh air, 1 August) was for the most part milquetoast Trump apologia, studded with the usual non-criticisms to give an impression of impartiality (yes, Trump does sometimes 'talk rubbish') and lauding one particular droplet in his firehose stream of insanity as some sort of visionary pronouncement (I would argue one of his more significant early actions was to economically attack my country, deride its sovereignty and muse on annexing us, but yes, restoring federal buildings is nice, too.) Where the article veered into insulting territory, however, was in comparing Trump to Teddy Roosevelt, claiming that both men 'seemed to care about America's natural environment, its forests and deserts, and a role for Washington in their custodianship'. To call this comparison absurd would be an understatement. Teddy Roosevelt was a committed conservationist who created the United States Forest Service; Trump called climate change a Chinese hoax. Roosevelt greatly expanded the national parks system; Trump opened up national parks in Alaska for oil drilling. Roosevelt created 51 wild bird reserves; Trump neutered the Migratory Bird Treaty Act at the behest of the fossil fuel industry. Roosevelt used executive orders to protect 600,000sq km of forest from logging and other exploitation; Trump used executive orders to try to bring back coal. Should I go on?Justin JoschkoOttawa, Ontario, Canada Imposing classical revival styles in federal architecture is the tool of dictators. To insinuate that Trump has any taste at all fails. His own ostentatious display of wealth by dipping everything that he surrounds himself with in cheesy gold paint is proof. The American Institute of Architects is on record against this mandate as being retrograde, and calls out this failure to promote forward-reaching design and creative Simmons Santa Fe, New Mexico, US Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder. As I have driven across Kansas, Oklahoma and crossing into California from Arizona on Interstate 10, I smile when I see those turbines turning and think, ah, green energy, less pollution and saving the planet. They, to me, are beautiful, much better than coal belching pollutants into the AckersLeawood, Kansas, US How disingenuous to suggest that President Trump has any care for the aesthetic beauty of our environment, without noting his zeal for plundering the earth's resources to their limit for personal and private profit. Don't we all remember 'Drill, baby, drill'? His antipathy to wind turbines, regardless of where they are sited, owes more to his loathing for renewable energy solutions than it does to his concerns about aesthetic HutchesonCastle Carrock, Cumbria If Donald Trump has an eye for beauty, why did he destroy the sand dunes near Aberdeen in order to install his golf course? Cliff SaxtonLauzun, France

We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?
We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?

The number of people who joined a pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday exceeded everyone's expectations. But just how many braved the rainy weather to urge the Australian government to do more to pressure Israel to stop the death and destruction in Gaza? That's been a sticking point. New South Wales police said initial estimates put the crowd at 90,000. A spokesperson for rally organisers the Palestine Action Group said police had informed them 100,000 people were in attendance – but the group estimated the figure was closer to 300,000. This article includes content provided by Instagram. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. Here's what we know. Just after 5pm on Sunday, the acting deputy police commissioner Peter McKenna said police estimated 90,000 people took part – far more than the 50,000 organisers expected. He said it was the largest protest he and the assistant police commissioner Adam Johnson had seen in their time in the force. Johnson also said it was the 'most perilous' in his '35 years of policing'. However organisers estimated it was closer to 300,000. 'It's even bigger than my wildest dreams,' one of the main protest organisers, Josh Lees, said while at the front of the march at the midway point. Lees later said a number of people had come up with a similar figure after crunching the numbers based on widely shared aerial footage. Dr Aldo Raineri, a senior CQUniversity lecturer and expert in crowd safety management, estimated the figure to be significantly higher than what police suggested. Guardian Australia shared drone footage with Raineri that showed the crowd just north of the bridge's midway point, extending back to Wynyard station and Lang Park, where the march began. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The distance from Wynyard station up to where protesters began to be turned back is approximately 2.5km. The roadway along the bridge is 30 metres wide. Based on these dimensions and what appeared to be an occupancy of three or four people per square metre, he estimated between 225,000 and 300,000 people attended. However, he noted 'these figures are really rough, given the variation in density'. Organisers said there were still people at Lang Park, who had not yet started to march, when police sent a message telling protesters to turn back. Lees said many who had gone to Sunday's protest felt it was on par with past major protests they had been to, including the anti-Iraq war protest in 2003, which saw demonstrators march through the CBD, and the walk for reconciliation march in 2000 which went across the Sydney Harbour Bridge. According to the National Museum of Australia, about 250,000 people walked across the bridge in a continuous stream lasting nearly six hours during the reconciliation march. NMA called it the 'largest political demonstration ever held in Australia'. In 2003, police estimated more than 200,000 took part in the anti-Iraq war rally, while organisers put the total at about 300,000, the Sydney Morning Herald reported. The paper said it was 'thought to be the biggest in the country's history'. In 2023, an estimated 50,000 people took part in a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of WorldPride. Chris Nash, who attended Sunday's march, said it 'felt much bigger' than the 2000 reconciliation march he also attended. 'That was much more spaced out,' he said. The former NSW premier Bob Carr marched at the head of the pro-Palestine protest across the bridge. He was the premier during the reconciliation march in 2000. Asked how the crowd sizes compared, he said: 'All that matters was that it was a big, beautiful success. A success with cheerful police cooperation and good-natured people motivated by the horror of Israel's actions in Gaza.' At about 3pm on Sunday, NSW police sent out a mass text message throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end of the bridge. Police sent a second mass text message saying they had consulted with the organisers and were turning everyone around. 'We could not get those people, the number, the significant size of that crowd off that northern egress route without risking crowd crush. We could not allow those numbers to then egress into the northern side, into those train stations without, again, that real risk of crowd crush,' McKenna told reporters. He said there were 1,000 police facilitating the protest. Raineri said allowing the crowd to amass without effective transport to disperse them would have been unsafe. He said the police went about this the right way by using mass text messages and consultating with protesters. However, Legal Observers NSW said the 'confusing and unplanned' directions from police were dangerous and could have caused a crowd crush. 'Police had not adequately planned for the initial route to North Sydney and there did not appear to be a plan if crowd numbers exceeded expectations and made entering and leaving North Sydney difficult,' the group's report on the protest said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store