Cascadia subduction zone earthquake could be even worse than feared
When an earthquake rips along the Cascadia Subduction Zone fault, much of the U.S. west coast could shake violently for five minutes, and tsunami waves as tall as 100 feet could barrel toward shore. But that's just the start of the expected horrors.
Even if coastal towns in Northern California, Oregon and Washington withstand that seismic onslaught, new research suggests floodwaters could seep into many of these vulnerable communities for good. That's because entire coastal shorelines are expected to drop by as much as 6½ feet when the earthquake strikes, according to new research, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Researchers analyzed seismic and flood modeling to produce some of the most detailed estimates of how the Cascadia earthquake would drop — or subside — coastal shorelines and found that it could affect more than double the number of people, structures and roads currently at risk. The effect will also worsen over time, as intensifying climate change raises sea levels further.
'This lesser talked about hazard is going to persist for decades or centuries after the earthquake,' said Tina Dura, the study's lead author. 'The tsunami will come in and wash away and it's going to have big impacts, don't get me wrong, but the lasting change of the frequency of flooding … that's going to have to be dealt with.'
Dura said geologic fossil evidence shows that previous Cascadia earthquakes immediately dropped the land level and turned dry ground into tidal mudflats in estuaries along the Pacific Northwest.
'That's going to happen again and we've built up a lot of those areas,' said Dura, who is an assistant professor of geosciences at Virginia Tech University. 'That's how we have ports there ... and that's where we built towns, and all that area is gonna drop down maybe over a meter, up to two meters.'
The Cascadia Subduction Zone fault, which runs offshore along North America's west coast from Northern California to northern Vancouver Island, represents a looming threat. The fault has the capability to produce a magnitude-9.0 earthquake, and a large temblor is expected there at least once every 450-500 years, on average. The last of those major quakes occurred in 1700.
The National Seismic Hazard Model suggests there is a 15% chance a magnitude-8.0 earthquake or stronger will rupture along the zone's margin within the next 50 years.
When the fault rips, experts have said it will precipitate the worst natural disaster in the nation's history. A 2022 state and federal planning exercise for a Cascadia earthquake predicted about 14,000 fatalities, more than 100,000 injuries and the collapse of about 620,000 buildings in the Pacific Northwest, including 100 hospitals and 2,000 schools.
The new research suggests that coastal planners must seriously reckon not only for the threat of intense shaking and tsunami waves, but also for the long-term reshaping and rapid sinking of the coastline itself.
'There's the flood itself and then there's the basically permanent change to land level at the coast and that has a big impact for what those communities have to plan for,' said Harold Tobin, the director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network and a professor at the University of Washington, who was not involved in the new research. 'Where are you going to put your school or hospital? Where are you going to build your transportation network? I think it's important to take the long view.'
After the earthquake, Dura's research suggests, large portions of towns along the Pacific Northwest coastline, such as Seaside, Oregon; Westport, Washington; and Aberdeen, Washington, would be expected to flood at least once every 100 years, if not more often.
The study also points out that sea level rise is accelerating as climate change intensifies, and the effects of post-earthquake flooding could worsen in the future.
Global mean sea levels have risen by about 8 to 9 inches since 1880, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Sea level rise is expected to dramatically accelerate in coming decades because of global warming, with NOAA predicting another 10 to 12 inches on average by midcentury.
Where you live could determine how dramatic sea level rise appears, and how it affects the coastline.
While land in some regions of the U.S., like the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia, is slowly sinking in a process called subsidence, parts of the Pacific Northwest have been rising because of continental uplift. That rise in land level has offset some of the sea level rise to date.
The uplift is the result of stress building up within the tectonic plates that form the Cascadia subduction zone offshore. At the subduction zone, the Juan de Fuca plate is being forced beneath the continental North American plate. This causes the North American plate to bow upward slightly, pushing the land level higher.
Right now, the subduction zone fault is quiet and building stress. When the fault ruptures, the bowing of the plate will release and cause a rapid subsidence of the land level, essentially erasing centuries of uplift in an instant.
'That happens in minutes, and it can be on the order of meters,' Dura said. 'The land persists down, and that can be for, like I said, decades and centuries. And so any areas that are kind of on the cusp of the floodplain are now in it."
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
11 hours ago
- Washington Post
Little-known cells might be key to human brain's massive memory
A new model of memory — and a little-heralded type of brain cell — might explain why the human brain has such a huge storage capacity, researchers reported in the journal PNAS in May. The study looks at astrocytes, star-shaped cells that interact with neurons in the brain. The brain contains billions of astrocytes, and scientists have long known they play a part in cleaning up molecules within brain synapses, the junctions where neurons come together. More recent research, though, suggests that astrocytes do more. The new model suggests the astrocytes could also be used for computation, coordinating with neurons and connecting synapses in networks. These complex connections might allow the brain to encode memories in dense networks that expand the brain's capacity beyond its neurons alone, the researchers write. 'This makes neuron-astrocyte networks an exciting candidate for biological 'hardware' implementing Dense Associative Memory,' they add. The model runs counter to the prevailing theory that memory storage occurs in synapses, and implies that the brain is capable of storing even more memories than once thought possible. The researchers also describe how the theory could be validated in the lab. 'We hope that one of the consequences of this work could be that experimentalists would consider this idea seriously and perform some experiments testing this hypothesis,' said Dmitry Krotov, a research staff member at the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab and IBM Research and the paper's senior author, in a news release. The model could also be used as a 'fresh source of inspiration' for future artificial intelligence technology, the researchers conclude.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists make disturbing discovery after examining effects of food packaging materials: 'This is of great significance'
Microplastic pollution is everywhere, leading researchers to search for plastic alternatives. But according to findings published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers say particles from one type of biodegradable plastic used commonly in food packaging could disrupt metabolic cycles. Polylactic acid is a Food and Drug Administration-approved medical biodegradable material that can help replace petroleum-based plastics, and it's already been widely integrated into food packaging. However, PLA is brittle, making it more likely to break down into microplastic particles. Now, a new study points to some pretty serious consequences of PLA microplastics in the bodies of mice. The researchers found that these particles' entry into the gut carbon cycle triggered metabolic reprogramming, ultimately leading to suppressed feeding behavior and significant weight loss. "[This study] is of great significance for assessing the biosafety of degradable plastics, and provides important data support for understanding the impact of degradable plastics on human physiological processes," said one of the study's authors, Chen Chunying, according to the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Microplastics — small plastic particles that break off from larger plastics — are all around us, from the chicken we eat to the water we drink. One high school student even discovered concerning levels of these particles in water at two remote lakes within Grand Teton National Park. These microplastics enter our bodies through the foods and drinks we consume as well as the air we breathe, ending up in organs such as the brain, uterus, and testes. While scientists are still exploring the health impacts of these particles, they've been tied to reproductive issues, testosterone disruption, learning difficulties in children, and more. Although it's difficult to remove microplastics from the environment, it's not entirely impossible. For instance, one group of scientists discovered a way to separate them from water by using egg whites. To reduce the amount of new microplastics entering the environment, it's imperative that we cut our plastic usage. Countries such as England and France are making strides toward that goal by banning plastic cutlery for most fast food and takeout. You can do your part by avoiding as many single-use plastics as possible. Opt instead for reusable shopping bags and water bottles, shampoo bars, and metal razors, for instance. Do you think we use too much plastic in America? Definitely Only some people Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Medscape
3 days ago
- Medscape
How Today's Human Brain Became so Uniquely Human
What unique processes conspire to create a healthy, functional human brain? How can we be so genetically similar to, say, chimpanzees, and yet be light-years more sophisticated cognitively and behaviorally? It may just come down to six cells. Evolutionary biologists who study the human brain and explore questions about why we're so different from other primates are especially interested in the contrasts between humans and chimpanzees. 'We share more than 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees, yet the human and chimpanzee brains are unique. That difference has always been very fascinating to me,' said Soojin Yi, PhD, professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Yi and colleagues recently published findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ( PNAS ) that help deepen scientists' understanding about what's behind our brain differences. They've found that 'there is more differential gene expression in human brains,' said Yi, referring to the activation of different genes within a single brain cell type that defines that cell's purpose. What's more, she said, 'Different brain cells follow different evolutionary paths depending on their unique roles in the brain.' New Findings While previous studies have suggested that human brain evolution is linked to accelerated changes in gene expression, Yi said many questions still remain. To explore how genes in different types of human brain cells have evolved compared with those of chimpanzees, the researchers used single-cell human and nonhuman primate (chimpanzee and rhesus macaques) transcriptomic data — messenger RNA transcripts present in a specific cell type — to analyze the unique molecular profiles (the gene activity) of six brain cell types. Yi said many single-cell research approaches had focused primarily on neurons, with relatively small numbers of nonneuronal cells, so their team aimed for a more diverse approach. 'To balance the brain cellular heterogeneity and statistical rigor,' she said that in addition to looking at excitatory and inhibitory neurons, they also looked at four glial cell types — astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Each of these cell types plays an important role in brain function and health. For example, excitatory neurons transmit signals between brain regions, inhibitory neurons help control brain activity, oligodendrocytes contribute to the formation of the myelin sheath around nerve fibers, and microglia are the brain's immune cells, always on the prowl for pathogens. Star-shaped astrocytes play a variety of roles, including maintaining the blood-brain barrier and supporting neurons. What They Learned 'Compared to chimpanzee brains, the human brain showed significant signs of accelerated regulatory evolution across all of the six major cell types in the brain,' said Yi, explaining that certain genes in human brain cells have evolved to produce more of certain proteins at a faster rate than in other primates. 'It's much more extensive than previously believed,' she said. Of the 25,000 genes involved in their analysis, Yi and colleagues were able to identify differences in the expression of about 5%-10% of the genes. When they considered cell subtypes, differences in expression leapt to 12%-15%. While the researchers expected to see more regulation than what was seen in previous studies, as well as some kind of cell-type specificity, Yi said, 'We didn't expect as much cell-type specificity as we saw.' 'What was really interesting to me was that when you compared cell types, genes that are differentially expressed in microglia are very different than genes that are differentially expressed in neurons,' said Yi. The findings support the belief held among many other researchers that there is 'a tremendous amount of diversity' among even the same types of brain cells in one part of the brain compared with another, Yi said. 'You may have the same cell type [such as a neuron], but it looks a little bit different in terms of transcript profiles depending on where it is located in the brain. I think that we cannot look at the brain from just a molecular perspective. We've got to really appreciate that the brain is an amalgam of many different cell types doing their own things while also working together to do these very complex functions that our brains are capable of,' said Yi. The authors pointed out study limitations, including the fact that data from nonhuman primates came from individuals living in captive facilities, which could affect their transcriptional profiles. Another Perspective In André Sousa's lab at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the assistant professor of neuroscience and his colleagues study human brain development and evolution. 'We try to understand the mutations that have accumulated in human DNA after our split from our closest lineage — chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas — that can alter gene expression,' he said. Sousa, who was not involved in the PNAS study, said the new research adds another piece to the puzzle. 'I don't think it's an 'aha moment' in the sense that several studies before this had shown this abundance of genes that are more expressed in the human brain. But most of those studies were done at the bulk tissue level. The brain is very heterogeneous, and in bulk tissue studies, you can be diluting lots of signals,' he said. Because the new study analyzed single cells, he said, 'they found way more differentially expressed genes than previous studies. And we need to be a little bit careful because it could be a bias from the methodology because when you are analyzing single cells, you increase your statistical power.' Sousa said the results of the study left him pondering the fact that 'in general, more genes are more expressed both in chimpanzees and humans than genes that are lower expressed.' And that's interesting. 'I've been thinking about it quite a lot. Why do we see more genes going up than down in all of these species? We still don't know very much about what it means. It's hard to understand what's happening because it's very complex. It can have a lot of justifications, both molecularly, what's happening in the DNA, but also evolutionarily, what are the constraints that allow a gene to be more or less expressed?' he said. Sousa said he also found it interesting that the researchers subdivided certain cell types into subgroups. 'Even within subtypes, they saw accelerated evolution in terms of more upregulated genes in humans and chimpanzees than downregulated ones, and what the interesting thing they see is that the genes that are differentially expressed in each cell tend to be different. So they speculate that that probably reflects functional specialization of these cells in these species. It's a potential explanation. But it's impossible to know for sure from this data set and will require more research,' said Sousa. The authors hope to continue studying differential gene expression at the cellular level in both human and primate brains, especially the brain cell subtypes. But Yi said as scientists continue to piece together clues to what makes today's human brain so uniquely human, all animal brain evolution is fascinating. 'There are other species with awesome brains that are doing all these special things, too,' she said.
