A redress scheme for school abuse survivors could become a ‘barrister-fattening exercise'
raised concerns about the potentially enormous cost
to the State of a redress scheme for victims of
sexual abuse in schools
have performed an important service. Our politicians and wider civil society need to think about these concerns very carefully.
The bottom line is whether today's children, and those yet unborn, should be penalised for the sins of their grandparents, and even great grandparents – because that is what a redress scheme for past wrongs potentially costing tens of billions of euro will amount to.
At a time when the Government is struggling to find a way to provide for the needs of the current population, the idea of devising a redress scheme on a 'far greater scale' than any other scheme in the history of the State, as the civil servants termed it, is something that needs to be thought through rigorously.
The group of top civil servants based across the Departments of the Taoiseach, Public Expenditure and Finance, Education, Children and Justice have had the experience of previous public inquiries and redress schemes costing far more than was envisaged when they were established.
READ MORE
Successive governments have responded to pressure from the opposition and the media to get to the bottom of a variety of scandals and abuses by establishing judicial inquiries of various kinds, as well as redress schemes, without giving any great thought to their eventual cost.
That cost has been borne by the exchequer, which is too often regarded in this country as some kind of bottomless money pit, rather than the fund that provides for the everyday services that keep the country's health, education and welfare services going.
Of course some of the redress schemes in the past have provided well-deserved compensation to the victims of State neglect or abuse, but a large proportion of the costs of inquiries has gone into the pockets of the lawyers, and they have lasted far longer than anybody ever anticipated when they were set up.
Then there is the question of whether the various judicial inquiries since the Beef Tribunal in the 1990s have actually achieved anything much for the people of the country, despite their cost. One clear achievement has been to dish out vast sums in legal fees in what was memorably described by Pat Rabbitte as 'a barrister-fattening exercise'.
The commission of inquiry into the sale of a company called Siteserv to businessman Denis O'Brien, which involved a State agency, is a case in point. The controversy kicked off when Social Democrat TD Catherine Murphy claimed in the Dáil in 2015 that insider trading took place before the company was sold.
A judicial inquiry under Mr Justice Brian Cregan was established by the government in 2016, but Murphy then refused to give evidence before it. Immediately hamstrung by her decision to opt out, it reported seven years later, with the final cost estimated at somewhere in excess of €70 million. And what did the tribunal find? Simply that nothing untoward had taken place during the sale process.
The scandal of abuse in schools is a very different proposition, but the basic fact is that the inquiry already established, never mind the potential redress scheme, will cost a considerable amount in legal fees and will take years, possibly even decades, to come to a conclusion.
The commission of inquiry into abuse in schools under Mr Justice Michael MacGrath has been given five years to report but few people in the legal world believe it will have finished its task in that time. A time frame of 10 years is probably more realistic. The decision on whether to proceed with a redress scheme will be taken after the commission has started its work.
[
The Irish Times view on the inquiry into the handling of child abuse in schools: a mammoth task
Opens in new window
]
The question raised by the civil servants needs to be answered before that happens. Is the State liable for the abuse that took place in schools? Will the religious orders who were responsible for the abuse be held liable? Can the victims sue the orders directly? A legal mechanism must be found to force them to pay, rather than making it the responsibility of the taxpayer.
Analysis by the Department of Public Expenditure warned the Government against 'the significant risks' of a 'rushed' redress scheme, 'including the assumption of risk by the State when liability should more appropriately be borne by third parties'. The report said that recent case law on the liability for the actions of school employees found that 'the State does not have such liability'.
At the heart of the reservations held by the senior civil servants about an open-ended redress scheme is the impact it is likely to have on the budgets for present-day needs. The priority must be for the State to deploy all possible resources to ensure the present generation of children are properly looked after.
A range of services for children are underfunded, with the Departments of Health, Education and Children having to fight tooth and nail for scarce resources. Are they to suffer even more pressure on their basic services to fund payment for the sins of the past?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
EU's von der Leyen: 15% the 'best we could get'
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen defended the trade deal clinched with United States on Sunday as "the best we could get." A 15% baseline tariff will now apply to all EU exports to the US, with the union agreeing to buy up $750bn worth of US energy and to invest $600bn into the US economy in the years ahead. The deal prevents a massive trade war between the US and the EU. Asked if she considered 15% a good deal for European carmakers, von der Leyen told reporters: "15% is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get." The EU committed to purchasing $750 billion worth US Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel over three years. "We still have too much Russian LNG that is coming through the back door," she said. The European Commission has proposed phasing out all Russian gas imports by January 2028. "Today's deal creates certainty in uncertain times, delivers stability and predictability," von der Leyen told reporters before leaving Scotland. Government sources, while welcoming the deal, were cautious and said they would need to see the finer details of the agreement. One senior source said 'nobody was jumping with joy' over the deal due to baseline tariffs, but that it did provide certainty to businesses. Read More Trade war averted as Government cautiously welcomes EU-US deal
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Wicklow Gaelscoil faces loss of teacher because it is ‘only one pupil short of the threshold'
Sinn Féin TD for Wicklow, John Brady, has called on the government to intervene to reduce the pupil-teacher ratio in Gaelscoileanna and to prevent the loss of a teacher from Gaelscoil Uí Chéadaigh, in Bray, this September. 'Following the crash in 2011, the government made the damaging decision to increase the pupil-teacher ratio in Gaelscoileanna, under the guise of aligning them with English-medium schools,' Deputy Brady said. 'This policy shift has had long-term consequences, and now we see those consequences play out locally in Gaelscoil Uí Chéadaigh, which is being forced to lose a teacher because they are only one pupil short of the threshold. It is disgraceful and deeply unfair,' he said. Deputy Brady said he has repeatedly raised the issue with the Education Minister Helen McEntee, but the Department has refused to consider exceptional circumstances, despite the significant impact this decision will now have on the school community, something he described as 'completely unacceptable'. 'I have been in contact with the Minister for Education, but despite the very clear case put forward by the school and community, there is a total unwillingness to show any flexibility. The result is that the children are being punished, staff are being stretched, and the quality of the education is being compromised', he said. The Wicklow TD also highlighted the 'hypocrisy at the heart of government claims' to support the Irish language and expand opportunities for Irish-medium education, while 'failing to back that rhetoric with real investment or meaningful policy change'. 'The Programme for Government set a target of 19:1 pupil teacher ratio for primary schools. But the reality in classrooms, particularly in many Gaelscoileanna, is worlds apart. Schools are overcrowded, under-resourced and under constant pressure. The decision to strip Gaelscoil Uí Chéadaigh of a teacher shows just how little regard this Government has for Irish-medium schools and for the children who attend them,' he said. He also criticised what he described as 'the ongoing failure of successive Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael governments' to tackle staffing issues in Gaelcholaistí, pointing to Coláiste Ráithín, in Bray, as an example of a school facing persistent difficulties. 'Year after year, Coláiste Ráithín is left scrambling to fill teaching posts due to staff shortages beyond their control. It is a repeated cycle that the Government refuses to fix. They 'talk the talk' regarding the Irish language, but when it comes to real support for the schools delivering Irish-language education, they vanish. It is a fantastic school, and they should not have this constant worry,' he said. He said that unless the Government reinstates the previous, lower pupil-teacher ratio for Gaelscoileanna and immediately intervenes to prevent the loss of staff at Gaelscoil Uí Chéadaigh, they will continue to fail children, parents and communities who recognise the value of Irish-medium education. 'If the government is serious about investing in children's education, about supporting the Irish language, and about giving real choice to families as to where they send their children to school, they must act now,' he concluded.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors
A proposal for a law that would allow religious organisations to be held liable for abuse by their members will not be considered by the Government until 2027 at the earliest. Many religious organisations are unincorporated bodies. This means they as entities cannot be sued and their assets may be beyond the reach of the courts if and when one of their members are found liable for damages against child sex abuse survivors. Individual members of such religious bodies can face legal action, but case law shows it can be difficult to legally pursue the organisation itself for redress. There are concerns about how the State will recoup redress funds from religious bodies for a scheme being considered for survivors of sexual abuse in schools. READ MORE If set up, it would likely be the largest and most expensive redress scheme in the history of the State. Since 2022, the Law Reform Commission (LRC) has been considering whether the Government should legislate to give unincorporated associations, such as voluntary religious orders, their own legal personality or set out another way by which they may be held liable. Minister for Education Helen McEntee has said: 'The Government will review any recommendations made by the commission in its final report, with a view to introducing any necessary legislative or administrative changes in due course.' However, a spokesman for the LRC said its report on changing the legal status of bodies such as religious organisations will not be ready before the end of next year. 'The report about the liability of unincorporated associations is being scoped at present. We do not yet have a completion date but we do not expect it to be published before the end of 2026,' the spokesman said. Labour Party leader Ivana Bacik has expressed concern about whether a delay in progressing such a law would stymie the ability of the Government to access religious organisations' assets, or the lay-run trusts that their assets may have been transferred to. Ms Bacik said her party is trying to bring forward a Bill that would allow civil proceedings to be taken against unincorporated bodies like religious orders. It would allow any damages awarded in such cases to be recovered from a religious organisation or from 'associated' trusts. The same law, if passed, would also add a one-year extension to the normal limitation period provided for in the statutes of limitations. The Labour Party leader said this was to allow any proceedings that the Bill would cover to be brought within 12 months of it being enacted. She recently personally handed a copy of the Bill to the Attorney General. Given the upcoming Commission of Investigation into historic abuse in schools, the Government cannot afford to 'sit back and wait' for the LRC report to finish, she said.
