PetVivo Holdings Inc. to Trade on OTCQX Best Market
PetVivo Holdings Inc. begins trading today on OTCQX under the symbol 'PETV.' U.S. investors can find current financial disclosure and Real-Time Level 2 quotes for the company on www.otcmarkets.com .
The OTCQX Market is designed for established, investor-focused U.S. and international companies. The OTCQX Market has 625 securities as of today, while the broader OTC Markets Group includes approximately 12,000 securities. To qualify for OTCQX, companies must meet high financial standards, follow best practice corporate governance, and demonstrate compliance with applicable securities laws. Graduating to the OTCQX Market marks an important milestone for companies, enabling them to demonstrate their qualifications and build visibility among U.S. investors.
PetVivo's signature product, SPRYNG with OsteoCushion Technology, is an intra-articular injectable veterinary medical device consisting of sterilized, extra-cellular matrix microparticles. The microparticles of Spryng have been found to adsorb onto the joint synovial lining of animals and subsequently integrate with the animal's subsynovial tissue. Such action promotes the restoration of proper joint mechanics, thereby aiding in the management of noninfectious sources of joint pain such as joint instability, degenerative joint disease and osteoarthritis.
PetVivo's other innovative product, PrecisePRP, is a first-in-class off-the-shelf platelet-rich plasma (PRP) product designed for use by veterinarians. PrecisePRP is a leucoreduced, allogeneic, pooled, freeze-dried PRP intended to provide a species-specific source of concentrated platelets in plasma for intra-articular administration in dogs and horses. Unlike any PRP mechanical kits currently on the market, PrecisePRP™ does not require a blood draw or centrifugation making it a truly off-the-shelf product that is easy and convenient. Perhaps more important is the uniformity and consistency that PrecisePRP® guarantees. Each vial of PrecisePRP® contains a consistent dose of 4 billion platelets per vial at a concentration of 500,000 platelets per microliter and is leucoreduced with less than 1500 white blood cells per microliter.
'Qualifying to trade on the OTCQX Best Market is a significant milestone for our Company,' said John Lai, Chief Executive Officer of PetVivo Holdings, Inc. 'This upgrade reflects our continued commitment to transparency, strong corporate governance, and delivering long-term value to our shareholders. Trading on OTCQX will enhance our visibility within the investment community and provide greater liquidity and accessibility for investors as we continue to execute on our strategic growth initiatives.'
For more information about PetVivo Holdings, Inc. please contact [email protected] or visit https://petvivo.com/ , https://www.petvivoanimalhealth.com/ and https://www.sprynghealth.com .
About PetVivo Holdings, Inc.
PetVivo Holdings Inc. (OTCQX: PETV; OTCID: PETVW) is an emerging biomedical device company currently focused on the manufacturing, commercialization and licensing of innovative medical devices and therapeutics for equine and companion animals. The Company's strategy is to leverage human therapies for the treatment of equine and companion animals in a capital and time efficient way. A key component of this strategy is the accelerated timeline to revenues for veterinary medical devices, which enter the market much earlier than more stringently regulated pharmaceuticals and biologics.
PetVivo has a robust pipeline of products for the treatment of animals and people. A portfolio of twelve patents and six trade secrets protects the Company's biomaterials, products, production processes and methods of use. The Company's lead products SPRYNG™ with OsteoCushion™ technology, a veterinarian-administered, intra-articular injection for the management of lameness and other joint related afflictions, including osteoarthritis, in cats, dogs and horses, and PrecisePRP, a first-in-class, off-the-shelf, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) product designed for use by veterinarians, are currently available for commercial sale.
CONTACT:
John Lai, CEO PetVivo Holdings, Inc.
Email: [email protected]
(952) 405-6216
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Brilliant Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Right Now
Key Points Some of the legacy tech giants are participating in quantum computing. That is one great way to bridge the gap between AI and quantum technology. But quantum computing pure plays could provide massive upside if they work out. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › Quantum computing isn't an easy area to invest in right now. Most companies agree that 2030 will be a turning point for the industry and commercially viable quantum computers will be available then. That's still a ways off, and investors need to be careful not to get in too early; otherwise, there could be a significant opportunity cost that would be incurred by investing in quantum computing instead of other possible areas. Still, I think there could be a huge opportunity if you invest in the right quantum computing stocks right now. I've got five stocks that can be purchased in a group that ensures investors get exposure to quantum computing as well as current market trends, and I think it's highly likely that this cohort outperforms the market over the next few years. Legacy tech players Quantum computing isn't an industry reserved for start-ups; some of the biggest names in tech are also investing in this technology. Two of the biggest are Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT). Both of these companies are developing their own quantum computing chip in-house, which could result in massive profits down the road if each develops a viable quantum computing solution. Both companies will use quantum computing for themselves, but will also offer it to clients through their respective cloud computing services. Right now, the big growth drivers for cloud computing are the migration of traditional workloads and artificial intelligence, but quantum computing could provide another growth driver. Microsoft's CEO stated that he believes quantum computing will be the next accelerator in the cloud, which could mean further growth for both Alphabet and Microsoft. Another legacy tech player that will benefit is Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). While Nvidia isn't directly developing quantum processing units, it's helping quantum computing players take a hybrid computing approach between traditional and quantum computing methods. It's also developing a quantum-focused version of its CUDA software, which helped it establish dominance in the traditional computing landscape. All three of these companies are excelling in the AI-driven market, but also have long-term investments ongoing in the quantum world. By investing in these three today, investors can ensure they have exposure to both current and emerging trends. But there are also a few pure plays that look intriguing. Quantum computing pure plays I also like adding picks like IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) into this basket, because it gives investors the massive upside of a pure-play quantum computing company. These two aren't very big companies, but if they make quantum computing viable, they could turn into huge winners for investors. While some may argue these two are due to be outspent and outclassed by competitors like Alphabet and Microsoft, they are actually taking a different approach to quantum computing entirely. Most quantum computing competitors like Alphabet and Microsoft are using a superconducting approach for their chips. However, IonQ is using a trapped ion technique, and D-Wave is using a quantum annealing approach. All three of these approaches have their use cases, but it will be some time before investors know which is the best. By having exposure to all three, investors have the best chance to make a profit in this emerging industry. Although we're still a few years out from quantum computing relevance, I think owning a basket of legacy and emerging players is a smart way to ensure investors make a great profit. Do the experts think IonQ is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did IonQ make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,071% vs. just 185% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 886.18%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 5 Brilliant Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Amazon is selling a 'must-buy' $1,400 laptop computer for just $299, and buyers love it for 'everyday use and work'
TheStreet aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission. Amazon is selling a 'must-buy' $1,400 laptop computer for just $299, and buyers love it for 'everyday use and work' originally appeared on TheStreet. The most convenient way to get work done on the go is with a laptop. It offers all the power of a desktop, but in a portable package. Whether you want to do complicated work, school tasks on a trip, or stream your favorite show at home, a good laptop is your best choice. Right now, Amazon is selling a powerful notebook computer for an almost unheard-of price, but there's no telling how long this deal will last. The Blackview Acebook 6 Laptop Computer is just $299 at the moment, which is an amazing 79% off the regular price of $1,400. All you have to do is clip the 12% coupon for the full discount before adding it to your cart. If you're in the market for a new laptop, don't hesitate. This just may be the perfect computer for you. Blackview Acebook 6 Laptop Computer, $299 (was $1,400) at Amazon With an Intel N150 Quad-Core processor, this machine can handle just about anything you put in its path. It includes 16GB of DDR4 RAM for easy multitasking and 256GB of SSD, which helps with rapid boot times and quick file transfers. As if all this weren't enough, it also comes with Windows 11 pre-installed. While the "guts" of the computer are impressive, what's on the outside is praiseworthy as well. The slim and sleek silhouette of this machine makes it attractive, but also easy to stow and transport. At just 19.5 millimeters thick, it slides easily into a laptop sleeve or backpack. The 15.6-inch full HD display is crisp and bright, offering a low-blue-light way to keep your eye on the ball for hours at a customers were thrilled with this powerful little laptop. One said, "I am loving it," before adding, "It has amazing battery life, and has sharp color…Must-buy, great use for office and engineering." Another described it as a "great laptop for everyday use and work," and shared, "The display is sharp and bright enough for indoor use with natural colors, and the blue light filter really helps reduce eye strain during longer sessions…a well-rounded laptop that delivers exactly what you need for work, studying, or everyday use." If you want to get a laptop that can assist in almost every aspect of your daily life, then consider the Blackview Acebook 6 Laptop Computer. If you buy now, you can have it for just $299, and that's a deal that just works. Amazon is selling a 'must-buy' $1,400 laptop computer for just $299, and buyers love it for 'everyday use and work' first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 1, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 1, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's unprecedented, potentially unconstitutional deal with Nvidia and AMD, explained: Alexander Hamilton would approve
'We negotiated a little deal,' President Donald Trump told reporters on August 11, about the developing situation with leading chip makers Nvidia and AMD continuing to do business in China. He explained that he originally wanted a 20% cut of Nvidia's sales in exchange for the company obtaining export licenses to sell H20 chip to China, but he was persuaded to settle at 15%. The H20 chip is 'obsolete,' Trump added … 'he's selling a essentially old chip.' The chips do appear to be quite significant to China, considering that the Cyberspace Administration of China held discussions with Nvidia over security concerns that the H20 chips may be tracked and turned off remotely, according to a disclosure on its website. The deal, which lifted an export ban on Nvidia's H20 AI chips and AMD's MI308, and followed heated negotiations, was widely described as unusual and also still theoretical at this point, with the legal details still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce. Legal experts have questioned whether the eventual deal would constitute an unconstitutional export tax, as the U.S. Constitution prohibits duties on exports. This has come to be known as the 'export clause' of the constitution. Indeed, it's hard to find much precedent for it anywhere in the history of the U.S. government's dealings with the corporate sector. Erik Jensen, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University who has studied the history of the export clause, told Fortune he was not aware of anything like this in history. In the 1990s, he added, the Supreme Court struck down two attempted taxes on export clause grounds (cases known as IBM and U.S. Shoe). Jensen said tax practitioners were surprised that the court took up the cases: 'if only because most pay no attention to constitutional limitations, and the Court hadn't heard any export clause cases in about 70 years.' The takeaway was clear, Jensen said: 'The export clause matters.' Columbia University professor Eric Talley agreed with Jensen, telling Fortune that while the federal government has previously applied subsidies to exports, he's not aware of other historical cases imposing taxes on selected exporters. Talley also cited the export clause as the usual grounds for finding such arrangements unconstitutional. Rather than downplaying the uniqueness of the arrangement, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been leaning into it. In a Bloomberg television interview, he said: 'I think you know, right now, this is unique. But now that we have the model and the beta test, why not expand it? I think we could see it in other industries over time.' Bessent and the White House insist there are 'no national security concerns,' since only less-advanced chips are being sold to China. Instead, officials have touted the deal as a creative solution to balance trade, technology, and national policy. How rare is this? The arrangement has drawn sharp reaction from business leaders, legal experts, and trade analysts. Julia Powles, director of UCLA's Institute for Technology, Law & Policy, told the Los Angeles Times: 'It ties the fate of this chip manufacturer in a very particular way to this administration, which is quite rare.' Experts warned that if replicated, this template could pressure other firms—not just tech giants—into similar arrangements with the government. Already, several unprecedented arrangements have been struck between the Trump administration and the corporate sector, ranging from the 'golden share' in U.S. Steel negotiated as part of its takeover by Japan's Nippon Steel to the federal government reportedly discussing buying a stake in chipmaker Intel. Nvidia and AMD have declined to comment on specifics. When contacted by Fortune for comment, Nvidia reiterated its statement that it follows rules the U.S. government sets for its participation in worldwide markets. 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide. America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.' The White House declined to comment about the potential deal. AMD did not respond to a request for comment. While Washington has often intervened in business—especially in times of crisis—the mechanism and magnitude of the Nvidia/AMD deal are virtually unprecedented in recent history. The federal government appears to have never previously claimed a percentage of corporate revenue from export sales as a precondition for market access. Instead, previous actions took the form of temporary nationalization, regulatory control, subsidies, or bailouts—often during war or economic emergency. Examples of this include the seizure of coal mines (1946) and steel mills (1952) during labor strikes, as well as the 2008 financial crisis bailouts, where the government took equity stakes in large corporations including two of Detroit's Big three and most of Wall Street's key banks. During World War I, the War Industries Board regulated prices, production, and business conduct for the war effort. Congress has previously created export incentives and tax-deferral strategies (such as the Domestic International Sales Corporation and Foreign Sales Corporation Acts), but these measures incentivized sales rather than directly diverting a fixed share of export revenue to the government. Legal scholars stress that such arrangements were subjected to global trade rules and later modified after international complaints. Global lack of precedent The U.S. prohibition on export taxes dates back to the birth of the nation. Case Western's Jensen has written that some delegates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, such as New York's Alexander Hamilton, were in favor of the government being able to tax revenue sources such as imports and exports, but the 'staple states' in the southern U.S. were fiercely opposed, given their agricultural bent, especially the importance of cotton at that point. Still, many other countries currently have export taxes on the books, though they are generally imposed across all exporters, rather than as one-off arrangements that remove barriers to a specific market. And many of the nations with export taxes are developing countries who tax agricultural or resource commodities. In several cases (Uganda, Malaya, Sudan, Nigeria, Haiti, Thailand), export taxes made up 10% to 40% of total government tax revenue in the 1960s and 1970s, according to an IMF staff paper. Globally, most countries tax profits generated within their borders ('source-based corporate taxes'), but rarely as a direct percentage of export sales as a market access precondition. The standard model is taxation of locally earned profits, regardless of export destination; licensing fees and tariffs may be applied, but not usually as a fixed percent of export revenue as a pre-negotiated entry fee. Although the Nvidia/AMD deal doesn't take the usual form of a tax, Case Western's Jensen added. 'I don't see what else it could be characterized as.' It's clearly not a 'user fee,' which he said is the usual triable issue of law in export clause cases. For instance, if goods or services are being provided by the government in exchange for the charge, such as docking fees at a governmentally operated port, then that charge isn't a tax or duty and the Export Clause is irrelevant. 'I just don't see how the charges that will be levied in the chip cases could possibly be characterized in that way.' Players have been known to 'game' the different legal treatments of subsidies and taxes, Columbia's Talley added. He cited the example of a government imposing a uniform, across-the-board tax on all producers, but then providing a subsidy to sellers who sell to domestic markets. 'The net effect would be the same as a tax on exports, but indirectly.' He was unaware of this happening in the U.S. but cited several international examples including Argentina, India, and even the EU. One famous example of a canny international tax strategy was Apple's domicile in Ireland, along with so many other multinationals keeping their international profits offshore in affiliates in order to avoid paying U.S. tax, which at the time applied to all worldwide income upon repatriation. Talley said much of this went away after the 2018 tax reforms, which moved the U.S. away from a worldwide corporate tax, with some exceptions. The protection racket comparison If Trump's chip export tax is an anomaly in the annals of U.S. international trade, the deal structure has some parallels in another corner of the business world: organized crime, where 'protection rackets' have a long history. Businesses bound by such deals must pay a cut of their revenues to a criminal organization (or parallel government), effectively as the cost for being allowed to operate or to avoid harm. The China chip export tax and the protection rackets extract revenue as a condition for market access, use the threat of exclusion or punishment for non-payment, and both may be justified as 'protection' or 'guaranteed access,' but are not freely negotiated by the business. 'It certainly has the smell of a governmental shakedown in certain respects,' Columbia's Talley told Fortune, considering that the 'underlying threat was an outright export ban, which makes a 15% surcharge seem palatable by comparison.' Talley noted some nuances, such as the generally established broad statutory and constitutional support for national-security-based export bans on various goods and services sold to enumerated countries, which have been imposed with legal authority on China, North Korea, Iraq, Russia, Cuba, and others. 'From an economic perspective, a ban on an exported good is tantamount to a tax of 'infinity percent' on the good,' Talley said, meaning it effectively shuts down the export market for that good. 'Viewed in that light, a 15% levy is less (and not more) extreme than a ban.' Still, there's the matter, similar to Trump's tariff regime, of making a legal challenge to an ostensibly blatantly illegal policy actually hold up in court. 'A serious question with the chips tax,' Case Western's Jensen told Fortune, 'is who, if anyone, would have standing to challenge the tax?' In other words, it may be unconstitutional, but who's actually going to compel the federal government to obey the constitution? This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
