logo
Shoppers warned that popular ‘fast' payment method could leave them unprotected

Shoppers warned that popular ‘fast' payment method could leave them unprotected

Independent2 days ago

Consumers are being encouraged to understand their payment protections amid the growing popularity of 'pay by bank' options.
The method allows for direct, secure transfers from a bank account without needing card details or recipient information. However, Which? has highlighted a potential 'protection gap' if purchases go wrong.
While pay by bank is increasingly used for credit card payments, bill settlements, and retail purchases, Which? warns it lacks the Section 75 and chargeback protections associated with other payment methods.
Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act can hold credit card companies liable for faulty or unfulfilled purchases, potentially allowing shoppers to claim refunds from their provider if the retailer fails to reimburse them.
People using a debit card or a credit card for purchases could also potentially get their money back via the voluntary chargeback scheme.
Which? said pay by bank is a 'potential game changer' for businesses as they can sidestep card transaction fees and also benefit from receiving customer funds immediately.
There is also appeal for consumers too as refunds can be processed instantly, and card details are not shared when making a transaction – eliminating the risk of them being stolen or compromised.
People do have general purchase rights under the Consumer Rights Act, meaning that goods must be fit for purpose, as described and of satisfactory quality.
But Which? said these protections are not always easy to enforce and in some cases may end up with people needing to go to a small claims court.
People may also face difficulties in the event of a business going bust, particularly if there is an issue with a future-dated purchase such as a flight, a festival, or a household big ticket purchase such as a kitchen or a sofa, the consumer group said.
Jenny Ross, Which? Money editor, said: 'Innovations like pay by bank present opportunities for businesses and consumers alike, but they're not without risk, particularly as they lack the rigorous purchase protections you get when paying by card.
'We're calling on the regulator to act to ensure consumers can use pay by bank with confidence, but in the meantime, we'd urge consumers to think carefully before using it to book events or make substantial purchases – for now, your good old-fashioned credit or debit card may be the best option.'
A spokesperson for banking and finance industry body UK Finance said: 'There are a range of options for making payments online which provides customers with choice as to how they wish to pay. Different payment methods do come with different levels of protection and it's worth being aware of these when shopping online, particularly when making higher value purchases.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU trade surplus with US grows in April despite tariffs
EU trade surplus with US grows in April despite tariffs

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

EU trade surplus with US grows in April despite tariffs

BRUSSELS, June 13 (Reuters) - The European Union's goods trade surplus with the United States expanded in April even after U.S. tariffs, data released on Friday showed, while the bloc's exports to China dropped for a ninth consecutive month. The EU's surplus in goods trade as a whole declined to 7.4 billion euros ($8.5 billion) from 12.7 billion euros in April 2024, data from EU statistics agency Eurostat showed. The EU goods surplus with the United States increased, as it has done every month since January 2024. Both exports to and imports from the United States increased for a fourth consecutive month in April, although the growth was lower than in previous months. U.S. President Donald Trump has announced wideranging tariffs on trade partners, and wants to reduce the U.S. goods trade deficit with the EU. In March, EU exports to the U.S. rose by 59.5%, implying U.S. importers were building stocks of EU and other goods ahead of tariff increases. European Union exporters faced 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium from March 11, on cars from April 3 and on car parts from May 3. Washington doubled the rate on metals to 50% on June 4. It also imposed so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on most EU goods on April 5, initially at 20%, but almost immediately cut to 10% until July 8. The bloc's surpluses with Britain, Switzerland and Mexico fell, while its deficits with China, Norway and South Korea widened in April. EU exports of machinery and vehicles to the rest of the world fell by 4.3%. There were also declines of its exports of raw materials and energy products, while food and drink and chemicals exports were higher than in April 2024. ($1 = 0.8681 euros)

How do add-ons work in football transfers?
How do add-ons work in football transfers?

BBC News

time21 minutes ago

  • BBC News

How do add-ons work in football transfers?

Liverpool have agreed a deal worth up to £116m for Germany forward Florian Wirtz - but it is still not entirely clear when the transfer would become a British basic fee is £100m, which puts it level with Jack Grealish's transfer from Aston Villa to Manchester City in 2021, Declan Rice's switch from West Ham to Arsenal in 2023, and Moises Caicedo's move to Chelsea from Brighton in the same the latter two of those deals had 'add-ons' attached to them - and Wirtz's transfer includes add-ons of £ payments are often complex and usually kept secret. What kind of add-ons exist? Clubs sometimes say add-ons are 'easily achievable' or 'difficult'.Easier-to-achieve add-ons can include things like making a basic number of appearances, or scoring a certain amount of goals. Add-ons can also be attached to a team's success rather than the individual player's - a club may agree to an add-on requiring an extra payment if they qualify for Europe, for can be more ambitious - tied to extreme levels of individual or collective success, like winning the Champions League or the Ballon d' example of the difficulty add-ons can present when discussing valuations would be the claims made in the Portuguese media in 2022 that the first additional payment in Darwin Nunez's £64m-plus-add-ons move from Benfica to Liverpool was triggered by the Uruguayan making just 10 April, Liverpool boss Arne Slot rejected speculation he had not started Nunez in any game since 8 March because it would trigger an additional Liverpool paid more for Nunez, or club captain Virgil van Dijk - for whom they paid a flat fee of £75m to Southampton in 2017 - cannot be determined without knowing exactly what add-ons were included in the Nunez deal, then figuring out which conditions he has and has not met. How expensive can add-ons become? It is common practice these days for transfer fees to have performance-based add-ons. The theory is the selling club gains more if the player goes on to be extremely successful, while the buying club is to some extent protected financially if the transfer doesn't work some cases, the total value of add-ons is significant - Real Madrid could end up paying an extra £30m to Borussia Dortmund for Jude Bellingham depending on how successful he is over the course of his career in the Spanish capital, for others, like the potential £1.7m worth of add-ons Brighton's £29.78m signing of Greece Under-21 forward Charalampos Kostoulas earlier this week included, are less significant. How do add-ons impact clubs' financial accounts? These extra amounts certainly add up. Let's take Manchester United as an their third-quarter financial results for 2024-25 - announced on 6 June - deep down on page 45 of 47, United confirmed that "under the terms of certain contracts with other football clubs and agents in respect of player transfers, additional amounts, in excess of the amounts included in the cost of registrations, would be payable if certain substantive performance conditions are met".United confirmed that as of 31 March 2025, the potential liability was £138.82m. Of that, £112.25m was related to player appearances, team success or new contracts, while £3.19m was around international appearances and £22.03m was related to 'awards', with the rest classed as 'other'.That entry goes some way to explaining what add-ons are and how they can tot he signed for United, the club let it be known that one of the add-ons attached to Anthony Martial's £36m move from Monaco was connected to the France striker winning the Ballon d'Or. This was never were also very quick to reject speculation Mason Mount had triggered one of the add-ons included in his transfer from Chelsea by playing for the club in a European final, the Europa League final defeat by Tottenham in Martial Ballon d'Or one was clearly far more difficult, although United argued at the time that if the forward reached that level of success, they would happily pay the clause on the basis they would have benefited enormously through results on the article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you team explores everything you need to know and calls upon a network of contacts including our experts and answer your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and go behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting coverage spans the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered... Why Alexander-Arnold is not allowed to wear number 66 for Real MadridWhen does the summer transfer window reopen?How is the Ballon d'Or winner decided?Summer transfer window - your questions answeredWhen are the 2025-26 Premier League fixtures released?

EU to force companies to share details of Russian gas deals, document shows
EU to force companies to share details of Russian gas deals, document shows

Reuters

time21 minutes ago

  • Reuters

EU to force companies to share details of Russian gas deals, document shows

BRUSSELS, June 13 (Reuters) - European Union companies will be required to disclose details of their Russian gas deals to the EU, under upcoming European Commission proposals to ban Russian gas imports by the end of 2027, an internal Commission document, seen by Reuters, showed. The Commission is preparing to propose legal measures to completely halt the EU's Russian gas imports by the end of 2027, and ban new Russian gas deals by the end of this year. The proposals are due to be published on June 17. An internal European Commission analysis of its upcoming proposals, seen by Reuters, said they will require companies to disclose information including the duration, annual contracted volumes, destination clause and date of conclusion of their Russian gas contracts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store