Government-funded grocery store flounders in Midwest city as similar proposal gains steam in NYC
The local government in Kansas City sought to address a so-called "food desert" — a term used to describe areas without access to full-service grocery stores that sell fresh produce, meat and other healthier options along with the standard supermarket fare.
The store, known as KC Sun Fresh, lost nearly $900,000 over the last year and received tens of millions of dollars dating back to 2018. The store's nonprofit operator's pre-pandemic success gave way to a downturn in the years since the pandemic, as customer traffic dropped and the store's operations suffered.
FOX Business Network's Kelly Saberi visited the store and noted that large portions of the store's shelves were bare or only partially stocked — including meat, produce and dry goods.
Mamdani's Public Grocery Stores May Have Devastating Effects On City's Food Supply
One customer told Saberi that the quality of products and the price they sell for in comparison to other local options is better, though another took issue with the lack of inventory for shoppers and said a change of ownership would be beneficial.
Read On The Fox Business App
"There's no meat. There's no vegetables. There's no nothing. Are you going to take care of the community that's surrounded around you? If not, sell the store to someone that can be more responsible," the patron told Saberi.
Grocery Ceo Warns Nyc Could Become 'Like Havana Under Castro' If Progressive Candidate Wins
Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas acknowledged the crime issues impacting the area around the store, though he noted another grocery store nearby is faring well, so the city needs to find a way to resolve the operational issues.
"While I hear and understand the crime issues and concerns, there's a grocery store right down the street — largely in the same kind of area, some of the same criminal numbers and statistics — that still is doing pretty darn well," Lucas said. "So we do want to make sure that we can get those operations right and that's the work that we're collaboratively trying to do."
Grocery stores run on relatively thin profit margins that fall into the range of 1% to 3%, which can make it very difficult to operate in a financially sustainable manner.
Grocery Chain Shutters Multiple Locations As Industry Struggles Continue To Mount
Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for the New York City mayoral race who has advocated for socialist policies, included a plan in his campaign platform to create city-owned grocery stores in each of the city's five boroughs.
"They will buy and sell at wholesale prices, centralize warehousing and distribution, and partner with local neighborhoods in products and sourcing," his platform states.
Mamdani's plan calls for halting city subsidies to private grocery stores to redirect those funds to a real "public option."
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson proposed a city-owned grocery store in 2023 after the city experienced the closure of a Walmart and Whole Foods.
However, Johnson's administration has since backed off the plan for a city-owned grocery store and is exploring the creation of a city-owned farmer's market — potentially with multiple locations — that would be more focused on providing vendors with a location to sell products instead of a full-fledged store.Original article source: Government-funded grocery store flounders in Midwest city as similar proposal gains steam in NYC
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NYC Rents Have Skyrocketed: Bronx Rent Up 61% Since 2019, while its Rent-to-Income Ratio Reaches 81.6%
New report reveals how even the city's "affordable" boroughs are pushing renters to the brink, yet closing the affordability gap could take decades AUSTIN, Texas, July 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- A new analysis from paints a startling picture of New York City's rental market. The median asking rent in NYC accounted for 55% of a typical household income in the second quarter of 2025, almost 10% above the national median in the for-sale market, which sits at 44.5% and more than double the recent share for typical renters across the U.S. Across the boroughs, renters feel a similar, if not worse, strain. In the Bronx, the rent-to-income ratio sits at a staggering 81.6%, while in Brooklyn the figure is 60.6%. It's 56.9% in Manhattan, and 49.4% in Queens; this highlights the premium that many are willing to pay to live in the Big Apple and how many of the city's renters are being priced out of even historically lower-cost areas. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership "In the Bronx, rent now eats up about 82% of a typical household income, nearly triple the recommended standard of 30%. Even if rents were frozen today, it would still take two decades of steady income growth to restore affordability," said Danielle Hale, chief economist at "New Yorkers can't wait decades to meaningfully close this gap. Housing supply has already featured prominently in this year's mayoral race. These figures underscore why the city's mayoral candidates must have a credible, multi-faceted plan to tackle housing supply if they hope to be elected to lead the city in the fall." Rents by Borough Borough Median Asking Rent Rent Change YoY Rent Change – 6 years Manhattan $4,569 3.3 % 2.4 % Brooklyn $3,835 6.0 % 40.8 % Queens $3,349 2.7 % 40.2 % Bronx $3,132 1.0 % 61.4 % In the Bronx, rents increased a staggering 61.4% over the last six years, marking the largest jump of any borough. Renters there are looking at a median asking rent of $3,132, nearly $2,000 more than the max affordable rent under current income, which is $1,152. In Brooklyn, rent increased 40.8% in the last 6 years, and the median asking rent is $3,835 while the max affordable rent under current income is $1,892. The data underscores a reality that's influencing political momentum around housing, and a notable driver of Zohran Mamdani's upset victory in the Democratic NYC mayoral primary. With renters now making up a record 70% of households, New Yorkers are demanding urgent solutions as affordability deteriorates across all boroughs. Affordability by Borough Market Median Asking Rent Household Income Rent to Income Ratio Max. Affordable Rent Under Current Income Manhattan $4,569 $96,301 56.9 % $2,408 Brooklyn $3,835 $75,696 60.6 % $1,892 Queens $3,349 $81,411 49.4 % $2,035 Bronx $3,132 $46,074 81.6 % $1,152 New York City $3,491 $76,114 55.0 % $1,903 This deepening crisis means that without interventions aimed at significantly ramping up affordable housing supply, the city's affordability gap could linger for generations. Even holding rents flat at today's levels, it would still take 12-20 years of steady income growth for costs to drop to the widely accepted 30% rent-to-income standard. It's a challenge that echoes beyond city limits: according to the recent State Affordability Report Cards, New York State as a whole earned a "D" grade, placing it among the least affordable states nationwide and underscoring just how widespread and entrenched this crisis has become. MethodologyNew York City rental data as of 2025Q2 for all units advertised as for rent on Rental units include apartments as well as private rentals (condos, townhomes, single-family homes). We use rental sources that reliably report data each month within New York City and each of its boroughs. To calculate the median asking rent for each quarter, we first obtain the median asking rent for each month within that quarter and then take the average of the three months. Data for Staten Island is currently under reviewed. began releasing regular monthly reports for New York City in August 2024 and transitioned to quarterly rental trend reports in April 2025, with historical data available dating back to Q2 2019. About pioneered online real estate and has been at the forefront for over 25 years, connecting buyers, sellers, and renters with trusted insights, professional guidance and powerful tools to help them find their perfect home. Recognized as the No. 1 site trusted by real estate professionals, is a valued partner, delivering consumer connections and a robust suite of marketing tools to support business growth. is operated by News Corp [Nasdaq: NWS, NWSA] [ASX: NWS, NWSLV] subsidiary Move, Inc. Media Contact: Asees Singh, press@ View original content: SOURCE 登入存取你的投資組合
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Government shutdown talk is starting early ahead of a difficult funding fight in Congress this fall
WASHINGTON — It's become tradition. Congressional leaders from both major political parties blame each other for a potential government shutdown as the budget year draws to a close. But this year, the posturing is starting extraordinarily early. The finger-pointing with more than two months to go in the fiscal year indicates the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual as a Republican-controlled Congress seeks to make good on its policy priorities, often with no support from the other political party. Democratic leadership from both chambers and the two panels responsible for drafting spending bills met behind closed doors recently to discuss the strategy ahead. The leaders emerged demanding that Republicans work with them but were careful to avoid spelling out red lines if Republicans don't. 'We are for a bipartisan, bicameral bill. That's what always has been done,' said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. 'The onus is on the Republicans to help us make that happen.' On the Republican side, lawmakers describe the Democrats as itching for a shutdown. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Schumer had threatened a shutdown should Republicans pass a bill to roll back $9 billion in public broadcasting and foreign aid funds. Republicans subsequently passed those cuts. 'It was disturbing to see the Democratic leader implicitly threatening to shut down the government in his July 'Dear Colleague' letter, but I'm hopeful that he does not represent the views of Senate Democrats as a whole,' Thune said. The federal government is operating on a full-year continuing resolution that provided about $1.7 trillion in spending for defense and non-defense programs. The funding expires Sept. 30. President Donald Trump requested a comparable amount for the coming fiscal year, but the Republican proposed dramatically overhauling how that money is distributed to include more for defense and border security and significantly less for health, education, housing and foreign assistance. So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills. The Senate has yet to approve any, but those bills that have advanced out of the Senate Appropriations Committee are enjoying bipartisan support while the House bills are generally advancing out of committee on party line votes. This week, the Senate is expected to consider the appropriations bill to fund military construction projects and the Department of Veterans Affairs, generally one of the easier spending bills to pass. One or two others could get added to the package. Congress got off to a late start on the funding process. Republicans prioritized Trump's tax and spending cut bill. Most lawmakers agree Congress will need to pass a stop-gap measure before Sept. 30 to avoid a shutdown and allow lawmakers more time to work on the full-year spending measures. Democrats overwhelmingly opposed this year's funding bill that expires in two months. But in the end, Schumer and nine Democratic colleagues decided a government shutdown would be even worse. They voted to allow the bill to proceed and overcome a filibuster, giving Republicans the ability to pass it on their own on a final vote. Schumer took considerable heat from progressives for his strategy. House Democratic leadership issued a statement at the time saying 'House Democrats will not be complicit.' And members of his own caucus publicly expressed disagreement. 'If we pass this continuing resolution for the next half year, we will own what the president does,' said Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. 'I am not willing to take ownership of that.' Some liberal groups threatened to hold protests at various events Schumer was planning to promote a new book, and some of those events ended up being postponed due to security concerns. The Democratic frustrations have only grown stronger in the ensuing months. First, the Democrats watched the Trump administration slow-walk or block hundreds of billions of dollars from going out in part through the work of its Department of Government Efficiency. Then they watched as Republicans passed Trump's big tax and spending cut bill without any Democratic votes. Finally, they watched as Republicans this month canceled $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funds when much of it had been previously agreed to on a bipartisan basis. Meanwhile, Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russ Vought, declared that the appropriations process 'has to be less bipartisan.' Democrats complain that much of the work taking place in the House has been a waste of time, since those partisan bills have no chance of getting 60 votes in the 100-member Senate. 'At this point in time, why have appropriations if they can just unilaterally through rescissions whack it all away?' said Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill. 'I think what you're seeing is more frustration than I've ever witnessed.' Republicans control all the levers of power in Washington. That could make it harder to blame Democrats for a shutdown. But in the end, any bill will need some Democratic support to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. 'Our concern is that from their standpoint, they want to have a shutdown,' Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., said of Democrats. '… The Democrats see it as a way to derail the agenda that we're putting through.' Sen. John Barrasso, the No. 2-ranked Republican in the Senate, said Republicans were determined to hold votes on the 12 spending bills. He said that Schumer 'had unilaterally shut down the appropriations process' in previous years by not holding such votes, moving instead to negotiate directly with GOP leadership in the House and then-President Joe Biden's Democratic administration on an all-encompassing spending package. 'If Democrats walk away from this process again, simply to protect wasteful Washington spending,' Barrasso said, 'they will be the ones sabotaging the Senate and shutting down the government.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government shutdown talk is starting early ahead of a difficult funding fight in Congress this fall
WASHINGTON (AP) — It's become tradition. Congressional leaders from both major political parties blame each other for a potential government shutdown as the budget year draws to a close. But this year, the posturing is starting extraordinarily early. The finger-pointing with more than two months to go in the fiscal year indicates the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual as a Republican-controlled Congress seeks to make good on its policy priorities, often with no support from the other political party. Democratic leadership from both chambers and the two panels responsible for drafting spending bills met behind closed doors recently to discuss the strategy ahead. The leaders emerged demanding that Republicans work with them but were careful to avoid spelling out red lines if Republicans don't. 'We are for a bipartisan, bicameral bill. That's what always has been done,' said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. 'The onus is on the Republicans to help us make that happen.' On the Republican side, lawmakers describe the Democrats as itching for a shutdown. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Schumer had threatened a shutdown should Republicans pass a bill to roll back $9 billion in public broadcasting and foreign aid funds. Republicans subsequently passed those cuts. 'It was disturbing to see the Democratic leader implicitly threatening to shut down the government in his July 'Dear Colleague' letter, but I'm hopeful that he does not represent the views of Senate Democrats as a whole," Thune said. Where things stand on government funding The federal government is operating on a full-year continuing resolution that provided about $1.7 trillion in spending for defense and non-defense programs. The funding expires Sept. 30. President Donald Trump requested a comparable amount for the coming fiscal year, but the Republican proposed dramatically overhauling how that money is distributed to include more for defense and border security and significantly less for health, education, housing and foreign assistance. So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills. The Senate has yet to approve any, but those bills that have advanced out of the Senate Appropriations Committee are enjoying bipartisan support while the House bills are generally advancing out of committee on party line votes. This week, the Senate is expected to consider the appropriations bill to fund military construction projects and the Department of Veterans Affairs, generally one of the easier spending bills to pass. One or two others could get added to the package. Congress got off to a late start on the funding process. Republicans prioritized Trump's tax and spending cut bill. Most lawmakers agree Congress will need to pass a stop-gap measure before Sept. 30 to avoid a shutdown and allow lawmakers more time to work on the full-year spending measures. The view from Democrats Democrats overwhelmingly opposed this year's funding bill that expires in two months. But in the end, Schumer and nine Democratic colleagues decided a government shutdown would be even worse. They voted to allow the bill to proceed and overcome a filibuster, giving Republicans the ability to pass it on their own on a final vote. Schumer took considerable heat from progressives for his strategy. House Democratic leadership issued a statement at the time saying 'House Democrats will not be complicit.' And members of his own caucus publicly expressed disagreement. 'If we pass this continuing resolution for the next half year, we will own what the president does,' said Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. 'I am not willing to take ownership of that.' Some liberal groups threatened to hold protests at various events Schumer was planning to promote a new book, and some of those events ended up being postponed due to security concerns. The Democratic frustrations have only grown stronger in the ensuing months. First, the Democrats watched the Trump administration slow-walk or block hundreds of billions of dollars from going out in part through the work of its Department of Government Efficiency. Then they watched as Republicans passed Trump's big tax and spending cut bill without any Democratic votes. Finally, they watched as Republicans this month canceled $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funds when much of it had been previously agreed to on a bipartisan basis. Meanwhile, Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russ Vought, declared that the appropriations process "has to be less bipartisan.' Democrats complain that much of the work taking place in the House has been a waste of time, since those partisan bills have no chance of getting 60 votes in the 100-member Senate. 'At this point in time, why have appropriations if they can just unilaterally through rescissions whack it all away?' said Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill. 'I think what you're seeing is more frustration than I've ever witnessed.' Republicans position for impasse Republicans control all the levers of power in Washington. That could make it harder to blame Democrats for a shutdown. But in the end, any bill will need some Democratic support to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. 'Our concern is that from their standpoint, they want to have a shutdown,' Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., said of Democrats. '... The Democrats see it as a way to derail the agenda that we're putting through.' Sen. John Barrasso, the No. 2-ranked Republican in the Senate, said Republicans were determined to hold votes on the 12 spending bills. He said that Schumer 'had unilaterally shut down the appropriations process' in previous years by not holding such votes, moving instead to negotiate directly with GOP leadership in the House and then-President Joe Biden's Democratic administration on an all-encompassing spending package. 'If Democrats walk away from this process again, simply to protect wasteful Washington spending," Barrasso said, 'they will be the ones sabotaging the Senate and shutting down the government.' ___ Follow the AP's coverage of Congress at Kevin Freking, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
