NATO is deploying eyes in the sky and on the Baltic Sea to protect vital cables. Here's why and how
With its powerful camera, the French Navy surveillance plane scouring the Baltic Sea zoomed in on a cargo ship plowing the waters below — closer, closer and closer still until the camera operator could make out details on the vessel's front deck and smoke pouring from its chimney.
The long-range Atlantique 2 aircraft on a new mission for NATO then shifted its high-tech gaze onto another target, and another after that until, after more than five hours on patrol, the plane's array of sensors had scoped out the bulk of the Baltic — from Germany in the west to Estonia in the northeast, bordering Russia.
The flight's mere presence in the skies above the strategic sea last week, combined with military ships patrolling on the waters, also sent an unmistakable message: The NATO alliance is ratcheting up its guard against suspected attempts to sabotage underwater energy and data cables and pipelines that crisscross the Baltic, prompted by a growing catalogue of incidents that have damaged them.
'We will do everything in our power to make sure that we fight back, that we are able to see what is happening and then take the next steps to make sure that it doesn't happen again. And our adversaries should know this," NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said this month in announcing a new alliance mission, dubbed 'Baltic Sentry,' to protect the underwater infrastructure vital to the economic well-being of Baltic-region nations.
What's under the Baltic?
Power and communications cables and gas pipelines stitch together the nine countries with shores on the Baltic, a relatively shallow and nearly landlocked sea. A few examples are the 152-kilometer (94-mile) Balticconnector pipeline that carries gas between Finland and Estonia, the high-voltage Baltic Cable connecting the power grids of Sweden and Germany, and the 1,173-kilometer (729-mile) C-Lion1 telecommunications cable between Finland and Germany.
Why are cables important?
Undersea pipes and cables help power economies, keep houses warm and connect billions of people. More than 1.3 million kilometers (807,800 miles) of fiber optic cables — more than enough to stretch to the moon and back — span the world's oceans and seas, according to TeleGeography, which tracks and maps the vital communication networks. The cables are typically the width of a garden hose. But 97% of the world's communications, including trillions of dollars of financial transactions, pass through them each day.
'In the last two months alone, we have seen damage to a cable connecting Lithuania and Sweden, another connecting Germany and Finland, and most recently, a number of cables linking Estonia and Finland. Investigations of all of these cases are still ongoing. But there is reason for grave concern," Rutte said on Jan. 14.
What's causing alarm?
At least 11 Baltic cables have been damaged since October 2023 — the most recent being a fiber optic cable connecting Latvia and the Swedish island of Gotland, reported to have ruptured on Sunday. Although cable operators note that subsea cable damage is commonplace, the frequency and concentration of incidents in the Baltic heightened suspicions that damage might have been deliberate.
There also are fears that Russia could target cables as part of a wider campaign of so-called 'hybrid warfare' to destabilize European nations helping Ukraine defend itself against the full-scale invasion that Moscow has been pursuing since 2022.
Without specifically blaming Russia, Rutte said: 'Hybrid means sabotage. Hybrid means cyber-attacks. Hybrid means sometimes even assassination attacks, attempts, and in this case, it means hitting on our critical undersea infrastructure.'
Finnish police suspect that the Eagle S, an oil tanker that damaged the Estlink 2 power cable and two other communications cables linking Finland and Estonia on Dec. 25th, is part of Moscow's 'shadow fleet' used to avoid war-related sanctions on Russian oil exports.
Finnish authorities seized the tanker shortly after it left a Russian port and apparently cut the cables by dragging its anchor. Finnish investigators allege the ship left an almost 100-kilometer (62-mile) long anchor trail on the seabed.
Intelligence agencies' doubts
Several Western intelligence officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of their work, told The Associated Press that recent damage was most likely accidental, seemingly caused by anchors being dragged by ships that were poorly maintained and poorly crewed.
One senior intelligence official told AP that ships' logs and mechanical failures with ships' anchors were among 'multiple indications' pointing away from Russian sabotage. The official said Russian cables were also severed. Another Western official, also speaking anonymously to discuss intelligence matters, said Russia sent an intelligence-gathering vessel to the site of one cable rupture to investigate the damage.
The Washington Post first reported on the emerging consensus among U.S. and European security services that maritime accidents likely caused recent damage.
Cable operators advise caution
The European Subsea Cables Association, representing cable owners and operators, noted in November after faults were reported on two Baltic links that, on average, a subsea cable is damaged somewhere in the world every three days. In northern European waters, the main causes of damage are commercial fishing or ship anchors, it said.
In the fiber-optic cable rupture on Sunday connecting Latvia and Sweden, Swedish authorities detained a Maltese-flagged ship bound for South America with a cargo of fertilizer.
Navibulgar, a Bulgarian company that owns the Vezhen, said any damage was unintentional and that the ship's crew discovered while navigating in extremely bad weather that its left anchor appeared to have dragged on the seabed.
NATO's 'Baltic Sentry' mission
The alliance is deploying warships, maritime patrol aircraft and naval drones for the mission to provide 'enhanced surveillance and deterrence.'
Aboard the French Navy surveillance flight, the 14-member crew cross-checked ships they spotted from the air against lists of vessels they had been ordered to watch for.
'If we witness some suspicious activities from ships as sea – for example, ships at very low speed or at anchorage in a position that they shouldn't be at this time – so this is something we can see,' said the flight commander, Lt. Alban, whose surname was withheld by the French military for security reasons.
'We can have a very close look with our sensors to see what is happening.'
___
Burrows reported from London. AP journalists Jill Lawless in London, David Klepper in Washington and Veselin Toshkov in Sofia, Bulgaria, contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Spain exempt from Nato's 5pc spending target
Spain will be exempt from spending 5 per cent of its GDP on defence after striking a deal with Nato, the country's prime minister said. Speaking ahead of this week's Nato summit in The Hague, Pedro Sanchez said he had achieved a 'success' for his country by securing an exception from the new spending target, which had been billed as a strict requirement for all 32 Nato members. It puts Madrid at odds with Donald Trump, the US president, who has called for a significant increase in defence spending and cast doubt on his willingness to defend Nato allies 'if they don't pay'. Mr Sanchez said Spain could fulfil its existing commitments to Nato with a defence budget of 2.1 per cent of GDP. 'We fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defence investment, but we are not going to do so,' the Spanish prime minister said in a televised address on Sunday. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, warned members earlier this month that they must commit to spending 5 per cent on defence spending or 'better learn to speak Russian'. It came after he had warned that Vladimir Putin could attack Nato by 2030. According to Nato estimates, Spain spent only 1.24 per cent of GDP on defence last year. In April, Mr Sanchez pledged to increase defence spending to 2 per cent by the end of this year. Target in doubt But Spain's Left-wing government is divided on the need to increase military spending and a think-tank linked to the administration has cast doubt on whether the 2 per cent target for this year is feasible. Mr Sanchez wrote to Mr Rutte last week to say that 5 per cent of GDP was 'unreasonable and counter-productive', arguing that such a commitment would impact the country's social spending and undermine EU plans for technological growth. On Sunday, it emerged that the agreement Nato leaders will sign at The Hague on Wednesday has been altered to accommodate Spain's objections. The text on the spending pledge has been changed from 'we commit' to 'allies commit', allowing Mr Sanchez to claim the commitment would not apply to Spain. Under the plan, countries are meant to reach 5 per cent of GDP by boosting their core defence spending goal from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent, and adding a further 1.5 per cent on related items such as cyber security and adapting roads and bridges for military vehicles. Mr Sanchez said that Spain needs only to spend 2.1 per cent of GDP to meet its Nato capability targets – the personnel, equipment and infrastructure requirements set by the alliance The announcement comes at a time of political difficulty for Mr Sanchez, who is under enormous pressure over a corruption scandal within his Socialist party.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer refuses to say UK would support US if it is attacked
Sir Keir Starmer has refused to say whether the UK would offer military support to the US if it was attacked, amid questions over the legal advice given. Britain was not involved in the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities that saw bunker-buster bombs dropped on the Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow nuclear facilities. The US made no request to use the UK military in the attack, either through RAF support from Typhoon fighter jets at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, or by using the Diego Garcia military base as a staging base for the bombing. It comes after leaked advice from the Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, last week warned that the UK should not join direct strikes by Israel against Iran as it might breach international law. Responding to the overnight attacks by the US, Sir Keir avoided any comment on their legality but said Iran's nuclear programme was a 'grave threat', which the US military action would 'alleviate'. Asked directly by Sky News whether he would offer military support if needed, the Prime Minister said there was a risk of escalation not only within the region but also beyond it. 'We have been moving assets to the region to make sure that we're in a position to protect our own interests, our personnel and our assets, and of course those of our allies,' he said. Asked whether the UK would support the US if it was attacked by Iran as allowed by article five under Nato's principle of collective defence, Sir Keir said: 'I'm not going to speculate about what may happen, because all of my focus is on de-escalation. 'But I do want to reassure the public that we have taken all necessary measures to protect UK interests, UK personnel, and to work with our allies to protect their interests as well. That's what you would expect.' The United Nations Charter says countries can only launch an attack in self-defence, to defend an ally, or if the UN Security Council passes a resolution authorising military action. The advice was drawn up before the US intervened in the conflict. Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, suggested the situation would be 'clear-cut' on acting in self-defence if UK forces came under attack, but would not comment further on the legal advice. He confirmed that Britain had been told in advance by the US 'shortly' before the strikes on Iran, but Government officials refused to say precisely when. Mr Trump's order to attack, however, came despite Sir Keir's appeals for a diplomatic solution. At the G7 summit in Canada last week, the Prime Minister even suggested the US would not intervene after sitting with Mr Trump at a dinner. Lord Wolfson, the shadow attorney general, said that in his view military action against Iran was lawful under conventions allowing collective self-defence, the right to take 'proportionate' action to avert Iranian attacks on UK bases and personnel, and to prevent Iran realising its 'genocidal intentions' against Israel. He accused Sir Keir of welcoming the end results of the attack but prevaricating over the means. In a post on X, Lord Wolfson wrote: 'The US and the UK are in the same legal position; accordingly, if the UK Govt's position (as reported) is that the UK cannot itself take offensive military action to support Israel, the UK Govt must also consider that the US strike on Iran's nuclear reactors was illegal. 'The UK Govt cannot welcome the ends but prevaricate about the means. So: what is our Govt's stance on the legality of the US military action. I support it. Does Keir Starmer?' In an article for The Telegraph, Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, claimed Sir Keir had been sidelined by his 'peripheral and hesitant' response to the Iran-Israel conflict. 'Ministers talk tough on Iran but have spent the past year straining relations with Israel – our key regional ally. We should be helping shape the international response, not reacting late from the sidelines,' she said. 'Commitment to peace and stability' Lord Ricketts, the former UK national security chief, said he believed the US decided it was better not to ask to launch B-2 bombers from the RAF base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean than to be told no. He told the Guardian: 'Either the Americans worked it out or were privately told please don't ask because it would raise fundamental questions about our taking part.' On Sunday, the Prime Minister held talks with Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, after convening a Cobra meeting. In a joint statement the three leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability for all countries in the region'. They added: 'We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear program. We stand ready to contribute to that goal in coordination with all parties. 'We urge Iran not to take any further action that could destabilise the region. 'We will continue our joint diplomatic efforts to defuse tensions and ensure the conflict does not intensify and spread further.' The diplomatic discussions come as Sir Keir faces divisions on his back benches, with Left-wing MPs criticising Mr Trump's intervention as unjustified, illegal and potentially catastrophic. 'These are [illegal] acts with no justification,' said Diane Abbott, while Richard Burgon said: 'This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security.' A third MP said: 'I do not support the entry of one nation state into another, and question the legality of this action, let alone the action itself.' Meanwhile, Britons in Israel have been told to book on the first Foreign Office charter flights to leave the region in the wake of the US bombings of Iran's nuclear facilities. The Foreign Office launched a flight registration form for British nationals in Israel and the Palestinian occupied territories to log their details and interest in the flights. It has opened a booking portal and urged all UK nationals to register their presence now. It said those with greatest need would be prioritised for flights. British nationals, plus non-British immediate family members travelling with them, are eligible.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
UK and NATO allies agree to boost spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035
The UK and its NATO allies have agreed to increase spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035, two diplomatic sources with knowledge of the deal have told Sky News. Ambassadors of all 32 alliance member states signed off on the new spending pledge ahead of a major summit of leaders, including Donald Trump, this week, they said. The boost - up from a current goal of 2% of GDP - is as much about keeping the US president onside as it is about responding to what is regarded by the allies as a growing threat from Vladimir Putin and the challenge posed by China. The target will be formally rubber stamped when the heads of state and government meet in The Hague on Tuesday and Wednesday. The ambitious spending goal - secured following a huge amount of persuasion by Mark Rutte, the NATO secretary general - is broken down into 3.5% of GDP spent on pure defence and 1.5% of GDP spence on related areas, which can include infrastructure and cyber security. Spain had been the last to agree. The UK had also been slow to sign up but is understood to have been pushing for the 2035 timeframe, which would mean it is pushed beyond the next parliament. Sir Keir Starmer has said he has an ambition to increase UK defence spending to 3% of GDP from 2.3% by 2034. The new 5% spending goal is the kind of level of defence spending invested by NATO allies during the Cold War.
