
For Jharkhand families who lost men working abroad, road to getting compensation is long
Madan is waiting for the remains of his son, Rameshwar Mahto. A lineman working in Kuwait and the only earning member of the family of six, Mahto died of 'cardiac and respiratory arrest' on June 15. For his family, Rameshwar's death has dealt a major blow, with the family now seeking what they see as their 'last resort' – compensation.
To push for this, the family had refused to accept the body, relenting only earlier this week.
'My father had worked for the company since 2013,' his son Kishor says. 'But the company is now saying my father's death was a natural death and not an accident. My father worked hard for this company for over a decade, and now they say there will be no compensation.'
The family isn't alone. A state with a significant migrant outflow, Jharkhand is increasingly witnessing a growing number of families refusing to accept bodies of migrants dying abroad – all in a struggle to get compensation.
Consider this: last year, the body of Hiraman Mahto, who died of natural causes in December, returned to India after over two months. Likewise, the body of Faljit Mahto, who died in Saudi Arabia in March this year under unclear circumstances, came back 40 days later.
The body of Santosh Mahto, who died in Malaysia in June last year, returned to India 21 days later.
According to migrant rights' activist Sikandar Ali, the problem is compounded by the difficulties in keeping track of blue-collared migrants.
'Such cases are not new in Jharkhand. The government has no record of them until something goes wrong,' he said. 'For families who have lost their sole breadwinners, the fight for compensation often turns into an endless wait just to see the body.'
For the families, it's usually a dilemma, where the urge to see a loved one's body return grapples with the need to ensure the family's survival.
'I long to see my son's body but I'm equally troubled by our debt of over Rs 10 lakh,' Rameshwar's mother Dalwa Devi, in her 80s, said. 'People keep barging in every few days to demand repayment of a loan we took.'
Jharkhand is a state with a significant migrant outflow – according to a 2023 migration survey by the Jharkhand government, some 45 lakh people from the state migrated to various places for livelihoods. This number includes domestic as well as international migrants.
Among those going abroad, migrants from Jharkhand usually head to countries such as Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Kuwait, Iran, Niger and Mali.
Given the number of migrant workers from the state, the Jharkhand government has implemented the Jharkhand Migrant Labourers Survey and Rehabilitation Scheme. Aimed specifically for skilled or semi-skilled workers, the scheme makes provision for death or injury caused in a workplace accident outside of the state.
But workers who die of natural causes – such as Rameshwar – are ineligible for such compensation.
According to Ali, companies either send scouts to Jharkhand's Hazaribagh and Giridih districts to look for migrant workers, or get them to enlist through WhatsApp.
'Later, interviews are held in big hotels, and candidates are offered better pay than they previously got. However, they are never told about the terms of their contract, social security benefits, or other legal provisions,' he said.
According to Rameshwar's oldest son Kishor, a report sent by IMCO, the Kuwait-based company his father worked for, puts the cause of death as 'Cardiac and Respiratory arrest due to severe Cerebral Haemorrhage'.
'Because of that, the company says we don't qualify for compensation,' he said.
On its part, the company claims that while natural deaths are not covered under their compensation policy, other benefits are covered.
'Under the Kuwaiti labour laws, if a worker has completed 10 years of service, they are entitled to a severance package, half a month's salary for each of the first five years and full salary for each of the next five. But we require proper paperwork before anything can be processed,' the official said.
In some cases, companies finally agree to pay but the road to it is long and gruelling. In the same village, the family of Dhananjay Mahto, a 29-year-old who died of 'failure of dominant neural centres in the brain' in Saudi Arabia on May 24, spoke about how it took 50 days of 'painful negotiations' to get the company he worked for to pay the compensation.
Like Rameshwar's family, they too refused to accept the body until the payment was made.
'Although we eventually received Rs 9 lakh from the company and Rs 5 lakh under a state government scheme, the company had initially put us under severe mental stress by denying compensation due to the 'natural death' clause. I told them I had no option left but to commit suicide. That statement finally pressured them,' Dhananjay's older brother Khirodhar says.
The family finally received the body on July 13.
Shikha Lakra, head of Jharkhand's State Migrant Control Room under the Labour Department, said the state government had approached the Indian Embassy over Rameshwar's case.
According to activist Sikandar Ali, the general lack of awareness leaves workers vulnerable to potential exploitation.
'Workers are only focused on earning money and don't pay attention to their contracts. Due to a general lack of legal awareness and understanding of foreign laws, they become vulnerable in cases of exploitation, such as low wages or no compensation to families after death,' Ali said.
Shubham Tigga hails from Chhattisgarh and studied journalism at the Asian College of Journalism. He previously reported in Chhattisgarh on Indigenous issues and is deeply interested in covering socio-political, human rights, and environmental issues in mainland and NE India.
Presently based in Pune, he reports on civil aviation, other transport sectors, urban mobility, the gig economy, commercial matters, and workers' unions.
You can reach out to him on LinkedIn ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Opposition alleges Rs 70,000 crore scam as CAG flags accounting lapses in poll-bound Bihar
Just months ahead of the upcoming Assembly election in Bihar, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India has flagged massive accounting lapses in the state's finances. The CAG has reported that as of March 31, 2024, as many as 49,649 Utilisation Certificates (UCs) — documents that confirm that allocated resources were utilised for the intended purpose — amounting to Rs 70,877.61 crore, had not been submitted to the Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) of Bihar. The findings have come as fresh ammunition for the Opposition. Bihar Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav said in a social media post, 'Thanks to Modi-Nitish, a scam of Rs 70,000 crore has taken place in Bihar. The CAG has unearthed the theft. No work was seen, but the entire expenditure was made… Modi-Nitish made history by committing a Rs 70,000 crore scam. Just like the Srijan scam, now efforts to manage this from Delhi to Patna have intensified.' According to the CAG's State Finances Audit Report for 2023-24, the non-submission of UCs violates Rule 271(e) of the Bihar Treasury Code that requires departments to submit the documents within 18 months of the financial year in which the grant is released. The report notes that the Bihar government 'did not comply' with the national accounting standards of IGAS-1, IGAS-2, and IGAS-3. The auditing body suspects that nearly Rs 70,878 crore of budgeted money has no audit clearance, and raised serious risk of fraud. 'In the absence of UCs, there is no assurance that funds disbursed have been used for the intended purpose,' the report said, adding that this level of pendency is 'fraught with the risk of embezzlement, misappropriation, and diversion of funds'. The report's year-wise data shows that Rs 14,452.38 crore worth of these pending UCs relate to grants issued up to 2016-17. In 2017-18, the pending UCs amounted to Rs 3,746.64 crore; to Rs 5,870.67 crore in 2018-19; Rs 17,980.24 crore in 2019-20 and 2020-21; Rs 16,014.34 crore in 2021-22; and Rs 12,813.34 in 2022–23. The pending UCs are heavily concentrated in a few departments, the CAG report revealed, indicating that five departments account for the majority of the unverified expenditure. The largest default is in the Panchayati Raj Department, with UCs worth Rs 28,154.10 crore pending, the report said. This is followed by the Education Department (Rs 12,623.67 crore), Urban Development and Housing Department (Rs 11,065.50 crore), Rural Development Department (Rs 7,800.48 crore), and Agriculture Department (Rs 2,107.63 crore). In addition to department-level grants, the CAG also found that large sums of grants to local bodies remained unverified. As per the CAG, as of March 31, 2024, utilisation certificates were pending for Rs 4,277.22 crore given to Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) and Rs 2,221.83 crore given to Rural Local Bodies under various central and state schemes, including 15th Finance Commission grants. The report also highlighted significant pendency in the submission of Detailed Contingent (DC) bills against Abstract Contingent (AC) bills. AC bills are required to draw advances by departments, and rules mandate that a department submitting an AC bill to withdraw cash must finalise the accounts by submitting a DC bill within six months. However, as on March 31, 2024, the report showed massive non-compliance, as Rs 9,205.76 crore was drawn in advance payments through 22,130 AC bills, but its expense details through DC bills were not submitted. Of this, Rs 5,577.91 crore (60.60%) pertained to advances drawn for the 'creation of Capital Assets', including major schemes under road works, education, health, rural development, etc. The CAG further noted that 1,648 AC bills, totalling Rs 1,041.12 crore, were drawn in March 2024 alone, indicating a 'rush' to exhaust budgets at the end of the financial year. The audit said that this pattern of drawing money late in the year and not reconciling it 'indicates poor public expenditure management'. 'The non-submission of DC bills within the prescribed period breaches financial discipline and enhances the risk of misappropriation of public money,' the report warned. The CAG also pointed to issues highlighting systemic lapses in financial reporting with classification of expenditure, particularly under grants-in-aid. It observed that 59.95% of the total budgeted grants-in-aid of Rs 77,600.47 crore disbursed during 2023-24 were lumped under the category, 'Others', without clearly identifying the institutions or schemes to which the funds were released. The CAG noted that without proper institutional codes, 'the amounts outstanding against all institutions could not be worked out.' This, it said, is a gap that 'affected the transparency of accounts'. The CAG also flagged significant parking of funds under the Deposit of Local Funds. According to the CAG report, funds budgeted as grants to local bodies and municipal bodies were transferred there, but never spent. Over 2019-24, the balance in these accounts swelled to Rs 30,017.64 crore. 'This amount has been shown as Revenue or Capital Expenditure in the respective years but is lying unspent in the deposit head,' the report says. It observes that this practice overstates actual expenditure, and further mentions that the 'reason for transfer of funds for parking in Deposit of Local Fund Head of Account were awaited'. The CAG also noted that internal audit mechanisms in departments were either weak or non-functional, and several previous audit recommendations had not been acted upon. It observed that delays in submission of audit replies and lack of timely action 'defeated the very purpose of the audit'. The CAG said that the combination of the issues of missing UCs, unreconciled advances, off-book deposits and generic accounting entries 'indicate lack of internal controls in the administrative departments'.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Setback to lenders: NCLT replaces RP in Anil Ambani's loan guarantee case
NEW DELHI: In a setback to lenders, the National Company Law Tribunal has removed Jitender Kothari as the resolution professional (RP) in an insolvency case related to Anil Ambani 's personal guarantee to SBI for a loan to Reliance Communications . NCLT appointed Prashant Jain as the new RP. In Sept 2016, Ambani had given a personal guarantee for a Rs 1,385-crore loan, which was retrospectively classified as an NPA effective late Aug 2016. Kothari was appointed RP in Aug 2020. A few days after his appointment, the RP sought multiple details from Ambani, including details of a case in a British court. The insolvency action had been challenged in Delhi HC and the SC. In May 2021, the RP filed his report in NCLT, recommending admission of company petition for insolvency resolution despite Ambani's lawyer seeking more time, citing restricted mobility due to Covid. A few days later, Ambani's lawyer wrote that the RP can only seek information from SBI. Meanwhile, the businessman's writ petition in SC was tagged along with one Surendra Jiwarajka, which was finally decided in Nov 2023. Ambani has accused the RP of "acting in undue haste and denying him fair and proper opportunity" to provide information. Besides, the RP is accused of exceeding the mandate under IBC in seeking "unrelated information". The RP denied the charges and SBI supported it, while arguing that the matter had been pending with NCLT for a long time and the case was being delayed. In its order on July 15, the benchsaid that in light of Covid-related disruptions, Ambani should have been given "a fair opportunity" to provide information to the resolution professional. "Instead, we note that the RP didn't even wait for adjudication of his application pending before this Tribunal seeking relaxation of 10 days' timeline and a cross application of the applicant before this Tribunal requiring more time in view of Covid restrictions. " "Though, we do not find any negligence or explicit bias on part of the RP in this case, however, we are of considered view since the insolvency resolution process after commencement has to be run in close coordination of debtor and RP," it said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Bride' tricks businessman man into trading, vanishes with Rs 1.28 crore
Thiruvananthapuram: A 32-year-old Manacaud-based businessman lost Rs 1.28 crore after an unidentified woman he met on a matrimony website persuaded him to invest in online trading. According to police, the man had created a profile on a matrimony site seeking suitable alliances and the accused woman expressed interest in May this year. She then sent him her family photos, shared other details and also promised to visit him with her family in Sept. After earning his trust, she shared a screenshot of her 'huge account balance' and claimed that she earned it through online trading. She then persuaded him to double his earnings through trading and shared a link for it. "She told me that she was from Thrissur and was working in a Delhi-based multinational company. I was very happy to have finally met a girl I truly liked. She shared with me a link for online trading. As per her direction, I invested a small amount initially and earned amazing returns. Later, I invested Rs 20 lakh and the website showed that I have earned Rs 70 lakh. However, to withdraw it, the website authorities asked me to pay Rs 70 lakh as a refundable security deposit. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Swelling and internal bleeding in the brain, help this baby Donate For Health Donate Now Undo After paying it, they kept on asking for more money and I ended up paying Rs 1.28 crore. Finally, I stopped making payments and asked them to return my investment. Soon after that, she stopped all communications. It was then I realised that it was a scam and approached the police," said the victim, who is an engineering graduate. On the complaint of the victim, city cyber police began a probe after registering a case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 318 (4) for cheating and 319 (2) for cheating by personation and also under Section 66 (D) of the Information Technology Act.