NV Energy asking to raise rates by more than twice as much as needed, say experts
(Photo: Ronda Churchill/Nevada Current)
The Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection says NV Energy requires less than half of the $224 million rate hike it's asking the Public Utilities Commission to approve for Southern Nevada customers, and criticized the utility for attempting to charge ratepayers for lavish spending on lodging and limos for company gatherings.
The 9% proposed rate hike is expected to cost the average customer an additional $15 to $20 a month.
An expert witness testifying on behalf of the BCP, Mark Garrett, says NV Energy, based on a formula used to determine its revenue requirement, needs a rate hike of $106 million to provide service to its customers in the south.
The utility is asking the PUC to include in the rate hike the cost of constructing Greenlink, a massive transmission line project, while it is still under construction and not benefitting ratepayers.
Greenlink's cost has ballooned from just under $2.5 billion to more than $4.2 billion, and could increase even more, depending on the outcome of President Donald Trump's trade wars with Mexico and Canada.
The increase related to Greenlink alone would hike rates by $60.6 million, or about $3.60 a month, for a little more than two years.
The company argues that including the cost of construction while in progress, which is usually not permitted because it requires customers to pay for a service not yet provided, will generate cash flow, and help maintain credit ratings.
In 2021, NV Energy's then-CEO Doug Cannon told state lawmakers that 'Nevadans will not be asked to pay for this investment until at least five to six years down the road.'
Cannon left the company last month, following the revelation that the utility overcharged some 80,000 customers, some going back as far as 20 years.
'The company is faced with meeting the demands of growth, addressing system reliability, resource adequacy, legislative goals and mandates, and operational needs as it relates to sufficient levels of staffing, technology, and insurance – all of which necessitates investments above those currently reflected in the existing revenue requirement,' NV Energy vice president and chief financial officer Mike Behrens said in testimony submitted to the PUC, justifying the utility's rate requests.
Behrens testified that including the costs of constructing Greenlink, while work is in progress, would help avoid a bond rating downgrade and higher interest rates on future debt.
Garrett, on behalf of the BCP, recommended the cost of constructing Greenlink not be included in the upcoming rate case.
'The company has not demonstrated a financial need,' Garrett countered, and said the claim that charging customers now for constructing the project would save money 'is inaccurate.'
While including the cost of construction in progress in the base rate would save the company $35 million in interest, it would cost customers $52.7 million in higher rates, and 'makes no economic sense for ratepayers,' Garrett testified.
NV Energy is also seeking to recoup $16.4 million in affiliate expenses incurred by the company or its affiliates, such as Berkshire Hathaway Energy, its holding company.
Among the expenses is an invoice for just under $1.3 million for Red Rock Resort, including $14,940 for incidentals, $152,156 for 'guest room attrition,' $575,068 for banquet food and beverages, $17,140 for internet, $78,482 for audio/visual services, and $3,248 for luggage porters.
Nichole Loar of the BCP recommended the PUC disallow all $16.4 million in affiliate expenses – including:
Chauffeured transportation services;
Washington, D.C. office building and related labor;
'Excessive lodging charges' at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C. and the J.W. Marriott in Phoenix;
Lobbying expenses;
Outside counsel;
Corporate airfare;
Alcoholic beverages;
Entertainment; and
Charitable donations
'The utility needs to be reminded they operate with a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (given by the PUC), which is a privilege to serve as a monopolistic entity, not a right,' Loar testified.
'The recent proposed increases are placing vulnerable demographics at a heightened risk for heat-related illnesses, such as heatstroke,' Las Vegan Angel DeFazio of the National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation said in a news release following a consumer input session last week on the proposed increase. She noted that seniors and others on fixed incomes are challenged to cover essential expenses, such as food and medicine, and pay for energy, especially during the summer months when bills skyrocket.
The PUC is expected to hold hearings on the proposed rate hike in September. If approved, rates would increase on Oct. 1.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nevada GOP governor vetoes voter ID bill that he pushed for in a deal with Democrats
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Nevada Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo unexpectedly vetoed a bill on Thursday that would have required voters in the swing state to show a photo ID at the polls — a conservative priority across the country and something that has long been on the governor's legislative wish list. The move brings a dramatic end to one of the legislative session's most surprising outcomes: A bipartisan deal that combined the requirement for voter identification with a Democratic-backed measure to add more drop boxes for mail ballots that Lombardo had initially vetoed. The bill came together in the final days of the session and passed mere minutes before the Democratic-controlled Legislature adjourned on June 3. Lombardo had been expected to sign it. The voter ID requirements in the bill mirrored a ballot initiative that Nevada voters overwhelmingly approved last November. But voters would have to pass it again in 2026 to amend the state constitution. The requirement would then be in place by 2028. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, the Democrat who brokered the deal with Lombardo, said when he introduced the legislation that voters seemed poised to give the final approval, and that enacting a voter ID law would have given the state a head start on ensuring a smooth rollout before the next presidential election. The Associated Press sent phone messages Thursday seeking comment from both Lombardo's spokespeople and Yeager. Voting rights groups condemned the legislation, saying it would have made it harder for some people to vote, including low-income or unhoused voters, people with disabilities and older voters. Barbara Wells, president of the League of Women Voters of Nevada, said the voter ID portion of the bill would "not allow their voices to be heard.' 'In Nevada, security throughout the voting process is so watertight that any deception is extremely rare, yet those who pushed for this bill would have the residents of our state believe otherwise,' Wells said, adding that while it 'was touted as a preventative or cure for voter fraud, it will create significant difficulties for many hard-working Nevadans.' Lombardo on Thursday also vetoed a bill that would have allowed the swing state's nonpartisan voters to cast ballots in Republican or Democratic primary races.
Time Business News
16 hours ago
- Time Business News
As More Operators Exit the State, Where Can You Play Online Poker in Nevada?
Out of the many things it's known for, Nevada is particularly famous for its vibrant poker scene. Las Vegas alone ranks among the top 10 places to visit in the United States, with millions stopping by every year to play the card game at its glamorous casinos. Many of them even head to one particular establishment—the Horseshoe—to participate in the World Series of Poker, which is considered the most prestigious poker tournament in the world. Poker is also frequently played by the state's locals, with many enjoying games both in physical poker rooms and on the internet. In fact, it's so popular here that Nevada started regulating both live and online poker in 2013, shortly after the federal government gave individual states the power to legalize the latter. Unfortunately, the state's online poker enthusiasts may have noticed that a number of the card game's prominent websites have recently stopped operating in Nevada. Last December, Global Poker announced that its site would no longer be accessible in the state after April 15. Soon after, PokerBros ceased operations here as well, noting that users could only play its games from outside Nevada. As a result, Esports Insider reported in February that Nevadans have to navigate a 'far more restrictive online poker system' now that their options are shrinking. That said, avid players may be wondering why this is happening—and if there's anywhere else on the internet where they can still play online poker in Nevada. The main reason Nevada is tightening its regulatory constraints around online poker is that not all operators use the same business model. In particular, the likes of Global Poker and PokerBros offer sweepstakes-style poker games that have come under intense legal scrutiny. That's primarily because of the pitfalls of the dual currencies sweepstakes models use. According to a recent report, sites like Global Poker allow players to purchase packages that consist of two kinds of coins: more common free-to-play tokens and much rarer 'sweeps' coins. Though both can be used to join poker games, only the latter can help users play for and win real money. Legislators argue that the sweepstakes model's dual currencies unfairly take advantage of current online gaming laws in the US, depriving users of the usual legal protections they can benefit from when playing online while simultaneously encouraging them to spend real money just to get more sweeps coins. As a result, sweepstakes poker in Nevada is under stricter scrutiny, resulting in the aforementioned sites, like Virtual Gaming Worlds, ceasing operations here. At least six other states—including Michigan, Connecticut, and Washington—have similarly restricted Global Poker and sites with similar offerings. Fortunately, it's still possible to play online poker in Nevada, which remains one of only eight states to legalize the activity. Though there aren't any dedicated, state-run sites you can currently try, you can still find a trusted option that complies with Nevada's stricter regulations. Americas Cardroom is particularly considered a go-to by locals, especially since it also stands as the #1 online poker site in the US overall. Internationally licensed in Curaçao, it has over two decades of experience and a stellar industry reputation as the flagship website of the Winning Poker Network, one of the first of its kind to launch in the US. That's allowed it to pinpoint the most effective ways to offer real-money poker games online. In leveraging SSL encryption, two-factor authentication, random number generators, and cryptocurrency, it provides a secure, fair, and transparent environment that safeguards player accounts and funds while offering a wide range of games and tournaments, including promotions that may specifically appeal to Nevadans. The prize at last year's Vegas Fast Track Series, for instance, was a $12,500 package that secured a main event slot at a professional Las Vegas poker tournament and covered travel costs (and winning locals could opt to cash out the package's monetary value, instead). This year, the Moneymaker May-Hem offers a similar reward with the added benefit of getting to meet poker pro and Americas Cardroom ambassador Chris Moneymaker. Because it more openly works to protect players while providing all the excitement online poker has to offer, this operator shows that it's still possible to play in Nevada—if you know where to look. As online poker becomes more prevalent across the U.S., Nevada offers a glimpse into where the industry is headed. The recent exits of major platforms underscore a larger trend: regulators are tightening oversight in an effort to ensure fair, transparent, and legally compliant gameplay. This shift marks a critical turning point—not just for Nevada, but for the entire country—as lawmakers seek to differentiate legitimate poker operations from legally ambiguous sweepstakes models. Looking forward, we can expect a continued emphasis on consumer protection. States that embrace online poker are likely to require higher standards for transparency, financial security, and age verification. This means that only the most robust, well-regulated platforms will thrive—especially those offering features like blockchain auditing, encrypted transactions, and strong player advocacy policies. Meanwhile, federal momentum may slowly build toward broader regulation or even nationwide frameworks. If more states legalize and interconnect their online poker player pools—as Nevada, Delaware, and New Jersey have done—players could benefit from bigger tournaments, larger prize pools, and a more vibrant online ecosystem. In this future, trusted operators like Americas Cardroom stand to become even more dominant, especially as they continue to innovate with cryptocurrency integration, enhanced security, and unique live event tie-ins. For Nevada-based players, the message is clear: while the path to online poker may be narrower, it's also becoming safer, smarter, and more sustainable. As online poker matures into a mainstream, regulated form of entertainment, those who adapt to these new standards will not only survive but lead the charge into a promising digital frontier. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NV Energy asking to raise rates by more than twice as much as needed, say experts
(Photo: Ronda Churchill/Nevada Current) The Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection says NV Energy requires less than half of the $224 million rate hike it's asking the Public Utilities Commission to approve for Southern Nevada customers, and criticized the utility for attempting to charge ratepayers for lavish spending on lodging and limos for company gatherings. The 9% proposed rate hike is expected to cost the average customer an additional $15 to $20 a month. An expert witness testifying on behalf of the BCP, Mark Garrett, says NV Energy, based on a formula used to determine its revenue requirement, needs a rate hike of $106 million to provide service to its customers in the south. The utility is asking the PUC to include in the rate hike the cost of constructing Greenlink, a massive transmission line project, while it is still under construction and not benefitting ratepayers. Greenlink's cost has ballooned from just under $2.5 billion to more than $4.2 billion, and could increase even more, depending on the outcome of President Donald Trump's trade wars with Mexico and Canada. The increase related to Greenlink alone would hike rates by $60.6 million, or about $3.60 a month, for a little more than two years. The company argues that including the cost of construction while in progress, which is usually not permitted because it requires customers to pay for a service not yet provided, will generate cash flow, and help maintain credit ratings. In 2021, NV Energy's then-CEO Doug Cannon told state lawmakers that 'Nevadans will not be asked to pay for this investment until at least five to six years down the road.' Cannon left the company last month, following the revelation that the utility overcharged some 80,000 customers, some going back as far as 20 years. 'The company is faced with meeting the demands of growth, addressing system reliability, resource adequacy, legislative goals and mandates, and operational needs as it relates to sufficient levels of staffing, technology, and insurance – all of which necessitates investments above those currently reflected in the existing revenue requirement,' NV Energy vice president and chief financial officer Mike Behrens said in testimony submitted to the PUC, justifying the utility's rate requests. Behrens testified that including the costs of constructing Greenlink, while work is in progress, would help avoid a bond rating downgrade and higher interest rates on future debt. Garrett, on behalf of the BCP, recommended the cost of constructing Greenlink not be included in the upcoming rate case. 'The company has not demonstrated a financial need,' Garrett countered, and said the claim that charging customers now for constructing the project would save money 'is inaccurate.' While including the cost of construction in progress in the base rate would save the company $35 million in interest, it would cost customers $52.7 million in higher rates, and 'makes no economic sense for ratepayers,' Garrett testified. NV Energy is also seeking to recoup $16.4 million in affiliate expenses incurred by the company or its affiliates, such as Berkshire Hathaway Energy, its holding company. Among the expenses is an invoice for just under $1.3 million for Red Rock Resort, including $14,940 for incidentals, $152,156 for 'guest room attrition,' $575,068 for banquet food and beverages, $17,140 for internet, $78,482 for audio/visual services, and $3,248 for luggage porters. Nichole Loar of the BCP recommended the PUC disallow all $16.4 million in affiliate expenses – including: Chauffeured transportation services; Washington, D.C. office building and related labor; 'Excessive lodging charges' at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C. and the J.W. Marriott in Phoenix; Lobbying expenses; Outside counsel; Corporate airfare; Alcoholic beverages; Entertainment; and Charitable donations 'The utility needs to be reminded they operate with a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (given by the PUC), which is a privilege to serve as a monopolistic entity, not a right,' Loar testified. 'The recent proposed increases are placing vulnerable demographics at a heightened risk for heat-related illnesses, such as heatstroke,' Las Vegan Angel DeFazio of the National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation said in a news release following a consumer input session last week on the proposed increase. She noted that seniors and others on fixed incomes are challenged to cover essential expenses, such as food and medicine, and pay for energy, especially during the summer months when bills skyrocket. The PUC is expected to hold hearings on the proposed rate hike in September. If approved, rates would increase on Oct. 1.
