
Oil sanctions: What can India do without Russian crude?
India
keep inflation in check and economy stable amid all the global turbulence. India relies on imports to meet more than 85% of its crude oil needs. While the Middle East was historically the main supplier, Russia has taken the lead in the past three years. But now India's steady supply of cheap Russian oil is under serious threat.
Frustrated with Russian President
Vladimir Putin
's double game of unabated attacks on Ukraine while appearing to be ready for a peace deal, US President Donald
Trump
announced early this week sanctions on buyers of Russian oil unless Russia agrees to a peace deal. Trump's threat of sanctions came with a 50-day grace period. 'We're very, very unhappy with (Russia). And we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a (Ukraine peace) deal in 50 days. Tariffs at about 100%, you'd call them secondary tariffs,' Trump said on Monday.
NATO
secretary general Mark Rutte also threatened India, China and Brazil with 100% secondary sanctions if they continue doing business with Russia, even as he urged the leaders of these countries to press Putin to take peace talks with Ukraine seriously. Meanwhile, Senator Lindsey Graham is pushing for the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, a bipartisan legislative proposal that threatens an unprecedented 500% tariff on all US imports from countries that buy Russian oil, gas, petrochemicals or uranium.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Artificial Intelligence
MCA
Data Science
Data Analytics
PGDM
Leadership
Management
Cybersecurity
healthcare
Healthcare
Public Policy
MBA
Finance
Digital Marketing
Design Thinking
Data Science
Degree
CXO
others
Product Management
Project Management
Operations Management
Others
Technology
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
7 Months
S P Jain Institute of Management and Research
CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Secondary tariffs mean that countries engaged in trade with Russia would face a 100% tariff when exporting goods to the US. India and China are the top two buyers of Russian oil. Earlier, India had to yield to Trump's oil sanctions when it stopped buying oil from Iran in 2019 after Trump, during his previous term as president, threatened secondary sanctions on buyers of Iranian oil.
Can India continue buying Russian oil?
Petroleum and Natural Gas of India Hardeep Singh Puri on Thursday said India is unfazed by US sanction threats as oil markets remain well supplied, adding that the prices will come down. Commenting on the threat of secondary sanctions, the minister said, "Russia is 10 per cent of global production. We have the analysis that if Russia were not included, the prices would have gone to 130 dollars a barrel. Even Turkey, China, Brazil and even the EU have bought oil and gas from Russia." Last week, the minister had said India's continued purchase of crude oil from Russia helped stabilise energy prices globally, and halting oil trade from Russia would have spiralled crude prices to over $120-130 per barrel. "I'm not worried at all. If something happens, we'll deal with it," Puri has said.
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
'Double standards': India claps back at NATO over sanctions warning on Russia oil deals
'There are two possibilities: one, the whole world consumes 10% less — which means some people won't get heating in winter; some won't get air conditioning in summer; some of the transport will stop flying,' Puri said. 'Or, you start buying more from the remaining 90% (suppliers). You know what that would do to prices? The prices would skyrocket,' he said.
Puri's comments indicate threats made by Trump and Nato of secondary sanctions may after all just be a negotiating tactic with Russia. As per a recent ET report, people familiar with the matter say that some NATO member states and European countries that have imposed sanctions against Russia continue to purchase Russian oil via third countries. The
European Union
plans to completely stop the import of Russian gas by 2027, but many nations still remain dependent on Russian gas and refined oil, they said, pointing out that in 2024, 18% of the EU's natural gas imports came from Russia.
Is Trump bluffing?
The oil market barely reacted to Trump's threats of secondary sanctions on Tuesday, with Brent trading around $69 per barrel, similar to levels seen over the past week. As per an ET report, refinery executives said if implemented, the proposed tariff could effectively shut Russia out of the global oil market, pushing prices to $120 per barrel or more, derailing Trump's own low-energy-price agenda and fuelling global inflation. Russia exports about 4.5–5.0 million barrels per day (mbd) of crude oil, roughly 5% of total global demand. In addition, it exports about 2 mbd of refined products.
Conversely, if India and China were targeted with 100% tariffs for continuing to buy Russian oil, the resulting spike in US import costs from these countries could burden American consumers and prove politically difficult for Trump to manage, executives said. 'This whole tariff game is about Trump trying to strike deals with countries, including Russia, not about disrupting energy trade or dealing with high inflation at home,' an executive told ET. Another executive said Trump's warning was just a ploy to induce seriousness in negotiations with Russia, whose leader Vladimir Putin has been following a dual-track strategy—engaging with Trump over the phone and talking of a peace deal, while simultaneously hammering Ukraine with an increasing barrage of missiles and drones.
You Might Also Like:
Oil executives brush aside Trump's tariff threat on Russian crude
How India can manage without Russian oil
If it really comes down to secondary sanctions, as threatened by Trump and Nato's Rutte, how will India manage without Russian oil which is now more than 33% of India's total oil imports? According to a Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) analysis, since the ban on Russian oil, China has bought 47% of Russia's crude exports, followed by India (38%), the EU (6%), and Turkiye (6%). In FY22, Russia made up just 2.1% of India's oil imports. Come financial year 2024-25, Russia's share in India's value of oil imports is a staggering 35.1%.
In FY22, India bought $2,256 million of Russian oil - three years later that number stands at a whopping $50,285 million. India's oil imports from Russia rose marginally in the first half of this year, with private refiners
Reliance Industries Ltd
and Nayara Energy making almost half of the overall purchases from Moscow, according to data provided by sources to Reuters. India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, received about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil in January-June this year, up 1% from a year ago, the data showed.
Indian refiners expect that any move by Trump is unlikely to disrupt oil supplies but could wipe out the thinning discount on Russian crude, as traditional and new suppliers ramp up output, refinery officials told Reuters.
Since secondary tariffs will apply to the whole country and affect all merchandise exports, unlike the scenario where only the entities doing business with sanctioned Russian entities are penalised, India will find it tough to continue buying Russian oil because sanctions will weigh heavier than the advantage India gets from buying Russian oil on which discount has now thinned.
Indian refiners will have no other way than pivot towards its traditional West Asian suppliers and new players such as Brazil to make up for lost Russian supplies. These new barrels will, however, come at a higher cost, ranging around $4-5/barrel. Arranging alternative supplies will not be difficult, as 'there is enough energy available in the world,' according to oil minister Puri. 'Oil prices are still between $65 and $70,' he said.
India is already diversifying its oil imports. Puri said that India has broadened its oil import network. India has diversified the sources of supplies from 27 to 40 countries now, he said. Data from S&P Global Commodity Insights showed India's crude imports from the US surged more than 50 per cent in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period last year, a sign that Indian refiners are once again warming up to non-OPEC sources. Shipments from Brazil saw the sharpest rise, growing 80 per cent year-on-year to 73,000 bpd from 41,000 bpd.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Caught on camera: Donald Trump cheats at golf in Scotland; netizens say, ‘Of course!'
US President Donald Trump is currently in Scotland as his family's business prepares for the August 13 opening of a new golf course bearing his name in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire. The Aberdeen area is already home to another of his courses, Trump International Scotland. Trump said upon arrival on Friday evening that his son Eric Trump is 'gonna cut a ribbon' for the new course during his trip. However, there's one incident reportedly from a Trump course near Turnberry, that has trumped Trump's visit to his homeland and his love for golf this time – allegations of cheating at the game. A viral video on social media shows the staff at a golf course handling a golf ball near a sand trap, which the US President then putts. This sparked accusations of Trump cheating at his favourite sport. However, this is not the first time Trump has been accused of manipulating his golf game. Believe it or not, there is an actual book on it titled 'Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump' by Rick Reilly. Social media users weren't surprised by the viral video of Donald Trump allegedly cheating in a golf game, and the first of their reactions was a simple, 'Of course!' The netizens also joked about how he'd just blame it on former US President Barack Obama. 'Of course he did,' said an unsurprised user. 'Super on brand,' added another. A user claimed, 'Con man gonna con,' to which another added, 'Never not cheating – in golf, on wives, in business, on taxes, in elections.' 'That's not even cheating for him anymore… that's his everyday life,' said another. 'Another FLAWLESS game, Mr. President,' quipped a user. 'He can never play fair, not even at the sport he's supposed to excel,' added another. 'The only skill he got is LYING!' exclaimed a user. Another added, 'The only way he wins anything…CHEATING.' 'I wonder how much the guy gets paid for tossing the ball? Let's pay more to hear how it all went down. I'm sure it's a wonderful story!' a user joked. 'Must be one of those balls they just pops up and wow you hit pretty good, it would've been great if it was a live tournament and it happened on tv,' another added. A user joked, 'I'm sure he'll say Obama did it.' 'I'm sure he'll just blame Obama. And they'll believe it,' added another. Donald Trump will be in Scotland until Tuesday, July 29, and plans to talk trade with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The White House has brushed off questions about potential conflicts of interest, arguing that Trump's business success before he entered politics was a key to his appeal with voters. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers called the Scotland swing a 'working trip." But she added Trump 'has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport.'
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Why illegal migrants are a bigger crisis for UK than US
Migrants becoming a hot button issue in the US has so engrossed the media space that similar crises in other Western countries, especially the UK, have almost escaped notice read more Britain has to face up to the fact that it is no longer an Empire with millions of acres of land at its disposal; it is a tiny island which is trying desperately to keep its faltering economy above the water. Representational image: REUTERS A photograph of anti-migrant protesters at London's Canary Wharf last week in an inside page of a major British daily this week included a Sikh waving a placard saying 'Stop calling us Far Right. Protect our women & children' and there was at least one other south Asian in the frame. But the overwhelming impression in the British media is that only gangs of white, Far-Right thugs are on the rampage to stop the influx of poor, starving, non-white asylum seekers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That is clearly not the correct picture, as a few candid photos show. It's not only the white nativists who are alarmed at the boatloads of 'asylum seekers' arriving on British shores to increase the burden on already inadequate public services—even as scores of more prosperous Britons flee to escape rising taxes. Britons with businesses struggling to survive or even those living in neighbourhoods where changing demographics have caused huge tensions are worried. Migrants becoming a hot button issue in the US—a country built by successive generations of emigration from Europe and elsewhere—has so engrossed the media space that similar crises in other Western countries, especially the UK, have almost escaped notice. And yet, given that the UK has such a large population of what is largely now third or fourth generation British-Indians, the warning signals should be heeded about rising public apprehensions about migrants. Many of those agitated on both sides of the migration issue are unable to understand that all migrants are not the same; nor are their intentions. Former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's parents, for instance, did not go to Britain from East Africa to live off welfare and create mini ethnic enclaves. They were hardworking professionals who contributed meaningfully to their adoptive country and assimilated even as they preserved their own cultural best practices. The waves of migrants who have arrived in Britain in the 21st century do not all fall into the Sunaks' category of new arrivals. Many of them have made little effort to support themselves financially and far too many of them have been unable to integrate with or even understand the society they are now part of. And the incomprehension is mutual because the newcomers are not very willing to let the locals into their close-knit social and even religious network. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The result is the latest phase of unrest and demonstrations at hotels in various English counties that have been mandated by the government to house migrants. And the catalyst—several recent violent incidents in the UK allegedly linked to migrants—make President Donald Trump's views on similar happenings in the US seem scarily prophetic. Except that Britain is far smaller and more densely populated than the US and therefore more vulnerable to rising tensions. It is germane to note that the people preemptively described as 'asylum seekers and refugees' arriving in the UK by boats across the English Channel from Europe are mostly Muslim and mostly from the Middle East, from Iran to Syria, though the two largest nationalities right now are Pakistani and Afghan. Ukrainians are another cohort. In 2024, a record 1.8 lakh asylum applications were made in the UK (the highest since 2002) and most of them were permitted to stay. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The trial and sentencing of an 18-year-old Somali-British national to 52 years in jail for killing three girls (aged 6 to 8, each was stabbed over 80 times) revealed that he had been flagged thrice in the five years before his murderous rampage, but investigators did not act on any of the complaints. The same reluctance to follow up cases of Pakistani-British men grooming and sexually exploiting white girls in northern England also showed institutional laxness. That has given rise to very justified fears among the public that their government is not willing to understand the ramifications of years of deference to multiculturalism, and that its institutions are chary of taking action for fear of being pulled up for racism. Protesters also believe if something is not done to regulate the flow of different kinds of migrants—winnowing out freeloaders and allowing in only those who can benefit the UK—there will be hell to pay. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Branding all anti-illegal-migrant protesters as 'Far Right' does not do any cause any favours. The key word is 'illegal' which is often deliberately omitted in reports to further the narrative that opposition to this ingress comes only from one quarter. There is also a big difference between migrants and asylum seekers. Migrants can be qualified professionals moving for career advancement, but the latter almost always implies that the state will have to look after them Lodging migrants, whether families or single men, in hotels situated in small communities pending processing is also an ill-thought measure, as integration there is even more difficult than in big cities. An Ethiopian asylum seeker arrested and charged this month with trying to forcibly kiss a local teenager in one such small community—to which he has registered a plea of not guilty—highlights the inherent danger of summarily accommodating migrants just anywhere. Opting to house asylum seekers in cities also draws flak as can be seen from the uproar over a four-star hotel in London's once glitzy Canary Wharf being kitted out with new mattresses, sanitaryware etc to house migrants. Instances of local police forces escorting 'pro-migrant' activists to places where the 'anti-migrant' camps are protesting—in the name of the democratic right to protest—only make matters worse as they increase the public's suspicion of official bias. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Britain has to face up to the fact that it is no longer an Empire with millions of acres of land at its disposal; it is a tiny island which is trying desperately to keep its faltering economy above the water. It may be flattering that so many refugees still consider the UK to be an attractive destination, but the fact is, there is no land to house them and no public willingness to accommodate them economically, socially or culturally. Seeing it as anything else is self-delusional. The author is a freelance writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Viral Clip Shows Caddie 'Helping' Trump At Scotland Golf Course, Internet Calls Out Cheating
Last Updated: The video shows the caddie discreetly dropping a ball into a more favourable spot near a bunker, after which Trump steps out and plays from the seemingly improved position Donald Trump is no stranger to controversies. The United States President, who played 18 holes amid tight security at Turnberry, the golf resort he owns on Scotland's rugged coast, has once again found himself under the internet's scanner—this time over a video that appeared to show him cheating at the game. The now-infamous clip, widely circulated on platforms like X, appears to show a member of Trump's entourage—his caddie—discreetly dropping a golf ball into a more favourable spot near a bunker, while Trump arrives in his golf cart, The Independent reported. With a quick glance, the President steps out, lines up, and plays from this seemingly improved position. The manoeuvre, performed almost casually by the caddie, immediately drew sharp-eyed viewers to cry foul, with phrases like 'commander in cheat" trending. Social media users were quick to react. 'LMAO for the morons that think Trump doesn't cheat at golf and wins all those club championships fair and square…watch his caddie here," one user jeered, while another quipped, 'Trump working hard to bring down grocery prices"—a tongue-in-cheek reference to his campaign promises. Some pointed out the seamlessness of the caddie's move, wondering how often such 'tricks" might occur on courses owned by Trump himself, The Week reported. According to the Hindustan Times, this isn't the first time Trump's golf game has faced scrutiny. Renowned sportswriter Rick Reilly, who wrote the book 'Commander in Cheat", has long alleged that Trump can't accept defeat on the course, recounting his own games with Trump where rules were bent so regularly that 'a gimme chip-in" became just another part of play. Earlier, film actor Samuel L Jackson had accused Trump of cheating during a round of golf they supposedly played together. When asked who the better golfer was, the Pulp Fiction actor confidently replied, 'Oh, I am, for sure. I don't cheat." In response on social media, Trump clarified that he had never actually played a round with Jackson. Meanwhile, even as the President enjoyed his rounds, protests rumbled across Scotland, with demonstrators in Edinburgh and beyond decrying his visit and questioning the British government's engagement with Trump during a tense time for UK-US trade relations, CBS News reported. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.