
Ajay Hinduja on Why Philanthropy Needs to Be Rooted in Responsibility
This principle has always been true for the Hinduja Family, one of the most influential families of Indian origin in the world. Through the Hinduja Foundation, their granting has never looked to steal the show. The Foundation works with communities to support public health interventions, rural development, or educational change and they never want to be the centre of attention.
'Recognition is fleeting. Responsibility lasts,' says Ajay Hinduja. 'If our giving becomes performance, we lose focus on the people we are serving.'
Ajay's belief is borne out of a value system that is part of the Hinduja Family ethos - wealth is a means to serve, not to be self-serving. Ajay Hinduja has a quiet intensity he brings to the Foundation, and in some ways, the Foundation doesn't facilitate the feel-good news but has long-tail investment in impact where it matters.
This is evidenced by how the Foundation integrates its values in practice, across all of their work in India. Instead of solely focusing on scaling poverty training initiatives with externally verifiable impact designed for mass media, they leverage support for smaller grassroots organisations that may have limited mobilisation means but immense community trust. From facilitating education in the form of digital learning tools to local municipal schools, opens up circles of raising awareness for low resource programmatic intervention with collectively focused NGO partners, and adding credibility on access to water in communities drought stricken year on year, the Hinduja Foundation's look to support, embed and help others realise their purpose rather than assume the mantle of a patriarchal way of un-support based assistance.
Ajay Hinduja highlights how this mentality of collaboration is essential. 'We are not here to lead communities. We are here to walk with them,' he says. 'Responsibility is recognising that real change comes from within, not from the top down.'
A project that is particularly important to him is the Foundation's support for preventive healthcare camps for women in urban police departments. These low-profile initiatives have helped identify early signs of breast cancer among hundreds of women who might otherwise go undiagnosed. The Foundation does not brand the events, nor does it seek media attention for them. What matters, says Ajay Hinduja, is the outcome.
Another key area where Ajay Hinduja believes responsibility must prevail over recognition is in building local capacity. While we focus on education, health care or climate resilience, our strategy as a Foundation is to empower communities to develop their own capacity, rather than rely on outside resources. This process takes time, involves a lot of listening and requires you to be patient as you support those who are demonstrating leadership.
'Sometimes, the best thing a philanthropist can do is step back,' he reflects. 'Our role is not to be the hero of the story. It is to ensure the story continues long after we are gone.'
In a development sector where data dashboards, awards, and global ranks are all encompassing, Ajay Hinduja sees a different vision, one where effectiveness is not about brand value but where the measure is human value. The guiding philosophy of the Hinduja Family's humanitarian legacy has remained constant under Ajay's vision: serving others comes before celebrating.
The Foundation is stepping up and expanding its work in mental wellness, digital inclusion, and urban environmental issues. However, the underlying principles will not change working for accountability, not applause. Working with respect and giving with integrity.
For Ajay Hinduja, this is not a question of optics; it is a question of ethics. 'True philanthropy is quiet. It does not seek reward. It seeks relevance. It asks us how we can do better, be better, and uplift, not overshadow.' At a moment in time when public visibility so often governs philanthropic influence, Ajay Hinduja's perspective is delightfully uncomplicated Responsibility is not just a value. It is a discipline. And in that quiet discipline lies the power to create lasting change.
'This article is part of sponsored content programme.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Burhidehing threatens lives & livelihood in two Dibrugarh villages, swallows farmland
Dibrugarh: Massive erosion by the Burhidehing river has wreaked havoc over the past one month, swallowing vast stretches of farmland and inching dangerously close to residential areas in Panimiri and Jhanjimukh villages at Khowang in Dibrugarh district. The relentless erosion, spanning approximately 3 km along the riverbank, has left the Mising community villagers in distress as their livelihoods and homes face an existential threat. For generations, the Mising people have lived along the banks of the Burhidehing, relying on farming as their primary source of income. However, the river's unchecked erosion has now consumed large portions of fertile land, pushing families to the brink of displacement. "We have lost nearly 20 bighas of farmland in just a month. The river is now barely 70-80 metres from our homes. If no action is taken, our entire village could vanish," said Raju Mili, a distressed farmer from Panimiri village. Residents claim that despite repeated pleas, neither the district administration nor the water resources department has taken concrete steps to mitigate the crisis. Temporary measures have proven futile against the river's aggressive currents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indian NRIs Are Getting Eligible For INR 2 Lakh Monthly Pension On Retirement. Invest 18K/M Get Offer Undo "We have been living here for generations, but now the river is coming closer to our homes every day. First it took our best agricultural land, and now we fear for our houses. Where will we go if the govt doesn't help us?" said Lakhimi Payeng, a mother of three from Panimiri village. Banikanta Doley, a village elder from Jhanjimukh, described the mounting anxiety among residents. "Our forefathers settled here because the soil was fertile and the river provided for us. Now that same river is destroying everything we have built. We cannot sleep peacefully knowing our homes might be next." The Mising community, one of Assam's major indigenous tribal groups, has traditionally thrived along riverbanks, developing agricultural practices adapted to the flood plains. However, changing river patterns and increased erosion have made their riverside existence increasingly precarious.


Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Tigers are not out of the woods yet
Synopsis India faced a severe decline in its tiger population post-independence. Project Tiger helped increase the numbers significantly. Now, the tiger population is over 3,700. Balancing tourism and conservation is a key challenge. Protecting villagers' interests is also important. The threat of poaching and the Chinese market remains. India needs innovative solutions for tiger conservation. Agencies The figures speak for themselves. In 1947, India's human population was 340 million and there were an estimated 40,000 tigers; when Project Tiger was launched in 1973, there were just 268 of them left although humans in India had nearly doubled to 584 million by then. So, since Independence 1,600 tigers had been killed per year, more than during the British Raj actually, although it was the white sahibs who had made large-scale hunting of the big feline a fashionable "sport".Till it was banned in 1972, people may recall that shikar was a tourism draw in India, with "game hunters" coming to shoot these magnificent animals, much as they kill lions in Africa now. That was probably justified then (as it is in some countries in Africa even now) as a legitimate economic activity, as there's such a "surplus" of them. What is a surplus? Surely if any species is "surplus" right now, it's humans but sport is not considered a way to remedy for "sport" or pleasure not food was always a pastime for Indian monarchs. But in the 19th century it became so democratised that every burra sahib, feudal and local notable worth his khidmatgars shot tigers, leopards and even the cheetah (the latter to extinction) by the mid-20th century. And to this day, hundreds of stuffed animals or their skins and heads adorn old forts, palaces and mansions. But people cringe at the very idea of displaying human skulls. Why?The human population of India has quadrupled from the 1947 figure to a whopping 1.4 billion now, but the tiger population has also increased over 10 times from 1972's abysmal three-figure to over 3,700 now. That we have managed to do this is nothing short of amazing even though there are alarming photos all the time of hordes of noisy, camera-wielding desi tourists in our tiger reserves and national parks. And that highlights a piquant to retired Forest Service stalwarts speaking on World Tiger Day at the Tollygunge Club in Kolkata last week, it was clear that unless people feel invested in tigers, they will not be motivated to protect them. The official focus, of course, is on villagers who live next to tiger reserves and often feel sidelined in favour of the endangered species. Their concerns-especially regarding compensation for families of those killed by tigers-are being addressed so that they do not regard the animals as enemies or harbingers of death and financial ruin. But what about the millions of tourists? Roads cutting through core areas, more vehicles accessing sanctuaries and staying longer hours inside, hotels hemming in the jungle and the sheer pressure of human interest in tigers and other large wildlife like lions, rhinos, elephants, gaud (bison) are scary developments. But the monetary lure of the insatiable Chinese market for wild tiger parts is also a perennial threat. So, could curtailing public access in order to protect tiger habitats then actually aid poaching?India's human population growth has slowed hugely; we now have to continue to demonstrate to the world the efficacy of our different approach to "managing" wildlife too. When India banned the fashionable "sport" of hunting and decided to save the tiger, the world sniggered. Seeing 268 become 3,700, they cannot deny the success of Project Tiger. With the Chinese spectre always looming, India also needs to think imaginatively now to resolve the current tiger-tourism conflict too.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
138 students from 34 schools across India debate at moot court in Kolkata
Kolkata: As many as 138 students from 34 schools across the country participated in the fourth edition of inter-school moot court in Kolkata on Friday. The students got a platform to hone their legal skills at a simulated court proceeding of a hypothetical case on public recruitment notification that debarred applicants who had an open school degree. The mock case involved a professor who was suspended for protesting against the notice. Students like Grusha Mukherjee of DPS, Ruby Park, and Saptak Sinha of PM Shri Kendriya Vidyalaya, Ballygunge had prepared for weeks. It was an enriching experience for them. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Ranjan Mitter, principal of The Future Foundation school, which hosted the event, said, "We are far from the field of application in Indian academic scene. With this initiative, we believe it shows a child his or her potential" Pritam Baruah, dean, School of Law, BML Munjal University said, "It is encouraging to see school students handle complex legal issues with clarity. "