logo
Miliband and Rayner join forces to save net zero

Miliband and Rayner join forces to save net zero

Telegraph01-05-2025
Gas boilers in new homes will be banned as soon as next year under plans being spearheaded by Ed Miliband and Angela Rayner.
The energy and housing secretaries have joined forces on new rules for housebuilders, which will require newbuilds to have heat pumps and solar panels.
The Telegraph understands the new rules will be announced by Ms Rayner this summer, and are likely to be in force by next year.
The fight for net zero is at the heart of a growing row engulfing Labour, exposed this week by Sir Tony Blair who warned Sir Keir Starmer that his current green policies were 'doomed to fail'.
Despite Labour MPs and unions urging Sir Keir to change course on net zero, Mr Miliband and Ms Rayner will drive their radical reforms forward this year.
The Cabinet ministers have been working together on net zero requirements in the Future Homes Standard, a change to building regulations first proposed by the Conservatives in 2019.
Insiders said the pair had opted for the most 'ambitious' version of the new rules, which would ban gas boilers as fast as possible in new homes by increasing the energy efficiency requirements on developers.
But housebuilders have warned that onerous new net zero requirements could increase costs, making it less likely that Ms Rayner will meet her target of building 1.5 million homes by the end of Labour's first term.
Industry sources said the boiler ban had been expected to come into force in 2027, after a 12-month period for the legislation to take effect and a further year to implement the changes.
Government sources now say the rules could take effect as soon as early 2026, giving the industry as little as six months to prepare.
Mr Miliband and Ms Rayner's new rules will also require solar panels on almost all newbuilds, adding up to £4,000 to the cost of the properties.
That plan, first floated in a Conservative-era public consultation, comes despite pressure from the housebuilding sector to make solar panels optional.
The latest report from Britain's fiscal watchdog estimated that Labour will fall 200,000 homes short of its 1.5 million target, even without the changes to building regulations.
On Thursday, Downing Street insisted the changes would not make it harder to hit the target.
The new homes standard was repeatedly delayed under previous Conservative governments, but has been quickly pursued by both Ms Rayner and Mr Miliband since they took office last year.
Officials at the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero are also working on plans to encourage homes with open fires and wood burning stoves to replace them with heat pumps.
Ministers have commissioned a Westminster-based research company to survey homes with 'secondary heating', including electric and gas fires, wood burning stoves and fan heaters.
In the company's contract, seen by The Telegraph, officials argued that 'reaching net zero by 2050 will require significant changes to how households heat their homes'.
The company was asked to find out whether the 'introduction of a heat pump would change households' use of secondary heating', noting that ministers wanted to 'minimise potential burden on the electricity grid and transition away from fossil fuel-based secondary heating'.
The Telegraph understands the report is designed to build understanding of how people use secondary heating, and no policy has yet been formed on whether or how to phase it out.
Labour has watered down other net zero policies, including a ban on new non-electric cars by 2030 that will no longer include vans, hybrids, or most British supercars.
Mr Miliband has clashed with his Cabinet colleagues over concerns that his net zero policies were unpopular with voters and threatened to hinder growth, despite his insistence that the drive for clean power will result in economic benefits.
On Wednesday Downing Street failed to guarantee that his job as Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary was safe for the remainder of Labour's first term.
Ms Rayner has also had her differences with Sir Keir, which sources close to her say have since been resolved since he tried to sack her in May 2021. However, earlier this week it was claimed that she threatened to resign over the Government's target to build 1.5 million homes, but was talked down by Sir Tony.
This week Sir Tony, who has been advising Sir Keir, criticised what he described as 'financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle' imposed on the public for the sake of a 'minimal' reduction in emissions.
The former prime minister later rowed back on that view, arguing that Labour's approach was the 'right one' following a conversation with Downing Street.
But Labour sources were furious with Sir Tony for his implied criticism of one of the Government's flagship policies just days before the local elections. One said the 'pretty incredible' intervention showed he had been 'out of the game for too long'.
Labour is bracing for a bloodbath at Thursday's local elections, with the party expecting to lose hundreds of council seats across the country.
Speaking on Wednesday a Downing Street spokesman insisted that the Government would try to 'tread lightly' on voters' lives when implementing net zero policies.
Sir Keir said last month that he would look for 'flexibilities' to reduce the burden on consumers and companies.
A Housing Department spokesperson said: 'The Future Homes Standard will be published later this year.
'We have always been clear that we want solar panels on as many new homes as possible, because they are a vital technology to help cut bills for families, boost our national energy security, and help deliver net zero.
'Through the Future Homes Standard we plan to maximise the installation of solar panels on new homes, as part of our ambition to ensure all new homes are energy efficient, and will set out final plans in due course.'
A Downing Street spokesman said on Thursday that the Future Homes Standard would contain measures to increase the uptake in solar panels.
Asked if this would affect the Government's housebuilding target, the spokesman replied: 'No. We're obviously doing this in consultation with the industry, which is why we're working on the details of it which you'll see once the future homes standard has been published.
'These proposals aren't new… We'll obviously also introduce it in a way that industry has time to deliver, deliver the new standards and that's exactly what we're working on as we speak.'
Rayner using Miliband to flex her political muscles
By Gordon Rayner
On Wednesday, No 10 insisted the Government would 'tread lightly' on people's lives as it implemented net zero policies.
A day later, we learn that Angela Rayner and Ed Miliband are pursuing the most radical possible net zero reforms to house building. So what exactly is going on?
A disconnect between Downing Street and Mr Miliband's department for energy security and net zero has been plain to see almost since Labour came to power, but the fact that Ms Rayner has teamed up with Red Ed smacks of factionalism.
No matter how hard the various parties might try to insist that they are all getting on swimmingly, Ms Rayner is canny enough to know how her latest move will be perceived, and in the eyes of voters perception is reality.
As the former Labour MP Tom Harris wrote earlier this week, speculation is rife among Labour MPs that Sir Keir Starmer might not contest the next general election as Labour leader. A bad set of results in this week's local elections and Runcorn and Helsby by-election will only turn up the volume on that Westminster gossip.
Currying favour
You might, then, speculate that Ms Rayner is hedging her bets by standing with Mr Miliband on his net zero agenda. Regardless of whether Mr Miliband has any chance of succeeding Sir Keir as leader and prime minister (a chance that is slim but not zero), Mr Miliband remains hugely popular with Labour members – the people who will choose the next leader.
Despite his disastrous previous crack at the Labour leadership, he remains more popular with the members than his Cabinet colleagues, and Ms Rayner may well want to share Mr Miliband's umbrella if bad news continues to rain down on the Starmer premiership.
What else could explain Ms Rayner's decision to back a policy that might scupper her chances of hitting her target of 1.5 million new homes by the time of the next election?
By speeding up a gas boiler ban and insisting on heat pumps and solar panels in new builds, Ms Rayner is increasing the cost and regulatory burden for builders at a time when she is already predicted to fall 200,000 homes short of her goal.
However, the new net zero rules are also a way for her to flex her political muscles by driving through changes that might not be popular with Sir Keir or Rachel Reeves, but which they can do little to stop.
Ms Rayner, directly elected as Labour's Deputy Leader, cannot be sacked from that role by Sir Keir, meaning he would hardly dare to remove her from her other job as Housing Secretary.
Sir Keir has watered down other net zero policies, including the ban on non-electric cars by 2030 that won't now include vans, hybrids or most British supercars.
There is also a suspicion among some Labour figures that Sir Tony Blair's curious net zero intervention this week, in which he said the current policies are 'doomed to fail', was designed to prepare the ground for a further downgrading of net zero policies by Sir Keir, who is desperate to stem the flow of voters to the net zero-sceptic Reform UK.
There are even those who believe Mr Miliband will be used as a scapegoat for poor election results this week, and could lose his job in the next reshuffle as a result.
Much has been read into the fact that Downing Street refused earlier this week to guarantee he would still be in post by the time of the next election, unlike Ms Reeves and David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, who have been assured they will keep their jobs throughout this Parliament.
If Mr Miliband were to be sacrificed by Sir Keir, Ms Rayner would at least be able to produce evidence to Labour members that she did not dip her hands in the blood.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves to cut ‘bats and newts' in boost to developers
Rachel Reeves to cut ‘bats and newts' in boost to developers

Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Times

Rachel Reeves to cut ‘bats and newts' in boost to developers

Rachel Reeves is preparing to strip back environmental protections in an effort to boost the economy by speeding up infrastructure projects. The chancellor is considering reforms that would make it far harder for concerns about nature to stop development, which she insists is crucial to restoring growth and improving living standards. The Treasury has begun preparing for another planning reform bill and is thinking about tearing up key parts of European environmental rules that developers say are making it harder to build key projects. Labour ministers have repeatedly insisted that their current planning overhaul will not come at the expense of nature, promising a 'win-win' system where developers will pay to offset environmental damage. But Reeves is understood to believe that the government must go significantly further, after expressing frustration that the interests of 'bats and newts' are being allowed to stymie critical infrastructure. She has tasked officials with looking at much more contentious reforms, which are likely to provoke a furious backlash from environmentalists and cause unease for some Labour MPs. A smaller, UK-only list of protected species is being planned, which would place less weight on wildlife — including types of newt — that is rare elsewhere in Europe but more common in Britain. Developers would also no longer have to prove that projects would have no impact on protected natural sites, under plans that would abolish the 'precautionary principle' enshrined in European rules. Instead, a new test would look at risks and benefits of potential projects. Further curbs to judicial review are also being considered by Reeves to stop key projects being delayed by legal challenges from environmentalists. No decisions have been made, but work is underway and Treasury sources acknowledged there was a growing belief that the government needed to go further, as Reeves says she wants to make boosting Britain's sluggish productivity the centrepiece of her autumn budget. She argued this week that building more infrastructure such as roads and railways were crucial to this aim. A Planning and Infrastructure Bill currently going through parliament attempts to encourage development through a 'nature restoration fund' through which developers will be allowed to press ahead with projects by setting up schemes elsewhere to offset their environmental impact. • The grid is struggling — and our green future hangs in the balance But the plan has been criticised by environmental groups while also attracting scepticism from some developers, who fear it will not work in practice and do little to speed up building. Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, who stood down as energy minister in May, is urging his former colleagues to go further to achieve Labour's promise of 150 major infrastructure projects. 'While I think the planning bill will work for housing, I don't think it is sufficiently focused on the major infrastructure projects, so it is encouraging that the Treasury is going to have another look at whether we've really got this right,' he said. 'The government has to face up to the tensions in the Habitat Regulations which are making it hard to build essential infrastructure and the reality is that at some point someone needs to make a hard decision and say 'on some things, you just have to press ahead'.' The rules, which incorporate the EU Habitats Directive into British law, ban killing of hundreds of species, including types of bats, news, voles, snails, spiders, insects and woodlice. Developers must prove there is no risk to protected sites and species before being allowed to go ahead with projects, under rules which critics say impose an 'impossibly high standard' on vital projects. Reeves is increasingly sympathetic to such criticism, after repeatedly hitting out at 'ridiculous' environmental protections. She said last month that she cared 'more about the young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails', after a speech in January in which she said developers should be able to 'focus on getting things built, and stop worrying about bats and newts'. Sir Keir Starmer has also expressed frustration with the ability of campaigners to delay projects through legal challenges, and is already introducing rules which limit judicial review to override the 'whims of nimbys'. Campaign groups and residents, who currently have three opportunities to apply for judicial review, which will be reduced to two, or one in cases deemed by a judge 'totally without merit'. Reeves is now considering allowing only one opportunity to bring any challenge. Some Labour MPs and peers want her to go further by using dedicated acts of parliament to prevent any legal challenge to specific named projects. The plans are at an early stage and are likely to cause tension with ministers in other departments who have pledged to protect the environment. Paul Miner, of the countryside charity CPRE, said targeting habitats regulations would 'take us backwards rather than forwards on nature recovery', adding: 'We urge the government to drop the worn-out 'builders versus blockers' narrative which wrongly frames climate and nature as being in conflict with economic growth.' Becky Pullinger, of the Wildlife Trusts, said maintaining environmental standards was 'essential if we are to achieve targets to protect and restore the natural world which is suffering huge declines, saying Reeves should abandon 'the myth that deregulation will lead to economic growth'. But Robbie Owen, head of infrastructure planning at Pinsent Masons, said: 'Ministers are finally realising that their rhetoric about reform doesn't match up up the reality of their bill. We have been saying to ministers and officials all year that the bill needs to go further and it seems that message has finally been heard.'

Illegal migrants brought to UK in ‘dangerous' £350 dinghies sold online by backstreet factories in China
Illegal migrants brought to UK in ‘dangerous' £350 dinghies sold online by backstreet factories in China

The Sun

time38 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Illegal migrants brought to UK in ‘dangerous' £350 dinghies sold online by backstreet factories in China

BACKSTREET factories in China sell £350 dinghies online to people smugglers bringing illegal migrants to Britain, a Sun probe found. Workshops 5,000 miles away churn out flimsy vessels to order for unscrupulous gangs in northern France — offering discounts for bulk purchases. 2 The National Crime Agency said the dinghies were becoming 'ever more dangerous and un-seaworthy, increasing the risk to life'. Our probe found that the factories, all in Shandong and Zhejiang ­provinces, advertise through Chinese e-commerce site and state their main export market is western Europe. They say the boats, typically 8m-long, can carry more than 30. In reality, double that cram on them. Last week, a 10m-long boat brought 106 into British waters. At least 469 fully-loaded dinghies have crossed to the UK so far this year, carrying 27,881, the majority young men. This week a shipment of 20 small boats destined to ferry migrants across the Channel to the UK was seized in Bulgaria. Another 25 were confiscated at the same location in July thanks to intelligence gathered by British law enforcement passed on to the Bulgarian National Customs Agency. It comes after the Foreign Office sanctioned Chinese firm Weihai Yamar Outdoors Product Co for advertising online inflatable boats for the specific purpose of people smuggling. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The Labour government claimed it would smash the gangs but can't even stop the Chinese-made boats being sold in France. Small boat crossings under Labour are on brink of hitting 50,000 - one illegal migrant every 11 mins since the election 'This is a weak government which has lost control of our borders. They aren't prepared to take the tough action needed to end this madness so the situation will get worse.' Alibaba said: 'Search terms or product listings such as 'refugee boat' or 'immigrant boat' are in ­violation of our listings policies and won't return positive search results.' It said the inflatables advertised were 'designed, certified, and intended for lawful purposes'. 2

Donald Trump is ‘not a force for good' London Mayor says
Donald Trump is ‘not a force for good' London Mayor says

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Donald Trump is ‘not a force for good' London Mayor says

London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has said he would be 'more than happy' to meet Donald Trump – despite warning that the US President could be 'inadvertently radicalising people' and is 'not a force for good'. Sir Sadiq dismissed jibes that President Trump made against him on a recent visit to Scotland, where he claimed the London Mayor was 'a nasty person' who has 'done a terrible job'. The Labour politician said remarks such as those were 'water off a duck's back'. However, he told an event at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe it sometimes felt like he was 'nine years old again' and 'in the school playground'. But Sir Sadiq, speaking at the Political Party show with comedian Matt Forde, hit back at the US President, saying: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. 'Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' He spoke out as he said that records showed since the middle of January this year – when Mr Trump began his second term in the White House – and July 'there have never been more Americans applying to British citizenship and living in London'. The Mayor said: 'So I think Americans have got good taste by and large.' He added that he hoped the President would come to London during his state visit to the UK next month, with Sir Sadiq stressing the 'diversity' of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness'. Speaking about this diversity, he insisted: 'I think it makes us stronger not weaker, richer not poorer. 'And when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous. 'He inadvertently – I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately – he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.' He spoke out about fears that minorities 'could be treated less favourably because of the views of the President of the USA' as he accused Mr Trump of 'using London and our diversity as a political football, as a proxy for a culture war'. The London Mayor continued: 'On a personal level, it is water off a duck's back, but we can't run away from the fact that there are some really serious challenges we face as a western society and President Trump, in my view, I speak generally, isn't a force for good.' However he insisted that he would be 'more than happy to meet President Trump' saying he would seek to show him that it is 'possible to be proud to be a westerner and a proud to be Muslim, that it is possible to be British, and proud to be British, and be of Pakistani origin and be a law abiding citizen and we aren't three headed monsters'. The Labour politician said: 'I suspect President Trump may have formed a view of Muslims because of the actions of a small minority of really bad people who are terrorists and use Islam in a perverted way. 'What I would want President Trump to know is that is a very small fraction of Muslims across the globe. 'So if there was an opportunity to meet President Trump, I would be more than happy to do so.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store