logo
Low investment, several years too late: Why India lags far behind China in tech innovation

Low investment, several years too late: Why India lags far behind China in tech innovation

Scroll.in03-05-2025

This article was originally published in Rest of World, which covers technology's impact outside the West.
China's DeepSeek moment has triggered unease for the Indian government and tech industry.
Earlier this month, India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, rebuked the country's entrepreneurs for their lack of innovation. 'We are focused on food delivery apps, turning unemployed youth into cheap labour so that the rich can get their meals without moving out of their house. And against that, what does a Chinese startup do? Work on developing electric mobility battery technologies, and with that, they today dominate the electric mobility ecosystem,' Goyal said at an industry event.
Goyal's comments sparked a backlash from Indian startup founders and investors, who pointed to bureaucratic red tape and import regulations on computing equipment as major barriers to innovation.
While explanations vary for why India – where startup funding is among the highest in the world — has fallen behind in advanced manufacturing and artificial intelligence, experts believe the gap dates back to the 1980s, when the two nations diverged economically: China invested heavily in manufacturing, while India leaned into services.
Today, China commands 30% of global manufacturing output, while India lags at 3%. India's services-led mindset and decades of underinvestment in innovation have left the country scrambling to catch up in the global tech race, according to industry analysts, government stakeholders, and academics.
'China's ecosystem is different. They already have the manufacturing prowess, which they built over time. So, for them to make a product which can be put into the market is not that difficult,' Pranay Kotasthane, chair of the High-Tech Geopolitics Programme at Takshashila Institution, a Bengaluru-based think tank, told Rest of World. India remains a 'service-focused' tech ecosystem – a space where the country beats China 'hands down,' he said.
The government is counting on the private sector for high-tech innovation, Abhishek Singh, a top-ranking bureaucrat and CEO of IndiaAI Mission, a state-led initiative to drive AI adoption, told Rest of World. 'The government can only enable the ecosystem. The actual work is done by the industry, startups and researchers.'
India has not innovated like China due to 'a lack of conviction at scale,' Anant Mani, founder and CEO of a Chennai-based artificial intelligence startup, Randomwalk AI, told Rest of World. 'India's AI startup ecosystem is alive, but not yet formidable. We have sparks – Sarvam AI, Niramai, Krutrim AI, etc – but not yet a sustained fire.'
India has over 200 generative AI startups, which raised $560 million in funding in 2024.
Yet, India is a net exporter of top AI talent, while China, despite producing nearly half as many high-quality researchers, retains most of them within its domestic ecosystem, according to a global AI talent tracker by Chicago-based think tank MacroPolo.
Despite losing much of its top AI talent to the US and Europe, India is still home to over 20% of the world's semiconductor design engineers, Kotasthane said. The leading 25 semiconductor companies in India with centers dedicated to design and research and development include global giants like Intel, Nvidia, and Qualcomm, according to the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a Washington-based science and technology think tank.
But India's investment in innovation is meagre, undermining its ambition to take on China. India spends 0.64% of its GDP on research and development, far below China's 2.4% or the US's 3.5%.
'The Indian mindset is that Silicon Valley is an extension of ours,' Payal Arora, a digital anthropologist and professor of inclusive AI cultures at Utrecht University, told Rest of World. 'We export the majority of brains to the US, where they become leaders and create offshore places like [Bengaluru]. … They are not Indians representing India in the US … They've become Americans and are serving American interests.'
The Indian government, in a recent survey, pointed out that private sector investment in research and development remains consistently low compared to countries like China, Japan, and the U.S.
China's Huawei alone spent nearly $23 billion on research and development in 2023 – more than India's total public and private spending combined. In the fiscal year ending 2023, India's top spenders, Tata Motors and Reliance Industries, spent Rs 23,265 crore (around $2.8 billion) supporting tech innovation.
'This is all capex [capital expenditure], which is very high-risk because you are doing the capex up-front in the hope that you will create something truly differentiated at a global scale,' said Ravi Jain, investment director at TDK Ventures – an arm of a Japanese tech company that invests in AI – and the former business head of Indian AI startup Krutrim AI. 'The chance of this coming through is very low because somebody will have to write a 100, 200, 300 million-dollar check up-front to be able to even get started in this pursuit.'
As part of its $1.26 billion IndiaAI mission, launched in March 2024, the Indian government has been ramping up efforts to support AI startups and reduce reliance on foreign chip imports. It plans to build a large cluster of graphics processing units – a powerful network of high-speed computers – and train AI models, while offering incentives for homegrown chip designs.
China's push for semiconductor self-sufficiency started in 2014 with the launch of the $150 billion National Integrated Circuit Plan. As the US imposed sanctions on China's high-tech chipmaking in 2018, Beijing scaled up homegrown innovation, making huge investments in tech parks, research and development labs, and startup incentives.
India's semiconductor policy was created seven years later in 2021.
Indian automaker Tata made a foray into chipmaking by establishing a $11-billion semiconductor fabrication facility in Gujarat in 2024. Several other assembly and testing facilities are coming up, including US chipmaker Micron's $2.75 billion semiconductor plant. Tata Group is building a semiconductor assembly and test plant in the northeastern state of Assam, with an investment of nearly $3.3 billion.
Manish Tewari, India's former minister of information and broadcasting, told Rest of World the government wasn't doing enough to become competitive on a global scale.
'The R&D spends are definitely on the lower side. And ultimately, you know, we may be driven by the private sector, but the private sector requires support … especially the kind of support which has been extended by the US, by other countries, including China,' Tewari said.
With China becoming increasingly inaccessible for foreign investors amid rising tariffs, industry experts say India's tech sector might benefit from the ongoing trade war.
In early January, Microsoft announced a $3 billion investment for the next two years in India's cloud and AI infrastructure. Amazon has set aside $120 million to fund manufacturing and AI development in India.
A sense of falling behind in the global AI race was palpable at a recent technology summit co-hosted by global think tank Carnegie India and India's Ministry of External Affairs, where several panels focused on the country's AI strategy.
Infosys co-founder and chair Nandan Nilekani was among the speakers. He struck an optimistic note, arguing India is well positioned to enable faster AI adoption, thanks to the digital transformation it has undergone over the past 15 years.
Nilekani said DeepSeek's debut has sped up the trend of models becoming accessible far and wide. The real gamechanger, he said, is how AI is applied and the quality of data behind it.
'We should not lose sleep because somebody hasn't built a model,' Nilekani said. 'Anybody can build a model – it's not a big deal. All the knowledge is out there. It's the data that makes the difference, so you've got to change the focus.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Non-Mumbai builders tap into financial capital via redevelopment projects
Non-Mumbai builders tap into financial capital via redevelopment projects

Business Standard

time20 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Non-Mumbai builders tap into financial capital via redevelopment projects

Real estate developers based outside of Mumbai such as Delhi-based DLF, Bengaluru-based Prestige Estates, Puravankara, Pune-based Blackstone-backed Kolte-Patil Developers, Vascon Engineers, and Hyderabad-based Ramky Estates, are foraying into India's largest real estate market through redevelopment projects. While Mumbai has always been India's prime real estate market, policy-level incentives for redevelopments, less capital intensive nature of redevelopment business amid a lack of open land parcels, is attracting developers that are using asset-light strategies to get better realisations from high property rates. 'For developers based outside the MMR, redevelopment offers an effective route to enter the Mumbai market, given the limited availability of greenfield land. Additional attractive factors include higher FSI allowances in slum rehabilitation and society redevelopment projects, which translate to better returns on investment,' said Siddharth Vasudevan, MD, Vascon Engineers. Mumbai's redevelopment market is big enough to accomodate more players like Bengaluru-based Sobha and Ahmedabad-based Arvind Smartspaces are evaluating opportunities. According to Credai-MCHI, over 25,000 buildings across MMR are eligible for redevelopment, with the total estimated project value exceeding Rs 30,000 crore. As per Anarock, as of 2024, average property prices in MMR stood at Rs 16,600 per sq ft, while those in Bengaluru and Hyderabad stood at Rs 8,380 per sq ft and Rs 7,300 per sq ft, respectively. The prices in NCR stood at Rs 7,550 per sq ft. Vijay Agrawal, MD- investment banking, Equirus said that the average margins in real estate are around 25-30 per cent but the Mumbai market is known for higher realisation per square foot, between Rs 25,000 and Rs 1 lakh. 'In other cities, general realisation is between Rs 5,000-12,000, except in a few micro markets. Higher realisations help developers disclose higher revenue with a smaller sales area. This helps in improving their blended per sq ft realisations.' In Mumbai, a developer can book revenue of Rs 500 crore for 1 lakh sq ft of a project with a sale price of Rs 50,000 per sq ft for one project. However, in other markets, a developer will need to sell 5 lakh sq ft of area at Rs 10,000 per sq ft to achieve the same revenue, Agrawal explained. 'Listed companies can meet their topline growth targets by executing projects in this market," Sanjay Daga, CEO and MD, Anex Advisory, said. But the bright opportunity has its challenges. Redevelopment for non-Mumbai developers involves multiple stakeholders, so having a reliable team in a new market in a must. Dealing with local tenants besides higher cost of approvals, construction in smaller area of sites compared to the other cities, are other issues to name a few. 'Developers fail to underwrite the working capital requirement in Mumbai projects. A typical project in other cities is between 5 to 15 acres, while Mumbai's typical project is 0.5 to 3 acres. Construction costs in Mumbai are very steep,' said an industry expert who didn't wish to be named. To overcome these hindrances, developers are forging joint ventures with local developers who already have the land or permissions, and industry experts who hold the ability to deal with the local administration and tenants more effectively. This helps in securing faster approvals and faster project launches. DLF, for its first Mumbai project, has tied up with Trident Realty, a local real estate firm. Prestige, for its mega redevelopment project in Bandra, has joined hands with Mumbai-based Valor Estate and RC Group. Despite strong balance sheets and deep expertise, building trust among buyers will take time. 'Local developers, due to their deep-rooted presence and familiarity with these intricacies, often have an edge,' Shrinivas Rao, CEO, Vestian.

Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?
Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?

Hindustan Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?

Known for its pristine beaches, affordable stays and vibrant nightlife, this country received the highest number of Indian tourists among Southeast Asian countries in 2024. Can you guess which one? Also read: 10 million tourists visited Asia's 'most-loved country' in Q1; more than Thailand, Indonesia India is one of Thailand's most significant tourism markets, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said in a press release in December 2024 to celebrate the 2 million-mark of Indian tourists in Thailand. In 2023, Indian tourists generated 61.9 billion Baht in revenue for Thailand. More than 35.5 million foreign tourists visited Thailand in 2024. Of these, 2.1 million were Indians. Indian travellers arrive in Thailand around the year. November to February is typically considered the high tourist season, overlapping with winter vacation for schoolchildren in India. Thailand is a popular tourist destination with both bachelors and families. There are plenty of factors that contribute to Thailand's popularity as India's favourite tourist destination, including accessibility, affordability and distance. In its press release, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said: 'Thailand's strong air connectivity with India has been instrumental in fostering this growth. As of June 2024, 342 weekly flights between the two nations offered 2.9 million seats annually, representing a 92.2% rebound from pre-pandemic levels. Recent additions, including Indigo's Hyderabad-Bangkok route, THAI's Kochi-Bangkok flights, and Thai AirAsia's Vishakhapatnam-Bangkok service, have further enhanced accessibility.' Friendly visa policies are another major factor contributing the footfall. Thailand has visa-free entry for Indians 'until further notice'. Popular tourist destinations in Thailand include Bangkok, Phuket, Chon Buri, Krabi, Chiang Mai and Phang-nga. Places like Phuket and Krabi are known for their stunning beaches and water activities. In Bangkok, tourists can enjoy shopping, visit famous temples like Wat Phra Kaew and Wat Arun, or drop into one of the city's famous rooftop bars. Chiang Mai, located in northern Thailand, is famous for its historic temples, night markets, and mountain landscapes. It also serves as a base for visiting elephant sanctuaries.

India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs
India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs

India's National Manufacturing Mission (NMM), announced in the Union budget this year, was much awaited. While the sector has grown over the years in size, its contribution to our economy has not gained share. The need to increase manufacturing as a proportion of GDP has always been emphasized and this mission-mode approach announced by the government should make a difference. An ambitious, empowered and inclusive framework is expected to be the hallmark for this mission. It must target a share of at least 12% in global manufacturing output for India, as against the current 3%. Let me share a few thoughts on a framework that could help propel India as a manufacturer. Also Read: Time to re-imagine Indian manufacturing from the ground up The first aspect is the structure of the mission, which could determine the success or failure of the initiative. The NMM can consider a three-tier structure. At the initial level, the government could consider having inter-ministerial task-forces. These should focus on the five key areas spelt out by the finance minister in her budget speech for 2025-26: namely, the ease of doing business; a future-ready workforce; micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs); technology adoption; and quality. These five task-forces could be under the concerned ministries with various stakeholders as members. They should recommend policies, propose roadmaps and drive implementation. The NMM could be headed by a senior industry leader. This can be the second tier. Its main members could be secretaries of key government departments related to manufacturing; they can provide policy and strategic direction. In addition, CEOs from industry associations could be members, while state chief secretaries can be special invitees. This high-level private-public partnership model will be crucial for driving this mission. At the pinnacle of this structure could be a high-level committee headed by the Prime Minister. Its members could be the NMM chairperson, finance minister, commerce and industry minister, cabinet secretary and a representative of the Niti Aayog. This three-tier structure, in our view, would be inclusive and empowered to drive reforms and take the steps required to achieve our goals. Also Read: Think ahead: India's electronics manufacturing must go up the value curve The second aspect is whether the NMM should have a sectoral focus or address sector-agnostic issues. In this, the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci) has suggested that its dominant focus should be on sector-agnostic areas, like regulatory reforms, cost competitiveness, the overall investment climate, skilling, quality, productivity and the like. The mission should also make strategic interventions in frontier-technology fields—such as electronics, batteries, defence, space, renewables, AI, quantum computing, etc—by boosting domestic design capability and value addition. Last year, the government announced an allocation of ₹1 trillion to encourage research and development (R&D) in sunrise domains by the private sector. We need to leverage this fund now to take a lead in the frontier technologies. The NMM's priorities are the third aspect. A sine qua non list would include macro-level policies, be it logistics, monetary, fiscal, tariffs or trade. These should be fully aligned with the mission's needs. It would also cover technology, which needs to be the key driver of manufacturing. A focus on value addition by way of design, key components and so on must also feature as a priority. So also export competitiveness, global value chain integration and import substitution in critical areas of dependency. As its fourth aspect, the mission will lay emphasis on MSMEs, which have been the main driver of manufacturing growth in several countries. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check Ficci has suggested six areas of intervention: Training for MSME promoters to grow into mid-sized or large firms in the future; an impetus to family-owned businesses; the development of urban MSME zones, non-polluting MSME malls or urban industrial clusters within city limits to reduce logistical costs and enhance market access for small enterprises; support for environment, social and governance capacity among MSMEs; a catalyst for digital adoption across MSMEs to drive efficiency and growth; and light-touch regulations for three years for MSMEs in strategic areas to help them take off. For India to become a global manufacturing powerhouse, quality cannot be ignored. The mission should collaborate with industry consortiums to set Indian standards and India should take an active part in such processes at international standard-setting bodies. We need to promote and push Indian standards alongside our exports. Apart from the NMM, a high-level committee for regulatory reforms was also announced by the government. Ficci has suggested some broad terms of reference for its institutional structure, urging the adoption of a regulatory impact assessment framework to ensure transparent and consistent policy implementation across regulators. Overall, the two structures should lead to seamless communication and interaction between all stakeholders at every level—from central and state functionaries to experts and leaders of academia and industry—with everyone focused on one mission: manufacturing. The author is president, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store