Court lifts block on Trump's mass firings at top US consumer watchdog
The ruling will not take immediate effect, the court said on Friday, to allow lawyers representing workers at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and consumer groups to file for a review of the case by the full circuit court of appeals for the District of Columbia.
The ruling is the latest twist in the legal battle over the fate of the CFPB, as the Trump administration has tried to fire 1,500 of the agency's 1,700 employees. The agency has returned more than $21bn to US consumers since its founding.
Russell Vought, director of the office of management and budget and the architect of Project 2025, the rightwing blueprint drawn up ahead of Trump's re-election, was appointed acting director of the CFPB in February.
The Trump administration has yet to nominate a permanent candidate for the director role since withdrawing its previous nominee in May.
US circuit judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao, both Trump appointees, ruled in favor of the administration on Friday. The district court behind the initial decision 'lacked jurisdiction to consider the claims predicated on loss of employment', the majority wrote.
In a dissent, circuit judge Cornelia Pillard, who was appointed by Barack Obama, said the lower court had acted properly in blocking the Trump administration from eradicating the CFPB entirely as the lawsuit played out.
Pillard wrote: 'It is emphatically not within the discretion of the President or his appointees to decide that the country would benefit most if there were no Bureau at all.'
Senator Elizabeth Warren, ranking member of the Senate banking, housing, and urban affairs committee who played a significant role in the creation of the CFPB, said: 'Today's divided panel decision willfully ignores the Trump administration's unprecedented and lawless attempt to destroy an agency created by Congress that has helped millions of families across the country.'
The ruling was described as a 'disgrace' by Cat Farman, president of the CFPB union. 'It empowers Donald Trump to unilaterally eliminate vital public services established by Congress. Without a functioning CFPB, there is less oversight of the biggest banks, which means more fraud and less help for veterans and the elderly who are major targets for financial scams.'
Farman added: '[CFPB workers] aren't giving up our fight to defend the rule of law from executive overreach and protect the hard-earned paychecks of working people from Wall Street greed.'
Reuters contributed reporting
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
California legislature poised to vote on redistricting plan in response to Texas gerrymandering
The California state legislature was poised on Thursday to vote on a plan to redraw its congressional boundaries and create five potential new Democratic House seats – an answer to the Republican redistricting push in Texas, sought by Donald Trump, aimed at tilting the map in his party's favor ahead of next year's midterm elections. The nation's two most populous – and ideologically opposed – states were racing on parallel tracks toward consequential redistricting votes, potentially within hours of each other. As Democrats in Sacramento worked to advance a legislative package that would put their 'election rigging response act' before voters in a special election this fall, Republicans in Austin were nearing a final vote on their own gerrymandering pursuit. Approval by the Texas senate, which is expected as early as Thursday, would conclude a dramatic showdown with the state's outnumbered Democratic lawmakers whose two-week boycott captured national attention and set in motion a coast-to-coast redistricting battle. The California plan, led by the state's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, is designed to flip as many as five Republican-held seats in California – the exact number of additional GOP seats Trump has said he is 'entitled to' in Texas. 'This is a new Democratic party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said on a call with reporters on Wednesday. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' The redistricting tit-for-tat is an extraordinary deviation from the norm. Traditionally, states redraw congressional maps once a decade based on census data, with both the Texas and California maps originally intended to last through 2030. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, is expected to easily approve new congressional maps despite sharp Republican objections. Newsom's signature would send the measure to the ballot in a special election this November. The California changes would only take effect in response to a gerrymander by a Republican state – a condition that would be met when the Texas legislatures sends the maps to the state's governor, Greg Abbott, for his promised signature. California was acting after a dramatic showdown in Austin, where Democratic lawmakers fled the state earlier this month to delay the GOP redistricting plan. When they returned, some were assigned police minders and forced to sign permission slips before leaving the capitol. Several spent the night in the chamber in protest ahead of Wednesday's session, where Republicans pushed through a map designed explicitly to boost their party's chances in 2026. The legislative action on Thursday followed a weeks-long showdown in Texas, after Democratic lawmakers fled the state in an effort to delay the GOP redistricting plan. They returned only after California moved forward with its counterproposal. California Democrats are moving ahead after days of contentious debate over the cost – and consequences – of a referendum to temporarily toss out the maps drawn by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Republicans estimated that a special election could cost more than $230m – money they said would be better spent on other issues like healthcare. On Wednesday night, the state supreme court declined an emergency request by Republican lawmakers seeking to block the Democratic plan from moving forward. The redistricting push has also caused angst among some Democrats and independents who have fought for years to combat gerrymandering. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Testifying in favor of the changes during a hearing earlier this week, Sara Sadhwani, a political science professor who served as a Democratic member of the state's independent redistricting commission in 2020, said the map-drawing tit-for-tat presented California voters with a 'moral conflict'. But she argued that Democrats had to push back on the president's power grab. 'It brings me no joy to see the maps that we passed fairly by the commission to be tossed aside,' she said. 'I do believe this is a necessary step in a much bigger battle to shore up free and fair elections in our nation.' The plan also drew the backing of former president Barack Obama and other champions of fair redistricting, such as his former attorney general, Eric Holder. But Newsom's redistricting plan – a high-stakes gambit for the term-limited governor who has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions – is not assured to succeed. It faces mounting opposition from high-profile Republicans, including the state's former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has vowed to 'terminate gerrymandering'. Early polling has been mixed. But a new survey conducted by Newsom's longtime pollster David Binder found strong support for the measure in the heavily Democratic state, with 57% of voters backing it while 35% opposed it. In a memo, Binder noted that support for the redistricting measure varies depending on how it is presented to voters. When framed as eliminating the state's independent redistricting commission designed to prevent partisan gerrymandering, support drops. However, when voters hear that the initiative would allow temporary map changes only in response to partisan actions in other states, like Texas, while retaining the commission, the measure enjoys a double-digit margin of support.
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Wall St futures slip after Walmart results; Fed meet in focus
Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S. stock index futures edged lower on Thursday, as investors analyzed big-box retailer Walmart's quarterly results for clues about the health of the American consumer, ahead of the Federal Reserve's three-day conference in Jackson Hole. Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab raised its fiscal year sales and profit forecasts, driven by strong demand from shoppers across all income levels, who have turned to the world's largest retailer amid rising product costs. However, shares of the retailer fell 2.5% in premarket trading. The company has implemented minimal price hikes compared to competitors and promised to maintain low prices, as well as stocked up on affordable discretionary products to draw in more customers. Investors are also trying to gauge how U.S. tariffs would impact holiday sales later this year, after reports from other retailers such as Target (TGT.N), opens new tab and Home Depot (HD.N), opens new tab earlier this week had painted a mixed picture. The week also witnessed a sharp decline in technology stocks such as Nvidia, AMD, Palantir and Meta signaling investor fears that the equities, which have soared since April lows, are now overvalued, while Washington's growing interference in the sector has also raised alarms. The selloff could also be a result of investors paring back their stock exposure during a traditionally rocky period for equities, according to the Stock Trader's Almanac. "Equities could be more at risk of volatility amid this week's selloff in AI-related stocks on the back of renewed doubts about AI valuations," said Raffi Boyadjian, lead market analyst at brokerage XM. "Although dip buyers have stepped in to stabilize the market, it's too early to rule out a further slump in mega-cap tech stocks." In premarket trading, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab and Palantir (PLTR.O), opens new tab were marginally up, while Meta (META.O), opens new tab slipped 0.3%. At 07:17 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 145 points, or 0.32%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 11.25 points, or 0.18% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 22.25 points, or 0.10%. Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab gained 1.5% after a report suggested the plane maker was in talks to sell as many as 500 jets to China. Among other market movers, Coty (COTY.N), opens new tab slumped 20% after the beauty products maker forecast a drop in current-quarter sales on weak U.S. spending. The Fed's annual symposium is expected to kick off on Thursday, with Powell scheduled to speak on Friday at 10 a.m. ET. Traders are looking for any commentary from Chair Jerome Powell that would signal an interest rate cut in September following recent job market weakness. Minutes from the central bank's July meeting showed on Wednesday that policymakers had struck a cautious tone and expect the current interest rates to be not far above the neutral level - where economic activity is neither stimulated nor constrained. Traders have pared back odds of a 25-basis-point interest rate cut in September to 79% from 99.9% last week, according to data compiled by LSEG. A weekly report on jobless claims, a private report on business activity and remarks from Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, are also expected on Thursday.
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump threatens funding for all California schools over transgender policies
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S President Donald Trump on Thursday said any California school district that does not adhere to his administration's transgender policies will not receive federal funding, but gave no other details. Representatives for the White House and the U.S. Department of Education did not immediately respond to requests for detail following Trump's comment, posted to his social media platform. U.S. schools receive the vast majority of their funding through local and state sources, but do receive some money from the federal government. Trump's post is the latest salvo in his fight against transgender rights as well as the state of California, led by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. His administration sued California in July over its policy to allow transgender athletes to compete in girls' school sports, alleging that it was a violation of federal anti-discrimination laws. In February, the Republican president signed a directive to strip federal funding from any school that allows transgender women or girls to compete in female sports. Representatives for Newsom's office could not be immediately reached.
