Chicago Fed president wants to see a 'few months of data' on inflation to gauge economy's health
Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee thought about that Wednesday as he toured Mel-O-Cream Donuts in Springfield, Illinois.
Even inside a donut shop, the effects of tariffs on the economy can be seen. 'It's sort of surprising, because donuts seem like a very local product, and yet they get some ingredients like palm oil that are coming from Indonesia,' Goolsbee said. The Trump administration set tariffs on Indonesia at 19%.
'They have to now figure out what are the tariff rates, and the tariffs went up a significant amount. If that happens, that could have a multi-thousand-dollar impact on their operation,' he continued. But, he added, 'I hope it's not a sign of something more extended or broader in the way that the Covid inflation ... generated its own snowballing, in which it was supposed to go away and it didn't go away.'
That tariff will cost Chris Larson, a co-owner of Mel-O-Cream, 'about $4,000 per shipment per week,' he said. And that used to be somewhere 'closer to $2,000 to $2,100 weekly. Now it's going to move up to $4,200 ... for the exact same product.'
Goolsbee's visit matters because he's one of just 12 people in the country who get to decide what to do with interest rates. The Fed's rate-setting committee will next decide whether to cut or hold on Sept. 17, and the perspectives of businesses like Mel-O-Cream are instrumental in helping him determine his next vote.
Larson's hope? That the Fed will cut interest rates, which would help Mel-O-Cream finance new equipment to cut costs in labor and blunt the impact of tariffs.
'What is the cost of money in order to expand, to upgrade, to update? What do those things look like?' Larson said. 'Those things do concern us, and we would love to see, as everyone would, the interest rates would come down.'
Goolsbee said he wasn't yet ready to tie his hands to an interest rate cut in September.
'Let's get a few months of data before we make any conclusions. The hardest thing that the Fed ever has to do is get the timing right at moments of transition,' he said Wednesday on NBC News' 'Here's the Scoop' podcast. 'I think as we go through this fall, September, November, December, all of those are live moments that we could be cutting rates.'
Government data Thursday showed that wholesale prices paid by U.S. companies rose much more than expected. Another measure, the consumer price index, showed Tuesday that inflation remained stubbornly high in July.
The Fed's target for inflation is 2%, lower than the most recent consumer inflation reading of 2.7% and producer inflation reading of 3.3%. Even with those numbers, the market still anticipates a cut next month.
President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on hundreds of trading partners around the world could affect the cost of most of the imports that businesses buy from overseas. With a myriad of rates as high as 50%, businesses may be faced with a new maze of rates and tariff bills, as well as the uncertainty that comes with the on-again, off-again tariff rollout.
'The Fed, by law, is supposed to maximize employment and stabilize prices. So it's inflation and employment that are really the twin towers of how we think about setting of rates,' Goolsbee said, underscoring the Federal Reserve's role in the broader economy.
'There are parts of the job market where there's still basically labor shortages. It's very hard for people to find workers. And that's what you kind of saw here at the donut factory,' he said.
Goolsbee oversees the Seventh Federal Reserve District, which includes Iowa, much of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin.
Some of his colleagues, including Jeffrey Schmid, of the Kansas City Fed; Alberto Musalem, of the St. Louis Fed; and Beth Hammack, of the Cleveland Fed, are sounding similarly cautious tones about the economy. All three current Federal Open Market Committee voters have said in recent days that it's either too early to decide or that keeping rates steady for now would be their preference.
The futures market predicts the Fed will cut by 0.25% at its next meeting. But some, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, think the Fed should make a more dramatic cut, by up to a half-point.
Musalem said Wednesday on CNBC that a cut that large would be 'unsupported by the current state of the economy.'
Amid unrelenting attacks from Trump and his administration against the FOMC and Chair Jerome Powell, Goolsbee, who was an economic adviser to President Barack Obama, said economic indicators should drive monetary policymaking, not politics.
'The FOMC and my own thinking are that what should drive interest rate decisions should be the economic conditions and the economic outlook,' he said. 'I invite anybody to look at the minutes or read the transcripts of the FOMC — the people on that body take extremely seriously that it is the economy that should drive the decisions. And that is what drives the decisions.'
'This is a committee made up of people from a lot of different perspectives. And as I say, they keep track of, word for word, what everyone says at the meetings. And you can look at it yourself.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Dedham developer plans $500 million lab, housing project off Route 128
The project, which is tentatively called 'The Campus at 128,' has not yet been formally proposed to the town, and is in its 'infancy,' said Peter Zahka, an attorney representing Supreme Cos. But given its scale and scope, he and Petruzziello wanted to start the public process early; they gave a preliminary presentation to the Dedham Select Board last month. 'It's very important that you're here in front of us. It's not typical at all for you to be coming in ... but this is not a real typical project,' said Dedham Select Board Vice Chair Dimitria Sullivan at the July meeting. 'Something of this magnitude (is) really different than what we have seen.' Advertisement Large-scale campus development proposals have been rare in Greater Boston since the COVID-19 pandemic upended the global commercial real estate market. The Select Board last month wrestled with potential benefits and drawbacks of a project of such magnitude: while it could bring much-needed commercial tax revenue and create local jobs and housing, it would also generate substantial change for an area that has historically been a quiet suburban residential enclave. Advertisement Bringing in commercial development and multifamily apartments to a town with a majority residential tax base would be a boon to Dedham's municipal finances, particularly the town's 'operational deficit,' Rosenberger said. In Dedham, commercial owners pay more than twice the residential property tax rate: a commercial property Still, he said he's heard from neighbors concerned about potential negative environmental impacts and more traffic. 'The more commercial we can provide, the better off the residential tax base can be,' he said. ' It's human nature to be concerned about a project of this magnitude. ... There's going to be impacts that are going to be to direct abutters, to traffic, that will need to be figured out.' Early plans shown to the Select Board last month show a possible 400,000 square feet of lab space, 470,000 square feet of research and development space, and 644 apartments on the acreage. Petruzziello later told the Globe he would also plan to include at least one residential building reserved for people age 55 and older. Creating hundreds of apartments would both help ease Advertisement 'It's a project that we think, if done correctly ... could be a grand slam for everybody,' Zahka said. Also at the July meeting, abutting landowner David Newman asked what consideration Supreme Cos. has given to neighbors at this stage of the development process. 'I, frankly, don't see any consideration to the abutters,' Newman said. 'I know we're early on in the project, but you're obviously out of the gate, causing a lot of sleepless nights to most residents on our street.' Select Board Chair Erin Boles Welch said the Planning Board will hold regular meetings that would include public comment. A 2022 Town Meeting vote allowed for a planned commercial development on land within a specific residential zoning district, if that commercial development met certain restrictions. At least 60 percent of the project would need to meet the definition of 'laboratory, research and development' standards and front Route 128/Interstate 95. That vote sparked the idea that the vacant land could host something substantial, Petruzziello said. Three years ago, when Dedham voters approved future lab campuses in residential areas with highway frontage, the life-science lab market in Greater Boston was peaking in demand and development. These days, however, the landscape looks very different. In an interview, Petruzziello and Zacha said that 57 acres off Route 128 is an ideal location for a planned commercial development. The campus could be home to 'tough tech' labs, or labs for artificial intelligence or robotics companies, rather than life-science labs, Petruzziello said. Commercial real estate markets can change swiftly — and he wants to be ready with a project when tenants are once again ready to lease up. Advertisement 'It's going to take us two years to permit, and we want to be ready … when they're knocking on our door,' Petruzziello said. Petruzziello said the mix of potential uses for The Campus at 128 is still in flux, but he would aim to formally propose a project with town officials 'sometime in 2026, for sure.' Catherine Carlock can be reached at
Los Angeles Times
14 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
News Analysis: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences
Deep in the badlands of defeat, Democrats have soul-searched about what went wrong last November, tinkered with a thousand-plus thinkpieces and desperately cast for a strategy to reboot their stalled-out party. Amid the noise, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has recently championed an unlikely game plan: Forget the high road, fight fire with fire and embrace the very tactics that virtue-minded Democrats have long decried. Could the dark art of political gerrymandering be the thing that saves democracy from Trump's increasingly authoritarian impulses? That's essentially the pitch Newsom is making to California voters with his audacious new special election campaign. As Texas Democrats dig in to block a Republican-led redistricting push and Trump muscles to consolidate power wherever he can, Newsom wants to redraw California's own congressional districts to favor Democrats. His goal: counter Trump's drive for more GOP House seats with a power play of his own. It's a boundary-pushing gamble that will undoubtedly supercharge Newsom's political star in the short-term. The long-game glory could be even grander, but only if he pulls it off. A ballot-box flop would be brutal for both Newsom and his party. The charismatic California governor is termed out of office in 2026 and has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions. But the distinct scent of his home state will be hard to completely slough off in parts of the country where California is synonymous with loony lefties, business-killing regulation and an out-of-control homelessness crisis. To say nothing of Newsom's ill-fated dinner at an elite Napa restaurant in violation of COVID-19 protocols — a misstep that energized a failed recall attempt and still haunts the governor's national reputation. The redistricting gambit is the kind of big play that could redefine how voters across the country see Newsom. The strategy could be a boon for Newsom's 2028 ambitions during a moment when Democrats are hungry for leaders, said Democratic strategist Steven Maviglio. But it's also a massive roll of the dice for both Newsom and the state he leads. 'It's great politics for him if this passes,' Maviglio said. 'If it fails, he's dead in the water.' The path forward — which could determine control of Congress in 2026 — is hardly a straight shot. The 'Election Rigging Response Act,' as Newsom has named his ballot measure, would temporarily scrap the congressional districts enacted by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Under the proposal, Democrats could pick up five seats currently held by Republicans while bolstering vulnerable Democratic incumbent Reps. Adam Gray, Josh Harder, George Whitesides, Derek Tran and Dave Min, which would save the party millions of dollars in costly reelection fights. But first the Democratic-led state Legislature must vote to place the measure on the Nov. 4 ballot and then it must be approved by voters. If passed, the initiative would have a 'trigger,' meaning the redrawn map would not take effect unless Texas or another GOP-led state moved forward with its own gerrymandering effort. 'I think what Governor Newsom and other Democrats are doing here is exactly the right thing we need to do,' Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin said Thursday. 'We're not bringing a pencil to a knife fight. We're going to bring a bazooka to a knife fight, right? This is not your grandfather's Democratic Party,' Martin said, adding that they shouldn't be the only ones playing by a set of rules that no longer exist. For Democrats like Rep. Laura Friedman (D-Glendale), who appeared alongside Newsom to kick off the effort, there is 'some heartbreak' to temporarily shelving their commitment to independent redistricting. But she and others were clear-eyed about the need to stop a president 'willing to rig the election midstream,' she said. Friedman said she was hearing overwhelmingly positive reactions to the proposal from all kinds of Democratic groups on the ground. 'The response that I get is, 'Finally, we're fighting. We have a way to fight back that's tangible,'' Friedman recounted. Still, despite the state's Democratic voter registration advantage, victory for the ballot measure will hardly be assured. California voters have twice rallied for independent redistricting at the ballot box in the last two decades and many may struggle to abandon those beliefs. A POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll found that voters prefer keeping an independent panel in place to draw district lines by a nearly two-to-one margin, and that independent redistricting is broadly popular in the state. (Newsom's press office argued that the poll was poorly worded, since it asked about getting rid of the independent commission altogether and permanently returning line-drawing power to the legislators, rather than just temporarily scrapping their work for several cycles until the independent commission next draws new lines.) California voters should not expect to see a special election campaign focused on the minutia of reconfiguring the state's congressional districts, however. While many opponents will likely attack the change as undercutting the will of California voters, who overwhelmingly supported weeding politics out of the redistricting process, bank on Newsom casting the campaign as a referendum on Trump and his devious effort to keep Republicans in control of Congress. Newsom employed a similar strategy when he demolished the Republican-led recall campaign against him in 2021, which the governor portrayed as a 'life and death' battle against 'Trumpism' and far-right anti-vaccine and antiabortion activists. Among California's Democratic-heavy electorate, that message proved to be extremely effective. 'Wake up, America,' Newsom said Thursday at a Los Angeles rally launching the campaign for the redistricting measure. 'Wake up to what Donald Trump is doing. Wake up to his assault. Wake up to the assault on institutions and knowledge and history. Wake up to his war on science, public health, his war against the American people.' Kevin Liao, a Democratic strategist who has worked on national and statewide campaigns, said his D.C. and California-based political group chats had been blowing up in recent days with texts about the moment Newsom was creating for himself. Much of Liao's group chat fodder has involved the output of Newsom's digital team, which has elevated trolling to an art form on its official @GovPressOffice account on the social media site X. The missives have largely mimicked the president's own social media patois, with hyperbole, petty insults and a heavy reliance on the 'caps lock' key. 'DONALD IS FINISHED — HE IS NO LONGER 'HOT.' FIRST THE HANDS (SO TINY) AND NOW ME — GAVIN C. NEWSOM — HAVE TAKEN AWAY HIS 'STEP,' ' one of the posts read last week, dutifully reposted by the governor himself. Some messages have also ended with Newsom's initials (a riff on Trump's signature 'DJT' signoff) and sprinkled in key Trumpian callbacks, like the phrase 'Liberation Day,' or a doctored Time Magazine cover with Newsom's smiling mien. The account has garnered 150,000 new followers since the beginning of the month. Shortly after Trump took office in January, Newsom walked a fine line between criticizing the president and his policies and being more diplomatic, especially after the California wildfires — in hopes of appealing to any semblance of compassion and presidential responsibility Trump possessed. Newsom had spent the first months of the new administration trying to reshape the California-vs.-Trump narrative that dominated the president's first term and move away from his party's prior 'resistance' brand. Those conciliatory overtures coincided with Newsom's embrace of a more ecumenical posture, hosting MAGA leaders on his podcast and taking a position on transgender athletes' participation in women's sports that contradicted the Democratic orthodoxy. Newsom insisted that he engaged in those conversations to better understand political views that diverged from his own, especially after Trump's victory in November. However, there was the unmistakable whiff of an ambitious politician trying to broaden his national appeal by inching away from his reputation as a West Coast liberal. Newsom's reluctance to readopt the Trump resistance mantle ended after the president sent California National Guard troops into Los Angeles amid immigration sweeps and ensuing protests in June. Those actions revealed Trump's unchecked vindictiveness and abject lack of morals and honor, Newsom said. Of late, Newsom has defended the juvenile tone of his press aides' posts mocking Trump's own all-caps screeds, and questioned why critics would excoriate his parody and not the president's own unhinged social media utterances. 'If you've got issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns about what he's putting out as president,' Newsom said last week. 'So to the extent it's gotten some attention, I'm pleased.' In an attention-deficit economy where standing out is half the battle, the posts sparkle with unapologetic swagger. And they make clear that Newsom is in on the joke. 'To a certain set of folks who operated under the old rules, this could be seen as, 'Wow, this is really outlandish.' But I think they are making the calculation that Democrats want folks that are going to play under this new set of rules that Trump has established,' Liao said. At a moment when the Democratic party is still occupied with post-defeat recriminations and what's-next vision boarding, Newsom has emerged from the bog with something resembling a plan. And he's betting the house on his deep-blue state's willingness to fight fire with fire. Times staff writers Seema Mehta and Laura Nelson contributed to this report.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Fed is expected to cut rates. Don't expect mortgage rates to follow.
A funny thing happened when the Federal Reserve began cutting interest rates last fall: Mortgage rates actually rose. Now, the central bank is gearing up to cut benchmark interest rates again, and there's a chance something similar could happen once more. The reason? Today's mortgage rates already reflect expectations about the Fed's next move: This week, they hit 6.58%, the lowest level since October 2024. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership A number of economic data releases between now and the Sept. 16-17 meeting could lead to rate swings in the coming weeks. The relationship between the Fed's rate cuts and mortgage rates isn't direct, and mortgage rates are sensitive to a number of other factors, most notably bond yields. Read more: How does the Fed rate decision affect mortgage rates? For mortgage industry professionals, moments like this can be a frustrating time to be in business. Mortgage rates stayed stuck in the high 6% area for most of this year, stymying affordability-stretched buyers and keeping refinancing action limited. Now that rates are finally moving lower, they're fielding more calls from prospective clients. But many customers say they want to wait until September to move forward, in hopes that rates will drop further. 'Oh my gosh, it's my least favorite thing to hear,' said Taylor Sherman, a mortgage loan originator at Barrett Financial Group in Tucson, Ariz. 'I'm like, 'Well, you know, that's already priced in.' Yes, Fed policy determines rates, but it's really about how the market views Fed policy.' When the Fed cuts interest rates, rates on debt tied to the prime rate, like home equity lines of credit and credit cards, typically drop soon after. But the rates on standard 30-year fixed mortgages aren't linked to prime, and often don't react much. Sometimes, like last year, mortgage rates even move higher. Mortgage rates are influenced primarily by 10-year Treasury yields, which move in response to a range of factors like market expectations about inflation, future government borrowing, and what the Fed is doing. Mortgage spreads — the difference between the 10-year yield and prevailing mortgage rates — also play an important role in rates and vary based on other factors like market volatility and demand for mortgage bonds. Read more: What is the 10-year Treasury note, and how does it affect your finances? According to CME FedWatch, traders currently see an 85% chance of a rate cut in September. Those odds are essentially baked into today's mortgage rates, but rates could still oscillate between now and then for a number of reasons. Before the Fed acts, new economic data on August hiring and producer and consumer inflation will be released. Earlier this month, weak jobs data in particular helped push mortgage rates to their current year-to-date lows. Right now, a buyer with $3,000 a month to spend on their home has around $20,000 more in purchasing power than they did in May, when mortgage rates hit their recent peak of just over 7%, according to Redfin. The brokerage's head of economics research, Chen Zhao, said in a statement that homebuyers waiting on the Fed before starting their search might be too late, especially as interest rate volatility is expected to kick up in the coming weeks as new data comes out. Read more: Will mortgage rates ever be 3% again? Bogdan Toderut, a loan officer with Summit Funding in Cumming, Ga., is monitoring inflation and hiring data as he tries to figure out where mortgage rates go from here. 'A lot of times, the market prices in expectations,' Toderut said. 'When you see the big changes, you see them when expectations weren't met.' Although he thinks some of his investor clients might be better off trying to time the market, he advises most buyers to consider overall affordability and their monthly payments over the minutiae of small rate moves. Sign up for the Mind Your Money weekly newsletter By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy After all, mortgage rates can change quickly and unpredictably. When rates hit 6.2% last September, Arkansas-based loan officer Amber Moser prepared refinancing quotes for several dozen clients. None of those deals went forward because the homeowners were holding out for lower rates that never came. Ultimately, they missed out on savings that could have amounted to $300 or $400 a month. Moser, who works for Gershman Mortgage, said she makes a point to educate prospective clients on how mortgage rates are market-driven and move before milestones like Fed cuts. But she, too, warns them that rates are ultimately unpredictable. 'There's no crystal ball, and we have no idea what's going to happen,' Moser said. 'The best bet is, don't try to time the market.' Claire Boston is a Senior Reporter for Yahoo Finance covering housing, mortgages, and home insurance. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
