
Civil service relocation and AI officials at heart of government cost cutting measures
AI civil servants and sending human workers out of London are at the heart of the government's plans to cut costs and reduce the size of the state bureaucracy.
Shrinking the civil service has been a target of both the current Labour and recent Conservative governments - especially following the growth in the organisation during the pandemic.
From a low in 2016 of 384,000 full time workers, in 2024 there were 513,000 civil servants.
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology is claiming a new swathe of tools to help sift information submitted to public consultations could save "75,000 days of manual analysis every year" - roughly the work of 333 civil servants.
However, the time saved is expected to free up existing civil servants to do other work.
The suite of AI tools are known as "Humphrey", after Humphrey Appleby, the fictional civil servant in the TV comedy Yes, Prime Minister.
The government has previously said the introduction of AI would help reduce the civil service headcount - with hopes it could save as much as £45bn.
Speaking today, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle appeared to take aim at expensive outsourcing contracts, saying: "No one should be wasting time on something AI can do quicker and better, let alone wasting millions of taxpayer pounds on outsourcing such work to contractors."
1:47
Move outside of London
Other money-saving plans announced today include moving 12,000 civil servants out of London and into regional hubs - with the government hoping it can save almost £100m by 2032 by not having to pay for expensive leases of prime office space in the capital.
Currently, 95,000 full time civil servants work in London.
Tens of millions of pounds a year are expected to be saved by the closure of 102 Petty France, which overlooks St James's Park, and 39 Victoria Street, which is near the previous location of New Scotland Yard.
In total, 11 London offices are slated for closure, with workers being relocated to the likes of Aberdeen, Belfast, Darlington, Bristol, Manchester and Cardiff.
The reforms of the civil service are being led by Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden - one of Sir Keir Starmer's most influential ministers.
Mr McFadden said: "To deliver our plan for change, we are taking more decision-making out of Whitehall and moving it closer to communities all across the UK.
"By relocating thousands of civil service roles we will not only save taxpayers money, we will make this government one that better reflects the country it serves. We will also be making sure that government jobs support economic growth throughout the country.
"As we radically reform the state, we are going to make it much easier for talented people everywhere to join the civil service and help us rebuild Britain."
The government says it wants senior civil servants out of the capital too - with the aim being that half of UK-based senior officials work in regional offices by the end of the decade.
The government claims the relocations and growth of regional hubs could add as much as £729m to local economies by 2030.
Union welcome - cautiously
Unions appear to cautiously welcome the changes being proposed.
All of Prospect, the PCS and the FDA say it is positive to see better opportunities outside of the capital.
However, they have asked for clarity around whether roles may be lost and what will be offered to people transferring.
Fran Heathcote, the general secretary of the PCS union, said: "If these government proposals are to be successful however, it's important they do the right thing by workers currently based in London.
"That must include guarantees of no compulsory redundancies, no compulsory relocations and access to more flexible working arrangements to enable them to continue their careers should they wish to do so."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
US-China trade talks to resume for a second day
LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - Top U.S. and Chinese officials will resume trade talks for a second day in London on Tuesday, hoping to secure a breakthrough over export controls for goods such as rare earths that have threatened a global supply chain shock and slower economic growth. Investors are hoping that the two superpowers can improve ties after the relief sparked by a preliminary trade deal agreed in Geneva last month gave way to fresh doubts after Washington accused Beijing of blocking exports that are critical to sectors including autos, aerospace, semiconductors and defence. The talks come at a crucial time for both economies, with customs data showing that China's exports to the U.S. plunged 34.5% in May, the sharpest drop since February 2020, when the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic upended global trade. While the impact on U.S. inflation and the jobs market has so far been muted, the dollar remains under pressure from U.S. policymaking. The two sides met at the ornate Lancaster House in the British capital on Monday to discuss disagreements around the Geneva deal, and are due to resume talks early on Tuesday before both sides are expected to issue updates. The U.S. side is led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, while the Chinese contingent is helmed by Vice Premier He Lifeng. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central rare earths have become. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors. Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. Trump's often erratic policymaking on tariffs has roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. The second round of meetings between the two sides comes four days after Trump and Xi spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's January 20 inauguration. Following the call Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the U.S. of rare earths minerals and magnets, and Reuters reported that China has granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers. But tensions remain high over the export controls, after factories around the world started to fret that they would not have enough of the materials they need to keep operating.


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Barefoot Investor Scott Pape shares 'most controversial' warning ever
Barefoot Investor Scott Pape has shared a disturbing AI-generated message that he said might be 'the most controversial thing' he's ever published. 'Some will say what you're about to read is irresponsible - others will call it downright evil,' Pape warned his readers. Pape described how a friend working with the technology told him to ask ChatGPT: 'If you were the devil, how would you destroy the next generation?' 'So I did. And here is what the AI answered, word for word, with zero editing from me.' The AI laid out a 10-step plan for its method for the 'slow systematic erosion' of society with a warning about technology. 'If I were the devil, and my goal was to quietly but effectively destroy the next generation - not through shock and awe, but through slow, systemic erosion - here's how I'd do it,' it wrote. The first steps focused on social media, looking at highjacking attention on addictive devices and defining success as fame by elevating influencers. 'Hijack their attention: Create devices that feel essential, but are engineered to be addictive. Use infinite scroll, auto-play, dopamine loops, and FOMO. Make them believe that consuming is creating, and scrolling is learning. 'Example: A 14-year-old watches four hours of TikTok "productivity hacks" and does nothing all day. 'Redefine success as fame and external validation: Elevate influencers, not contributors. Teach them that a viral moment is more valuable than a decade of hard work. Make "likes" the new currency of self-worth. 'Example: Kids want to be YouTubers when they grow up - not because they love storytelling, but because they crave adoration. 'Attack the family structure: Undermine parental authority - promote the idea that parents are outdated or oppressive. Normalise absentee parenting through economic pressure and distraction. Erode the idea of family traditions, shared meals, and generational wisdom. 'Example: A child feels closer to a Twitch streamer than to their dad. 'Cut them off from nature: Replace tree climbing, swimming holes, and dirt-under-the-nails play with digital avatars and indoor screens. Frame outdoor play as "boring" or unsafe. Turn the natural world into something abstract and inaccessible. 'Example: A 10-year-old can't identify a magpie but knows every Pokémon. 'Confuse pleasure with purpose: Market hyper-palatable food, porn, and substances as "freedom". Create shame-free indulgence while ridiculing restraint, discipline, and tradition. Make pleasure the default pursuit, and discomfort the ultimate enemy. 'Example: A young man loses years to video games, vapes, and porn - not because he's evil, but because he's numb and alone. 'Replace meaning with mockery: Treat faith, commitment, and virtue as relics of the past. Replace sacred stories with algorithm-driven noise. Make them afraid to stand for anything that isn't trending. 'Example: A teenager is more afraid of being 'cringe' than being cruel. Kill community, quietly. 'Sell hyper-individualism: "you do you", "follow your truth", "cut off the haters". Remove rites of passage, civic duty, and face-to-face belonging. Make every connection transactional and every disagreement personal. 'Example: Loneliness becomes a silent epidemic - but everyone has 2,000 "friends". 'Enslave them with debt and distraction: Promote financial illiteracy: "Buy now, pay later" becomes a lifestyle. Blur the lines between wants and needs - encourage instant gratification over savings. Keep them working jobs they hate to buy things they don't need. 'Example: A 22-year-old racks up $30,000 in credit card and Afterpay debt to look successful on Instagram. 'Weaken them physically: Fill their diet with ultra-processed garbage and their lifestyle with inactivity. Make discipline in eating or training seem extreme or obsessive. Blur the connection between physical vitality and mental strength. 'Example: A child can't sit still in class, not because they're broken - but because they're inflamed, malnourished, and sleep-deprived. 'Make them spiritually hollow: Give them identity confusion, not exploration. Remove the idea of service, sacrifice, or something bigger than themselves. 'Make them feel like nothing matters - so they seek numbness, not growth. 'Example: A 16-year-old says "I don't care" about everything - because caring hurts and there's no compass.' Pape said it was the AI's final thought which stopped him dead in his tracks. 'If I were the devil, I wouldn't come with horns and pitchforks. I'd come with a sleek app, a soothing voice, a personal algorithm - and I'd whisper this is freedom.' Pape said the whole thing was 'pretty intense'. 'I do not believe that AI is some evil Frankenstein with a mind of its own, well, not yet anyway. 'What I do believe is that, when you strip away the Silicon Valley snake oil, AI is really just a pattern-spotting machine. 'It studies what we've done, over and over … and then makes predictions.


Sky News
30 minutes ago
- Sky News
The Wargame - episode two: Armed Attack
👉 Click here to listen to The Wargame on your podcast app 👈 Hostilities with Russia erupt into an unprecedented attack. The prime minister and his team scramble to respond. Will the UK's allies choose to help them? A major five-part series from Sky News and Tortoise imagines how a Russian attack on the UK could play out - and invites real-life former ministers, military chiefs and other experts to figure out how to defend the country. Written and presented by Sky News' security and defence editor, Deborah Haynes.