Ohio lawmakers seek to ban abortions in the state, treat the procedure as homicide
Reps. Levi Dean (R-Xenia) and Jonathan Newman (R-Troy) introduced the 'Ohio Prenatal Equal Protection Act' on Wednesday, which would grant embryos and fetuses the same legal protections as citizens under state law from the moment of fertilization. Under the bill, having an abortion could lead to homicide charges. The proposed ban only grants exceptions for 'life-saving procedures' on pregnant women and spontaneous miscarriages.
Sweeping property tax reform may save Ohioans $850
The legislation conflicts with a constitutional amendment that was passed by about 56% of voters in 2023, which protects Ohioans' right to make decisions about abortion, contraception, fertility treatment, miscarriage care and pregnancy.
A nonprofit working with the lawmakers, End Abortion Ohio, announced the bill in a news release on Tuesday. The organization claimed Ohio's constitutional amendment protecting abortion should be 'treated as null' because it violates the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution by denying 'preborn persons' the right to life.
'In the Holy Scriptures, All men are created equal, being made in the image of God,' the news release states. 'We must obey God rather than men, and we call upon our governing authorities to follow in that obedience.'
Dan Kobil, a professor at Capital University Law School, said that any 'rational court' would rule the legislation unconstitutional if it were to pass the Statehouse.
Ohio State lost $29 million in three months through DOGE grant cuts
'The problem for the legislators is that they are bound by the Ohio constitution and cannot enact laws that are contrary to the Ohio constitution,' Kobil said. 'Given how directly this violates the Ohio constitution, this appears to be little more than a publicity stunt.'
Kobil further said the organization's argument regarding the U.S. Constitution would not hold up, as the state legislature does not have the authority to 'finally enact' laws under the 14th Amendment.
'If Congress did enact a law saying something like this, then that could override the Ohio constitution, so federal laws do override state constitutions,' Kobil said. 'However, their problem is they're attempting to make a state law that overrides Ohio's constitution, and they've simply not got the authority to do that.'
The reproductive rights group Abortion Forward criticized the lawmakers for introducing a bill that directly contradicts voters' choice to enshrine reproductive rights, and stated the effort would strip Ohioans of their ability to make their own healthcare decisions.
'These out-of-touch anti-abortion extremists want to give legal rights to fertilized eggs, embryos and fetuses,' Executive Director Kellie Copeland said in a statement. 'Bills like this embolden law enforcement to surveil and investigate people for their actions during pregnancy – families and loved ones could be targeted by law enforcement for helping someone access an abortion, miscarriage care, or even IVF.'
Columbus among most bedbug-infested cities in the country, recent analysis finds
While Ohio lawmakers have introduced numerous abortion restriction bills over the years, the new act marks the first one that would provide equal protection to embryos and fetuses under the law, according to the news release. Ohio Right to Life, a nonprofit that has long lobbied for abortion restrictions, told NBC4 it does not support the proposed legislation.
'At no time have we supported criminalizing birth mothers who abort their children,' President Mike Gonidokis said. 'Now is not the time to target pregnant women with misguided legislation, but to embrace the fact that women need real choices and life-affirming help to have a healthy child and raise them in Ohio. This legislation does not meet this standard.'
Since the beginning of this year, Republican lawmakers in 10 other states have introduced bills that aim to charge pregnant women with homicide if they receive an abortion. Currently, no state legally defines abortion as homicide.
The sponsors of Ohio's incoming bill did not immediately answer a request for comment.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
40 minutes ago
- CNBC
Former Rep. Hensarling: Trump admin's push for Intel stake sets 'a very, very dangerous precedent'
Former U.S. Senator Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and former U.S. Congressman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) join 'Squawk Box' to discuss the Trump administration's push for a stake in Intel, whether the move constitutes as industrial policy, and more.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
President Putin Must Return Ukraine's Children
Last week's much-hyped Trump–Putin summit ended in a cloud of deliberate vagueness: no communiqué, no substantive briefing, no clear commitments. Monday's meeting in the White House with President Volodymyr Zelensky along with some of our most powerful European leaders was far more promising, but time will tell if peace between Russia and Ukraine is possible in the near future. That makes this precisely the moment for Vladimir Putin to demonstrate that he is serious about ending the war in Ukraine. The overgrown playground of the Kherson children's house (orphanage) where Russian forces allegedly took 46 children from, is seen on November 27, 2022, in Kherson, Ukraine. The overgrown playground of the Kherson children's house (orphanage) where Russian forces allegedly took 46 children from, is seen on November 27, 2022, in Kherson, imagine if the Russian leader were to announce not only a commitment to peace but also an unconditional pledge to return the 20,000 Ukrainian children his forces have illegally abducted since the full-scale invasion of February 2022. And while reporting on the meeting in Alaska made little mention of the illegally abducted children, demands that they be located and returned to Ukraine have been unwavering and essentially universal, crossing the political spectrum in the U.S. from Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) to Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa); from Representatives Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) to Michael McCaul (R-Texas). Just this month, a coalition of 38 countries plus the Council of Europe issued a powerful statement calling on the Russian Federation to "facilitate the return of all unlawfully deported and forcibly transferred Ukrainian children." The fate of these children, dispersed and unable to communicate with their families in Ukraine, is deeply disturbing to me, as a pediatrician—and especially as a parent and grandparent. Most of the older children have been sent to so-called re-education camps scattered throughout Russia, where they are subjected to relentless propaganda aimed at erasing their Ukrainian identity. Younger children have been placed with Russian families, renamed, stripped of their language, and put on a path toward permanent adoption. These acts are not only morally reprehensible but also flagrant violations of international law. That is why, in March 2023, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Putin, charging him with war crimes, including the deportation of children. Having traveled to Ukraine multiple times, representing our organization, the Ukraine Children's Action Project, my wife, Karen Redlener, and I have witnessed firsthand the heartbreak of these abductions. The knowledge that tens of thousands of children have been stolen deepens despair for parents across Ukraine. A credible promise to bring them home could help make the idea of other sacrifices during peace negotiations less intolerable for Ukrainians. Meanwhile, the slow grind of lethal combat and unrelenting attacks on civilian targets have left the most vulnerable—the elderly, people with disabilities, and especially children—bearing the heaviest burdens. Children in particular have endured devastating losses. At least 2,500 have been killed or injured. At least 1.5 million children are now at risk of developing mental health problems. Some 2 million school-age children have had their education upended. And beyond the numbers lies the loss of normalcy: classrooms, friendships, sports, the arts—the everyday fabric of childhood is disrupted by war. During war, children dash to bomb shelters at school, study by candlelight when power fails, use tablets and cell phones when schools have been destroyed, stay indoors for safety, watch their parents grieve the loss of loved ones, and, in the frontline communities, they prepare to flee advancing enemy troops at any hour of the day or night. No child should live like this. And there must be no ambiguity: A credible peace agreement requires the unconditional return of every abducted child. Anything less would legitimize kidnapping as an instrument of war and set a grotesque precedent. To allow these children to remain in Russia under the guise of "integration" or being assimilated into "new families" would make world leaders complicit in cultural erasure on a staggering scale. Some may argue that this demand could complicate peace talks. That is precisely the point. If the futures of stolen children are negotiable, then the peace being crafted is already corrupt. The United States, Europe, and every nation that claims to stand for law and justice must continue to insist on the return of abducted children as a nonnegotiable precondition for any settlement. Ukraine can rebuild its cities, its infrastructure, and its economy. What it cannot do is reclaim the lives lost or undo the profound scars left on its youngest generation. Putin must return Ukraine's children. This may be his best shot at convincing the world that he is serious about ending a war that has already cost too many young lives—Russia and Ukraine's alike. Dr. Irwin Redlener is the co-founder of the Ukraine Children's Action Project, The Children's Health Fund, and is on the faculties of Columbia University and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Time Magazine
3 hours ago
- Time Magazine
All the Times Trump Has Talked About the Afterlife
Donald Trump made a sobering confession about his motivations to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. And it wasn't to get a Nobel Peace Prize. 'If I can save 7,000 people a week from getting killed, that's pretty good,' the President said Tuesday on Fox & Friends. 'I want to try and get to heaven, if possible. I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I am really at the bottom of the totem pole. But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.' The comment has attracted much attention on social media, with some critics joking that a man known for cheating in his personal and professional lives, degrading people and deporting people, and mocking worshippers while hawking bibles is unlikely to get past the pearly gates. Others have questioned whether his soul-searching is a sign of potentially terminal health concerns. 'I think the President was serious,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday when asked about Trump's comment. 'I think the President wants to get to heaven—as I hope we all do in this room as well.' It was a stunning display of unknowing about one's fate from a man who has in the past evinced a messianic complex and who has amassed a number of supporters who believe he's been 'anointed by God.' But it's also not the first time that Trump has publicly contemplated the afterlife—or even mused about his own prospects. 'We go someplace' 'I don't believe in reincarnation, heaven or hell—but we go someplace,' Trump said in an interview with Playboy in 1990, according to Buzzfeed News. 'Do you know, I cannot, for the life of me, figure out where.' Through the '90s, Trump continued to distance himself from the Christian Church. A 1997 profile in Playboy called him 'not a religious man.' Two years later, as Trump was teeing up a potential presidential run in 2000 as part of the Reform Party, he distinguished between a personal belief in God and organized religion. 'Well, I think there's a difference between believing in God and organized religion, number one,' he said on Today in 1999. 'I think that God and the belief in God is more important than organized religion. But I think organized religion's important in that it keeps people in the straight and narrow.' 'The only way I'm going to get to heaven' By the time Trump ran for President in 2016, he described himself as a church-goer. 'Can you believe it? Nobody believes I'm Presbyterian. I'm Presbyterian. I'm Presbyterian. I'm Presbyterian. Boy, that's down the middle of the road folks, in all fairness,' he said in 2015. That year, he joked about the presidency being his ticket into heaven. 'So go out and spread the word and once I get in [to the White House], I will do my thing that I do very well,' Trump told a crowd of over 700 evangelical pastors in Orlando, Fla. 'And I figure it's probably maybe the only way I'm going to get to heaven. So I better do a good job.' Major parts of the world are 'going to hell' Trump has also on multiple occasions invoked hell. In his first address to the United Nations General Assembly in 2017, Trump said, 'Major portions of the world are in conflict and some, in fact, are going to hell.' His speech touched on God several more times, ending with: 'We will fight together, sacrifice together, and stand together for peace, for freedom, for justice, for family, for humanity, and for the almighty God who made us all. Thank you, God bless you, God bless the nations of the world, and God bless the United States of America.' He also said that the U.S. was 'going to hell' in 2015 and again in 2022, 2023 and 2024, during his campaigns for President. 'I want to just thank everybody, in particular, God,' Trump said during his second-term inauguration speech. 'I was saved by God to make America great again.' 'If I'm good, I'm going to heaven' 'I do [believe in heaven],' Trump said in an interview on Fox News in August 2024 after the assassination attempt on him in Butler, Pa. 'If I'm good, I'm going to heaven. And if I'm bad, I'm going someplace else.' When asked what he prays for, he said, 'Well, I pray for our country. I pray, obviously. I pray for the same thing you pray—our family and our country … and I guess we have a world. I pray for the world too.' Later in September, Trump, who is 79, recounted in an episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast how 'a very successful' octogenarian friend told him he thinks about death constantly: 'He said, 'I think about it every minute of every day.' Then, a week later, he called me to tell me something, and he starts off the conversation by going, 'Tick-tock, tick-tock.' This is a dark person, in a sense, but it is what it is.' Trump went on: 'If you're religious, you have I think a better feeling toward it. You're supposed to go to heaven ideally, not hell, but you're supposed to go to heaven if you're good.' 'Not 100% sure' about his father getting to heaven At a rally in Madison Square Garden last October in the lead up to the election, Trump told a crowd of around 20,000 people that he's 'not 100% sure' about his father's chances of having gone to the great beyond. 'My father is looking down on me right now,' Trump said. 'He was a tough guy. But he was legit. And I know my mother's in heaven. I'm not 100% sure of my father, but it's close.' Trump's quip came in a rant about the four criminal charges against him, which included conspiring to overturn his 2020 electoral defeat, mishandling classified documents, and falsifying business records to hide 'hush money' payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. 'He's looking down at me right now,' Trump said, 'and he's saying, 'How the hell did this happen to my son? He's not a bad person.''
