Zohran Mamdani's mayoral primary raises alarm among New York business community
Business leaders in New York City voiced concerns on Wednesday, following progressive Democrat Zohran Mamdani's likely victory in the city's hotly contested primary for mayor the day before.New York, the nation's preeminent financial center, boasts an annual GDP of more than $1 trillion and more residents than any city in the nation - many who are struggling with the high cost of rent, health care and groceries.advertisementThose concerns motivated voters to come out in early voting, and in 100 degrees Fahrenheit heat (37.7 degrees Celsius) on Tuesday for the 33-year-old Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist who finished first in the city's initial round of ranked-choice voting ahead of the frontrunner, former New York state governor Andrew Cuomo. Final results of the city's ranked-choice system will not be known for a couple of weeks.
Mamdani campaigned on freezing rent, free buses, and subsidised groceries, policies that business leaders say may not solve the affordability crisis and could push many to leave the city under threat of higher taxes. He has also called for a higher minimum wage and a new office to promote small businesses."Think about how crazy this situation is. A man who prides himself on being a socialist has a real shot at becoming the mayor of the heart of the global financial system," said Anthony Pompliano, founder and chief executive officer at Professional Capital Management, and one of the biggest investors in cryptocurrencies. "Irony doesn't even start to describe the situation."advertisementMamdani did not respond for immediate request for comment.He will still have to win November's general election against currentMayor Eric Adams who is running as an independent and Republican Curtis Sliwa, who lost to Adams in 2021. Cuomo may also run in the general election as an independent.Mamdani's promise to freeze rent resonated particularly in Manhattan, where the median monthly rent for an apartment sits at a record $4,571. A renter typically must earn 40 times the rent. As mayor, Mamdani would be able to appoint members of the city's rent guidelines board. Apartment owners say such a move would make buildings unlivable."A four-year rent freeze all but ensures these buildings completely crumble," said Kenny Burgos, chief executive officer of the New York Apartment Association, which represents several thousand property owners and managers. "I sympathise with folks who have an issue with the cost of rent and the lack of affordability, but there's a conversation to be had on policy that doesn't ignore the cost."Shares of New York-based banks exposed to real estate fell on Wednesday, with Flagstar Financial FLG.N and Flushing Financial FFIC.O, down 3.8% and 3.4%, respectively.As of May, Manhattan's median rent was up 7.6% from a year earlier, up 6.6% in northwest Queens, and is at a record in Brooklyn, according to real estate company Douglas Elliman.advertisement"I've lived in New York since 1990; it's only gotten worse for what it costs," said Marc Chandler, chief market strategist at Bannockburn Capital Markets. "Most young people I know have to have roommates."Mamdani also campaigned on subsidised grocery stores, which drew opposition from store owners."If he opens stores and gives the product away for nothing on the city's budget, how do you compete with City Hall? People walk in, take what they want, they don't pay," said John Catsimatidis, a Republican donor and CEO of New York-based grocery chains Gristedes and D'Agostino Supermarkets.Mamdani, if elected, would have to also contend with the city's dwindling operating budget surplus, which has been falling as the city's workforce shrinks due to retirees and people leaving the city, according to New York's independent budget office.Whitney Tilson, a hedge fund executive who also ran for mayor but attracted little support, said that Mamdani was "totally unqualified to be mayor of one of the world's largest, most complex cities," and predicted that Adams would drop out and support Cuomo in an effort to defeat Mamdani.advertisementHedge fund managers Bill Ackman and Daniel Loeb blasted the outcome on social media following the results, with Loeb reposting a meme about Florida real estate agents laughing in delight.Chandler dismissed the idea of a mass exodus. "If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, I wouldn't have to work anymore."- EndsTrending Reel
IN THIS STORY#United States of America
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Finger on the Pulse: How a word-of-mouth candy brand made a ₹750-crore dent in the market
New Delhi: A decade-old hard-boiled candy brand has crossed ₹750 crore in annual revenue, making it the best-selling candy brand in India, its parent company said on Thursday. Pulse, a tangy candy, was launched in 2015 by Noida-based Dharampal Satyapal Group (DS Group). Demand for the ₹1 sweet spread like wildfire in the early days as word-of-mouth kicked in. In FY25, 7.5 billion of the candies were sold, bringing in ₹750 crore of revenue, DS Group said. Pulse currently holds a 19% share of India's ₹4,000-crore hard-boiled candy market, according to DS Group. It competes with the likes of Perfetti Van Melle's Alpenliebe and ITC's Candyman brands of confectionery, apart from Parle Products' candy brands such as Melody, and those sold by Mondelez. 'Over the past three fiscal years, Pulse has registered an impressive compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15% against a CAGR of 9% in the hard-boiled candy segment. This consistent growth in revenue highlights the brand's strong pull across both urban and rural markets, especially when the broader market dynamics have not been as buoyant," the company said. India's overall confectionery market was worth worth ₹14,800-crore as of May, according to data from NIQ. The category posted 8% value growth in FY25, signalling continued resilience and consumer demand, NIQ said. "This growth has been predominantly driven by increased consumption, with medium and large manufacturers playing a significant role. Hard boiled candies (HBC) and toffees remains the dominant segment with a double-digit growth," said Roosevelt Dsouza, head of customer success, India, NielsenIQ. Going viral Pulse is sold at 35 lakh outlets across India. The candy, initially launched in raw mango flavour, appeals to people across age groups. Its taste is suited to Indian palates, and it's one of many similar products that use Indian flavours such as jeera, tamarind, local spices, and mango. Over the years, it has been launched in more flavours as guava, orange, pineapple and litchi, and new formats such as 'shots' in the original raw-mango flavour. In the initial years after its launch, Pulse candy prioritised a robust distribution thrust, focusing on both expansion and deeper market penetration. 'Advertising has played a very little role for the brand. We are only doing activities that connect with our consumers. The typical role of marketing is not required," Rajiv Kumar, vice chairman, DS Group, said in an interview with Mint. The DS Group also sells brands such as Catch spices and Chingles candy, apart from Pass Pass and Rajnigandh mouth fresheners. Two years ago it acquired the LuvIt brand of chocolates and confectionery. The company aims to achieve ₹5,000 crore in revenue for its confectionery segment by 2029. It crossed ₹1,000 crore in FY25, Kumar said. What's next for Pulse? The company will continue to expand the Pulse brand to other categories and formats, Kumar said. It recently launched a sugar-free variant and a tamarind flavour under the brand. It already sells formats such as jelly and soft chews. The company briefly launched tangy beverages under the Pulse brand but rolled it back, citing a lack of product-market fit. 'It is among the most distributed brands in India. We continue to grow, as India has 1.5 crore outlets, giving us a large headroom. It is a category based on distribution. We did not advertise but promoted the product at retail stores. Word of mouth has given us mileage," he said. The brand is also distributed in select overseas markets. Citing high raw-material prices that make it hard for candy-makers to sustain the ₹1 price, Jain said the company was working towards upgrading consumers to ₹5. 'It's a price-up strategy—we are trying migrate customer from ₹1 to ₹5 and Rs10 multi-packs. ₹1 still remains a dominant part of the sale of the brand," he said.
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Globe Civil Projects IPO subscribed 86.03 times
The offer received bids for 100.93 crore shares as against 1.71 crore shares on offer. The initial public offer of Globe Civil Projects received bids for 1,00,93,90,240 shares as against 1,17,32,392 shares on offer, according to stock exchange data at 17:30 IST on Thursday (26 June 2025). The issue was subscribed 86.03 times. The issue opened for bidding on 24 June 2025 and it will close on 26 June 2025. The price band of the IPO is fixed between Rs 67 and 71 per share. An investor can bid for a minimum of 211 equity shares and in multiples thereof. The public issue comprises entirely of a fresh issue of up to 1,67,60,560 equity shares of a face value of Rs 10 per equity share. Of the net proceeds from the fresh issue, Rs 75 crore will be used to fund working capital requirements, and Rs 14.255 crore will go towards capital expenditure on the purchase of construction equipment/machinery. The balance is for general corporate expenses. Global Civil Projects, promoted by Ved Prakash Khurana, Nipun Khurana, and Vipul Khurana, is a New Delhi-based integrated EPC company engaged in transport, social, and commercial infrastructure construction. With a strong presence in educational and railway infrastructure, it has completed 37 projects across 11 states and is currently executing 13 projects. As of March 31, 2025, its order book stood at Rs 669.10 crore. The company also operates through joint ventures and derives a major share of revenue from government clients like the CPWD. Ahead of the IPO, Globe Civil Projects on Monday, 23 June 2025, raised Rs 35.69 crore from anchor investors. The board allotted 50.28 lakh shares at Rs 71 each to 6 anchor investors. The firm reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 17.79 crore and total income of Rs 254.66 crore for the nine months ended on 31 December 2024.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Face the M&A truth: Mergers are glitter but grit is gold
The buzzwords 'synergy', 'market expansion' and 'cost savings' have long bewitched corporate boards, luring executives into the treacherous currents of mergers and acquisitions (M&As). From New York to Bangalore, leaders repeat the same tropes of talent acquisition, diversification, owning unique assets, entering high-growth sectors, etc, in the hope of achieving the magical alchemy that will transform two companies into a single powerful entity. But the empirical record is unforgiving: most mergers fail to meet their objectives. Also Read: Decoding the Supreme Court's decision: Implications for India's merger control regime Last year saw over $2.6 trillion deployed worldwide by companies chasing a mirage, but the hoped-for gains evaporated in many cases the moment the ink dried on these M&A deals. The fatal flaw lies in leadership teams taking untested assumptions as immutable facts. Boards rubber-stamp plans presented by the executive team and when headlines hinge on the deal's success, any hint of course correction is resisted. Sunk-cost thinking and a 'commitment escalation' bias tend to harden the resolve to press forth even in the face of hazard signals. As time passes, the window for latent risks—clashing IT architectures, cultural misalignments, fractured supply-chains, etc—balloon, revealing complexities no spreadsheet could have projected. The recent union of US-based Dick's Sporting Goods with Foot Locker, valued at $2.4 billion, shone bright on paper: a suburban-leaning 'house of sports' popular with family shoppers had merged with an urban-centric sneaker specialist courting aspirational youth. It was meant to amplify negotiating leverage with Nike and gain a gateway to foreign markets. The stock market's verdict? Foot Locker's shares soared 85% while Dick's tumbled 14%, a signal that investors believed the acquirer had overpaid for a turnaround riddled with unseen costs. This embodies the integration trap: superficial similarities mask profound differences. Foot Locker's 2,400-store empire spans 20 countries, but it has shuttered hundreds since 2023 amid a mall-retail slump. Dick's was not merely buying real estate, but inheriting a beleaguered retail network in need of format overhauls, a loyalty-programme rejig, talent redevelopment and digital-platform realignment. Not easy. Also Read: Merger or demerger—what's the better route to unlock value? Boards frequently assume that category experience in one firm transfers seamlessly to another, wilfully ignoring divergent IT stacks, real-estate footprints and, critically, organizational DNA. 'Synergy' is the incantation that summons boards into action, but this is a speculative projection of behavioural change across two complex systems. Realizing even modest cost savings calls for consolidating procurement, merging software platforms and aligning vendor contracts; all these are subject to the push and pull of local allegiances, regulatory boundaries and political currents. Academic research lays bare the truth: 83% of deals fail to boost shareholder returns, scuttled by mismanaged brands, mismatched strategies, cultural friction and overstretched managerial capacity. Flawless integration is rare. The corporate graveyard is strewn with M&A hubris. Microsoft's $7.2 billion dalliance with Nokia's phone business in 2014 resulted in massive write-downs and layoffs. The AOL–Time Warner marriage of 2000, once valued at $165 billion, unravelled under the weight of incompatible cultures and evaporating value. AT&T's acquisition of Time Warner in 2018, pitched as a defining moment for content synergy, faltered amid cord-cutting trends and the need to invest in fresh content. Google's $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility in 2011 yielded no enduring hardware foothold; three years later, Motorola was sold to Lenovo for $2.9 billion. Also Read: What the overhaul of India's merger control regime means Why do boards persist in these strategic follies? Overconfidence bias looms large. Acquisitions offer hidden 'tenure insurance' for CEOs because a high-visibility coup can overshadow current performance. Under investor pressure, M&As are touted as revenue multipliers. Also, incentives are badly misaligned: executive compensation goes by market cap more than sustainable value creation. The M&A failure record demands a radical reframe that treats uncertainty not as an obstacle but as a design constraint. Here's what should be done: One, preserve optionality over integration by structuring acquisitions in staged commitments (such as pilot alliances) that allow incremental learning and course correction. Two, account for probable failure by calibrating purchase prices to downside scenarios rather than best-case projections. Three, acquire capabilities, not scale, focusing on distinctive platforms or talent (à la Google's acquisition of YouTube or Facebook's of Instagram) and granting them autonomy. Four, build integration muscle proactively through smaller bolt-on deals, training cross-functional teams, refining playbooks and mastering change-management before a merger. Five, realign incentives for long-term value creation, tying executive compensation to post-deal performance metrics. Also Read: The Reliance-Disney merger is great for them. But will it be for consumers? Real resilience springs not from flashy deals, but from cultivating purposeful customer intimacy, operational excellence and a culture of iterative learning. True boldness lies in rejecting the merger mirage. The question isn't which megadeal will defy the odds, but when leaders will note that while 'mergers are glitter, grit is gold.' The authors are, respectively, professor at Columbia Business School and founder of Valize; and co-founder of the non-profit Medici Institute for Innovation. X: @MuneerMuh.
