Trump plans executive orders to power AI growth in race with China
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
The Trump administration is readying a package of executive actions aimed at boosting energy supply to power the US expansion of artificial intelligence, according to four sources familiar with the planning.Top economic rivals US and China are locked in a technological arms race and with it secure an economic and military edge. The huge amount of data processing behind AI requires a rapid increase in power supplies that are straining utilities and grids in many states.The moves under consideration include making it easier for power-generating projects to connect to the grid, and providing federal land on which to build the data centers needed to expand AI technology, according to the sources.The administration will also release an AI action plan and schedule public events to draw public attention to the efforts, according to the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.The White House did not respond to requests for comment.Training large-scale AI models requires a huge amount of electricity, and the industry's growth is driving the first big increase in U.S. power demand in decades.Between 2024 and 2029, U.S. electricity demand is projected to grow at five times the rate predicted in 2022, according to power-sector consultancy Grid Strategies.Meanwhile, power demand from AI data centers could grow more than thirtyfold by 2035, according to a new report by consultancy Deloitte.Building and connecting new power generation to the grid, however, has been a major hurdle because such projects require extensive impact studies that can take years to complete, and existing transmission infrastructure is overwhelmed.Among the ideas under consideration by the administration is to identify more fully developed power projects and move them higher on the waiting list for connection, two of the sources said.Siting data centers has also been challenging because larger facilities require a lot of space and resources, and can face zoning obstacles or public opposition.The executive orders could provide a solution to that by offering land managed by the Defense Department or Interior Department to project developers, the sources said.The administration is also considering streamlining permitting for data centers by creating a nationwide Clean Water Act permit, rather than requiring companies to seek permits on a state-by-state basis, according to one of the sources.In January, Trump hosted top tech CEOs at the White House to highlight the Stargate Project, a multi-billion effort led by ChatGPT's creator OpenAI , SoftBank and Oracle to build data centers and create more than 100,000 jobs in the U.S.Trump has prioritized winning the AI race against China and declared on his first day in office a national energy emergency aimed at removing all regulatory obstacles to oil and gas drilling, coal and critical mineral mining, and building new gas and nuclear power plants to bring more energy capacity online.He also ordered his administration in January to produce an AI Action Plan that would make "America the world capital in artificial intelligence" and reduce regulatory barriers to its rapid expansion.That report, which includes input from the National Security Council, is due by July 23. The White House is considering making July 23 "AI Action Day" to draw attention to the report and demonstrate its commitment to expanding the industry, two of the sources said.Trump is scheduled to speak at an AI and energy event in Pennsylvania on July 15 hosted by Senator Dave McCormick.Amazon earlier this month announced it would invest $20 billion in data centers in two Pennsylvania counties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
The AI frenzy is escalating. Again.
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Silicon Valley's artificial intelligence frenzy has found a new and a half years after OpenAI set off the artificial intelligence race with the release of the chatbot ChatGPT, tech companies are accelerating their AI spending, pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into their frantic effort to create systems that can mimic or even exceed the abilities of the human tech industry's giants are building data centres that can cost more than $100 billion and will consume more electricity than 1 million American homes. Salaries for AI experts are jumping as Meta offers signing bonuses to AI researchers that top $100 venture capitalists are dialling up their spending. US investment in AI companies rose to $65 billion in the first quarter, up 33% from the previous quarter and up 550% from the quarter before ChatGPT came out in 2022, according to data from PitchBook, which tracks the industry."Everyone is deeply afraid of being left behind," said Chris V. Nicholson, an investor with the venture capital firm Page One Ventures who focuses on AI astonishing spending, critics argue, comes with a huge risk. AI is arguably more expensive than anything the tech industry has tried to build, and there is no guarantee it will live up to its potential. But the bigger risk, many executives believe, is not spending enough to keep pace with rivals."The thinking from the big CEOs is that they can't afford to be wrong by doing too little, but they can afford to be wrong by doing too much," said Jordan Jacobs, a partner with the venture capital firm Radical biggest spending is for the data centres. Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and Google have told investors that they expect to spend a combined $320 billion on infrastructure costs this year. Much of that will go toward building new data centres—more than twice what they spent two years OpenAI and its partners build a roughly $60 billion data centre complex for AI in Texas and another in the Middle East, Meta is erecting a facility in Louisiana that will be twice as large. Amazon is going even bigger with a new campus in Indiana. Amazon's partner, the AI startup Anthropic, says it could eventually use all 30 of the data centres on this 1,200-acre campus to train a single AI experts question whether companies like Anthropic will continue to improve their AI systems at the rapid rate they have maintained over the last few years. But Amazon says that even if the progress stops, it will use those 30 data centres to deliver AI systems to companies are spending so much on data centres, they see no problem with dropping several billions more to buy a startup or millions on a world-class AI researcher. In 2013, Google shocked Silicon Valley when it paid $44 million for just three researchers. Today, that seems like table just invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI, a startup that helps collect and organise the enormous amounts of digital data needed to train AI systems. In return, Meta landed Scale AI's young chief executive, Alexandr Wang, who is considered an up-and-coming deal maker in the AI was not the first big technology company to make such an unusual deal. Google, Microsoft and Amazon have also been investing hundreds of millions—or even billions—in startups just for the right to hire their employees and use their technology. In essence, they bought everything but the startups."Companies are acquiring other companies not necessarily for their products or their services or their revenues but just for their talent," said Dimitri Zabelin, an emerging-technology analyst at Scale AI investment was part of an effort by Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's chief executive, to start an AI research lab dedicated to the creation of superintelligence, a hypothetical technology that would be more powerful than the has been offering compensation packages worth as much as $100 million a person. He and his company made more than 45 offers to researchers at OpenAI alone, according to a person familiar with these approaches.(The New York Times has sued OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement of news content related to AI systems. The two companies have denied the suit's claims.)One Silicon Valley giant, Apple, has been more cautious about chatbots. But as the AI race escalates, Apple is also scrambling for talent. The company has had internal discussions about buying the AI startup Perplexity, according to a person familiar with those conversations. Perplexity is valued at $14 billion."Apple seems to be sitting on its hands. But I am sure they will surprise us before too long," said Matt Murphy, a partner at the venture firm Menlo Apple spokesperson did not respond to a request for as venture firms double down on their deal making, there is less appetite for investing in general AI systems designed to do everything, because that work is dominated by established companies like OpenAI and Google. Instead, they are starting to focus on AI that does specific tasks, like Ribbon, a company that does AI for job interviews, and Eleos Health, which creates AI to record and summarise doctor companies acknowledge that they may be overestimating AI's potential. But even if the technology falls short, many executives and investors believe the investments they're making now will be worth it."Christopher Columbus thought he was headed to the Orient, and he ended up in the Caribbean," said Nicholson of Page One Ventures. "He did not get to where he thought he was going, but he still got to a place that was highly valuable."
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Key Rulings: All details about birthright citizenship, Obamacare task force, LGBTQ school books
On Friday, the US Supreme Court issued four major decisions. These rulings involved the Trump administration's birthright citizenship proposal, preventive health care coverage, rural internet funding and religious objections to LGBTQ-themed books in schools. Each ruling came through a 6-3 vote, mostly along ideological lines. Birthright Citizenship The Court allowed the Trump administration to take steps toward ending automatic birthright citizenship. In a 6-3 ruling, it limited the use of nationwide injunctions. Judges may now issue injunctions only for parties involved in the lawsuit. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that courts should not exceed their authority, even if they find executive actions unlawful. She added that lower courts must quickly decide how wide any injunction should be. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo This ruling does not decide the legality of the policy itself. The Trump order redefines birthright citizenship, making it available only to children of US citizens or legal residents. The 14th Amendment currently guarantees citizenship to almost anyone born in the country, except children of diplomats. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, called the ruling a threat to the rule of law. She urged plaintiffs to file class action suits, which the ruling still permits. Live Events The executive order remains blocked in New Hampshire due to a separate case. Still, the decision allows the proposal to move ahead in other states. Also Read: NYC Mayor Race: Will US deport Zohran Mamdani? See who wants to revoke his US citizenship and does law permit it Obamacare Task Force In another 6-3 ruling, the Court upheld the authority of a government task force under the Affordable Care Act. The task force recommends preventive services that insurers must cover at no cost. The challenge came from Christian-owned businesses. They argued that the task force held unchecked power because its members were not Senate-confirmed. The Court disagreed. About 150 million Americans currently receive free preventive services under this arrangement. These include screenings and medications related to cancer, HIV, and cholesterol. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented. They questioned the structure and influence of the task force. Internet Subsidy Program The Court upheld the Universal Service Fund (USF), which supports phone and internet access in rural areas, schools and hospitals. The decision rejected a challenge from Consumers' Research, which claimed Congress gave too much authority to the FCC and a private company. The fund, started in 1996, distributes about $8 billion a year. It supports low-income users and underserved communities. Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the majority. She said the funding structure does not violate the Constitution. Justices Gorsuch, Thomas and Alito dissented. The decision keeps the USF intact. Both the Biden and Trump administrations defended the program. Also Read: Reacher Season 4 Casting Update: Christopher Rodriguez-Marquette joins cast. See which role will he play LGBTQ Books in Schools The Court sided with parents who objected to their children reading LGBTQ-themed books in Maryland elementary schools. The 6-3 ruling found that the school board's refusal to offer opt-outs violated religious rights. Justice Samuel Alito wrote that denying opt-outs placed a burden on parents' right to exercise their religion. The books include stories involving same-sex marriage and transgender identity. The case arose after a school board revised its English curriculum in 2022 to reflect diverse families. Initially, opt-outs were offered but later withdrawn. The plaintiffs included Muslim, Catholic and Orthodox Christian families. A federal judge and appeals court had sided with the school board, but the Supreme Court reversed that decision. FAQs What did the Supreme Court decide about birthright citizenship? The Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed by limiting court injunctions, without ruling on whether the plan itself is constitutional. How did the Court rule on preventive health coverage? The Court upheld a task force's authority under the ACA to mandate no-cost preventive services, benefiting over 150 million Americans.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Congress cut off? White House limits intel sharing after Iran strikes report leak
The White House is restricting congressional access to classified information after a leak revealed details of US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. This leak, exposing a Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, has sparked outrage and prompted immediate action. The Trump administration will limit intelligence shared on CAPNET, raising concerns about transparency. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Congressional Access to Classified Info Curtailed Classified Channels to Congress Now More Restricted Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Speaker Johnson Blames Congress Without Proof The Leak's Origin Still Unclear FBI Launches Investigation FAQs The White House is tightening its grip on classified information shared with Congress after a leaked report revealed the early damage assessments of recent US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, as per NBC News leak, which exposed a Defense Intelligence Agency finding that Iran's nuclear capabilities may have only been set back by three to six months, has drawn sharp rebuke from both the administration and lawmakers, and now prompted swift action to restrict access to such kind of information, according to the READ: Supreme Court rules in favor of Donald Trump's birthright citizenship proposal The Trump administration will now limit what intelligence appears on CAPNET, the classified communications network used to share sensitive materials with Congress, as reported by NBC News. It's a move that immediately raised concerns about transparency and oversight, especially from Democratic members of Congress, according to the Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that, 'The administration should immediately undo this decision," adding, 'They seem not to want to see the facts to get out. Just Trump's version of the facts, which we know is often false," as quoted by NBC News READ: Pete Hegseth sparks buzz by renaming USNS Harvey Milk after World War II hero Oscar V. Peterson Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson, expressed anger over the leaked reporting of the Defense Intelligence Agency's early assessment of the US strikes on Iran, saying, 'There was a leak, and we're trying to get down to the bottom of that. It's dangerous and ridiculous that happened. We're going to solve that problem, and we'll keep the coordination,' as quoted in the NBC News report. When he was asked if he thought the leak came from Congress, the speaker responded, saying, 'That's my suspicion,' as quoted in the though the Trump administration's crackdown and Johnson's suspicions are on Congress, it's not actually known if the leak came from a member of Congress, as reported by NBC to the report, lawmakers had access to the early assessment about the strikes from the Defense Intelligence Agency and were able to view it in a secure location in the Capitol, known as a SCIF, and then the assessment was sent to leadership through these official the White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News, 'I am told by the FBI the leak already is being investigated, and it absolutely should be because this was a top secret intelligence analysis that very few people in the United States government had access to see,' as quoted by The Hill a secure network the executive branch uses to send classified information to no proof yet. Speaker Johnson suspects it, but investigations are still underway.
