Department to present revised TB plan this week
The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine is set to present a revised plan to amend the TB Eradication Programme, Agriland understands.
This plan will be presented to farm organisations ahead of follow-up meetings with stakeholders this week, following on from the extraordinary 'summit' meeting that took place earlier this month, it is understood.
At that earlier meeting, a slate of 30 proposals were put forward for consideration by stakeholders, with a view to amending the eradication programme in light of deteriorating metrics for TB in Ireland.
These proposals were met with some criticism by farm organisations, who called for changes to what was being recommended.
In the latest development, it is understood that Minister for Agriculture, Food, and the Marine Martin Heydon has invited stakeholders to bilateral meetings to discuss a revised plan.
Farm organisations have not yet received that revised plan, but are due to receive it before the meeting, which is scheduled to take place on Thursday of this week (May 22), it is believed.
Agriland understands that each farm organisation will be invited to bring four of their members to the bilateral meetings.
TB
Speaking to Agriland recently, Minister Heydon said that the TB situation in Ireland at present is 'a crisis of very significant proportion'.
'Only very recently a couple of years ago, we were having 20,000 reactors a year, last year we had 41,600. If I don't act very soon, we could be up to 60,00 reactors. I'm not going to let that happen on my watch,' he said.
'I was listening to the concerns raised by farm organisations, and I really hope they were listening to me too. The points I was raising, where we're coming from… This has to be backed by science.
'I will invest more, I will put more focus in this space, and I need everyone to work with me, but I won't leave a space where we let the disease seep through. We've got to stop this rapid increase in the disease. We have to stabilise it, reduce it, and then we can credibly talk about eradication again,' the minister said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Lack of Cork border control post driving up food prices, say TD and importers
A full border control post for the Port of Cork is again being sought to facilitate inspections of agricultural products. Cork East Fianna Fáil TD James O'Connor asked agriculture, food, and marine minister Martin Heydon in the Dáil to consider the move. The Port of Cork Company previously stated that the current system results in higher prices for consumers of products such as bananas, pineapples, melons, grapes, and citrus fruits. Food importers have also claimed at least 2,000 shipping containers of fruit and veg a year, which could be landed in Cork, were being diverted to ports in Britain or Europe, for transit back to Ireland for the required checks in Dublin. Mr O'Connor, who raised the issue in the Dáil, said a full border control post is needed in Cork. It is required to facilitate consignments of food, food contact materials, animals, feed, and plants that are subject to increased import controls that must enter the EU. Mr O'Connor said the lack of a post is severely impacting the growth of the port while causing additional pollutant emissions and increasing costs for importers and consumers. Mr Heydon said the port is designated a border control post for container shipments of wood and wood products only The Port of Cork company submitted a business case to the Department in October 2022 requesting approval for a full post. Organic sector Much of the benefit expected would accrue to the fruit, vegetable, and organic sector. The department considered the proposal and engaged with the company. 'At the time, it was considered that this proposal did not demonstrate a significant increase of trade to justify the investment in terms of exchequer resources required to run a [border control post],' he said. Mr O'Connor also asked if the department would consider granting temporary derogations of three to six months to prevent disruption to seasonal goods imports needing physical inspection. This would give the port greater flexibility to encourage importers to use Cork and boost trade, while avoiding additional pollutant emissions and increased costs for importers and consumers, he said. Mr Heydon said EU member states are required to perform official controls on live animals, plants, plant products and products of animal origin as required under the European regulation. There are four designated posts in Ireland — located at Dublin Port, Dublin Airport, Rosslare Europort, and Shannon Airport. The designation of posts must be approved by the European Commission and necessitates compliance with detailed rules on minimum requirements for infrastructure, professional staff, equipment, and commodity-specific requirements. Mr Heydon said derogations from these requirements are not provided for in this legislation Cork Port is a designated border control posts for bulk consignments of roundwood logs, but is not designated for live animals, products of animal origin, plants, plant products or organic goods. During 2024, a facilitation was allowed for the importation of melons through the port. This was not a derogation from the requirements for post approval. It was a specific facilitation that allows for a very small number of plants and plant products deemed, on assessment, as presenting minimal risk to the plant health status of the EU. The small number of plants eligible for this facilitation is still subject to identity and physical inspections. A similar facilitation for products of animal origin, live animals, and for most plants and products of plant origin cannot be legally provided, he said. Read More Moorepark dairy open day set for July
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
Big shift in favour of dairy farming among scenarios proposed in government's land reforms
DRAFT PROPOSALS FROM a land review commissioned by the last government show a major shift towards dairy farming. The Land Use Review was formed to address future land use in Ireland and making the sector climate neutral up to 2050, and covered issues ranging from emissions from agriculture to how to restore habitats and water bodies across the country. The draft recommendations – seen by The Journal – are likely to cause anger among environmentalists, given disputes of recent years around the environmental pollution arising from intensive dairy farming. Some farmer groups also believe a number of the proposals are unrealistic and may cause frustration for their members. The proposals have also resulted in alarm for some of those who took part in the process, with a representative from one environmental group arguing that the measures risk being a 'step backwards' for Ireland's climate targets. One farming representative who took part in the discussions told us they believe many of the recommendations would place a burden on non-dairy farmers. The intensive nature of dairy farming and its impact on the environment has been of significant concern for environmental groups in recent years, while the proposed shift towards dairy will likely frustrate farmers in the hard-pressed beef sector. Scenarios for the future Several of the scenarios submitted to government departments responsible for implementing the recommendations propose a 10:1 ratio of dairy farming to beef farming. The current ratio is estimated to be 3:2 in favour of dairy. One scenario put forward by the report recommended keeping this more balanced ratio, but with added environmental measures and an emphasis on paying farmers for work maintaining nature. The report, which follows the second phase of the Land Use Review, was submitted to the Department of Agriculture and Department of Climate, Environment and Energy in recent weeks. In terms of agriculture's impact on the climate, the sector was the largest single source of greenhouse gas emissions last year , making up 34.3% of Ireland's emissions. While agriculture emissions fell by 4.6% in 2023 when compared to 2022, that still only represented a 2.9% fall in emissions since 2018. According to sections of the draft document, it states that desired outcomes are to make Irish farming climate neutral and to restore ecosystems, from biodiversity protections to water quality. One recent report by the Environmental Protection Agency found a 'welcome reduction' in water pollution arising from nitrogen used by farmers fertilising their land – although the watchdog said levels were still too high in the dairy farming heartland of the south-east. Criticism The draft proposals have been criticised by some of those who took part in the review. Fintan Kelly, an agriculture policy officer for the Irish Environment Network, took part of the review and said that many of the draft recommendations are 'much more limited in scope' than expected and risk being a 'step backwards' for Ireland's climate targets. Advertisement 'They seem to be designed primarily to protect business as usual in the intensive dairy sector, by shielding the most profitable, farmers in the country in the wealthiest part of the country that are producing a lot of pollution, greenhouse gasses, but also water pollution because of the big issues with nitrates.' Kelly added that he feared the review would end up being a 'total disaster' for biodiversity and water quality targets. The report has higher ambitions for rewetting of bogs, aiming for 90% of peatland to be rewetted by 2050. This is higher than the 70% target under the EU Nature Restoration Law. But Kelly said this risked 'creating an east-west divide' in the country, where the 'most profitable and least sustainable farmers in the east are allowed to continue as normal while the burden of change is shifted onto the least profitable farmers who also represent the majority of farm families'. Daniel Long, a member of farming and food policy campaign group Talamh Beo who took part in the review, raised concerns about the direction of the final report. 'If you were from an environmental persuasion or farming persuasion, I think both sides could very much argue that they were dissatisfied. I'm living in the south of the country myself and what you want is fairness across for whatever type of farming you're doing,' Long said. Long also questioned whether farmers based on the western side of the country may be subject to the 'majority' of the environmental measures, unlike farmers in more dairy focused regions across the east and south. 'If you look at the eastern side, we're the ones with the issues with the water quality and we're the ones with the intensive farming,' Long said. 'So is it fair that the farmers on the western side of the country pay for that? I would say, as a farmer, no. Of course the minister needs to reflect on all of this in the final recommendations.' Denis Drennan, president of the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association – one of the largest farming organisations in the country – believes the 10:1 ratios are unrealistic. Drennan said that it will take serious effort to reverse the 'huge problem' of generational renewal, meaning ensuring that retiring farmers have successors to take over from them. 'It's a great success story for the country that we have so many options for young people but it means there's a decreasing number of people willing to take over a farm,' Drennan said. 'The policy review was driven by the Green Party very much, which is fine, but we have to get in touch with reality here,' Drennan added, outlining that reducing emissions needs to be done in a way that is fair to farmers. As to whether some of the draft scenarios may cause a rift between farmers themselves, Drennan said 'that's there already' for beef and dairy farmers because of a 'huge demand for land' among competing farms. 'A review of our land use is badly needed because at the moment it's taking place in different silos, from forestry, to solar farms, organic farming and more. But you need to get to grips with generation renewal to even make that work.' When contacted, a spokesperson for the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment said that the final report was submitted to Cabinet ministers across a number of government departments covering climate, housing and agriculture. 'The Ministers, before reporting to government, are currently considering the report,' the spokesperson said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Agriland
3 days ago
- Agriland
Watch: Potential for vaccines to reduce methane emissions?
With the threat of global warming increasing, research around greenhouse gases (GHG) and in particular methane, is becoming increasingly important. According to Sharon Huws, professor in animal science and microbiology at Queens University Belfast there are 'huge gaps' in ruminant bacteria available for methane emission research. Speaking at the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine's (DAFM) Agriculture and Climate conference this week at Dublin Castle, Huws highlighted the challenges associated with the 'complexity' of the ruminant microbiome. Huws said: 'The rumen is one of the most complex microbiomes that you will find in nature. 'And with this complexity brings quite a lot of challenges, but ultimately what we're trying to do with our methane mitigation strategies is manipulate the processes in the rumen. 'If we do not have these microbes available, it means that we cannot understand them.' Prof. Sharon Huws, Queens University Belfast Reducing methane emissions Huws told Agriland how the Rumen Gateway Project, taking place at Queen's University Belfast, aims to 'fill in' the understanding around how methane is produced. She detailed that the purpose of the project is to gather methane-producing bacteria from ruminant animals across the world and combat them with methane mitigation strategies. Huws also added that 'practical' solutions can be implemented on farms such as introducing multi-species swards and willows to reduce methane emissions. Feed additives such as Bovaer are now gaining interest among farmers, with Huws emphasising that 'we [researchers] would never put anything on farms unless we know it does not affect animal health and welfare and that the products produced won't affect human health'. 'Those are the number one things, ensuring that farmers and the general public have confidence in what we're [researchers] doing'. Huws also highlighted that the acceleration of research on methane vaccines will require a team effort by immunologists and microbiologists. 'I think probably, three or four years down the line we'll hear a lot more about methane vaccines,' Huws added.
