Trump deploys nuclear submarines in row with Russia
Trump and Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's security council, have been sparring on social media for days.
Trump's post on his Truth Social platform abruptly took that spat into the very real -- and rarely publicized -- sphere of nuclear forces.
"Based on the highly provocative statements," Trump said he had "ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that."
"Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," the 79-year-old Republican posted.
Trump did not say in his post whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the exact deployment locations, which are kept secret by the US military.
But in an interview with Newsmax that aired Friday night, Trump said the submarines were "closer to Russia."
"We always want to be ready. And so I have sent to the region two nuclear submarines," he said.
"I just want to make sure that his words are only words and nothing more than that."
Trump's remarks came hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin said Moscow had started mass producing its hypersonic nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile, and could deploy them to Belarus, a close Russian ally neighbouring Ukraine, by year-end.
The nuclear sabre-rattling came against the backdrop of a deadline set by Trump for the end of next week for Russia to take steps to ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions.
Despite the pressure from Washington, Russia's onslaught against its pro-Western neighbor continues to unfold at full bore.
An AFP analysis Friday showed that Russian forces had launched a record number of drones at Ukraine in July.
Russian attacks have killed hundreds of Ukrainian civilians since June. A combined missile and drone attack on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv early Thursday killed 31 people, rescuers said.
Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half year invasion were "unchanged".
Those demands include that Ukraine abandon territory and end ambitions to join NATO.
Putin, speaking alongside Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, said Belarusian and Russian specialists "have chosen a place for future positions" of the Oreshnik missiles.
"Work is now underway to prepare these positions. So, most likely, we will close this issue by the end of the year," he added.
- Insults, nuclear rhetoric -
The United States and Russia control the vast majority of the world's nuclear weaponry, and Washington keeps nuclear-armed submarines on permanent patrol as part of its so-called nuclear triad of land, sea and air-launched weapons.
Trump told Newsmax that Medvedev's "nuclear" reference prompted him to reposition US nuclear submarines.
"When you mention the word 'nuclear'... my eyes light up. And I say, we better be careful, because it's the ultimate threat," Trump said in the interview.
Medvedev had criticised Trump on his Telegram account Thursday and alluded to the "fabled 'Dead Hand'" -- a reference to a highly secret automated system put in place during the Cold War to control the country's nuclear weapons.
This came after Trump had lashed out at what he called the "dead economies" of Russia and India.
Medvedev had also harshly criticized Trump's threat of new sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine.
Accusing Trump of "playing the ultimatum game," he posted Monday on X that Trump "should remember" that Russia is a formidable force.
Trump responded by calling Medvedev "the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President."
Medvedev should "watch his words," Trump posted at midnight in Washington on Wednesday. "He's entering very dangerous territory!"
Medvedev is a vocal proponent of Russia's war -- and generally antagonistic to relations with the West.
He served as president between 2008-2012, effectively acting as a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power.
The one-time reformer has rebranded over the years as an avid online troller, touting often extreme versions of official Kremlin nationalist messaging.
But his influence within the Russian political system remains limited.
In Kyiv on Friday, residents held a day of mourning for the 31 people, including five children, killed the day before, most of whom were in a nine-storey apartment block torn open by a missile.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said only Putin could end the war and renewed his call for a meeting between the two leaders.
"The United States has proposed this. Ukraine has supported it. What is needed is Russia's readiness," he wrote on X.
burs-sms/sco/tym
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
‘I know how its all going to end': Ex-CIA chief warns of Vladimir Putin's demise
Don't miss out on the headlines from World. Followed categories will be added to My News. Vladimir Putin is terrified, sickly and facing a fate just like his toppled dictator pal Bashar al-Assad, a former CIA chief has warned. Ralph Goff, ex-CIA chief of operations for Europe and Eurasia, said the ageing Russian tyrant is preoccupied with his health. And while he fumbles with trying to keep well, there is likely to be fomenting dissent in his elites, The Sun reports. He said Putin, 72, could fall very quickly if his oligarch pals turn on him – potentially losing power in a sudden uprising like Assad. Get all the latest news happening around the world as it happens — download the app direct to your phone. Vladimir Putin is facing a fate just like his toppled dictator pal Bashar al-Assad, a former CIA chief has warned. Photo: AFP Goff said the Russian president's health and wellbeing is his 'top concern'. 'Putin is a guy who's afraid of Covid, afraid of being sick,' the ex-spook – a 35-year CIA veteran said. 'His personal health and wellbeing are his top concern. 'Putin may have the same fate as Bashar al-Assad who fell suddenly without warning. 'I think this is one of the more likely outcomes for Putin – a threat that he doesn't even see coming, comes out of nowhere, and he's gone.' Like other intelligence chiefs, Goff – who served in Europe, the Middle East, and Central and South Asia – believes Putin 'sees a threat in the elite'. Goff said the Russian president's health and wellbeing is his 'top concern'. Photo: AFP 'Putin is a guy who's afraid of Covid, afraid of being sick.' Photo: AFP 'It's similar to the Italian mafia organised crime in the United States – where if the head was judged bad for business, then the they would get together and take him out. 'So Putin's got to watch out. He's got to watch the economy. 'He's got to watch the loyalty of the oligarchs.' Despite leading a war effort that has been devastating to Russia, Vlad is 'still popular', Goff said. However, 'It's a huge scale of devastation and loss. And that can undermine just about anybody,' he added. Ralph Goff served in the CIA for 35 years. Photo: Supplied Despite leading a war effort that has been devastating to Russia, Vlad is 'still popular'. Photo: AFP As the war rumbles on, Goff revealed the recipe for Ukraine success – more weapons from Europe and targeting Russian assets. 'When the Ukrainians are successfully armed and prepared, they can hold out – and there's an increased chance of forcing some sort of settlement. 'If not, Putin can continue this war for as long as he likes – to the point where the Ukrainians are forced to kind of seek a very disadvantageous peace, or ceasefire.' Goff warns it would be 'very unstable' with 'no guarantee that some sort of war won't break out in the future'. And outside Russia, Goff believes a regime change in Iran would have a direct impact on Putin's war. 'A change in regime would undermine that support and help isolate Russia just a little bit more,' he said. This article originally appeared on The Sun and has been republished with permission Originally published as 'I know how its all going to end': Ex-CIA chief warns of Vladimir Putin's demise
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Bent on upheaval': Unlikely nations unite
Russia may have choked in Ukraine. China may have overreached with Iran. But a new report warns the axis of authoritarians is only getting stronger, and more determined to topple the world order. 'A new Axis of Upheaval — the increasing alignment among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea — is fundamentally altering the geopolitical landscape,' argues the Washington DC-based Centre for a New American Security (CNAS). 'Bound by shared opposition to a US-led global order, the four powers are growing in strength and coordination and bent on upheaval.' Russia and China began a new round of joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan yesterday. It's a move designed to reinforce their 'friends-without-limits' strategic partnership. Notably, this deal was sealed days before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Now, CNAS senior fellow Adrea Kendall-Taylor and researcher Nicholas Lokker argue their collaboration has deepened significantly. And Pyongyang and Tehran are tagging along. 'The axis of upheaval envisions a world ordered far differently from the one in which we live today,' says Richard Fontaine, chief executive officer of CNAS. 'The United States must develop a comprehensive response that will safeguard its interests, values, and international arrangements.' But those same 'interests, values and international arrangements' are under stress from within. US President Donald Trump is taking a blowtorch to international trade agreements, friendly alliances and global institutions established through the United Nations after World War II. At the same time, China is strengthening its own international power bloc. 'The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) has become a prototype for China and Russia to institutionalise their coordination on geopolitical affairs,' Mercator Institute for China Studies analyst Claus Soong said. It was founded in 2001 as a regional security forum, he explains. Now, its purpose is to 'legitimise their influence over social and political norms in parts of the world outside the Western-led rules-based order and to promote an alternative order in which global power is shared by multiple states'. But are the new axis powers truly united? And are their promises of mutual support real? Axis of upheaval It's not an anti-NATO. But it is an expanding network of like-minded dictators. 'Looking forward, the military challenges that the axis of upheaval poses are likely to grow,' the CNAS report states. 'Axis cooperation will also complicate the picture for US and allied defence planners who can no longer assume that any one of these countries would fight alone, either because one or more of these countries provides military aid and weapons or, less likely, fighters.' Chairman Xi Jinping and President Vladimir Putin issued a joint SCO statement in May: 'Both sides, together with other member states, will continue to enhance the international influence of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, promoting its role in building a multipolar world order centred on the United Nations and based on strict adherence to international legal principles.' It's a message designed to appeal to leaders uncomfortable with Western rules and standards, and how these are applied. 'The (SCO) organisation has conveyed a worldview emphasising sovereignty and security, and amplifying Chinese and Russian narratives, such as preventing 'colour revolutions' or stopping a 'new Cold War', as Xi has stated, and 'shaping a fair multipolar world order', as Putin has remarked,' Soong explained. But China clearly has issues with UNCLOS, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, despite signing the territorial treaty. Russia sidestepped the UN Charter with its unilateral military assault on a neighbouring sovereign nation (Ukraine). Iran's support for Middle Eastern terrorist organisations — which it insists are religious freedom fighters — has earned it near global pariah status. And North Korea's repressive Kim regime has clawed its way through decades of international sanctions to secure for itself a significant nuclear ballistic missile force. But the SCO is not an alliance, Soong adds; 'Nor does it have a common basis of geopolitical interest. China and Russia are aligned but not allied, and they have differing interests in treating Central Asia as their sphere of influence.' And that, argues Washington DC geopolitical analysts Craig Singleton and Grant Rumley, is the difference between words and actions. 'Herein, of course, lies the rub with Beijing's much-touted Middle East network and the wider China-Russia-Iran alignment,' they write. 'Both rest on partnerships of convenience united by shared grievance — but all too often divided by capability and caution. Convergence on Ukraine 'Co-operation among the four countries was expanding before 2022, but Russia's invasion of Ukraine accelerated their deepening economic, military, and technological ties,' reads the CNAS report, titled The Axis of Upheaval, Gauging the Growing Military Cooperation Among Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. North Korea has sent thousands of troops and millions of rounds of ammunition to support Russia's efforts to eradicate Ukraine. China has been less blatant. At first, it was deliveries of minor mass-produced components to support Russia's failing war machine. Then, accusations expanded to the delivery of Chinese-made drone engines in shipping containers marked 'industrial refrigeration units'. Now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has accused China of directly providing Russia with weapons. 'Military cooperation within the axis is likely to shorten the time it will take Russia to reconstitute its conventional forces, increasing the pressure on Europe to more rapidly ramp up its own capabilities,' the CNAS report warns. And Moscow, despite the failure of its advanced weaponry, has plenty to offer in return. 'Russian advancements on the battlefield in Ukraine and experience in modern warfare, for example, are diffusing to each axis country,' the report explains. But this emerging Axis is offering Moscow more than spare parts. 'As Putin's Russia faces Western sanctions due to its war on Ukraine, the SCO has also provided a diplomatic platform through summits and ministerial meetings that have allowed both Beijing and Moscow to form a front with Global South countries more aligned with their anti-Western narratives and authoritarian view,' Soong explains. It's a trend that's drawn the ire of the US Ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker. He has attacked Beijing for using Moscow to wage a 'proxy war' to distract the West from Taiwan and the South and East China Seas. 'China thinks they're fighting a proxy war through Russia,' he told Fox News last week. 'They want to keep the US and our allies occupied with this war, so that we cannot focus on our other strategic challenges.' Iran, the Axis' weak underbelly 'Importantly, the axis's limp showing during the (Iran) war was far more than a political embarrassment for Beijing,' argue Rumley and Singleton. 'It is a warning that any hostile move against Taiwan — especially with Trump in the Oval Office — could trigger an unpredictable US response.' Israel's virtually unopposed targeted assassination of key Iranian military leaders, scientists and politicians and the US bombing of underground nuclear facilities was a direct confrontation with the new Axis. It met no resistance. 'As Israeli warheads slammed into Iranian sites, Chinese statements scolded Israel and urged Washington to rein in its ally, but Beijing still withheld drones, credit, and replacement missile parts for its 'comprehensive strategic' partner,' they argue. 'The net effect has been to reinforce a perception that China often pontificates more than it meaningfully participates.' Soong says the air strikes on Iran demonstrate the SCO's limitations. 'In addition to lacking common values and coherent geopolitical interests, the SCO also has no concrete leverage to take collective action,' he writes. 'When Iran was targeted, the organisation had little capacity for action beyond issuing calls for de-escalation and condemning both Israel on June 14 and the United States on June 23 for their military strikes.' It also demonstrated the West's capabilities. Again. 'The United States' sudden intervention in the Iran-Israel conflict could complicate China's Taiwan calculus,' Rumley and Singleton argue. 'In a crossâ€'strait crisis, a wild-card US president such as Donald Trump might act sooner and hit harder than Chinese planners previously assumed.' But CNAS argues that Russia's and China's limited support for Iran, this time, does not spell the end of their ties. Instead, that cooperation is likely to persist and expand. 'The incentives fuelling their cooperation have not changed since Israel's actions against Iran,' the report states. 'If anything, Russia, China, and North Korea are likely to see value in helping Tehran reconstitute its capacity to antagonise the United States and create policy dilemmas for Washington.' Axis of spin, or leverage? 'With the dust now settled, the lesson most relevant to Beijing lies far from the Gulf,' argue Rumbley and Singleton. 'The short clash confirmed what Chinese strategists have long preached: In great-power contests, hard power decides outcomes.' The Axis forces of World War II were more about moral support than material. Nazi Germany did offer support to Fascist Italy, mainly in an effort to secure oil supplies. But Imperial Japan was limited to an exchange of critical minerals and technical breakthroughs. What of the new Axis of Upheaval? 'There is more divergence among SCO members than alignment, despite its non-Western appearance,' argues Soong. 'The call for collectively building a multipolar global order does not transcend the individual geopolitical interests of its members.' But the Axis is well-positioned for propaganda, he adds. 'Their messaging is clearly reflected in SCO statements and demonstrates a deepening strategic alignment in rhetoric, positioning themselves on the moral high ground in contrast to perceived Western double standards – that the West labels Russia a destabiliser for invading Ukraine, while remaining silent on, or even encouraging, Israel's attack on Iran. ' But CNAS argues the threat of Axis coordination is real. 'While these countries are reticent to incur unnecessary costs on behalf of their partners, they will seek out opportunities to support one another, especially in ways that help them withstand Western pressure,' the report argues. 'Through their cooperation, these countries are gaining valuable information and learning lessons that may strengthen each country's military, and their collaboration will likely increase the resilience of their regimes. 'There is also a rising risk of simultaneity, or the prospect that these countries could initiate more than one crisis at the same time, in an explicitly coordinated or opportunistic manner.' Iran's cheap, functional drone weapons are now being used by Russia and North Korea. Moscow's defence officials are travelling to Pyongyang, Beijing and Tehran to share their combat experience. 'Their cooperation will not end with Russia's war against Ukraine,' the CNAS report concludes. 'Russia's aims go beyond Ukraine, and Moscow will continue to view cooperation with China, Iran, and North Korea as essential to accomplishing these aims.'
The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
Trump deploys nuclear submarines in row with Russia
US President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines Friday in an extraordinary escalation of what had been an online war of words with a Russian official over Ukraine and tariffs. Trump and Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's security council, have been sparring on social media for days. Trump's post on his Truth Social platform abruptly took that spat into the very real -- and rarely publicized -- sphere of nuclear forces. "Based on the highly provocative statements," Trump said he had "ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that." "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," the 79-year-old Republican posted. Trump did not say in his post whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the exact deployment locations, which are kept secret by the US military. But in an interview with Newsmax that aired Friday night, Trump said the submarines were "closer to Russia." "We always want to be ready. And so I have sent to the region two nuclear submarines," he said. "I just want to make sure that his words are only words and nothing more than that." Trump's remarks came hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin said Moscow had started mass producing its hypersonic nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile, and could deploy them to Belarus, a close Russian ally neighbouring Ukraine, by year-end. The nuclear sabre-rattling came against the backdrop of a deadline set by Trump for the end of next week for Russia to take steps to ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions. Despite the pressure from Washington, Russia's onslaught against its pro-Western neighbor continues to unfold at full bore. An AFP analysis Friday showed that Russian forces had launched a record number of drones at Ukraine in July. Russian attacks have killed hundreds of Ukrainian civilians since June. A combined missile and drone attack on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv early Thursday killed 31 people, rescuers said. Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half year invasion were "unchanged". Those demands include that Ukraine abandon territory and end ambitions to join NATO. Putin, speaking alongside Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, said Belarusian and Russian specialists "have chosen a place for future positions" of the Oreshnik missiles. "Work is now underway to prepare these positions. So, most likely, we will close this issue by the end of the year," he added. - Insults, nuclear rhetoric - The United States and Russia control the vast majority of the world's nuclear weaponry, and Washington keeps nuclear-armed submarines on permanent patrol as part of its so-called nuclear triad of land, sea and air-launched weapons. Trump told Newsmax that Medvedev's "nuclear" reference prompted him to reposition US nuclear submarines. "When you mention the word 'nuclear'... my eyes light up. And I say, we better be careful, because it's the ultimate threat," Trump said in the interview. Medvedev had criticised Trump on his Telegram account Thursday and alluded to the "fabled 'Dead Hand'" -- a reference to a highly secret automated system put in place during the Cold War to control the country's nuclear weapons. This came after Trump had lashed out at what he called the "dead economies" of Russia and India. Medvedev had also harshly criticized Trump's threat of new sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine. Accusing Trump of "playing the ultimatum game," he posted Monday on X that Trump "should remember" that Russia is a formidable force. Trump responded by calling Medvedev "the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President." Medvedev should "watch his words," Trump posted at midnight in Washington on Wednesday. "He's entering very dangerous territory!" Medvedev is a vocal proponent of Russia's war -- and generally antagonistic to relations with the West. He served as president between 2008-2012, effectively acting as a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power. The one-time reformer has rebranded over the years as an avid online troller, touting often extreme versions of official Kremlin nationalist messaging. But his influence within the Russian political system remains limited. In Kyiv on Friday, residents held a day of mourning for the 31 people, including five children, killed the day before, most of whom were in a nine-storey apartment block torn open by a missile. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said only Putin could end the war and renewed his call for a meeting between the two leaders. "The United States has proposed this. Ukraine has supported it. What is needed is Russia's readiness," he wrote on X. burs-sms/sco/tym
