Punjab ACE to probe RDA scam
In light of weak financial discipline within the Rawalpindi Development Authority (RDA), a major embezzlement scandal involving Rs1.64 billion in public funds has come to light.
Talking to The Express Tribune on Monday, sources said authorities have decided to refer the matter to the Anti-Corruption Establishment Punjab for investigation. Depending on the findings and nature of the case, it may also be forwarded to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) or the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), based on recommendations from the anti-corruption body.
According to the sources, the embezzlement is linked to RDA's role as the executing agency for the Rawalpindi-Islamabad Metro Bus Project. Starting in fiscal year 201617, RDA received its share of project funds, which, along with other public funds, were allegedly transferred over a prolonged period to various companies via Call Deposit Receipts (CDRs) from official RDA accounts.
Initially, the suspected embezzlement amount was estimated at Rs3 billion. However, a detailed review of the CDR records confirmed the misappropriation stands at approximately Rs1.64 billion.
In response, RDA Director General Kinza Murtaza first constituted a departmental inquiry committee comprising RDA officers. It included Director Admin and Finance Qazi Sohaib Ahmed, Director State Management Shehzad Nasir Gondal, Director Land Malik Ghazanfar Awan, and Director WASA Tahir Bashir, among others. However, during internal consultations, concerns were raised that while a departmental inquiry may establish facts, it lacks the authority to recover misappropriated funds or hold individuals accountable. Therefore, it was decided to treat the matter as a formal reference and forward it to the Anti-Corruption Establishment Punjab.
Additionally, due to the suspected involvement of private banks in the transactions, the Anti-Corruption Establishment Punjab has the discretion to escalate the case to NAB or FIA as deemed appropriate.
Meanwhile, several RDA officials who were in service during the period of the alleged embezzlementand who have since retiredhave been summoned by the DG RDA. Some have already appeared before the authority to present their statements, while others are expected to report soon.
The sources further revealed that a special team within the RDA has already retrieved significant documentation and has identified the specific banks where funds were transferred into private company accounts. These banks have been formally requested to freeze the relevant accounts to prevent the withdrawal or disappearance of public money and to facilitate the possible recovery of misappropriated funds.
It is important to note that authority for cash transfers and other financial matters rests jointly with the institution's head and the departmental chief. Despite multiple attempts, Director General Kinza Murtaza could not be reached for comment on the alleged financial scandal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Case for sugar trading on Pakistan Mercantile Exchange
Sugar — a seemingly simple kitchen staple — holds a complex and powerful position within Pakistan's economy. With an annual production and consumption hovering around 7 million tonnes, sugar is not only an essential household item, but also a strategic commodity impacting national food security, industry dynamics, and government policy. Yet, for a commodity so central to the country's socio-economic fabric, the mechanisms that govern its trade remain largely opaque, informal, and inefficient. At present, sugar trading in Pakistan is carried out through a sprawling network of intermediaries and informal 'exchanges'– marketplaces operating without licenses or regulatory oversight. Transactions are executed on platforms as rudimentary as WhatsApp, where truckloads (typically 12-tonne lots) are bought and sold on speculative pricing. Prices fluctuate based on these informal notations, and deals are struck without transparency, accountability, or the protections offered by centralised clearing systems. This market structure not only limits fair price discovery, but also exposes traders to defaults, arbitrary tax liabilities, and legal risks. Utilising a formal commodities exchange — such as the Pakistan Mercantile Exchange (PMEX) — for sugar and similar agricultural products is not just a recommendation; it is a necessity. Let's begin with the fundamentals. A regulated commodities exchange introduces three critical elements to any market: transparency, trust, and efficiency. In the case of sugar, a formal exchange ensures that both buyers and sellers are properly onboarded after KYC (Know Your Customer), AML (Anti-Money Laundering), and CFT (Countering the Financing of Terrorism) checks. This brings the shadow economy into the formal sector, discouraging tax evasion and fostering accountability across the trading ecosystem. More importantly, it transforms price discovery from a speculative, rumour-driven process influenced by a handful of traders into a transparent, data-informed mechanism that has participation from tens of thousands of investors and traders from across the country. On regulated exchanges, prices are determined through structured futures contracts, in which both parties deposit a small margin (usually between 5-10%) and commit to either buying or selling sugar at a future date. As delivery date approaches, these margins escalate every day to discourage pure speculators ensuring that real buyers, sellers and hedgers remain in the market to curb speculative impact on sugar prices. This enables a more accurate projection of market trends, allowing producers, consumers, and even policymakers to make informed decisions about production planning, procurement, and inventory management. The role of speculation, often misunderstood, is also critical in this context. A regulated environment doesn't eliminate speculation – it restrains it through various levers like daily circuit breakers, escalating margins close to delivery dates, broader investor participation, etc. Speculators bring liquidity to markets and contribute to robust price discovery. Whether they're informed by satellite data on crop yields, insights from sugar mills, or international price trends, these traders inject diverse perspectives into the pricing mechanism. When speculation is allowed in a structured and monitored space, it becomes a strength – not a risk. To understand the urgency of reform, one must consider the current challenges. Informal sugar dealers are often subjected to massive tax claims from the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) in the absence of reliable trading history and profit and loss accounts. A trader may turn over billions of rupees, but face net losses due to volatile market swings – and yet receive tax bills calculated purely on their trade volume. This drives many away from transparency and toward further informality. A regulated exchange solves this mismatch by recording and validating every trade, offering clarity on net positions, margins, and actual profit or loss. Then there's the matter of volatility and fairness. In informal setups, there is no central counterparty to guarantee performance. If a party fails to honour a deal – say, they can't deliver the sugar they sold or pay for the sugar they bought – there is no protection for the counterparty. A licensed exchange like PMEX acts as the central counterparty, ensuring that all trades are honoured through active risk management systems and daily margining processes. It's a safeguard for all players, large or small, and incentivises broad investor participation in commodity markets. Of course, the goal is not merely to digitise the existing system but to modernise it. Pakistan's commodity trading infrastructure is archaic – in some cases, unchanged for over a century. Prices vary between local 'mandis' and even across 'thadas' within the same 'mandis', with buyers and sellers often disconnected from broader market trends. This disjointed structure penalises both ends – farmers and consumers – as middlemen extract disproportionate margins. By integrating sugar, and eventually wheat, rice, and maize into a centralised, transparent exchange, we pave the way for inclusive, modern agricultural markets. It's not just about making sugar trading efficient. It's about rewriting the country's agricultural policy playbook. Transparent futures price signals help farmers decide which crops to plant. Government agencies can monitor supply-demand dynamics in real time. And consumers benefit from more stable, predictable pricing – especially during sensitive periods like Ramazan. In conclusion, the case for regulated sugar trading is as much about economic reform as it is about governance, equity, and national resilience. By shifting from fragmented, informal systems to structured, licensed platforms, Pakistan can unlock a more productive, transparent, and inclusive future for its commodity markets. Sugar may be the starting point – but the implications reach far beyond the sweetener itself. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
APTMA demands immediate removal of yarn, fabric from EFS
KARACHI: All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA) has urged the government to immediately remove yarn and fabric from the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS), warning that their continued inclusion is jeopardising the domestic textile industry and distorting fair market competition. Addressing a press conference at APTMA House here on Tuesday, Kamran Arshad Chairman APTMA said that inclusion of Yarn and Fabric in the EFS has resulted in unfair market competition as the domestic industry products are paying 18 percent GST, while importers are enjoying tax-free and duty-free regime. He said that Pakistan Cotton Brokers Association (PCBA) and Pakistan Cotton Ginners Association (PCGA) and many other textile associations are supporting APTM's move. APTMA for removing yarn & fabric from ambit of EFS On the occasion, Naveed Ahmed, Chairman of APTMA Southern Zone, Khawaja Muhammad Zubair, Chairman PCBA and Dr Jassu Mal PCGA, Yasin Siddik former chairman APTMA, Asif Inam and others were also present. 'FY25 budget removed sales tax exemption on local inputs under EFS; however, imports are sales tax-free and duty-free. This move is directly hurting the domestic industry', Kamran Arshad He mentioned that some 18 percent sales tax on local inputs is refundable, but refunds are delayed, incomplete, and costly to process, especially disadvantageous to SMEs. Due to this disparity, over 120 spinning mills and 800 ginning factories have already shut down; looms are also closing and loom workers are protesting on streets in Faisalabad. SMEs are specifically disadvantaged as they have fewer channels for import and pay sales taxes at every stage. In addition, only 60 to 70 percent of refunds are issued, while the rest are stuck in manual processing with no progress in the last 4-5 years, he added. 'Due to cheap import of yarn and fabric, exporters strongly prefer imported inputs, resulting in disadvantageous local suppliers.' There is a massive $1.5 billion increase in import of only cotton, yarn and greige cloth compared to export growth of $1.4 billion in FY25. The import of these items rose from $2.19 billion in FY24 to $3.64 billion in FY25, he mentioned. Chairman APTMA said that subjecting local supplies to 18 percent sales tax while bestowing zero rating on imports is an anti-Pakistan policy that is bleeding the economy within. He informed that APTMA has pushed as much as it can for restoration of the EFS to its June 2024 position with sales tax zero-rating on local supplies. 'We have held meetings with the Minister Finance, Chairman and Members FBR, IMF representatives; however, the IMF has not agreed to restoration.' He said a high-level committee was also formed led by Ahsan Iqbal, Minister for Planning Development & Special Initiatives of Pakistan for negotiation with IMF; however, the meeting could not hold. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Far-right leader Wilders quits Dutch coalition over immigration row
Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders speaks to the media following his decision to leave the governing coalition, in The Hague, Netherlands, June 3, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article The Dutch government collapsed on Tuesday, most likely ushering in a snap election, after anti-Muslim politician Geert Wilders quit the right-wing coalition, accusing other parties of failing to back his tougher immigration policies. But Prime Minister Dick Schoof, an independent, accused the political maverick of irresponsibility, and the other coalition parties denied failing to support Wilders, saying they had been awaiting proposals from his PVV party's own migration minister. PVV ministers will quit the cabinet, leaving the others to continue as a caretaker administration until an election unlikely to be held before October. Frustration with migration and the high cost of living is boosting the far right and widening divisions in Europe, just as it needs unity to deal effectively with a hostile Russia and an unpredictable and combative US president in the form of Donald Trump. "I have told party leaders repeatedly in recent days that the collapse of the cabinet would be unnecessary and irresponsible," Schoof said after an emergency cabinet meeting triggered by Wilders' decision. "We are facing major challenges both nationally and internationally that require decisiveness from us," he added, before handing his resignation to King Willem-Alexander. The prospect of a new election is likely to delay a decision on boosting defence spending and means the Netherlands will have only a caretaker government when it hosts a summit of the transatlantic NATO alliance this month. Election may months away Wilders said he had had no option but to quit the coalition. "I proposed a plan to close the borders for asylum seekers, to send them away, to shut asylum shelters. I demanded coalition partners sign up to that, which they didn't. That left me no choice but to withdraw my support for this government," he told reporters. "I signed up for the strictest asylum policies, not for the demise of the Netherlands." He said he would lead the PVV into a new election and hoped to be the next prime minister. An election is now likely at the end of October or in November, said political scientist Joep van Lit at Radboud University in Nijmegen. Even then, the fractured political landscape means formation of a new government may take months. It remains to be seen whether right-wing voters will see the turn of events as Wilders' failure to turn his proposals into reality, or rather decide that he needs a bigger mandate to get his way, van Lit said. Simon Otjes, assistant professor in Dutch politics at Leiden University, said the PVV must have calculated that the next election would be seen as a referendum on immigration policy, "because they know they would win that". Amsterdam resident Michelle ten Berge hoped that "with the new election we will choose ... a government that's more moderate". But florist Ron van den Hoogenband, in The Hague, said he expected Wilders to emerge the winner and take control of parliament "so he can do like Trump is doing and other European countries where the extreme right is taking over". Immigration a divisive issue Wilders won the last election in November 2023 with an unexpectedly high 23% of the vote. Opinion polls put his party at around 20% now, roughly on a par with the Labour/Green combination that is currently the second-largest grouping in parliament. Wilders had last week demanded immediate support for a 10-point plan that included closing the borders to asylum seekers, sending back refugees from Syria and shutting down asylum shelters. He also proposed expelling migrants convicted of serious crimes and boosting border controls. Migration has been a divisive issue in Dutch politics for years. The previous government, led by current NATO secretary general Mark Rutte, also collapsed after failing to reach a deal on restricting immigration. Wilders, a provocative politician who was convicted of discrimination against Moroccans in 2016, was not part of the latest government himself. He only managed to strike a coalition deal with three other conservative parties last year after agreeing not to become prime minister. Instead, the cabinet was led by the unelected Schoof, a career civil servant.
