logo
I spent years unlearning an eating disorder – then I was told to diet for health reasons. This is what it taught me

I spent years unlearning an eating disorder – then I was told to diet for health reasons. This is what it taught me

The Guardian16 hours ago
When I was a teenager suffering from anorexia, I thought it was a life sentence. I genuinely believed slogans like 'every woman has an eating disorder' and couldn't imagine a future where calories didn't make me sweat. With this in mind, you must understand that I'm boasting when I write this next sentence: in November 2024, I was diagnosed with 'very high' cholesterol.
After years of restriction, I spent my 20s unable to understand why every meal shouldn't be the maximum amount of delicious. This means that last year, I was regularly melting a packet of white chocolate buttons on my morning porridge before heading out for a white chocolate matcha with cream, followed by a cheese and egg sandwich in a brioche bun, a slice of cake, fried chicken and chips, to say nothing of the bread and butter before dinner and dessert. In short, I was smashing through my recommended daily allowance of saturated fat and loving every second of it. 'Treats', to my mind, are not something that have to be earned.
I went up a couple of dress sizes and while it would be a lie to say I did so 'happily', I didn't really care too much about it – certainly not enough to change my eating habits or move my legs.
But what is mentally healthy isn't always physically healthy – and perhaps I wasn't as mentally healthy as I believed. My recovery had become almost as performative as my disorder. While I once thought I was superior for starving, I soon felt superior for never saying 'no' to ice-cream and never ordering salad without a side of chips. I viewed healthy eaters with suspicion. Maybe I no longer believed that every woman had an eating disorder, but I certainly had the wrongheaded belief that every woman who worked out did.
It's hard to shake this mindset, which is, of course, entirely defensive – hence why I just masked my high cholesterol diagnosis with the word 'boasting'. The truth is that my cholesterol results scared me: my family has a long history of strokes and heart attacks, and although I don't have a pension, I am – on the whole – into the idea of reaching old age.
I was first diagnosed with high cholesterol in 2023 when I had a health check as part of the Our Future Health scheme, and made some half-hearted attempts to swap brownies for flapjacks. I only accepted that I would really have to change my diet and start exercising after the numbers jumped to 'very high' a year later.
I have now spent about half a year eating a healthier, lower saturated fat diet, and have reduced my total cholesterol to 'normal' levels (although I'm only within them by 0.1 of a point, so I still have a way to go). The past six months has made me reflect a lot on our – and my – attitudes to food and health. I feel very happy about where I am mentally now, but quite despondent about the way we all remain imprisoned by contradictory and reductive health messaging.
To start with, my doctor couldn't have cared less when I was diagnosed with high cholesterol in 2023, and I don't believe he would have been as flippant if I was overweight. We're told the problem with being fat is that it's unhealthy, but there are people who are heavier than I am who have far better cholesterol levels. I'm certain my doctor would have been sterner if I was 'fat', which is ridiculous because the number on the scale should matter less than the numbers on my blood test results. Yet I was barely asked about my diet.
I'm also angry that this all happened because I was taught – and women are still taught! – to focus on calories at the expense of nutrition. A 'bad' food, to many minds, is a calorific one – but there are high-calorie foods that are very healthy, and low-calorie foods that are shockingly high in saturated fat, or low in nutrients in general. Once I recovered from my eating disorder, I saw no reason to limit myself – after all, the world told me that the scariest consequence of eating what you liked was gaining weight, and I was very proud to no longer be scared of that. Of course, I didn't forget that too much saturated fat, salt and sugar are bad for you, but our culture repeats that 'being fat is unhealthy' rather than 'being unhealthy is unhealthy'. The world loves nothing more than a thin woman who can house a burger with extra bacon. Can you blame me for internalising that?
But I think I'm most angry that society is set up so that if you want to be healthier, it's assumed you must also want to lose weight. Because here is the sad truth: while total recovery is possible, anorexia never stops waiting for its next opportunity. At the start of the year, I downloaded an app to monitor my saturated fat intake and naturally, obviously, it also counted calories. At first I wished there was a way to remove this feature and then – comically quickly – I became very into it. I didn't eat anywhere near enough for a week, until I confessed to my husband, deleted the app and broke the spell (which I want to let everyone know can be surprisingly easy to do if you break your silence).
Again and again, I'm reminded that society seems set up to invite me back to my disorder. I was recently on holiday and averaging 30,000 steps a day because I adore exploring new places on foot. But while I didn't connect my step count to my energy expenditure, my phone did – it sent me a cheery alert that I was burning more calories than usual. Why tell me that? Don't tell me that. Why is the default assumption that I should care?
And when I had an appointment with the nurse after my 'very high' diagnosis, she handed me a sheet of paper banning me from eating 'fancy breads'. It seemingly didn't occur to anyone to approach things more sensitively because of my eating disorder history.
It's ironic that trying to save myself from a heart attack could have given me one – if I had allowed anorexia to take over my life again in the pursuit of 'health', I would have become unhealthier than ever before. The rise of 'skinny' jabs is driving home these messages like never before: because weight loss is still seen as the ultimate, most desirable goal. Seemingly no one cares if some jabbers taking them for that reason also lose their hair, experience painful gastrointestinal side-effects, don't get enough nutrients to sustain their body, and even reduce the efficacy of their contraception. That's not to mention the risk of vision loss. Once again, weight is seen as the most important marker of health, even though pursuing weight loss can and does make people very unhealthy.
But, in the end, it's not just society I'm shaking my fists at – I've been forced to confront myself, too. Post-anorexia, it wasn't healthy for my eating habits to still be such a huge part of my identity. I hated asking pals to swap a pizza reservation for sushi when I got my diagnosis, and I cringed at saying 'no' to a slice of birthday cake at a party in a pub – I especially detested that when I ordered salad at lunch a friend copied me with the words: 'Oh, I should be good too!' There's still a defensive, confrontational part of me that thinks eating healthily and exercising is inherently disordered and unenlightened, and a mean little part of my brain that wants me to whisper, 'Get a life!' at people who eat five fruits and vegetables a day.
No matter how I started this article, this isn't actually a healthy attitude. Though it's painful to disclose, I do now actually enjoy exercising. And though it is against my political beliefs to admit this, treats actually are more enjoyable if you're not having them on the hour, every hour.
I'm slightly sad that my diagnosis means I once again have to go through life thinking about what I eat – but if I'm honest, maybe I never stopped thinking about it, even when I thought I was completely free. I'm still stuck in a strange middle ground where (sadly) I can feel a little burst of happiness if my trousers seem looser and yet, simultaneously, I can fill a stamp-able sweet shop loyalty card in two weeks. I don't have all the answers. But if there's one thing that I wish I could change … it's my cholesterol. And if there's a second thing, it's our attitudes to diet and health.
Amelia Tait is a freelance features writer
In the UK, Beat can be contacted on 0808-801-0677. In the US, help is available at nationaleatingdisorders.org or by calling ANAD's eating disorders hotline at 800-375-7767. In Australia, the Butterfly Foundation is at 1800 33 4673. Other international helplines can be found at Eating Disorder Hope
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shower gel advert banned for depicting black skin as 'problematic' and white skin as 'superior' by advertising watchdog
Shower gel advert banned for depicting black skin as 'problematic' and white skin as 'superior' by advertising watchdog

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Shower gel advert banned for depicting black skin as 'problematic' and white skin as 'superior' by advertising watchdog

A shower gel advert has been banned for depicting black skin as 'problematic' and white skin as 'superior', the advertising watchdog has said. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned the ad after investigating complaints that it perpetuated a 'negative and offensive racial stereotype'. The Sanex shower gel ad, broadcast in June, depicted a black woman with red scratch marks and another covered with a cracked clay-like material. Over this, a voiceover said: 'To those who might scratch day and night. To those whose skin will feel dried out even by water.' Over scenes of a white woman the ad stated: 'Try to take a shower with the new Sanex skin therapy and its patented amino acid complex. For 24 hour hydration feel.' The ad ended with on-screen text and the voiceover adding: 'Relief could be as simple as a shower.' Colgate-Palmolive, which owns the Sanex brand, argued the depiction of diverse models in the ad was shown in a 'before and after' scenario to demonstrate their product was suitable for all, rather than as a comparison based on race or ethnicity. On that basis, it believed the ad did not perpetuate negative racial stereotypes and was not likely to cause serious or widespread offence. Clearcast, which approves or rejects ads for television broadcast, said the ad did not perpetuate negative racial stereotypes and instead demonstrated the product's inclusivity. The agency said one model with darker skin was depicted in a 'stylised and unrealistic way' to demonstrate dryness, but her skin tone was otherwise not a focal point. However the ASA said the use of different skin colours created a juxtaposition of black skin shown as itchy and dry in the 'before' scenes, and white skin shown as smoother in the 'after' scenes. The watchdog said: 'The ad was therefore structured in such a way that it was the black skin, depicted in association with itchy and dry skin, which was shown to be problematic and uncomfortable, whereas the white skin, depicted as smoother and clean after using the product, was shown successfully changed and resolved. 'We considered that could be interpreted as suggesting that white skin was superior to black skin.' The ASA added: 'Although we understood that this message was not the one intended and might appear coincidental or pass unnoticed by some viewers, we considered that the ad was likely to reinforce the negative and offensive racial stereotype that black skin was problematic and that white skin was superior. 'We concluded that the ad included a racial stereotype and was therefore likely to cause serious offence.' Colgate-Palmolive was approached for comment.

Major brand has advert banned for suggesting black skin is ‘problematic'
Major brand has advert banned for suggesting black skin is ‘problematic'

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Major brand has advert banned for suggesting black skin is ‘problematic'

A Sanex shower gel television advertisement has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for reinforcing an offensive racial stereotype. The watchdog ruled the ad, which suggested black skin was "problematic" and white skin "superior", must not air again. This followed two complaints that it perpetuated negative stereotypes about darker skin tones. The ad, seen in June, included a voiceover that said: 'To those who might scratch day and night. To those whose skin will feel dried out even by water,' alongside scenes of a black woman with red scratch marks and another covered with a cracked clay-like material. Alongside scenes of a white woman taking a shower with the product, the ad then stated: 'Try to take a shower with the new Sanex skin therapy and its patented amino acid complex. For 24 hour hydration feel.' The ad ended with on-screen text and the voiceover stating: 'Relief could be as simple as a shower.' Colgate-Palmolive, which owns the Sanex brand, said the depiction of diverse models in the ad, either experiencing skin discomfort or post-product relief, was shown in a 'before and after' scenario to show their product was suitable and effective for all, rather than as a comparison based on race or ethnicity. On that basis, it believed the ad did not perpetuate negative racial stereotypes and was not likely to cause serious or widespread offence. Clearcast, which approves or rejects ads for broadcast on television, said the ad did not perpetuate negative racial stereotypes and instead demonstrated the product's inclusivity. The agency said one model with darker skin was depicted in a 'stylised and unrealistic way' to demonstrate dryness, but her skin tone was otherwise not a focal point. A second model, also with darker skin, was shown with itchy skin, but this was portrayed through scratching visibly healthy skin and the resulting marks, and was therefore more about sensation than any visible skin condition. The ASA said the use of different skin colours was a means of portraying a 'before and after' of the product's use, which created a juxtaposition of black skin shown as itchy, dry and cracked in the 'before' scenes, and white skin shown as smoother skin in the 'after' scenes. The watchdog said: 'The ad was therefore structured in such a way that it was the black skin, depicted in association with itchy and dry skin, which was shown to be problematic and uncomfortable, whereas the white skin, depicted as smoother and clean after using the product, was shown successfully changed and resolved. 'We considered that could be interpreted as suggesting that white skin was superior to black skin.' The ASA added: 'Although we understood that this message was not the one intended and might appear coincidental or pass unnoticed by some viewers, we considered that the ad was likely to reinforce the negative and offensive racial stereotype that black skin was problematic and that white skin was superior. 'We concluded that the ad included a racial stereotype and was therefore likely to cause serious offence.' It further told Colgate-Palmolive 'to ensure they avoided causing serious offence on the grounds of race'.

How adding more fiber to meals can benefit one's health
How adding more fiber to meals can benefit one's health

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

How adding more fiber to meals can benefit one's health

Increasing dietary fiber intake can significantly lower cholesterol levels, thereby reducing the risk of life-threatening heart attacks and strokes. Both soluble and insoluble fiber are beneficial; soluble fiber, found in foods like oats and lentils, binds with cholesterol in the digestive tract to prevent its absorption. Most adults currently consume around 15 grams of fiber daily, which is considerably less than the recommended 25–30 grams for optimal health. Practical ways to increase fiber include adding steel-cut oats with fruit for breakfast, incorporating lentils or hummus into lunch, and baking sweet potatoes for dinner. It is crucial to note that a high-fiber diet is not a complete remedy if saturated fats and salt remain high; fiber should be increased gradually with ample water intake to prevent discomfort.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store