Australia's plan to build more homes is in deep trouble. We need bold action
Australia's plan to build 1.2 million new homes by 2029 is in trouble. A new report by the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC) shows we are likely to miss this ambitious target by a huge margin.
At the current pace, the council forecasts we will fall about 262,000 homes short of the goal. In other words, for every five homes we need, we're only on track to build about four.
No state or territory is building enough to meet its share. This is more than just a number; it means the housing affordability crisis will continue unless we act fast.
The report lays out five areas of priority for reform. But implementing its recommendations will require bolder action than we're currently seeing.
NHSAC's State of the Housing System 2025 report shows very challenging conditions for future home buyers and renters. By the end of 2024, it took half of median household income to service a new mortgage.
Think about that: half of your income gets spent on maintaining a roof over your head. That's well above one common measure of "housing stress" for lower-income households: spending more than 30 per cent of gross income on housing.
Anyone planning to purchase their first home faces an average savings period that extends beyond ten years just for their deposit.
For renters, the report found it now takes 33 per cent of median household income to cover the cost of a new lease.
It doesn't help that rental vacancy rates are near record lows, around 1.8 per cent nationwide. This means renters are competing fiercely for very few available homes. This drives rents even higher.
Australians can see the daily reality this report describes. And it can have disproportionate negative impacts on vulnerable groups in society.
For example, the rate of homelessness among First Nations people has been about 8.8 times the rate for non-Indigenous Australians.
Supply remains a key factor underpinning Australia's housing crisis. We simply aren't building enough homes. Australia completed approximately 177,000 new dwellings in 2024 but that fell short of demand for about 223,000 new homes.
And the report predicts we will remain behind our targets for coming years. Under current policy settings, a forecast total of 938,000 new homes will be built between mid-2024 and mid-2029, well short of the Housing Accord's 1.2 million home target.
The report identifies five essential action areas needed to restore Australia's housing system to proper functioning.
1. Lift social and affordable housing to 6 per cent of all homes
In 2021, only about 4 per cent of dwellings were for social or affordable housing. Governments and not-for-profits must add many more low-rent homes so people on modest incomes aren't trapped on long waitlists.
2. Improve productivity and build faster with modern methods of construction
Prefabricated panels, modular kits and even 3D printed structures can halve building time and use fewer tradies.
Federal and state governments could fund factories, training and pilot projects to get these methods into the mainstream.
The report also calls on the government to address labour and skills shortages.
3. Fix planning systems and unlock land
Quicker approvals, firm deadlines and updated zoning would let builders put taller or denser housing near transport, jobs and schools. Governments also need to bundle and service big sites so work can start without years of red tape.
4. Support for renters
The report calls on governments to support better outcomes for renters, and to fully implement National Cabinet's "Better Deal for Renters" agreement.
This includes through fair notice requirements, no-fault eviction limits and longer leases.
It also calls for more support for institutional investment. Tax settings that attract super funds and insurers into large build-to-rent projects would add professionally managed apartments and steady rents.
5. Swap stamp duty for land tax
Paying a small yearly land charge instead of a huge upfront stamp duty lets people move or downsize with less of a financial hit, freeing under-used homes and smoothing the market.
The council's proposed solutions seem excellent when studied theoretically, but their practical application will prove challenging.
Australia needs significant time and effort to address multiple systemic obstacles.
One big challenge is the construction workforce. The current workforce lacks enough skilled tradespeople to build homes at the necessary speed. This can result in major delays - even when funding exists.
Another barrier is the planning system itself. Changing planning and zoning regulations faces significant political challenges.
Higher-density developments face community resistance because of the "not in my backyard" (NIMBY) problem while councils tend to move slowly in updating their regulations.
However, the report notes signs of progress in some states. The NSW government has accelerated approval processes and also emphasises "transit-oriented development" - putting new homes near planned and existing transport infrastructure.
Similarly, moving to land tax is easier said than done: State governments generate revenue from stamp duty and a shift to an alternative system would require many years to implement. The absence of federal backing and state incentive payments risks delaying this reform.
NHSAC's report doesn't just diagnose the problem, it offers a roadmap to a healthier housing system.
But those recommendations require bold action. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government has a crucial opportunity to turn words into deeds.
Australia's housing woes didn't appear overnight, they are the result of decades of under-supply and policy missteps. Turning things around won't be instant - but it is achievable with sustained effort.
Australia's plan to build 1.2 million new homes by 2029 is in trouble. A new report by the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC) shows we are likely to miss this ambitious target by a huge margin.
At the current pace, the council forecasts we will fall about 262,000 homes short of the goal. In other words, for every five homes we need, we're only on track to build about four.
No state or territory is building enough to meet its share. This is more than just a number; it means the housing affordability crisis will continue unless we act fast.
The report lays out five areas of priority for reform. But implementing its recommendations will require bolder action than we're currently seeing.
NHSAC's State of the Housing System 2025 report shows very challenging conditions for future home buyers and renters. By the end of 2024, it took half of median household income to service a new mortgage.
Think about that: half of your income gets spent on maintaining a roof over your head. That's well above one common measure of "housing stress" for lower-income households: spending more than 30 per cent of gross income on housing.
Anyone planning to purchase their first home faces an average savings period that extends beyond ten years just for their deposit.
For renters, the report found it now takes 33 per cent of median household income to cover the cost of a new lease.
It doesn't help that rental vacancy rates are near record lows, around 1.8 per cent nationwide. This means renters are competing fiercely for very few available homes. This drives rents even higher.
Australians can see the daily reality this report describes. And it can have disproportionate negative impacts on vulnerable groups in society.
For example, the rate of homelessness among First Nations people has been about 8.8 times the rate for non-Indigenous Australians.
Supply remains a key factor underpinning Australia's housing crisis. We simply aren't building enough homes. Australia completed approximately 177,000 new dwellings in 2024 but that fell short of demand for about 223,000 new homes.
And the report predicts we will remain behind our targets for coming years. Under current policy settings, a forecast total of 938,000 new homes will be built between mid-2024 and mid-2029, well short of the Housing Accord's 1.2 million home target.
The report identifies five essential action areas needed to restore Australia's housing system to proper functioning.
1. Lift social and affordable housing to 6 per cent of all homes
In 2021, only about 4 per cent of dwellings were for social or affordable housing. Governments and not-for-profits must add many more low-rent homes so people on modest incomes aren't trapped on long waitlists.
2. Improve productivity and build faster with modern methods of construction
Prefabricated panels, modular kits and even 3D printed structures can halve building time and use fewer tradies.
Federal and state governments could fund factories, training and pilot projects to get these methods into the mainstream.
The report also calls on the government to address labour and skills shortages.
3. Fix planning systems and unlock land
Quicker approvals, firm deadlines and updated zoning would let builders put taller or denser housing near transport, jobs and schools. Governments also need to bundle and service big sites so work can start without years of red tape.
4. Support for renters
The report calls on governments to support better outcomes for renters, and to fully implement National Cabinet's "Better Deal for Renters" agreement.
This includes through fair notice requirements, no-fault eviction limits and longer leases.
It also calls for more support for institutional investment. Tax settings that attract super funds and insurers into large build-to-rent projects would add professionally managed apartments and steady rents.
5. Swap stamp duty for land tax
Paying a small yearly land charge instead of a huge upfront stamp duty lets people move or downsize with less of a financial hit, freeing under-used homes and smoothing the market.
The council's proposed solutions seem excellent when studied theoretically, but their practical application will prove challenging.
Australia needs significant time and effort to address multiple systemic obstacles.
One big challenge is the construction workforce. The current workforce lacks enough skilled tradespeople to build homes at the necessary speed. This can result in major delays - even when funding exists.
Another barrier is the planning system itself. Changing planning and zoning regulations faces significant political challenges.
Higher-density developments face community resistance because of the "not in my backyard" (NIMBY) problem while councils tend to move slowly in updating their regulations.
However, the report notes signs of progress in some states. The NSW government has accelerated approval processes and also emphasises "transit-oriented development" - putting new homes near planned and existing transport infrastructure.
Similarly, moving to land tax is easier said than done: State governments generate revenue from stamp duty and a shift to an alternative system would require many years to implement. The absence of federal backing and state incentive payments risks delaying this reform.
NHSAC's report doesn't just diagnose the problem, it offers a roadmap to a healthier housing system.
But those recommendations require bold action. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government has a crucial opportunity to turn words into deeds.
Australia's housing woes didn't appear overnight, they are the result of decades of under-supply and policy missteps. Turning things around won't be instant - but it is achievable with sustained effort.
Australia's plan to build 1.2 million new homes by 2029 is in trouble. A new report by the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC) shows we are likely to miss this ambitious target by a huge margin.
At the current pace, the council forecasts we will fall about 262,000 homes short of the goal. In other words, for every five homes we need, we're only on track to build about four.
No state or territory is building enough to meet its share. This is more than just a number; it means the housing affordability crisis will continue unless we act fast.
The report lays out five areas of priority for reform. But implementing its recommendations will require bolder action than we're currently seeing.
NHSAC's State of the Housing System 2025 report shows very challenging conditions for future home buyers and renters. By the end of 2024, it took half of median household income to service a new mortgage.
Think about that: half of your income gets spent on maintaining a roof over your head. That's well above one common measure of "housing stress" for lower-income households: spending more than 30 per cent of gross income on housing.
Anyone planning to purchase their first home faces an average savings period that extends beyond ten years just for their deposit.
For renters, the report found it now takes 33 per cent of median household income to cover the cost of a new lease.
It doesn't help that rental vacancy rates are near record lows, around 1.8 per cent nationwide. This means renters are competing fiercely for very few available homes. This drives rents even higher.
Australians can see the daily reality this report describes. And it can have disproportionate negative impacts on vulnerable groups in society.
For example, the rate of homelessness among First Nations people has been about 8.8 times the rate for non-Indigenous Australians.
Supply remains a key factor underpinning Australia's housing crisis. We simply aren't building enough homes. Australia completed approximately 177,000 new dwellings in 2024 but that fell short of demand for about 223,000 new homes.
And the report predicts we will remain behind our targets for coming years. Under current policy settings, a forecast total of 938,000 new homes will be built between mid-2024 and mid-2029, well short of the Housing Accord's 1.2 million home target.
The report identifies five essential action areas needed to restore Australia's housing system to proper functioning.
1. Lift social and affordable housing to 6 per cent of all homes
In 2021, only about 4 per cent of dwellings were for social or affordable housing. Governments and not-for-profits must add many more low-rent homes so people on modest incomes aren't trapped on long waitlists.
2. Improve productivity and build faster with modern methods of construction
Prefabricated panels, modular kits and even 3D printed structures can halve building time and use fewer tradies.
Federal and state governments could fund factories, training and pilot projects to get these methods into the mainstream.
The report also calls on the government to address labour and skills shortages.
3. Fix planning systems and unlock land
Quicker approvals, firm deadlines and updated zoning would let builders put taller or denser housing near transport, jobs and schools. Governments also need to bundle and service big sites so work can start without years of red tape.
4. Support for renters
The report calls on governments to support better outcomes for renters, and to fully implement National Cabinet's "Better Deal for Renters" agreement.
This includes through fair notice requirements, no-fault eviction limits and longer leases.
It also calls for more support for institutional investment. Tax settings that attract super funds and insurers into large build-to-rent projects would add professionally managed apartments and steady rents.
5. Swap stamp duty for land tax
Paying a small yearly land charge instead of a huge upfront stamp duty lets people move or downsize with less of a financial hit, freeing under-used homes and smoothing the market.
The council's proposed solutions seem excellent when studied theoretically, but their practical application will prove challenging.
Australia needs significant time and effort to address multiple systemic obstacles.
One big challenge is the construction workforce. The current workforce lacks enough skilled tradespeople to build homes at the necessary speed. This can result in major delays - even when funding exists.
Another barrier is the planning system itself. Changing planning and zoning regulations faces significant political challenges.
Higher-density developments face community resistance because of the "not in my backyard" (NIMBY) problem while councils tend to move slowly in updating their regulations.
However, the report notes signs of progress in some states. The NSW government has accelerated approval processes and also emphasises "transit-oriented development" - putting new homes near planned and existing transport infrastructure.
Similarly, moving to land tax is easier said than done: State governments generate revenue from stamp duty and a shift to an alternative system would require many years to implement. The absence of federal backing and state incentive payments risks delaying this reform.
NHSAC's report doesn't just diagnose the problem, it offers a roadmap to a healthier housing system.
But those recommendations require bold action. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government has a crucial opportunity to turn words into deeds.
Australia's housing woes didn't appear overnight, they are the result of decades of under-supply and policy missteps. Turning things around won't be instant - but it is achievable with sustained effort.
Australia's plan to build 1.2 million new homes by 2029 is in trouble. A new report by the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC) shows we are likely to miss this ambitious target by a huge margin.
At the current pace, the council forecasts we will fall about 262,000 homes short of the goal. In other words, for every five homes we need, we're only on track to build about four.
No state or territory is building enough to meet its share. This is more than just a number; it means the housing affordability crisis will continue unless we act fast.
The report lays out five areas of priority for reform. But implementing its recommendations will require bolder action than we're currently seeing.
NHSAC's State of the Housing System 2025 report shows very challenging conditions for future home buyers and renters. By the end of 2024, it took half of median household income to service a new mortgage.
Think about that: half of your income gets spent on maintaining a roof over your head. That's well above one common measure of "housing stress" for lower-income households: spending more than 30 per cent of gross income on housing.
Anyone planning to purchase their first home faces an average savings period that extends beyond ten years just for their deposit.
For renters, the report found it now takes 33 per cent of median household income to cover the cost of a new lease.
It doesn't help that rental vacancy rates are near record lows, around 1.8 per cent nationwide. This means renters are competing fiercely for very few available homes. This drives rents even higher.
Australians can see the daily reality this report describes. And it can have disproportionate negative impacts on vulnerable groups in society.
For example, the rate of homelessness among First Nations people has been about 8.8 times the rate for non-Indigenous Australians.
Supply remains a key factor underpinning Australia's housing crisis. We simply aren't building enough homes. Australia completed approximately 177,000 new dwellings in 2024 but that fell short of demand for about 223,000 new homes.
And the report predicts we will remain behind our targets for coming years. Under current policy settings, a forecast total of 938,000 new homes will be built between mid-2024 and mid-2029, well short of the Housing Accord's 1.2 million home target.
The report identifies five essential action areas needed to restore Australia's housing system to proper functioning.
1. Lift social and affordable housing to 6 per cent of all homes
In 2021, only about 4 per cent of dwellings were for social or affordable housing. Governments and not-for-profits must add many more low-rent homes so people on modest incomes aren't trapped on long waitlists.
2. Improve productivity and build faster with modern methods of construction
Prefabricated panels, modular kits and even 3D printed structures can halve building time and use fewer tradies.
Federal and state governments could fund factories, training and pilot projects to get these methods into the mainstream.
The report also calls on the government to address labour and skills shortages.
3. Fix planning systems and unlock land
Quicker approvals, firm deadlines and updated zoning would let builders put taller or denser housing near transport, jobs and schools. Governments also need to bundle and service big sites so work can start without years of red tape.
4. Support for renters
The report calls on governments to support better outcomes for renters, and to fully implement National Cabinet's "Better Deal for Renters" agreement.
This includes through fair notice requirements, no-fault eviction limits and longer leases.
It also calls for more support for institutional investment. Tax settings that attract super funds and insurers into large build-to-rent projects would add professionally managed apartments and steady rents.
5. Swap stamp duty for land tax
Paying a small yearly land charge instead of a huge upfront stamp duty lets people move or downsize with less of a financial hit, freeing under-used homes and smoothing the market.
The council's proposed solutions seem excellent when studied theoretically, but their practical application will prove challenging.
Australia needs significant time and effort to address multiple systemic obstacles.
One big challenge is the construction workforce. The current workforce lacks enough skilled tradespeople to build homes at the necessary speed. This can result in major delays - even when funding exists.
Another barrier is the planning system itself. Changing planning and zoning regulations faces significant political challenges.
Higher-density developments face community resistance because of the "not in my backyard" (NIMBY) problem while councils tend to move slowly in updating their regulations.
However, the report notes signs of progress in some states. The NSW government has accelerated approval processes and also emphasises "transit-oriented development" - putting new homes near planned and existing transport infrastructure.
Similarly, moving to land tax is easier said than done: State governments generate revenue from stamp duty and a shift to an alternative system would require many years to implement. The absence of federal backing and state incentive payments risks delaying this reform.
NHSAC's report doesn't just diagnose the problem, it offers a roadmap to a healthier housing system.
But those recommendations require bold action. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government has a crucial opportunity to turn words into deeds.
Australia's housing woes didn't appear overnight, they are the result of decades of under-supply and policy missteps. Turning things around won't be instant - but it is achievable with sustained effort.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
32 minutes ago
- West Australian
Australian economy: Slow March quarter growth just 0.2 per cent
Australia's economy grew just 0.2 per cent in the first three months of the year, according to the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Through the 12 months to March, growth was 1.3 per cent. 'Economic growth was soft in the March quarter,' ABS head of national accounts Katherine Keenan said. 'Public spending recorded the largest detraction from growth since the September quarter 2017. 'Extreme weather events reduced domestic final demand and exports. Weather impacts were particularly evident in mining, tourism and shipping.' The period covered the Reserve Bank's February rate cut and was prior to US President Donald Trump's 'liberation day' tax hikes on trade. Economists yesterday lowered their hopes for the March quarter figures on the back of a run of weak data. ANZ had expected 0.2 per cent growth while Commonwealth Bank tipped 0.3 per cent. International body the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development also revised down their projections thanks to the chaos of Mr Trump's trade war. 'Weakened economic prospects will be felt around the world, with almost no exception,' chief economist Álvaro Pereira said. The OECD warned Australia had been hit hard by a decade-long international slowdown of business investment which will weigh on growth and wages. The Reserve Bank cut interest rates a second time in May, to brace for the trade war and amid encouraging signs that inflation had slowed. Minutes from that meeting showed the RBA's board believed trade uncertainty would 'best be managed by adopting a path of least regret, which . . . would be likely to involve a lower cash rate'. Earlier this week, Treasurer Jim Chalmers had anticipated the economy would be 'resilient in the face of substantial headwinds at home and abroad'. 'Our economy has been hit by natural disasters and we're not immune to global volatility, but the progress Australians have made together means we are well placed and well prepared to face this uncertainty,' he said on Monday. More to come
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Trevor Scroop faces court over multiple child sex abuse offences
A man who worked closely with South Australia's Department for Child Protection to house First Nations children has pleaded not guilty to more than 40 charges of sexual offending against minors. The court previously heard Trevor James Scroop, a former ABC employee, had access to more than 100 mostly Aboriginal children under an arrangement with SA's Department for Child Protection. The court previously heard that the 65-year-old had a formal arrangement with the department to care and house young Aboriginal boys from communities in the Northern Territory, at his Adelaide home so they could attend school. The matter has been before the court for more than 18 months but the details of the allegations can now be revealed for the first time, after the District Court removed a suppression order. Mr Scroop was arraigned in the District Court on Wednesday.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
This is how much super you really should have by now
ANALYSIS Australians spend a lot of time worrying about their super. I'm going to show you the average super balance for someone your age. Then I want you to forget it. Here's the chart, it shows that the average 30 year old has well under $100,000, the average person in the early 40s has just over $100,000, the average person in their early 50s has a bit over $200,000 and the average person over 65 has over $400,000. But this is kinda dumb. Averages are useful for understanding things like height where people are all pretty even. Superannuation is not like height! Instead lots of people have no super, and some people have absolutely crazy amounts of it. Let's check in on the 60-somethings. Remember we said the average amount of super was $400,000? Well here's the thing. The average is not actually a common amount for 60-64 year olds to have. A lot of them have way less than that. But some have way more, as the next chart shows. Each red bar is 5 per cent of taxpayers. So we have 20 groups of 60-64 year olds in the graph, ranked from least super at the left to most super at the right. The top 5 per cent have more than a million dollars in super. We can see the median, or the amount in the middle, where half have more and half have less. I gave that a gold-coloured label on the chart. If your super account contains $177,421 you're at the median. Some important things to know here: this is the latest detailed data out of the ATO but it is not current, it's from 2022. The shape of the balance distribution will be the same but the dollar values will have gone up. Height of red bar represents minimum threshold for entering that group. Which is perfect for understanding how the money is spread out, except for the top group. Inside the top 5% all the balances are higher than $1.176 million, and sometimes far higher. In fact, the distribution inside the top 5% is similarly unequal to the distribution overall. One Australian famously has over $400 million in super!] What's important about this way of laying out the data is it reveals how unequal super is. Most articles about super just lay out the averages by age group and they don't reveal the secret truth: super is a form of wealth that is highly uneven. That can leave people freaking out and worrying they don't have enough. They spend ages stuffing their super accounts when they might actually be better using that money in the here and now. Certainly the superannuation industry would like people to put more and more money in their accounts, they want to create that FOMO feeling! Here's the chart for people in their early 30s. if you've cracked $140,000, you're in the top 5 per cent (remember this data is from 2022, the figure is probably a touch higher now). Many people go through their life feeling like being on the pension is a fate worse than death; they worry everyone else has so much super that the government might shut down the pension any old day now. What these charts hopefully show you is … nah. The pension is going to be with us for a long time. A huge number of Australians have an amount in super that means they will be using the pension at some point after retirement. And the pension is $1585 a fortnight for a couple, $792.50 for a single. If you own a house that's far from a poverty wage. The pension age rose from 65 to 67, it is not scheduled to rise any more. And it is indexed to inflation so its value is maintained. Too much super Is it possible to have too much super? They say you can't be too rich! But certainly some people have enough super that their balance goes up after they retire. Imagine your super makes $100,000 in investment returns every year. If you spend $50,000 a year on groceries and bills, you are spending only half of your earnings and your super balance will rise. Let's see how that looks for groups over retirement age: Over 70, 65 to 69 and 60-64. The next chart is three charts put together. The important thing to notice is that low balances get lower after retirement and high balances get higher. The panel in the left is the oldies – taxpayers over 70. There's loads of them with no super by the time they're over 70. And the median (gold label) is falling as people spend their super. But the super balances of the top 5 per cent are actually rising! Perhaps some are still making contributions but most are just making money faster than they can spend it. This benefits their heirs, who are probably going to get this money in the next 20 years. Most likely it arrives when the heirs are deep into their 50s, and barely moves the needle on their wealth – the sort of people whose parents have millions in super probably have a lot of assets themselves! The last thing I want to do in this piece is share with you guys the whole picture of all the age ranges. The next few charts are like the one above, with three-in one. They cover all the age groups and if you look closely you can figure out where your super balance sits. For example, if you're 22-years-old, you're in the middle chart of this group of three, and if you have $20,000 in super, you're in the second red bar, putting you in the top 10 per cent. But if you have the same amount at 27, that's only the median. The point of this piece has been to hopefully put your mind at ease – the numbers we like to compare ourself to are very high!
