
Invest or perish: Technology security is the new national currency — Ahmad Ibrahim
MAY 25 — We often talk about GDP, FDI, and natural resources as markers of national strength. But in today's world, technology security has quietly become the new currency of power. Control over critical tech, from semiconductors to AI infrastructure, now shapes not only business competitiveness but national sovereignty and economic resilience. The signs are everywhere. The US-China tech cold war is restricting chip exports and AI investments. The pandemic laid bare our fragile global supply chains. Nations are scrambling to protect their data, digital systems, and infrastructure from cyber threats and technological over-dependence. Yet, in Malaysia, this conversation still feels like a fringe topic, when it should be at the heart of our economic strategy.
In the 20th century, nations secured their futures through control of territory, oil, and military alliances. In the 21st century, technology security has become just as critical, if not more so. From semiconductors to artificial intelligence, data infrastructure to satellite systems, technological assets now underpin not only business competitiveness but national sovereignty, economic resilience, and social stability. We are already witnessing the beginnings of a geopolitical reshaping based on technology power. The US-China tech rivalry, restrictions on chip exports, battles over 5G networks, and debates about AI governance are just the opening chapters of what will be a decades-long contest. Yet, in many middle-income nations, including Malaysia, the idea of technology security remains an emerging concept, largely confined to academic or think-tank discussions. It's time we bring this conversation into the policy mainstream.
At its core, technology security refers to a nation's ability to develop, access, control, and protect critical technologies essential to its economy, infrastructure, defence, and societal functions. It means ensuring that a country's technological infrastructure and strategic industries are not overly dependent on, vulnerable to, or controlled by external powers. This includes secure control over data infrastructure and digital systems, access to semiconductor supply chains and computing power, local capacity in artificial intelligence, biotech, cybersecurity, and renewable energy technology, protection against technological espionage and sabotage, and strategic autonomy in telecommunications and defence systems. But why the growing concern?
A nation that lacks technology security faces economic vulnerability through over-dependence on foreign tech firms. It is also exposed to cyberattacks on critical infrastructure. Not to mention the loss of national sovereignty over data and digital services. The consequence includes the inability to compete in high-value industries like AI, renewable energy, or advanced manufacturing. Inadvertently, it would be left behind in global standard-setting and technology governance frameworks. For developing nations, this risk is amplified by the so-called 'digital colonisation', where a handful of global tech giants dominate data, cloud services, and digital ecosystems in markets they don't reside in.
Technology insecurity doesn't just threaten governments. It directly impacts businesses. There are supply chain risks when there is overdependence on a handful of tech providers and foreign infrastructure players. Data sovereignty issues would crop up. Loss of control over sensitive operational and consumer data. Competitive disadvantage would creep in. Inability to access or develop critical tech locally, leaving firms reliant on external sources and vulnerable to geopolitical shocks. Then there are cyber risks. Not to mention increased exposure of financial systems, logistics, and digital platforms to disruptive cyber-attacks. In short, if the nation is tech insecure, so is its business ecosystem.
Securing our technology future isn't about shutting the world out. It's about building resilience, diversifying partnerships, and future-proofing national capabilities. Here's what needs to happen. Identify and safeguard strategic tech sectors. Focus on semiconductors, AI, data infrastructure, and renewables. Invest aggressively in indigenous R&D.
Create incentives for public-private tech innovation ecosystems. Fortify cybersecurity infrastructure. Protect power grids, financial systems, and data assets. Forge smart international tech alliances. Collaborate selectively to co-develop, co-own, and co- control critical technologies. Nurture tech-ready talent. Prioritise AI, cybersecurity, data science, and advanced manufacturing skills.
If Malaysia wants to remain competitive in the coming decades, technology security must become a boardroom, cabinet, and national priority. The nations that control their data, digital infrastructure, and critical technologies will write the rules of the new economy. Those that don't will end up consumers in someone else's digital empire. It's time we decide which side of history we want to be on.
* The author is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an associate fellow at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya. He can be reached at [email protected] .
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anwar denies seeking immunity after losing bid to refer Yusoff Rawther's suit to apex court
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim today said he wanted to ensure that high public office is protected from litigation that may be strategically timed, politically motivated, or institutionally disruptive. PETALING JAYA : Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has rejected suggestions that he is seeking personal immunity from legal proceedings, after the High Court dismissed his application to refer eight legal questions arising from a civil suit filed by a former aide to the Federal Court. Anwar's remarks come amid public and political debate surrounding a civil suit filed by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther, in which questions have arisen about whether the prime minister is seeking legal immunity to avoid standing trial. 'This matter has never been about seeking personal immunity or escaping legal scrutiny,' said Anwar in a Facebook post. 'It concerns the integrity of our constitutional system and the need to ensure that high public office is protected from litigation that may be strategically timed, politically motivated, or institutionally disruptive. 'I remain fully committed to the rule of law, the independence of our courts, and the dignity of democratic governance.' Anwar said the legal process will continue as required, and that he will 'continue to discharge (his) responsibilities without distraction or compromise'. At a press conference after the High Court decision, his lawyer, K Rajasegaran, said Anwar's legal team will immediately file an appeal to the Court of Appeal. Rajasegaran said the eight questions submitted are neither abstract nor academic in nature, but pertain to serious and unresolved constitutional issues. Last Tuesday, Anwar filed an application asking the Kuala Lumpur High Court to refer eight questions of law to the Federal Court for determination, including whether he has immunity from the civil suit brought against him by Yusoff four years ago. He said he wanted the apex court to rule whether Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from the suit. Opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin then criticised Anwar, stating that Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution guarantees equality under the law. Hamzah said no one, not even the prime minister, is above the law. The eight questions of law are linked to a civil suit filed by Yusoff over alleged incidents that took place before Anwar assumed office on Nov 24, 2022. Yusoff, a grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.


Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Govt considering homes above train stations to ease congestion
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said the proposal will involve building both public and private housing above train stations. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The government is exploring plans to build housing above train stations to help ease traffic congestion, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said today. He said the proposal is being studied in collaboration with Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) and will require regulatory changes. 'This would involve building both public and private housing above train stations, with a portion set aside for the public,' Anwar said during a forum here. Transport minister Loke Siew Fook said the move marks a 'major policy shift' towards developing affordable housing near LRT and MRT stations, with the goal of reducing car dependency and making homes more affordable. 'We are discussing this with the housing and local government ministry. If implemented, it could significantly reduce car usage,' he told reporters. Loke said the plan also includes reviewing car park requirements for developments near transit stations. Reducing these requirements would lower development costs and housing prices. 'If a project is close to a train station, we can cut down on parking needs. That makes the homes cheaper for buyers,' he said. Prasarana president and group CEO Azharuddin Mat Sah said the public transport operator is looking into using its land near rail stations to support affordable housing. 'We have 15 plots of land. Seven are being developed. Previously, we focused on commercial projects with the highest bids,' he said. 'But now there's a shift in thinking. We want to develop affordable, high-rise housing so people can live closer to public transport.' He said the eight remaining land parcels are being considered under this revised approach. Drone transport not a priority Touching on future transport modes, Loke said drone mobility is not a current priority. 'Drone-based transport is still at an early stage. There are many challenges – technology, regulation, operations,' he said. 'Passenger and cargo drone trials are ongoing, but for now, our focus remains on land transport.'


Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
No need for Syura Council to vet candidates for top 2 posts, says Hashim
PAS spiritual leader Hashim Jasin said he was among the earliest to support the call for the party's top positions to continue being entrusted to individuals with religious backgrounds. PETALING JAYA : PAS spiritual leader Hashim Jasin has dismissed a call for the party's Syura Council to vet candidates for the president and deputy president's posts. Hashim said that in the current open contest system, those elected typically already have religious backgrounds, reflecting the preferences of PAS members. 'That's why it's not an issue. There's no need for the Syura Council to interfere or set a policy requiring the president and deputy to come strictly from among the ulama or religious scholars,' he told FMT. Hashim said he was among the earliest to support the call for these top positions to continue being entrusted to individuals with religious backgrounds. 'This matter isn't so crucial that the Syura Council needs to vet the candidates to ensure only religious scholars are selected. 'We leave the process as it is because members do not chase after positions in PAS,' he said, noting that there have been no individual candidate campaigns or factional clashes in the run-up to the party's elections in September. Earlier, PAS Dewan Ulama committee member Mokhtar Senik proposed that candidates for the party's top two posts be vetted by the Syura Council, PAS's highest decision-making body. He said this is to ensure that those who intend to challenge the positions currently held by Abdul Hadi Awang and Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man are qualified. Hadi and Tuan Ibrahim are both members of the Syura Council, which is chaired by Hashim. Speculation had emerged that, for the first time, the president and deputy president's posts might be contested at the upcoming party elections. FMT reported that this may happen if Hadi, who has served as president since 2002, steps down, as urged by some members, because of his health. At the same time, there are rumours that Tuan Ibrahim also intends to make way for new leadership, though there have been calls from the pro-ulama faction for him to defend the party's No 2 post. On May 22, PAS vice-president Amar Abdullah had called for the party's top leadership posts, especially those of the president and deputy president, to continue to be held by individuals with religious backgrounds to safeguard the party's Islamic foundation. 'I support that view,' Hashim said, stressing that it is important to ensure the party's policies remain rooted in religion.