A Historic Course Correction: How The World's Shipping Sector Is Setting Sail For Net Zero
Every day, tens of thousands of massive ships criss-cross the world's oceans, transporting grain, clothing, electronics, cars, and countless other products. Nearly 90 per cent of global cargo is moved this way. But this vital industry comes with an added cost: international shipping is responsible for three per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, which are heating the planet.
For years, ship emissions were a complex and often postponed topic in international climate discussions. But that changed in April 2025 when the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the UN body overseeing global shipping regulations, approved a historic plan to make the industry net-zero by around mid-century.
'This demonstrates that multilateralism and the United Nations are still relevant and important in these particular times,' Arsenio Dominguez, IMO's Secretary-General, told UN News. He reflected on the tense and often emotional negotiations at the Marine Environment Protection Committee's 83rd session, calling the approval a commitment by IMO and the shipping sector to combat climate change.
The deal, dubbed the IMO Net-Zero Framework, marked the culmination of years of painstaking talks between member States, including small island nations at risk from rising seas and the world's largest shipping nations.
'I could spend hours just telling you in detail all those great moments working very closely with the delegates of all the member states at IMO in order to get this agreement,' Mr. Dominguez recalled. 'That collaborative approach, to see all the member states gathering and rallying each other to get this deal in place, is something that I will always remember.'
A breakthrough years in the making
The 2025 breakthrough did not happen overnight. The IMO's work to tackle emissions spans more than a decade. In 2011, it rolled out the first mandatory energy efficiency measures for ships. Then, in 2018, member countries agreed on the Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships, marking the first international targets to cut the sector's climate impact.
Building on that progress, IMO ramped up ambition in 2023 and set clear goals: reduce emissions by at least 20 per cent by 2030 and 70 per cent by 2040, and phase in zero or near-zero emission fuels. The 2025 Net-Zero Framework transforms these plans into binding regulation.
'We're focusing first on 2030, meeting those goals of reducing emissions by at least 20 per cent, and achieving at least a five per cent uptake of alternative fuels, because it's going to pave the way for the next set of actions and demonstrate what other mechanisms or measures we need to put in place,' Mr. Dominguez said.
The machinery of global commerce
What's at stake is more than just the environment – it's the very machinery of global commerce. In 2023, maritime trade volumes soared past 12 billion tonnes of cargo, UN data shows. 'Even the chair you are sitting on right now was likely transported by ship,' remarked Mr. Dominguez. 'Things move around by ship because it's the most efficient method of mass transportation. But that comes with responsibility and some drawbacks'.
Although the shipping sector has been 'slow' to regulate its climate impact, the 2025 framework is changing that with two key measures: a global fuel standard to reduce greenhouse gas intensity and a pricing mechanism for ships exceeding emission thresholds.
Polluters will need to purchase 'remedial units' or offset their excess emissions by investing in the IMO Net-Zero Fund. Ships adopting zero or near-zero emissions technologies can earn surplus credits, creating an incentive to clean up. A shipowner exceeding their emissions limit might buy credits from another ship that has outperformed its targets or contribute to the fund.
Revenues from the fund will be used to reward low-emission ships and help developing countries with capacity building, technology transfer, and access to alternative fuels.
Oversight by member States and IMO will ensure accountability for the new measures. 'We work with the member States, particularly small island developing states and least developed countries, to enhance the implementation of IMO instruments,' Mr. Dominguez explained.
Certification, verification, audits, and reporting processes will monitor compliance. 'Everything gets reported to the Organisation, and from there we take additional measures.'
Balancing climate action and trade
The measures will cover large ocean-going ships that exceed 5,000 gross tonnes, which are responsible for about 85 per cent of industry emissions.
When asked about potential impacts on supply chains and consumer prices, particularly for countries heavily reliant on imports, the IMO chief emphasised that they have carried out a comprehensive impact assessment.
'There is a cost to pay when it comes to decarbonising and protecting the environment. There has also been a cost to polluting the environment. So, all these rules, of course, are going to have an impact. What we looked at is reducing that impact as much as possible. If there is an impact, the financial measures and pricing mechanisms will support the industry's transition''.
Innovation will play a major role, and some promising technologies include ammonia and hydrogen fuels, wind propulsion, solar-assisted shipping, and onboard carbon capture. 'Our rules are there to foster innovation and not to limit it,' Mr. Dominguez said, explaining that the Organisation is carrying out an initial analysis. 'We are rediscovering the existence of wind in the shipping industry, if I may say it like that…We have to be open to everything that's happening out there. There's a lot of work going on alternative fuels.'
This transition will also require investment in training and safety measures for seafarers as these alternative fuels are adopted, he warned. 'We have to pay paramount importance when it comes to the people.'
An industry in transition
The framework sets a strict timeline: industry emissions must drop by at least 20 per cent (striving for 30 per cent) by 2030, by at least 70 per cent (striving for 80 per cent) by 2040, and reach net-zero by around 2050. The first compliance year will be 2028.
'The end goal of the main objective of the strategy is to decarbonise to reach net zero by around 2050. But it doesn't mean that we're not doing anything between,' Mr. Dominguez stressed. 'This is a progressive approach.'
The IMO has also committed to constant review and refinement. 'For us, it's not just about the next step,' Mr. Dominguez said. 'It will be a constant process of analysis, review, and engagement to gather the experience and expertise needed to tweak or provide any additional support that may be required''.
Beyond emissions
While greenhouse gases dominate the headlines, Mr. Dominguez explained that shipping's environmental footprint extends beyond CO. 'There's so much more that this Organisation [does],' he said.
IMO measures address issues like biofouling, which is the accumulation of aquatic organisms like algae and barnacles on the hulls of ships, increasing drag and fuel consumption; underwater noise, which can disturb marine life; and ballast water management, which prevents invasive species from being transported across the globe.
'We always take into account that ships touch many parts of the environment, and we need to protect them,' he added.
The road ahead
When UN News asked about the framework's adoption at IMO's extraordinary session in October, Mr. Dominguez stated: 'Of course, I'm confident because we just demonstrated that multilateralism is still relevant, that IMO is ready to meet its commitments'.
He explained that the next step will be addressing concerns and developing guidelines for implementing the new measures, including the pricing mechanism.
'That is going to help us meet the very ambitious timeframe that member states are committed to, so that as soon as these amendments enter into force in 2027, we can start demonstrating with tangible results what the shipping industry means when it talks about decarbonization.'
For Mr. Dominguez and many observers, the agreement represents a rare victory for multilateralism – and a new beginning for a critical but long-overlooked sector. 'It's not if we get it right. We are getting it right,' he said. 'This is a process, a transition. We're taking the first steps now that will lead us to the main goal.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact
A plume of smoke rises out of an industrial chimney into the sky, in Copenhagen, Denmark. Photo: Supplied/ Unsplash - Mudit Agarwal Three of the country's biggest greenhouse gas emitters no longer have to reveal how much planet-heating gas they produce. For the first time, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)'s company-level emissions data doesn't include agriculture, after the government ended compulsory reporting for the farming sector. The change means companies responsible for around half the countries' greenhouse gases no longer have to supply information to the EPA every year giving a rough total of their methane emissions , unless they happen to be captured by other disclosure rules (for example climate disclosure rules covering stockmarket-listed companies). Meat processors Affco and Alliance no longer have to supply emissions data. Nor does Open Country Dairy, the country's second biggest milk exporter after Fonterra. All three were previously among the country's top ten emitters . RNZ asked Affco, Alliance and Open Country Dairy for their totals, but none had responded by deadline. The two biggest greenhouse gas producers in the farming sector - Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms - still disclose their emissions tallies in their own annual reports, as well as listing measures to reduce their impact. "It's critical that everyday people are able to find out who is responsible for New Zealand's climate pollution," said climate advocate Alex Johnston, of the Don't Subsidize Pollution campaign. "To not have big corporate from agriculture, the sector responsible for more than half of the country's emissions, required to report their emissions footprint is not responsible governing. "It's like closing the door on your kid's bedroom when they've left the heater on and then wondering why the power bill is so high." The change came about because the government removed farmers from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Agriculture was previously included in the scheme as a backstop in case voluntary discussions between farmers and government didn't result in an agreement to price methane. The backstop provision was removed and voluntary pricing talks were scrapped and re-started after the last election. Farming companies never had to pay for their methane emissions under the ETS the way petrol importers, coal miners and gas producers pay for their carbon dioxide emissions. However, until this year, they had to submit annual totals giving a rough estimate of their climate impact. ETS emissions reports were the only public information available for comparing individual companies, because some companies choose not to voluntarily disclose emissions. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts told Newsroom last year that officials had prepared an option to keep compulsory reporting while otherwise removing farming form the ETS. The government decided not to take it. He said the government was pursuing farm-level reporting instead. The change means reported emissions in the report have halved compared with last year, down from 65.7 million tonnes to 32.5 million tonnes. The difference is almost entirely because of the removal of the 33 million tonnes previously reported by the agriculture sector. When Fonterra is included, top 10 emitters collectively produce more than half the country's emissions, with Fonterra in the top spot followed by big petrol companies Z Energy, BP and Mobil. Farming companies - or their fossil fuel suppliers - still have to report and pay for any coal, gas or other fossil fuel they use in New Zealand under the ETS, for example coal used to dry milk or process meat. Affco reports its energy related emissions on its website, but not the larger total that comes from methane produced by farming the meat it processes. Alliance's website also discusses progress at reducing coal at its processing plants and said it completed a full lifecycle assessment of all its emissions last year, however doesn't appear to list the total. Open Country's website also discusses successful conversion of coal boilers to clean heat and said it is committed to reducing emissions from agriculture through the He Waka Eke Noa programme. He Waka Eke Noa was the programme scrapped by the coalition government after the election and replaced by direct engagement with farming groups through the government's Pastoral Sector Group. The new group is yet to announce a pricing plan or targets. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
To Decarbonize Shipping, We Must Move Forward Together
By IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez, on the occasion of his first official mission to the Pacific region (3-16 August) since taking up his role As I set foot on Pacific soil for the first time in my role as Secretary-General of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), I do so with deep sense of respect and humility. Pacific Island nations are custodians of more than 30 million square kilometres of vast ocean, with their combined Exclusive Economic Zones equivalent to the total land area of the African continent. The region is uniquely placed as a steward of the ocean's biodiversity and precious ecosystems. In a world marked by environmental decline and geopolitical tensions, the Pacific continues to stand as a voice of courage and principle. While among the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, Pacific Island countries have demonstrated, time after time, that they are not merely victims or passive observers, but essential partners who are actively shaping the global response. Their commitment was instrumental in securing the ambitious targets set out in IMO's Revised Strategy to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships, adopted in 2023. This landmark agreement set a clear course global shipping to reach net-zero emissions by or around 2050, with indicative benchmarks for 2030 and 2040. It is the kind of contribution we will need again to ensure we deliver on our shared targets. This coming October, as part of IMO's GHG Strategy, IMO Member States are expected to formally adopt the newIMO Net-Zero Framework. This set of legally-binding regulations is designed drive down emissions across the international shipping industry, through a mandatory marine fuel standard and global pricing mechanism to ensure compliance. The result: less polluting ships, cleaner air, a healthier ocean and a more climate-resilient future. Revenue from the pricing mechanism will be directed into a new IMO Net-Zero Fund. This Fund will support the energy transition by rewarding low-emission ships, advancing innovation and infrastructure, funding trainings and capacity development, and mitigating any negative impacts on small island states and least developed countries. Reaching this point has not been easy. It required years of negotiation, rigorous technical analysis and ultimately, a willingness to compromise. Yet such agreements are just the starting point for implementation, setting the stage for more ambitious actions to come. The adoption of the IMO Net-Zero Framework is the first port of a much longer voyage, with the horizon of what's possible still stretching out beyond us. So we must keep moving forward and persist even when the waters grow rough. At a time when multilateral cooperation is under strain, every shared step forward is a victory. All Member States are needed at the table as we design the tools, policies and investments to succeed in our bold mission to decarbonize an entire global industry. IMO stands ready to work side by side with Pacific nations to ensure this framework is not only implemented but continually strengthened. This is why we are opening the IMO's Regional Presence Office in Suva, Fiji, to better understand the needs of the region, develop local and regional capacity and ensure constant engagement. Establishing this regional office recognizes that maritime transport has always been at the heart of Pacific Island life, from the region's ancient seafaring traditions to the modern-day global trade routes that support food security, energy needs, tourism and the livelihoods of countless families and communities. It also reflects the Pacific's key role in supporting the international maritime regulatory framework, most notably through the Marshall Islands, one of the world's top three flag States by tonnage. My message to the peoples of the Pacific on my first visit is simply this: IMO is listening, we need you, and we are here to engage. As the maritime sector enters a period of rapid transformation - from digitalization to decarbonization - new challenges will emerge, but also great opportunities. It is crucial that we work together in step to shape a just, sustainable and resilient maritime future for the Pacific and for the world.
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Pacific SIDs meet as UN plastics meeting continues in Geneva
Photo: artisteer / Getty Images/ iStockphoto Finance has been debated at a UN meeting on formulating a plastics treaty. Multiple meetings are continuing at the second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee , which aims to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. The session will run until 14 August. Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are scheduled for a regional meeting on Tuesday in Geneva. The Secretariat of Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) reported that decisions over finance, to support the goals of the treaty and its implementation, have made minimal progress. It said the debate over who pays and who receives still remains unresolved. Fiji's permanent secretary for environment and climate change Dr Sivendra Michael said the financial mechanism is the heartbeat of the entire treaty. "In negotiating this, it is very important to make sure it is pumping the right amount of blood to all parts of the treaty so we have enough resources to be able to tackle plastic pollution at every stage of its life cycle, and that those resources are appropriate to our special circumstances," he said. "We don't produce plastic, we import it. So it's vital that we address the source." Dr Michael said without accessible and predictable financial support, even a strong treaty would consist of empty promises. "While we are talking about new and additional finance, climate change and biodiversity loss already have their own dedicated funding streams; and the underlying question is really - where will this money come from? "We need countries that are most responsible for the plastics crisis and those with the capabilities to do so to contribute towards addressing it." The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee process was initiated following the adoption of UNEP Resolution 5/14 in March 2022, which called for the development of an international legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution. A study on plastic consumption published in 2024 warned that business as usual will result in nearly double the amount of plastic pollution .
