logo
‘Transformative': the UK lab working on a way to halt genetic type of dementia

‘Transformative': the UK lab working on a way to halt genetic type of dementia

The Guardian2 days ago

Behind the gleaming glass facade of an office block in east London's docklands, Dr Martina Esposito Soccoio is pipetting ribonucleic acid into test tubes.
Here, not far from Canary Wharf's multinational banks, a British university spinout is working on a breakthrough treatment for a form of dementia suffered by millions of people worldwide.
There is no cure for dementia at present, but scientists at AviadoBio hope their clinical studies can stop the progression of a particular genetic type of frontotemporal dementia (FTD).
'It may be one of the first dementias to have a definitive treatment, a cure if you like, a really transformative treatment that allows people to live much longer and much more normal lives,' says Prof James Rowe, consultant neurologist at Cambridge's Addenbrooke's Hospital.
FTD mainly affects the front and sides of the brain and unlike Alzheimer's disease, does not begin with memory loss, which tends to occur later. It is characterised by progressive loss of language and changes in personality and behaviour.
Most cases are diagnosed in people aged 45 to 65, but it can affect people in their 20s and 30s. There are an estimated 20,000 to 40,000 people living with FTD in the UK, and between 1m and 2m in the world.
Rowe says: 'It's a double-edged sword: the young onset, the high genetic burden and rapid illness are also features that perhaps make it more tractable to treat.'
The Die Hard and Pulp Fiction actor Bruce Willis, who recently celebrated his 70th birthday, was diagnosed with FTD two years ago, with his family calling it a 'cruel disease'. They have not said whether he has a genetic form of FTD.
The gene therapy developed by AviadoBio, which was spun out of Prof Christopher Shaw's research lab at King's College London in 2021, targets a type of FTD known as FTD-GRN. This is caused by mutations of a gene that lead to a deficiency of progranulin (GRN), a protein that is essential for maintaining healthy brain cells.
AviadoBio, which employs 60 people, signed an exclusive licence agreement with the Japanese pharma firm Astellas last October to develop the therapy. It is now recruiting patients for its clinical trial in the UK, as well as the US, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the Netherlands.
The first patient received the infusion in Warsaw in March 2024, out of six patients who have had the treatment so far, in Poland and the US. All patients will be followed for up to five years as part of the trial. AviadoBio expects to publish the first data next year.
Three years ago, Jessica Crawford, from Beverley in Yorkshire, lost her mother to FTD, caused by mutations of another gene, C9orf72. In 2014, when her mother was 58, her behaviour changed; the family suspected depression. Previously very sociable, she stopped going out and started playing games like Candy Crush or watching TV shows 'over and over,' her daughter recounts.
Her mother initially did not want to see a doctor, and was only diagnosed with FTD in February 2019. By this time she was so confused she once put raw chicken in a sandwich. 'Getting the diagnosis wasn't easy because FTD wasn't well known; my mum was aceing in the memory tests,' Crawford says. But her mother became increasingly confused and lost the ability to speak, and to communicate at all. Crawford became her full-time carer in 2020, until her mother deteriorated so much that she had to go to a care home in late 2021, and died the following year.
Crawford, 33, found out that she herself carries the gene mutation, and with her husband decided to conceive through IVF with a pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. When their five embryos were screened, four had the gene mutation, and the fifth resulted in the birth of their son. The couple donated their other four embryos to science and she takes part in GENFI – a long-running UK-led global study of families with FTD across 40 sites.
AviadoBio itself was born out of the research done at King's by Shaw, a neurologist who has focused on FTD and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) for more than three decades, and Dr Youn Bok Lee and Dr Do Young Lee from the UK Dementia Research Institute's centre based at King's. ALS, the most common form of motor neurone disease, has also been linked to mutations of the GRN gene and leads to muscle weakness, paralysis and eventually death.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Shaw acts as the company's chief scientific and clinical adviser, and while the Lees are no longer involved in the firm's research, all three remain shareholders.
David Cooper, AviadoBio's chief medical officer, says: 'It was something that hit me when I first joined the company, you look at the MRI scans of patients with a GRN mutation, the frontal and temporal parts of their brain are just melting away … So we really need earlier treatment, an, earlier diagnosis and a more organised healthcare approach to deal with it.'
AviadoBio's lead product, known as AVB-101, is infused directly into the brain by a neurosurgeon using a cannula as thin as a strand of angel hair pasta, during a 90-minute procedure guided by MRI. It delivers a functional copy of the progranulin gene to restore appropriate levels of the protein to affected areas of the brain. It is a once-only treatment, and no immunosuppressant drugs are needed subsequently.
'The patients who have FTD are born with almost half of the progranulin levels that you and I might have,' says chief executive Lisa Deschamps. 'Our goal in the study is to supplement the GRN gene and restore as much progranulin in these individuals as possible to normal levels to reduce the neurodegeneration effect.
Other medications in development at AviadoBio include two gene therapies, from Philadelphia-based Passage Bio and Eli Lilly-owned Prevail Therapeutics, but they do not target the thalamus, the 'relay station' in the brain. Passage Bio's therapies are delivered directly to the cerebrospinal fluid in a single treatment. Denmark's Vesper Bio has developed an oral capsule, designed to act on the GRN gene, that is being trialled at University College London Hospital.
AviadoBio, whose investors include Johnson & Johnson's innovation arm and the UK not-for-profit LifeArc Ventures, is part of a growing life science cluster in Canary Wharf. At its labs, scientists – assisted by robotics – research how to target a particular gene.
'The UK has real strengths in this area,' says Rowe, pointing to the international GENFI study, run since 2011 by Prof Jonathan Rohrer, a neurologist from UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology who also sits on AviadoBio's scientific advisory board. 'It's a real win for the UK.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands of NHS patients ‘to be denied breakthrough Alzheimer's drugs'
Thousands of NHS patients ‘to be denied breakthrough Alzheimer's drugs'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Thousands of NHS patients ‘to be denied breakthrough Alzheimer's drugs'

Breakthrough drugs that slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease will reportedly be refused for use on the NHS this week in a blow to thousands of patients. The two drugs, Lecanemab and donanemab, slow down the decline in Alzheimer's patients' ability to carry out daily activities. The drugs' success in halting the progression of Alzheimer's was heralded as a 'new era' by campaigners and researchers. However, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) is expected to refuse to recommend them on the NHS, according to The Sunday Times. The regulator has already issued two decisions, one in October last year and another in March, saying they would not recommend the drugs for use on the NHS. A final decision will be published on Thursday. Both drugs already have UK drug licences, making them available privately. It is estimated that around 70,000 adults in England would have been eligible for treatment if the drugs had been approved. The regulator will reportedly turn down both drugs on the grounds of cost-effectiveness, with one insider telling The Sunday Times: 'It is the end of the road for these drugs on the NHS'. Lecanemab removes build-ups of the protein beta-amyloid from the brain. Trials showed that lecanemab can slow the progression of Alzheimer's by 27 per cent over 18 months if given to someone early on in the course of their decline. Donanemab, marketed as Kisunla in the UK, teaches the body's immune cells to recognise and remove the amyloid protein, which builds up in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease. The protein build-ups are thought to be toxic to brain cells, leading to the symptoms of Alzheimer's, the Alzheimer's society has said. Lecanemab can, however, cause swelling and bleeding in the brain. In trials for Donanemab, a third of recipients experienced abnormalities in their brain scans caused by brain swelling and bleeding, NICE said. The drugs reportedly cost around £20,000 to £25,000, with the NHS being offered a lower price. Privately, the treatment costs between £60,000-80,000 per year, according to Alzheimer's Research UK. In a previous review by NICE in October 2024, director of medicines evaluation Helen Knight said: 'Donanemab could slow down cognitive decline by 4-7 months, but this is just not enough benefit to justify the additional cost to the NHS. The cost-effectiveness estimate for donanemab is five to six times above what NICE normally considers an acceptable use of NHS resources'. While the regulator said the decision would be disappointing for some, 'there are other treatments being developed'. Hilary Evans-Newton, chief executive of Alzheimer's Research UK, said the decision to turn down the drugs would be 'deeply disappointing'. She added: 'These treatments are not perfect, and we recognise the challenges they pose around cost, delivery and safety. But scientific progress is incremental, and these drugs represent a vital foundation to build on.' The regulator NICE is due to publish the final draft guidance about the two drugs on Thursday. This leaves space for the decision to be challenged and sent to a review panel before the final guidance is published.

Expert witnesses are ‘weakest link in English justice system', says wrongly convicted surgeon
Expert witnesses are ‘weakest link in English justice system', says wrongly convicted surgeon

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Expert witnesses are ‘weakest link in English justice system', says wrongly convicted surgeon

David Sellu knows full well the impact an expert witness can have on the outcome of criminal case, and the lives of the people on trial. A former surgeon, Sellu spent 15 months in prison after being convicted of gross negligence manslaughter in 2013, following a trial that largely hinged on the evidence of medical expert witnesses brought by the prosecution. After an appeal in 2016, Sellu's conviction was quashed and the appeal judge criticised the way the expert evidence was handled, saying they 'asserted gross negligence' when this was 'a matter for [the jury] and not the experts'. 'I think I can probably say that there are many, many hundreds of people who would not be alive today had it not been for my skills and my treatment,' Sellu said. 'And yet medicine was deprived of my further input, purely on the back of a case that should never have been brought. 'It's affected my whole family, we've gone through a very difficult time. But we've come out of it all. We're carrying on as best we can.' He now speaks out about the issues with expert witnesses, particularly in cases involving medical professionals where the subjects being examined are often highly complex and expert witnesses act at the 'crucial bridge' between medicine and the law. 'My case was in 2015, it is now 2025 and I don't really believe that much has changed. It worries me that there will be miscarriages of justice from expert testimony,' Sellu said. 'As recently as the case of Lucy Letby, expert testimony is still being questioned.' Sellu was convicted over the death of a man at a private hospital in 2010 who suddenly fell ill after knee surgery. The patient's condition deteriorated due to delays to his care, which expert witnesses said amounted to gross negligence by Sellu. The exonerated doctor said he remained alarmed that there were no 'prescribed training programmes' for expert witnesses to ensure the evidence they give is unbiased, high quality and follows all legal procedure. 'There should be a benchmark that expert witnesses must achieve, because they are such an important bridge between medicine and the law in terms of being able to deliver justice,' he said. 'In my view, they are the weakest link in our justice system. They're not accredited, not properly trained, nobody really knows clearly how they're selected. And they play such a vital role in the delivery of justice that I think it's a shame that nobody has really grappled with this issue to try to get it fixed.' Expert witnesses are used in almost all criminal trials, but are particularly crucial in medical cases where a jury would struggle to understand and interpret complex terminology. They are appointed by both prosecution and defence lawyers, and although there is guidance from the Crown Prosecution Service, there is little oversight over how expert witnesses are appointed and what checks are carried out. One defence barrister said that lawyers often 'don't ask the questions' about the experts they're hiring, and 'work on the premise that people who are purporting to hold themselves out as experts, are experts'. Sellu said: 'The words 'expert witness' are a bit of a misnomer, because they're neither experts nor are they witnesses. Anybody can put themselves up as an expert witness, there's no clear accreditation. 'And they are the only people in the trial who give evidence who were not there at the time the alleged events took place – they're not witnesses, they're simply giving opinions.' In 2021 a judge asked the Crown Prosecution Service to investigate an eminent psychiatrist, Dr David Ho, who had been used by prosecutors as an expert witness in a large number of cases, after concerns were raised about him during a murder trial. In the case of a man accused of beheading his mother, who was found not guilty of manslaughter on the basis of insanity, defence lawyers said there were apparent errors in Ho's report and he allegedly refused to answer questions. Ho had concluded there was no evidence to suggest the defendant did not know what he was doing, a finding that was disputed by other consultant forensic psychiatrists. The judge said there was concerns that Ho 'had potentially lost the necessary degree of independence and objectivity, his awareness of his overriding duty to the court, and his approach to his task'. The CPS said an internal review had been carried out, and Dr Ho had not been used as an expert witness since. There have been a number of high-profile miscarriages of justice linked to inadequate medical expert evidence. Three men found guilty of murder in 1998 had their convictions quashed due to 'discredited' evidence by pathologist Dr Michael Heath, whose findings were questioned in a string of cases. Despite the concerns around the veracity of his work, he continued to practise and was under investigation by the General Medical Council at the time of his death in 2023. In the 1990s, evidence by paediatrician Sir Roy Meadow led to several wrongful convictions of mothers for murdering their babies. Sally Clark, Trupti Patel and Angela Cannings were all exonerated after evidence by Meadows, used as an expert witness by the prosecution, was proven incorrect. He misused statistics to convince a jury it was almost impossible for more than one sudden infant death to occur in the same family, and that it was much more likely to be murder. 'There is a real danger with expert evidence, because it is elevated evidence, so when it's wrong, it can lead to wrongful convictions and that's a real concern,' said Matt Foot, co-director of Appeal, which supported Sellu's case. 'Where the problem comes, and it has happened in many miscarriages of justice, is when expert evidence is given that is biased, inappropriate, or completely unreliable. 'Experts are not there for the police or the prosecution. They can feel obliged to provide evidence in a certain way when their duty is to the court for independence rather than to any party. That's the biggest danger, I think, because that danger leads to innocent people going to prison.' Expert witnesses are often also crucial in overturning miscarriages of justice, he said, but greater regulation or oversight would be beneficial. 'When things go wrong, there is no proper record anywhere that it has happened, and that you therefore need to treat this expert with great caution,' said Foot. 'That's not part of the system. So there are no safeguards in place to stop that happening again, with the same person.'

Morrisons & Sainsbury's told to make major change to stores as government warns supermarkets ‘stop promoting' product
Morrisons & Sainsbury's told to make major change to stores as government warns supermarkets ‘stop promoting' product

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Morrisons & Sainsbury's told to make major change to stores as government warns supermarkets ‘stop promoting' product

SAINSBURY'S and Morrisons have received a stern warning from the government in relation to a popular product. The two major chains have been instructed to stop 'promoting' the item as they could be in breach of the law. 2 2 According to the BBC, the two supermarkets received a letter instructing them to remove any adverts which displayed heated tobacco products. Heated tobacco differs from cigarettes and vapes as it uses an electrical current to directly warm up the tobacco. This produces a vapour which can be inhaled. Smoking advertisements were banned in 2002 by the then-Prime Minister Tony Blair. The ban covered any products which could be "smoked, sniffed, sucked or chewed". Since the heated tobacco products produce a vapour - not a smoke - advertising laws are much murkier. Speaking about the letter, a spokesperson for Sainsbury's said: 'We offer a range of age-restricted products under our strict Think25 policy, including this heated tobacco device which is advertised. 'This is an alternative to cigarettes and is fully compliant with current legislation. We recognise the deeply complex and emotive nature of this topic. 'We remain in close contact with the Government and industry partners and are planning our transition to ensure we also comply with planned incoming legislation." A spokesperson for Morrisons said: "We only received a letter at the end of May. "We are just in the process of reviewing it and will respond back to the Department for Health and Social Care in due course." The Department of Social Care have been approached for comment by The Sun. Starmer CONFIRMS smoking ban plan with cigarettes to be banished from pub gardens Previously, a Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson told the BBC: "In May, we wrote to supermarkets reiterating that the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act 2002… applies to all tobacco products currently on the market, and formally requested they stop advertising and promoting heated tobacco products in stores. "All tobacco products are harmful to health." The proposed Tobacco and Vapes Bill will tighten existing advertisement laws and has received the backing of prominent Labour politicians, including Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Baroness Meron. So far, the bill has passed in the House of Commons and awaits the approval of the House of Lords. Another key component of the bill is a proposed ban on the sale of tobacco to people born on or after 1 January 2009. It is hoped that this will create a "smokefree generation', driving down cancer rates and other health problems. The move was aimed to prevent young people from buying the single-use devices and becoming addicted to tobacco. Traders who continue selling the product face a £200 fine and repeat offenders face prison time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store