
How Tariff Uncertainty Impacts The Wine Industry
'One in every two bottles of wine is consumed outside its country of origin," says John Barker, International Vine and Wine Organization (OIV) Director General
getty
Tariffs, trade, and the economy are top of mind for many these days. The wine industry is no exception. While consumers worry over increased prices of groceries and household goods, industry professionals brace for ongoing uncertainty in the global wine market.
'Trade is the lifeblood of the wine industry,' says John Barker, International Vine and Wine Organization (OIV) Director General, in a recent 2024 state of the industry address. 'One in every two bottles of wine is consumed outside its country of origin.'
Reflect on that a moment…one in every two bottles.
How does an industry that relies so heavily on global trade mitigate the impact of uncertainty and disruption? The answer depends on who's being asked. However, as Eric Asimov wrote in the New York Times, 'Pretty much everybody in the American wine world stands to lose something.'
Since early February, President Donald J. Trump has announced, applied, withdrawn, and threatened so many different tariff scenarios it's hard to keep up. The 200 percent tariff threat has not come to fruition. The proposed 20 percent on European Union wine, 30 percent on South African wine, and 17 percent on Israeli wine are currently on 90 day pause.
A general 10 percent tariff remains in effect on all imports from every country, including countries that import more goods than they export. Wine is included in this 10 percent. Additionally, Canada and Mexico are facing up to 25 percent tariffs on about half their U.S. exports. Prompting nine of Canada's ten provinces to remove American wine from stores and restaurants. Canada is the U.S. wine industry's biggest export market, at the tune of about $1 billion annually.
While China is not a large export market for American wineries, it has been growing steadily—reaching $50 million in 2024. Additionally, many products American wineries use, such as glass, are produced in China. Uncertainty looms as to how long the 145 percent tariffs on Chinese imports will last. At time of publication, President Donald J. Trump indicates these tariffs will 'come down substantially,' but the timeframe remains unclear.
'It was hard to imaging tariffs taking affect at 200 percent,' says Travis Perez, Southern Glazer's Signature Fine Wine Division Account Representative. 'If 25 percent, that would still be detrimental, but can possibly be spread out, with importers and distributors taking a little so the full amount isn't on the consumer. It's so hard to plan because we don't know where the number will actually fall.'
The wine (alcohol) industry operates in what is known as a three-tier system.
When Perez speaks of spreading out tariffs so the full amount is not passed on to consumers, this three-tier system is what he is speaking of. The fear he shares is small wineries, importers, distributors, and retailers cannot absorb any of the tariff because their profit margins are too thin.
'This could lead to consolidation; employees will be let go,' he says. 'This will also impact domestic producers who rely on distribution to get their wines to retailers and restaurants because the remaining portfolios will expand so that they too will go unsold.'
This is key: Tariffs also negatively impact American wineries because they too rely on distribution to reach retailers, and ultimately consumers. Consolidation means more wines for few distributors. Smaller wineries tend to lose in this scenario.
'Wine is non-fungible. You cannot replicate specific communes of Burgundy that were formed over millennia by planetary evolution. The more a wine reflects terroir, the harder it is to replicate.'
Nicole Nowlin, Managing Director of Able Brown Augusta, is trying not to be reactive. She is storing what she can, but with a small footprint, the restaurant is unable to house a large wine inventory. She shares Perez's concerns about the impacts of tariffs on small businesses.
'Many importers, producers, retailers and restaurants are small businesses,' says Nowlin. 'Many I know are still recovering from the first round of tariffs in 2018, impacts of Covid, and rising costs in shipping and wine. The margins are so small and the ripple effects are huge. It can take years to recover. Subtext: It Sucks.'
Her concern is small importers will have to forgo once a year allocations due to tariff inflated pricing. This risks the importer losing that wine allocation in the future. She fears producers will start selling more to China and other countries, impact many U.S. employees from dock workers, truck drivers, farmers, janitorial staff.
'There are a lot of faces we aren't thinking about who will be impacted. Not to be bleak, but small producers, importers, distributors, retailers, and restaurants will not exist. Is this what we want? We will become an industry of strip malls filled with big chains.'
These professionals see wine as communal, connecting over stories and history.
'The more diverse a wine list the more interesting it is to customers,' says Nowlin. 'Wine is hospitality. In the restaurant we interact with our customers over wine, sharing stories of producers or vintage. We can't move everyone to cocktails and maintain the same connection.'
Perez agrees, adding, 'Wine is non-fungible. You cannot replicate specific communes of Burgundy that were formed over millennia by planetary evolution. The more a wine reflects terroir, the harder it is to replicate.'
Because Dallas's Quarter Acre focuses on Chef Toby Archibald's world travels and New Zealand roots, its wine list largely highlights Australian and New Zealand wine. In the past, this has allowed Jacob Fergus, Assistant General Manager and Beverage Director of Quarter Acres Restaurant, to be less concerned about tariffs.
'When I get a question about tariffs, in the context of dining room service, I usually turn that as a positive for our program which, usually, it is,' he says. 'New Zealand and Australia are not normally targeted in the same group as European Union wine producers so in previous tariff scenarios it has only improve the value proposition for these wines.'
Ten percent tariffs are easier for the three-tier system to absorb, but the ongoing uncertainty poses challenges for planning.
'As for business planning, this is the most unpredictable part. Restaurants, with the exception of major national chains, are completely at the mercy of the distribution and supply steps before us with basically no control over the pricing,' he says. 'Wines can change prices without notice, sometimes even to the surprise of the distribution sales reps! The best we can do is react quickly as soon as we see any changes start to happen.'
'Wine is hospitality. In the restaurant we interact with our customers over wine, sharing stories of producers or vintage. We can't move everyone to cocktails and maintain the same connection," says Nicole Nowlin, Managing Director of Able Brown Augusta
getty
According to the OIV 2024 state of the wine industry address, production and consumption has slumped to its 1961 levels. Tariff uncertainty does not aid this decline.
'Trade is the lifeblood of the wine industry. It's a cultural exchange that is highly diverse and highly connected. It depends on stability, which is more important today than ever,' says OIV's Barker.
Terri Burney, founder and owner of Winetastic Wine Bar in Dallas, recalls the 2019 tariffs and spoke to her suppliers in November 2024 to prepare for this round. She says many put wine on ships immediately after the election to be prepared for tariffs.
'As a small business, I can switch up my inventory quickly if need be. Shoot from the hip, as they say,' she says. 'For the next several months all is good. If this continues for years, that's another story.'
Italian Wineries Remain Optimistic In Today's Uncertain Wine Market
What If The Wine Industry Adopted A First Do No Harm Mentality?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Israel says Iran counterattack ‘ongoing,' dozens of missiles fired
Israeli officials on Friday said Iran's counterattack is 'ongoing' after the Islamic republic fired dozens of ballistic missiles toward Tel Aviv. The retaliatory strikes come hours after the Israeli military took out Tehran's top military leaders and targeted key nuclear facilities in a surprise strike on Thursday. 'The Iranian attack is ongoing. Dozens of additional missiles were launched toward Israel,' the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) said in a Friday post on social platform X. Explosions could be heard throughout Tel Aviv. There have been at least seven hits on the ground in the city, a source told The Hill's sister network NewsNation.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran launches missiles, drones at Israel as Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites
Warning sirens sounded across Israel on Friday and a military official told CBS News that dozens of Iranian ballistic missiles were en route to Israel. The country's population had been instructed to remain in bomb shelters until further notice. The apparent retaliatory action from Iran came after Israel has launched over 200 airstrikes on Iran — continuing a major operation that began overnight, Israel Defense Forces spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said Friday. Israel's airstrikes are continuing, Defrin said. Israel first launched airstrikes on Iran early Friday and announced its operation was targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, scientists and senior military commanders. Tehran responded by launching more than 100 drones at Israel on Friday morning, Israel's military said. Defrin said earlier Friday that Israel's air defenses had worked to "intercept the threats." Later Friday, an Israeli military official told reporters that while the threat wasn't over, Israel had managed to intercept many of Iran's UAVs. "Throughout the day, we once again demonstrated our ability to remove threats in a coordinated, precise and daring manner," Defrin said Friday night. In a televised statement on Friday, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the Iranian Armed Forces would respond fiercely to the strikes and leave Israel "helpless." Shortly after the statement, the IDF confirmed that its fighter jets had "completed a strike on the Iranian regime's nuclear site in the Isfahan area." Ishafan is in central Iran. The strike "dismantled a facility for producing metallic uranium, infrastructure for reconverting enriched uranium, laboratories, and additional infrastructure," the IDF said. The U.S. was not involved in Israel's strikes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, adding a warning that "Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel." President Trump said in a post Friday morning on his Truth Social media platform that he had given Iran "chance after chance" to make a deal with the U.S. on its nuclear program, but that despite his warnings to Tehran that the alternative would be "much worse" than anything seen before, "they just couldn't get it done." "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end," Mr. Trump said. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left." In a later post on Friday, Mr. Trump said he "gave Iran a 60 day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!" Israel has intercepted virtually every Iranian weapon launched in previous large-scale attacks by the Islamic republic. The retaliatory action by Iran was long anticipated and well planned for, Defrin said. Iran's President Mahsoud Pezeshkian said Friday on Iranian TV that the country would "strongly take action" against Israel in response to the attacks, promising "a severe, wise and strong answer." "The Iranian nation and the country's officials will not remain silent in the face of this crime, and the legitimate and powerful response of the Islamic Republic of Iran will make the enemy regret its foolish act," he said. Israel says it destroyed Iran's air defenses, killed top commanders Earlier Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the IDF had begun "Operation Rising Lion," with a massive wave of airstrikes against dozens of Iranian nuclear sites, military commanders and research scientists, saying the goal was to "roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival." Like Netanyahu, Defrin, the IDF spokesman, called the attack on Iran preemptive in a video statement delivered Friday, saying Israeli intelligence had uncovered an Iranian "plan to destroy Israel that has taken shape in recent years." He said that plan involved Iran "racing towards a nuclear bomb," working to double or triple its ballistic missile stockpile, and continuing to "finance, arm, and operate its proxies throughout the Middle East against the State of Israel." "I can confirm that the senior security leadership of the Iranian regime has been eliminated in the strike: the Iranian Chief of Staff, [Mohammad] Bagheri; the Commander of the Revolutionary Guards, [Hossein] Salami; and the Head of the Emergency Command, [Gholamali] Rashid," Defrin said, adding that other commanders had been killed and that Israeli would provide further updates. He said Israel had "targeted and struck the Iranian regime's aerial defense arrays." The IDF said its operation would continue for days, but that the first wave consisted of 200 Israeli fighter jets dropping "over 330 different munitions," to hit more than 100 targets in Iran. "The breadth and scale of these strikes — against senior Iranian officials and other military facilities in addition to nuclear sites — suggest this operation is intended to not just dissuade Iran from pursuing nuclear weapons, but also cripple any potential military response and even to destabilize the regime," Matthew Savill, Director of Military Sciences at the Royal United Services Institute, a British military think tank, said in a statement. "Israel has once again demonstrated its considerable conventional military superiority, and the size of the force allegedly assembled for this series of attacks represents the overwhelming bulk of their longer-range strike aircraft. They have the ability to conduct multiple such rounds of strikes, but operating for an extended duration over this considerable range will stretch even the Israeli Air Force." Savill said Iran's response "might be delayed or split into multiple phases, but their main weapon will be ballistic missiles, which have the best chance of inflicting damage on Israel, whereas drone and cruise missile attacks will face more extensive Israeli defenses. Israel operations have therefore targeted air defenses and ballistic missile sites to forestall this." Savill said that if Iran "believes the U.S. or others were involved" in the Israeli strike, then their retaliation could include targeting the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, and American air facilities in Qatar, "though both would widen the conflict to drag in others." NATO chief urges de-escalation, says nuclear clash "not close" Iranian state media said the Israeli strikes had hit several cities, including in the capital of Tehran and the city of Natanz, a key center for Iran's uranium enrichment program. The IDF said it struck Iran's uranium enrichment site in the Natanz area. "The underground area of the site was damaged," the IDF said in a statement. "This area contains a multi-story enrichment hall with centrifuges, electrical rooms, and additional supporting infrastructure. In addition, critical infrastructure enabling the site's continuous operation and the Iranian regime's ongoing efforts to obtain nuclear weapons were targeted." The United Nations' nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, said in a series of social media posts that its Director General, Rafael Grossi, had been in contact with Iranian authorities on Friday, who told him the country's highly-sensitive and highly-secured Fordo nuclear site "has not been impacted" by the Israeli strikes. Later Friday, Reuters reported that two explosions had been heard near the site and that state media said Iranian air defenses had shot down an Israeli drone near the facility. The IAEA also said Iran's "Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant had not been targeted and that no increase in radiation levels has been observed at the Natanz site." On Friday, during a visit to Sweden, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told reporters that "this was a unilateral action by Israel. So I think it is crucial for many allies, including the United States, to work as we speak to de-escalate." Despite the ongoing attacks, Rutte said he believed the region was "not close" to a possible nuclear conflict. While there have been no claims that Iran has yet built a nuclear weapon, Israel is believed to have multiple warheads, though it has never formally confirmed nor denied its status as a nuclear-armed nation. Iranian officials quickly threatened retaliation to the attack, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei saying Israel "should await a harsh response." The IDF said in a statement before Iran's retaliatory strikes that it had prepared for "a campaign on the frontline and on the home front." Netanyahu said Israel's strikes against Iran, "will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat." Shortly after Israel's strikes, the U.S. Embassy in Israel ordered American personnel to shelter in place. A day beforehand, the Trump administration ordered non-emergency U.S. personnel to leave Iraq and allowed U.S. military family members to leave the Middle East voluntarily. Risk of an escalating regional conflict Israel has carried out strikes against Iranian proxies in recent years, while Iran has backed foes of Israel, including the militant group Hamas. In April of last year, Iran launched missiles and drones at Israel after a strike on Iran's consulate in Damascus was widely attributed to Israel, but the Israeli military intercepted the vast majority of the weapons. Six months later, Iran launched more missiles at Israel, which retaliated with strikes on Iranian sites. Friday's back-and-forth could escalate to be among the most severe clashes between Israel and Iran, which have been adversaries for decades. Mr. Trump warned earlier in the week that the strikes could snowball into a "massive" conflict. Farea Al-Muslimi, a research fellow at the Chatham House think tank, said in a statement Friday that the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen could play a role in the Iranian response to Israel. "With Iran currently weakened and humiliated, this marks the first time the Houthis will be called upon to repay decades of Iranian investment and support," Al-Muslimi predicted. "Following the killing of Hassan Nasrallah in Lebanon and the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, the Houthis have effectively become Iran's first line of defense against Israel — an increasingly central role." Al-Muslimi said the Houthi response could extend beyond retaliatory strikes on Israel itself. "Strikes in the Red Sea will likely resume, the ceasefire with the United States may unravel, and we shouldn't be surprised if Saudi Arabia and the UAE are dragged back into direct conflict in Yemen," Al-Muslimi said. "Attacks by the Houthis on U.S. military bases in the Gulf, the Horn of Africa, and naval forces at sea are also highly plausible." Fabian Hinz, an air warfare expert at London's International Institute of Strategic Studies, told the Associated Press that Iran's current capabilities are potentially "more threatening to the U.S. military than to Israel." Iran has a "huge arsenal" of shorter-range missiles, Hinz said, and there are a number of U.S. military bases in the region. He said Iran also has "lots of anti-ship capabilities." "Think of the Iranian shipping threat as similar in quality to the Houthi threat, but much larger in quantity," Hinz told the AP. Israeli attack casts doubt on fate of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks The Israeli strikes and Iranian counterattack came amid efforts by President Trump to strike a new deal with Iran to limit the country's nuclear ambitions — an idea Israel has long been dubious of. The U.S. and Iran were set to hold talks Sunday, multiple U.S. officials told CBS News. There was no immediate comment from any high-ranking Iranian officials that those plans would change after Israel's attack, but some reports in Iranian media outlets indicated Iran would likely no longer participate in the negotiations. "With Israel's actions, the sixth round of negotiations with the United States will probably not be held," Iranian lawmaker Aladdin Boroujerdi, a member of parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, said, according to Iranian media. Michal Ben-Gal, Seyed Bathaei, Jennifer Jacobs and Olivia Gazis contributed to this report. Video shows Air India plane crashing in Ahmedabad Air India plane crashes shortly after takeoff, carrying more than 240 people Remembering the Beach Boys' Brian Wilson
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats Push Republicans For Kristi Noem Testimony On Alex Padilla Incident
WASHINGTON – Democrats want Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem to testify on Capitol Hill about the manhandling of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and other House Democrats asked House Oversight Committee chair James Comer (R-Ky.) in a letter Friday 'to demand sworn testimony' from Noem, by subpoena if necessary, about the 'violent detention' of Padilla. Federal law enforcement officials forcibly removed Padilla from a Noem press conference in a federal building in Los Angeles on Thursday, with video showing agents pushing him to the floor and handcuffing him after he tried to interrupt Noem's remarks with a question. The Department of Homeland Security said shortly after the incident that Secret Service agents 'thought he was an attacker' and acted appropriately in response. Video showed Padilla identifying himself as a U.S. senator as he was pushed from the room. President Trump this week deployed the National Guard and Marines to California in response to violent protests, a significant break from the usual protocol in which presidents deploy troops in response to state requests. A federal judge said Trump's use of the National Guard was illegal, but an appeals court said it could continue while the case unfolds. 'We are not going away,' Noem said before Padilla's interruption. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' Frost first demanded Noem's testimony during an oversight hearing on Thursday, which led to a testy back-and-forth on the dais and Comer eventually telling the Florida Democrat to 'shut up.' It's unlikely Comer will take Frost's suggestion; instead, Comer demanded information Friday from Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Gov. Gavin Newsom about their response to recent immigration raids and subsequent attacks on police. To Democrats, Padilla's arrest represented an escalation of the Trump administration's efforts to challenge Congress as a coequal branch of government and increase the power of the president. 'This shocking encounter adds to a litany of alarming moves by the Trump Administration to seize and abuse power, including by turning the military on the American people,' the Democrats wrote in their letter. 'The Trump Administration has mobilized the military to the streets of an American city, and any other city could be next. The Trump Administration has violently tackled, kneeled on, and handcuffed a sitting U.S. senator, and any other American could be next.' Congressional Republicans have mostly dismissed the Padilla melee as just another stunt by Democrats. Several House Democrats recently had a run-in with federal immigration officers at a facility in New Jersey, an incident that resulted in federal charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) for interfering with law enforcement.