Pope Francis funeral: 250,000 people bid farewell to pontiff who said 'build bridges, not walls'
Tens of thousands of people packed St Peter's Square for the funeral of Pope Francis before his body was carried through the streets of Rome.
Royals, world leaders and cardinals joined scores of worshippers at The Vatican, as mourning of the 266th pontiff transcended wealth and social class.
In keeping with Francis's life as a breaker of tradition, many of the more elaborate and expensive rituals customary for the burial of popes have been foregone in favour of simpler options.
Around 250,000 people are attending the funeral, with around 50,000 packing out St Peter's Square to watch the service before the coffin bearing the pontiff began its journey through the streets of the Italian capital.
2:24
His body had been lying in state since his death aged 88 on Easter Monday, spending the last few days in St Peter's Basilica to allow mourners to pay their respects.
The Vatican - where the funeral service took place - and Rome - where Francis will be laid to rest - are under heavy security, with a no-fly zone in place overhead.
President Donald Trump and Joe Biden, along with Sir Keir Starmer, President Emmanuel Macron and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, headline a huge selection of global leaders and dignitaries.
Francis's coffin was taken out into St Peter's Square where 220 cardinals and 750 bishops and priests sat in rows, waiting to say goodbye to the Bishop of Rome.
The pontiff eschewed the elaborate coffins used by many of his predecessors, opting instead for a simple wooden casket lined with zinc - a reflection of his efforts to reform the papacy and build "a poor church for the poor".
2:27
A series of sermons and prayers began with Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re reading the Penitential Act - a way for the faithful to confess their sinfulness.
This was followed by the Liturgy of the Word, a part in Catholic mass where faithful gather to hear and reflect on the word of God.
Cardinal Re then delivered the homily, speaking about Pope Francis' life and service to God.
1:21
The cardinal praised the pontiff as someone who "touched the minds and hearts of people" who was "attentive to the signs of the times".
He added: "Despite his frailty and suffering towards the end, Pope Francis chose to follow this path of self-giving until the last day of his earthly life."
He said Francis "was a pope among the people, with an open heart towards everyone".
Cardinal Re also repeated one of Francis's strongest criticisms of President Trump - who was in the audience - with a call to "build bridges, not walls".
He also called for care for migrants and action on climate change.
As the service in front of St Peter's Basilica drew to a close, Cardinal Re blessed the pope's coffin with holy water.
At the end of the mass, the choir sang in Latin: "May the angels lead you into paradise; may the martyrs come and welcome you and take you into the holy city, the new and eternal Jerusalem."
The coffin was then carried back into St Peter's Basilica through the 'doors of death', as a 10-ton funeral bell tolled.
Pope Francis's body then left the basilica aboard a white truck and was taken in procession through the streets of Rome to his final resting place at his favourite church, the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore.
There were cheers and applause from the public on either side of the roads as the popemobile passed them.
Upon arrival, Pope Francis's body will be ushered into the basilica - which is dedicated to the Virgin Mary - by prisoners and migrants, a last reflection of his priorities as pope.
In a break with tradition, the Pope outlined in his will his request to be buried "in the ground, without particular ornamentation" but simply with the inscription "Franciscus".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Is air conditioning ‘far right?'
If you want to understand what lies behind the rise of Reform and its consistent – indeed, deepening – lead in the polls, I have a suggestion: French air conditioning. To be more specific, if you want to understand the difficulty Reform's opponents have in tackling it and why the party's rise seems inexorable, the row going on at the moment in France over air conditioning offers a guide. The New York Times reports how Marine Le Pen has said, with her typically incisive populist touch in the middle of a heat wave, that if she became president she would introduce a 'major air-conditioning equipment plan' around France. She was backed by an opinion piece in Le Figaro, arguing that 'making our fellow citizens sweat limits learning, reduces working hours and clogs up hospitals.' With its equally typical tone-deaf response, the French left is using the heat wave to campaign against air conditioning. Libération, the left's house newspaper, called air con 'an environmental aberration that must be overcome' because it uses up too much energy. We've all heard the arguments many times. But more than that, as Brits we live in a country where air con is viewed by the authorities as something close to evil. In Florida, aircon is standard in 95 per cent of new homes, as in Australia where 75 per cent of homes have it. In Europe, long considered an aircon backwater by Americans, it is present in 30 per cent of Italian homes and 40 per cent of Spanish houses. And it is entirely normal in hospitals and care homes almost everywhere. Except, of course, in the UK – despite the appalling consequences of this. Last year 496 people died in care homes from heat, with a further 473 dying in hospitals. But there is one argument against aircon I confess to not having come across before, until I read the New York Times report. A French talk show host introduced its debate on Le Pen's proposals by asking, 'Is air-conditioning a far-right thing?' If you want to take advantage of technology to be cool in your own home, you may, it seems, be far right. Forget the fact that modern air-to-air pumps remove much of the green issues around cooling, for some supposed progressives, the very concept of cool air is seen by some as 'far right'. Which brings us to Reform, and also to the protests currently taking place outside asylum hostels and hotels. Because if you insist that wanting cool air is 'far right', you are in the same sphere as those who say that protecting borders is pandering to the far right, and that worrying that your neighbourhood is housing sex offenders and dangerous young men also shows you are far right. You are removing any real meaning from the term by using it to describe mainstream ideas held by tens of millions. And so the more you insist that such ideas are far right, the more you turn your defeat into a self-fulfilling prophecy. Screaming 'far right' at people who want air conditioning won't lead to anyone deciding they would rather sweat in the heat, just as labelling as far right anyone concerned over the influx of asylum seekers in their neighbourhood won't cause them to suddenly take stock and welcome them into the village. Quite the opposite, in fact. Because the more you label politicians who support ideas which are widely popular as 'far right', and the more you attack those who agree with those politicians, the more likely you make it that those you attack will draw the logical conclusion: that those politicians are the ones on their side. And the more their support will grow. But more than that, the more likely you also make it that those who really are far right are able to present themselves as being smeared, because the term has become devoid of real meaning. How is it that such a basic lesson still needs to be learned?
The National
10 hours ago
- The National
Scottish Enterprise panned for lack of checks on Israeli-linked arms firms
A Freedom of Information request has revealed that two major arms companies in receipt of Scottish Enterprise grants – Italian arms giant Leonardo and American multinational Raytheon Systems – haven't received a human right due diligence check since October 2019 This funding comes despite both firms continue to supply Israel with weapons amid its genocide in Gaza. In that timeframe, both firms have also been in receipt of Scottish public money – Leonardo received £786,125 in 2023 while Raytheon Systems, which has a factory in Glenrothes, was given £500k in the first half of 2024. Leonardo produces laser targeting systems for Lockheed Martin, which sells the F-35 jets Israel, and Raytheon makes Paveway II guided missiles which are also used by Israel. READ MORE: JD Vance panned for 'lies about Scotland' ahead of luxury Ayrshire holiday The last time a check was performed on French arms firm Thales was July 2021, while Babcock was last checked in March 2022 and Chemring Energetics in December 2021. Bae Systems received a check in February 2024. In response, human rights charity Amnesty International told The National that the 'more we learn' about the checks 'the more concerning it becomes' that Scottish Enterprise and Scottish ministers are defending the process. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater, meanwhile, said it was 'shocking', adding: 'There is no point in having human rights checks at all if they are never carried out.' In total, Scottish Enterprise has given £8 million to 13 companies involved in weapons manufacturing since 2019. The Scottish Government has repeatedly insisted that no public funding goes towards the manufacturing of munitions specifically but other areas these companies operate in, including research, training and apprenticeships. Scottish Enterprise, meanwhile, has strongly denied its human rights checks are not adequate. However, that has been called into question given that, of the 199 human rights checks between 2021 and 2023, no firm has ever failed. When pressed on the issue in an exclusive interview with The National last weekend, First Minister John Swinney defended the grants. 'We won't support the production of munitions. That's our hard line. And we get criticised for taking that hard line, and I'm very confident that hard line is applied,' he said. The First Minister was then pressed on the argument that any funding – even if ring-fenced by the Scottish Government – will directly help a company's cash flow and could, hypothetically, free up money to be used elsewhere, including in the building of munitions. 'I understand that point. But there are also defence requirements of Scotland. Scotland is part of an island nation. We require, for example, shipbuilding resources to support the maritime defense of the United Kingdom because nobody wants to see us vulnerable to an attack from Russia. I certainly don't want to,' he responded. An Amnesty International spokesperson said: "Amnesty is aware from our own research that payments were made to companies known to supply Israel without a new check being triggered by the unfolding genocide in Gaza. 'Alarmingly, that is the process Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Government attempted to characterise as robust and well aligned to international standards. The recent in-house review of the human rights checks recommended some improvements, but unsurprisingly they don't go far enough. We will be meeting with Scottish Enterprise in the coming weeks to take these concerns forward." Slater, meanwhile, said it 'flies in the face of any kind of due diligence'. "These are some of the biggest arms companies in the world. They have armed human rights abusers and dictatorships and some have directly enabled and profited from the genocide in Gaza,' she said. "They should not be receiving public money in the first place, and the Scottish Government absolutely should not be setting up tests to win favourable headlines while refusing to actually implement them. "How can we trust a word they say on ensuring they are applying human rights standards when they are refusing to even ask the right questions of those they are giving public money to?" A spokesperson for Scottish Enterprise said: 'Under our current processes, Human Rights Due Diligence Checks last for three years. New checks are carried out prior to the approval of new funding if they have expired. Funding was authorised and contracted while valid checks or exemptions were in effect in all cases. 'It is important to note that contractual payments are made to companies in stages as the conditions of their contracts are met, in line with the effective management of public funds. Payments can therefore be made over several years. 'The recent review of our HRDD checks affirmed the strength of our processes while identifying areas for enhancement, including increasing the frequency of checks to better respond to emerging risks. We are committed to implementing identified improvements over the course of 2025/26. 'We have been transparent on the frequency of our checks and have corresponded in detail on this with interested parties including Amnesty International, who we look forward to meeting next week.'
The Herald Scotland
10 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Jimmy Kimmel says he got Italian citizenship amid Trump presidency
"A lot of people I know are thinking about where they can get citizenship," Silverman said. Kimmel replied, "I did get Italian citizenship." 'The personal is political': Rosie O'Donnell moves to Ireland amid Trump presidency The "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" host has long been an adversary of the president's policies. Trump, for his part, has openly criticized Kimmel's career over the years. USA TODAY has reached out to Kimmel's reps for comment. Kimmel says 'what's going on' is 'unbelievable' Kimmel didn't specifically cite Trump's presidency for his new Italian citizenship, but he and Silverman did allude to the current state of American politics. "What's going on is as bad as you thought it was going to be," Kimmel said, to which Silverman replied, "Way worse." "It's so much worse. It's just unbelievable," Kimmel said. "Like I feel like it's probably even worse than he would like it to be." Silverman added, "Every once in a while I'll Google Trump regrets or MAGA regrets." The comedians went on to elaborate on the political climate, with Kimmel mentioning Joe Rogan and other Trump supporters who have questioned the administration's policies. Kimmel is latest comedian to consider overseas move If Kimmel opts to move abroad, he wouldn't be the first comedian to do so amid Trump's presidency. Rosie O'Donnell, who notably has a long-standing feud with the president, moved to Ireland in January as Trump entered office. She said in a TikTok video in March that she is relieved not to be "singled out by the President of the United States." "I feel healthier (and) I'm sleeping better without the stress and anxiety over what was happening politically in the country," O'Donnell said. Similarly, Ellen DeGeneres and wife Portia de Rossi also headed across the pond in 2024 and haven't been back to the United States since. "We got here the day before the election and woke up to lots of texts from our friends with crying emojis, and I was like, '(Trump) got in,'" DeGeneres said during an event in South West England on July 20. "And we're like, 'We're staying here.'" Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at
