US economy shrinks by 0.5% in Q1, more than initially estimated
Agencies
The U.S. economy shrank at a 0.5% annual pace from January through March as President Donald Trump's trade wars disrupted business, the Commerce Department reported Thursday in an unexpected deterioration of earlier estimates.
First-quarter growth was weighed down by a surge of imports as U.S. companies, and households, rushed to buy foreign goods before Trump could impose tariffs on them. The Commerce Department previously estimated that the economy fell 0.2% in the first quarter.
Economists had forecast no change in the department's third and final estimate.The January-March drop in gross domestic product — the nation's output of goods and servicesreversed a 2.4% increase in the last three months of 2024 and marked the first time in three years that the economy contracted.
Imports expanded 37.9%, fastest since 2020, and pushed GDP down by nearly 4.7 percentage points.Consumer spending also slowed sharply, expanding just 0.5%, down from a robust 4% in the fourth-quarter of last year.
It is a significant downgrade from the Commerce Department's previous estimate.
Consumers have turned jittery since Trump started plastering big taxes on imports, anticipating that the tariffs will impact their finances directly.
And the Conference Board reported this week that Americans' view of the U.S. economy worsened in June, resuming a downward slide that had dragged consumer confidence in April to its lowest level since the COVID-19 pandemic five years ago.
The Conference Board said Tuesday that its consumer confidence index slid to 93 in June, down 5.4 points from 98.4 last month.
A measure of Americans' short-term expectations for their income, business conditions and the job market fell 4.6 points to 69. That's well below 80, the marker that can signal a recession ahead.
Former Federal Reserve economist Claudia Sahm said 'the downward revision to consumer spending today is a potential red flag.''
Sahm, now chief economist at New Century Advisors, noted that Commerce downgraded spending on recreation services and foreign travel — which could have reflect 'great consumer pessimism and uncertainty.''
A category within the GDP data that measures the economy's underlying strength rose at a 1.9% annual rate from January through March. It's a decent number, but down from 2.9% in the fourth quarter of 2024 and from the Commerce Department's previous estimate of 2.5% January-March growth.
This category includes consumer spending and private investment but excludes volatile items like exports, inventories and government spending.
And federal government spending fell at a 4.6% annual pace, the biggest drop since 2022.
In another sign that Trump's policies are disrupting trade, Trade deficits reduce GDP. But that's just a matter of mathematics.
GDP is supposed to count only what's produced domestically, not stuff that comes in from abroad. So imports — which show up in the GDP report as consumer spending or business investment — have to be subtracted out to keep them from artificially inflating domestic production.
The first-quarter import influx likely won't be repeated in the April-June quarter and therefore shouldn't weigh on GDP. In fact, economists expect second-quarter growth to bounce back to 3% in the second quarter, according to a survey of forecasters by the data firm FactSet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Hegseth defends results of US strikes in push to win public opinion battle
agencies washington US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth took the lectern at the Pentagon briefing room on Thursday morning with two goals. He wanted to present evidence of the success of the American attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, pushing back against a preliminary defence intelligence assessment that suggested the strikes were less effective. And he wanted to berate the American media and paint their coverage of that preliminary report as unpatriotic and disrespectful to the 'brave men and women' in the US military. It was a briefing aimed at winning over divided public opinion on the attacks – and to satisfy an audience of one in the White House, who has been railing against the media coverage for days. The former goal is still in question, but the latter seems to have been a mission accomplished. 'One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!' Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social after Hegseth concluded. During his half-hour briefing, Hegseth ticked through a range of intelligence information, although little of it was new. He read from a Wednesday letter penned by CIA Director John Ratcliffe that claimed there was 'intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'. He cited an earlier Israeli intelligence finding, detailed a recent statement by Iranian leaders and reviewed initial findings of 'very significant damage' by the International Atomic Energy Agency. After General Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provided information about the development and power of the 'bunker buster bombs' used in the attack – including how they were used to repeatedly hit the ventilation shafts at Iran's Fordo facility - Hegseth told Americans to use their common sense when deciding whether the strikes were successful. 'Anyone with two eyes, ears and a brain can recognise that kind of firepower, with that specificity at that location and others is going to have a devastating effect,' he said. 'You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated, choose your words,' he said. 'This was a historically successful attack.'
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
North Korea to open beach resort as Kim bets on tourism
North Korea is opening a beach resort that its leader Kim Jong-un hopes will boost tourism in the secretive communist regime, state media reports. Wonsan Kalma on the east coast will open to domestic tourists on 1 July, six years after it was due to be completed. It is unclear when it will welcome foreigners. Kim grew up in luxury in Wonsan, where many of the country's elite have private villas, and has been trying to transform the town, which once hosted a missile testing site. State media KCNA claims the resort can accommodate up to 20,000 visitors, occupying a 4km (2.5 mile) stretch of beach, with hotels, restaurants, shopping malls and a water park - none of which can be verified. Heavily sanctioned for decades for its nuclear weapons programme, North Korea is among the poorest countries in the world. It pours most of its resources into its military, monuments and landmarks - often in Pyongyang - that embellish the image and cult of the Kim family that has run the country since 1948. Some observers say this is an easy way for Pyongyang to earn money. While foreign tourists are allowed in, tour groups largely tend to come from China and Russia, countries with whom Pyongyang has long maintained friendly relations. Tourism from overseas took a hit during the COVID-19 pandemic, though, with the country closing its borders in early 2020. (Agencies)
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump secures unique oversight in US steel buyout
Agencies President Donald Trump will control the so-called 'golden share' that's part of the national security agreement under which he allowed Japan-based Nippon Steel to buy out iconic American steelmaker U.S. Steel, according to disclosures with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The provision gives the president the power to appoint a board member and have a say in company decisions that affect domestic steel production and competition with overseas producers. Under the provision, Trump — or someone he designates — controls that decision-making power while he is president. However, control over those powers reverts to the Treasury Department and the Commerce Department when anyone else is president, according to the filings. The White House didn't immediately respond to questions Wednesday about why Trump will directly control the decision-making and why it goes to the Treasury and Commerce departments under future presidents. Nippon Steel's nearly $15 billion buyout of Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel became final last week, making U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Trump has sought to characterize the acquisition as a 'partnership' between the two companies after he at first vowed to block the deal — as former President Joe Biden did on his way out of the White House — before changing his mind after he became president. The national security agreement became effective June 13 and is between Nippon Steel, as well as its American subsidiary, and the federal government, represented by the departments of Commerce and Treasury, according to the disclosures. The complete national security agreement hasn't been published publicly, although aspects of it have been outlined in statements and securities filings made by the companies, U.S. Steel said Wednesday. The pursuit by Nippon Steel dragged on for a year and-a-half, weighed down by national security concerns, opposition by the United Steelworkers and presidential politics in the premier battleground state of Pennsylvania, where U.S. Steel is headquartered. The combined company will become the world's fourth-largest steelmaker in an industry dominated by Chinese companies, and bring what analysts say is Nippon Steel's top-notch technology to U.S. Steel's antiquated steelmaking processes, plus a commitment to invest $11 billion to upgrade U.S. Steel facilities. The potential that the deal could be permanently blocked forced Nippon Steel to sweeten the deal. That included upping its capital commitments in U.S. Steel facilities and adding the golden share provision, giving Trump the right to appoint an independent director and veto power on specific matters. Those matters include reductions in Nippon Steel's capital commitments in the national security agreement; changing U.S. Steel's name and headquarters; closing or idling U.S. Steel's plants; transferring production or jobs outside of the U.S..
