logo
Will Syria normalise relations with Israel?

Will Syria normalise relations with Israel?

Al Jazeera18 hours ago
After nearly 14 years of war in Syria, the new government is resetting its regional relations, and a lot of focus is on what will happen with Israel.
There are reports of talks between Syria and Israel, with timelines even being floated for potential normalisation between the two countries, which have technically been at war since the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.
Here's what you need to know about possible normalisation between Syria and Israel:
What has happened so far?
Syria and Israel have held direct talks, according to Israeli media, about potentially entering into a normalisation agreement.
Communication between the two states has reportedly been facilitated by the United Arab Emirates, which established a backchannel for contact.
Any agreement would likely be an extension of the Abraham Accords, an agreement brokered by the United States between some Arab states and Israel.
The Abraham Accords were a top-down approach by Donald Trump during his first term as US president to get Arab states to formalise relations with Israel.
They were signed in August and September 2020 by the UAE and Bahrain, and soon followed by Sudan and Morocco.
Since then, Trump has worked to expand the accords by pushing more countries to sign agreements with Israel.
Trump visited three countries in the Middle East in May, and, while in Saudi Arabia, he met Syria's new president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, and reportedly encouraged him to normalise relations with Israel.
Is normalisation possible?
Possibly down the road, analysts say, but right now it would be nearly impossible, according to Syrian writer and author Robin Yassin-Kassab.
There is a deep enmity between Syria and Israel, which heightened during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war and Israel's occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights.
Israeli Defence Minister Gideon Saar said his country would insist on its occupation of the Golan Heights in any deal with Syria, and the Israeli army has gone deeper into the Golan, occupying homes and expelling people from the area.
Many Syrians would oppose giving up the Golan to Israel, according to analysts. Still, many might welcome common-sense negotiations.
'Syrians are split … because on the one hand people are exhausted, everyone recognises Syria cannot defend itself or fight Israel … so it's good [al-Sharaa's] negotiating,' Yassin-Kassab said, adding that a return to an agreement like the 1974 ceasefire is the most realistic option.
About a week after then-President Bashar al-Assad fled Syria in December 2024, Israel's parliament voted on a plan to expand settlements in Syria – illegal under international law. There are currently more than 31,000 Israeli settlers in the occupied Golan Heights.
Syria, under al-Sharaa, has said it is open to peace with Israel and that it would uphold a 1974 ceasefire agreement between the two states, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on December 8 – the day al-Assad fled to Moscow – that he viewed the agreement as void.
Israel attacked Syria repeatedly, destroying much of its military infrastructure and seizing Syrian territory near the border with Syria's Golan Heights.
Syria would likely ask for Israel to withdraw from the newly occupied area under a new non-aggression deal, though reports say the Golan Heights have not yet been discussed.
What moves have been made lately?
In recent days, Israeli officials have said they are open to a deal with Syria, and Netanyahu reportedly asked US Special Envoy Tom Barrack to help negotiate one.
Israel's National Security Council head, Tzachi Hanegbi, has reportedly been overseeing discussions with Syrian officials. The talks include a US presence and are in 'advanced stages', according to senior Israeli officials who spoke to The Times of Israel.
Figures close to al-Sharaa are reportedly asking for an end to Israeli aggression without Syria having to accept full normalisation, Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar reported.
What would Syria want from talks with Israel?
Syria wants the Israeli attacks on Syrian territory to cease.
There are concerns over Israel's expanded occupation of the Golan Heights among many Syrians; however, it's unclear if al-Sharaa's government will demand the return of the occupied parts.
Syria would, however, want Israel to pull out of the Golan proper and the parts it occupied over the last year.
Israel also threatened the new Syrian government not to deploy soldiers south of Damascus, a region near its border with Israel.
Israel has also tried to stoke sectarianism in this area, threatening to intervene to 'protect the Syrian Druze' during sectarian-driven tensions between groups affiliated with the new Syrian government and Syria's minority Druze community.
While many in the Druze community have shown a distrust of Syria's new government, many have also denounced Israel's threats of intervention as a calculated stunt to cause further discord among Syrians.
What would Israel want?
Netanyahu reportedly wants a security agreement – an update on the 1974 text – with a framework towards a total peace plan with Syria.
US envoy Barrack claims the issue between Syria and Israel is 'solvable' and has suggested they begin with a 'non-aggression agreement', according to Axios.
Such a continued occupation of the Golan would likely upset many Syrians.
'It's too politically difficult [for al-Sharaa], even under American pressure and the continued threat of violence from Israel,' Yassin-Kassab said.
Israel also reportedly has additional conditions: no Turkish military bases in Syria, no presence of Iran or Iranian-backed groups like Hezbollah, and the demilitarisation of southern Syria.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Senate passes Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill', sending it to the House
US Senate passes Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill', sending it to the House

Al Jazeera

time6 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Senate passes Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill', sending it to the House

The United States Senate has passed a sweeping tax bill championed by President Donald Trump, sending the controversial legislation to the House of Representatives for what could be a final vote. Lawmakers passed the bill by a 51-to-50 vote in the Republican controlled-chamber on Tuesday, after Vice President JD Vance broke the tie. The successful vote ended what was a marathon 27 hours of debate in the upper chamber. Three Republicans joined with Democrats to vote against the bill, which would enshrine many of Trump's signature policies, including his 2017 tax cuts, reductions for social safety net programmes, and increased spending on border enforcement and deportations. Critics on both sides of the aisle have taken aim at the estimated $3.3 trillion the bill would add to the national debt. Others have blasted reductions to programmes like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). They argue that the bill takes support away from low-income families to finance tax cuts that will primarily help the wealthy. Trump, however, has pressed for the bill to be passed by July 4, the country's Independence Day. The legislation — informally known as the One Big Beautiful Bill — now heads back to the House of Representatives for a Wednesday vote on the updated version. The president found out about the Senate's passage in the midst of a news conference in south Florida, where he was touting his crackdown on immigration. Despite tight odds in the House of Representatives, Trump struck an optimistic tone about the upcoming vote. ' I think it's going to go very nicely in the House,' Trump said. 'Actually, I think it will be easier in the House than it was in the Senate.' The president also downplayed one of the most controversial provisions in the bill: cuts to Medicaid, a government health insurance programme for low-income families. About 11.8 million people are anticipated to lose their health coverage in the coming years if the bill becomes law. 'I'm saying it's going to be a very much smaller number than that, and that number will be all waste, fraud and abuse,' Trump said. Criticisms in the Senate Trump was not the only Republican to be celebrating the passage of the omnibus bill. In the Senate, leading Republican John Thune touted the bill as a victory for American workers. 'It's been a long road to get to today,' Thune said from the Senate floor. 'Now we're here, permanently extending tax relief for hard-working Americans.' But not all Republicans were as enthused about the bill. Three party members — Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine — all voted against its passage. And even a critical vote in favour, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, appeared to express regret in the aftermath. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told a reporter for NBC News. 'I know, that in many parts of the country, there are Americans who are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don't like that.' She later took to social media to criticise the haste of its passage. 'Let's not kid ourselves. This has been an awful process – a frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline that has tested every limit of this institution.' Meanwhile, the top Democrat in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, said that Republicans had 'betrayed the American people and covered the Senate in utter shame'. 'In one fell swoop, Republicans passed the biggest tax break for billionaires ever seen, paid for by ripping away healthcare from millions of people,' said Schumer. Still, Schumer announced one symbolic victory on Tuesday, writing on the social media platform X that Trump's name for the legislation — 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — had been struck from its official title. Republicans currently hold a trifecta in US government, with control of the Senate, the House of Representatives and the White House, giving Democrats reduced power in legislating. But the Republicans have narrow majorities in Congress, leading to uncertainty about the bill's fate. In the Senate, they hold 53 of the chamber's 100 seats. In the House, where the bill heads now, they have a majority of 220 representatives to the Democrats' 212. 'Not fiscal responsibility' The bill is therefore likely to face a razor-thin margin in the House. An early version that passed on May 22 did so with just one Republican vote to spare. The House Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline conservatives, has continued to baulk at the bill's high price tag and could push for deeper spending cuts in the coming days. 'The Senate's version adds $651 billion to the deficit — and that's before interest costs, which nearly double the total,' the caucus wrote in a statement on Monday. 'That's not fiscal responsibility. It's not what we agreed to.' Billionaire Elon Musk, whose endorsement and funding helped propel Trump to victory in the 2024 presidential election, has also been a vocal opponent of the bill. 'What's the point of a debt ceiling if we keep raising it?' Musk asked on social media on Tuesday. 'All I'm asking is that we don't bankrupt America.' Musk has threatened to fund primary challenges against Republicans who support the bill and even floated on Monday launching a new political party in the US. Trump, however, has brushed aside Musk's criticism as a reaction to the elimination of tax credits for electric vehicles: The billionaire owns one of the most prominent manufacturers, Tesla. The president also threatened to use the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — which Musk helped to found — to strip the billionaire's companies of their subsidies. 'DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon,' Trump said as he travelled to Florida. Reporting from Washington, DC, Al Jazeera correspondent Alan Fisher said that public support has been slipping as a clearer picture of the bill has emerged. 'The longer this has been talked about and the more details that become public, the fewer Americans support him,' Fisher said. Several recent polls have shown a majority of Americans oppose the bill. A survey last week from Quinnipiac University, for example, found just 29 percent of respondents were in favour of the legislation, while 55 percent were against it. Increase to national debt All told, the legislation in its current form would make permanent Trump's 2017 cuts to business and personal income taxes, which are set to expire by the end of the year. It would also give new tax breaks for income earned through tips and overtime, a policy promise Trump made during his 2024 campaign. At the same time, the bill would provide tens of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration crackdown, including funding to extend barriers and increase technology along the southern border. The bill would also pay for more immigration agents and build the government's capacity to quickly detain and deport people. Beyond cuts to electric vehicle tax breaks, the bill also guts several of former President Joe Biden's incentives for wind and solar energy. Faced with criticism about the knock-on effects for low-income families, Republicans have countered that the new restrictions to Medicaid and SNAP — formerly known as food stamps — would help put the programmes on a more sustainable path. Many Republicans have also rejected the Congressional Budget Office's assessment that the legislation would add $3.3 trillion to the country's already $36.2 trillion debt. Nonpartisan analysts, meanwhile, have said the increase in debt has the potential to slow economic growth, raise borrowing costs and crowd out other government spending in the years ahead.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store