Brit beaten and mugged for Rolex in front of wife and screaming child in Majorca
Police are investigating after a British tourist was beaten and mugged for his £40,000 Rolex watch in front of his wife and daughter in Majorca.
The Brit, 44, was attacked in the resort of Port d'Andratx in the south-west of the island during an evening stroll that took place after a meal at a luxury hotel. It is thought the man had been watched for hours by an organised gang following repeated warnings about Rolex thefts in both Majorca, other Spanish holiday islands and the mainland.
The violent robbery, which saw three people get out of a car and snatch the watch, is being investigated by the Spanish Civil Guard. It comes after a warning to Brit tourists planning all-inclusive holidays to Spain.
"The man, together with his partner and their young daughter, was walking quietly in the area after having dinner in a luxury restaurant,' Spanish newspaper Ultimahora.es reported. 'Suddenly a car stopped nearby and three men with their faces covered came out of it and went directly to them. Between all of them they held the Briton and in a few seconds, and despite the resistance of the injured party, they stole the valuable watch he was wearing on one of his wrists.'
The man's frightened daughter began to scream during the attack, which alerted hotel staff, and patrols from the Local Police of Andratx and the Civil Guard appeared at the scene within minutes. By then, the alleged criminals had already raced away from the scene after getting back in their vehicle with the watch.
Investigators are now reviewing CCTV at different points in the Port d'Andratx area in a bid to identify the thugs. Police have also interviewed a number of witnesses.
Sources close to the investigation say the gang had almost certainly watched the family for a number of hours before they struck. The extent of the British man's injuries is not yet known.
It comes after Brits heading on holiday to Spain this summer were warned by police about a crime wave hitting all-inclusive hotels. Police have told tourists to be on their guard after a sudden increase in thefts and robberies from individuals and gangs who are targeting these types of locations.
Authorities say that although all-inclusive hotels provide a wide variety of services but "safety is not usually among them." Through a video published on its official TikTok account, the Spanish National Police have issued an alert that highlights "a common and dangerous practice among tourists": neglecting their belongings while enjoying the pools and beaches of hotels.
'It is essential to remember that travelling to an all-inclusive hotel does not expressly guarantee protection for your personal effects in common areas such as the pool. Therefore, although it is a period to relax and disconnect, it is advisable to stay in control and take measures to avoid unpleasant situations that can spoil your holiday," say the police.
Thefts tend to increase especially on summer holidays in destinations such as the Costa del Sol, the Costa Blanca, the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands, where the influx of tourists skyrockets and security measures can be overwhelmed on certain occasions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Moment plane passenger bundled screaming onto airport bus after punching stewardess & ‘refusing to turn off her phone'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THIS is the shocking moment a furious airline passenger punched a flight attendant after being told to "turn off her phone". The aggressive outburst resulted in the woman being hauled off onto an airport bus by a group of staff. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 A violent passenger hits a flight attendant in the face 5 The woman is carried onto the airport bus 5 The passenger (now wearing a jacket) grapples with airport staff The chaos erupted on Sunday on a domestic flight from the city of Lagos, Nigeria, to the town of Uyo, around 400 miles away. A woman was asked by Ibom Air cabin crew to turn off her phone as the plane was heading towards the runway. But she is said to have ignored the request, refusing and insisting she would switch her phone to flight mode instead. When things became more heated, the pilot turned the aircraft back to the terminal at Lagos's Murtala Muhammed International Airport. The woman was forced to get out of her seat and brought to the front of the plane, where she hit a flight attendant standing in the doorway. In the shocking video, the staff member can be heard saying: "She is hitting me. She is f***ing hitting me." The attendant raises her hands to protect her face from further blows. The incensed passenger shouts: "What did you do?" The passenger is then seen putting on her jacket and being removed from the plane with her luggage. Once outside, security staff were forced to restrain her. Moment drunk Brit pensioner, 66, is left with broken arm after getting into fight with Thai bar girl & being thrown to ground At one point, the passenger even swings a small leather handbag at staff. The woman shout and swears at airport officials before attempting to attack one. Staff had to lift her onto the airport bus, where she continued to struggle. Ibom Air has imposed a lifetime ban on the passenger, according to local outlet Business Day. A statement by the airline read: 'Ibom Air reiterates its zero-tolerance policy towards any form of unruly or violent conduct that threatens the safety of passengers, crew, or equipment. "Such behaviour will be met with the strongest possible response, including legal action and permanent restriction from our services." It added that it "commended the bravery and professionalism" of its crew and the support of airport staff and the Nigerian Police. Speaking about the incident, Michael Achimugu, Director of Public Affairs and Consumer Protection at the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), reminded passengers that they should respect instructions by cabin crew. He said: "When cabin crew ask you to turn off your phone before take-off or landing, simply comply. "I can't understand why simple routine issues would lead to incidents like this. "Passengers need to understand they have responsibilities, not just rights." It comes after a brawl recently erupted onboard a flight when some passengers reportedly refused to keep quiet after the lights were dimmed. Shocking footage from an AirAsia flight from Kuala Lumpur to China shows several people wrestling in the middle of the aisle. Tensions flared when a man seated behind a row of three young women became furious when they kept 'talking loudly'. He then shouted: "'Shut up... are you stupid? I want to sleep." Footage shows a woman in a green outfit and baseball cap leaning across the seat while repeatedly throwing punches at the man, who cowered beneath the food tray. Desperate AirAsia cabin crew in the company's distinctive red dresses can be seen wrestling with those involved in the fight. 5 The passenger grapples with staff
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
The big questions the government needs to answer over Palestine Action
On March 31 1990, Londoners gathered in Trafalgar Square to protest Margaret Thatcher's poll tax. Windows were smashed and premises were set alight. 339 people were arrested. That is thought to be the record number arrested at a single protest in the UK – until last Saturday. The demonstration at the weekend was a very different affair. While six people were arrested for allegedly assaulting police officers, the overwhelming majority – 522 – were arrested for holding up placards reading 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'. As of last month, Palestine Action (PA) is officially considered a terrorist group by the British government. The direct action network, which targets businesses and factories in a bid to draw attention to Israel's actions in Palestine, was proscribed by Parliament on the same day as the Russian Imperial Movement and the Maniacs Murder Cult. Speaking to the media today, a government spokesperson suggested some of those arrested on Saturday might not be aware of how the organisation they were supporting operates in real life. Asked if Keir Starmer thinks the demonstrators – average age 54 – are terrorists or supporters of a terrorist group, the spokesperson said: 'We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation.' He added that the assessments made by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre were 'very clear', and PA is a 'violent organisation' that has committed 'violent, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage'. Hello, I'm Craig Munro and I'm Metro's man in Westminster. Every Wednesday, I write our Alright, Gov? newsletter with insights from behind the scenes in the Houses of Parliament – and how the decisions made there will end up affecting you. Last week we had a look inside Labour's split on trans women – and answered a question from a reader about if Sir Keir Starmer is likely to suspend more MPs in the future. Click here to sign up If the government believes people attended Saturday's protest without understanding who they were supporting, that means one of two things. Either they don't realise the extent of the crimes committed by PA, or they know about the crimes but don't believe they should be considered terrorism. If it's the first, ministers might need to work on publicising what exactly the group has done – and maybe even figure out a way to make public some of the details Home Office Minister Alex Davies-Jones said the government 'cannot disclose because of national security' in an LBC interview today. If it's the second, ministers might need to clearly explain to the public why PA's acts have passed the legal threshold for terrorism. Dr Jessie Blackbourn, an expert in counter-terrorism law at Durham University, said this appeared to be the first time a group has been proscribed largely based on criminal damage rather than 'serious violence against people' such as murder or torture. One example of 'terrorism' defined under the Terrorism Act 2000 is 'serious damage to property' – a controversial clause in the legislation that has rarely been used until now. Dr Blackbourn told Metro: 'Obviously, the Home Secretary is convinced that she's applied the definition of terrorism correctly in proscribing this organisation. 'But I think if you ask someone on the street what terrorism looks like, they would be more likely to think of it as being something like the IRA or al Qaeda or Islamic State than Palestine Action.' When announcing the proscription, the Home Office pointed to three 'attacks' carried out by PA: one in 2022 at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow, and two last year at Instro Precision in Kent and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol. The incident at Thales 'caused over £1 million worth of damage to parts essential for submarines', the department said, adding: 'Staff fled for safety as pyrotechnics and smoke bombs were thrown in evacuation areas.' A few days before the announcement, two activists from the group also broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged a pair of aircraft with red paint. Outlining the reasons for proscription to the House of Commons the following day, Security Minister Dan Jarvis said: 'Palestine Action's attacks are not victimless crimes. 'Employees have experienced physical violence, intimidation and harassment, and they have been prevented from entering their place of work. 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and we cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.' Following Saturday's protest, Amnesty International UK chief executive Sacha Deshmukh said: 'We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. More Trending 'These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.' On July 30, the High Court ruled the proscription of Palestine Action could be reviewed after lawyers for the group's co-founder Huda Ammori argued the move gagged legitimate protest. However, Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain also refused a request to pause the ban temporarily until the outcome of the challenge. That raises the possibility of further demonstrations and even more arrests – unless the government is able to explain why the protesters shouldn't bother. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man 'throws water and grabs throat' of protester demanding release of Israeli hostages MORE: Netanyahu says Israel has 'no choice but to finish the job' in Gaza MORE: Netanyahu 'will have blood of hostages on his hands' if more are killed in Gaza takeover
North Wales Chronicle
4 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Small boats migrants from Muslim countries pose sexual assault risk
Sarah Pochin told reporters that a quarter of sexual assault convictions last year were committed by foreign nationals, as she warned of the risk of 'sexual assault and rape'. The Runcorn and Helsby MP also told the PA news agency that US President Donald Trump, who Reform UK's leader Nigel Farage has a close relationship with, could come across as a 'bit of a chauvinist' but had appointed women at the top of his team. Ms Pochin claimed the problem posed by migrants arriving on small boats from France was a 'national security' issue, which also posed significant dangers for women and girls. She said: 'The vast majority of these migrants are young, military-aged males. We can see it with our own eyes.' 'The inconvenient truth for the left is that the culture of men from predominantly Muslim countries like Afghanistan is one that holds a medieval view of women's rights. 'It is fundamentally alien to the centuries of progress made by our own western culture and attitudes. 'Women are at risk of sexual assault and rape from these men, hundreds of young men who arrive in this country, housed in our communities, who undoubtedly become sexually frustrated, have a warped view of their right to sexually assault women.' She claimed that of 1,453 sexual assault convictions in 2024, a quarter were committed by foreign nationals. She said: 'Afghan men are three times more likely to be convicted of a sexual offence than someone born in the United Kingdom and represent the largest group of migrants who commit sexual violence against women, and yet we know that 18,000 at least, were covertly let into this country by the last government with no security vetting.' She said Reform would deport all small boats migrants who live in Houses of Multiple Occupancy (HMOs), who have been moved out of hotels. The party would also deport foreign criminals, she added, and went on to tell a press conference on women's safety in Westminster that police would be made to respond to every 'inappropriate sexual behaviour' report made against a migrant. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said the Government would deport foreign criminals who are not serving life sentences. He said: 'They have no place in our prisons, no place in our society. We've taken radical action to ramp up the deportation of the portion of foreign criminals. 'It's right that we seek to deport foreign criminals from our prisons, both saving money for the British taxpayer, but also protecting the public from dangerous criminals who would otherwise, after their release, be back on our streets.' Ms Pochin later said Mr Trump 'clearly does respect women' although she admitted he can appear as a 'bit of a chauvinist'. She denied Reform UK was aligned with the US president but added: 'Donald Trump certainly comes across at times, when I look at him through the television or the media, as possibly a bit of a chauvinist, or whatever. 'But look at his team. I mean, his press secretary (Karoline Leavitt) is awesome – can't remember her name – but he has a lot of very senior women in his team. 'So actually, he clearly does respect women and promotes women in his team, as Nigel is very much doing, as you've seen today, with four senior women hosting this press conference.' Speaking at the event, the party's Mayor for Greater Lincolnshire Dame Andrea Jenkyns detailed physical threats and verbal abuse she and activists had faced online and in public. She criticised the police, including under the previous Conservative government she was a part of, for inaction over them. The former Tory minister detailed explicit threats she had faced and claimed those responsible were let off by police or not found. Dame Andrea said: 'I received 70 emails in three months telling me I needed to buy a stab vest and watch out. The person was let off with just a caution. 'I don't feel safe, and as a mother, I no longer feel that our children live in a safe, beautiful haven of Britain that I grew up in.' But she told PA she thought the Government's Online Safety Act, which has been criticised by Reform UK, would not solve the issue and would instead push people onto the 'dark web'. She said: 'We're already seeing quite benign social media posts being monitored, and how far does it go where it starts actually silencing free speech?'
