
Sunscreens and staying safe in summer – DW – 07/25/2025
Skin cancers, of which more than 300,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, are preventable. And yet cases continue to rise, particularly in regions of the world where numbers have previously been low.
As well as avoiding direct sunlight and wearing protective clothing such as hats, long-sleeved shirts and pants, effective sunscreen products have been available for years. But as genuine concerns about product safety mix with myths and falsehoods on social media and elsewhere online, some people may move away from these cancer-preventing products.
"The most important thing that I always want to emphasize in any of the research I'm doing is the importance of using [sunscreen]," said Richard Blackburn, a materials scientist at the University of Leeds and Keracol Limited, UK, who researches and develops new sunscreens and skin products.
"We should be worried about skin, skin damage, DNA damage, skin aging, so the use of a sunscreen, if you're going to be out, is really, really important."
Ultraviolet (UV) light is emitted by the sun, penetrates Earth's atmosphere and reaches the surface. And it's dangerous.
"UV damages all living things," said Antony Young, a photobiologist at Kings College London, UK.
UV is invisible but the damage it causes to humans when it's absorbed by the skin is obvious. Even a short-term exposure to sunlight — sometimes less than half an hour — can cause sunburn.
There are two types of UV light: UVA and UVB.
UVA is a longer wavelength form of ultraviolet and reaches deep layers of the skin. UVB usually penetrates the outer skin layers, such as the epidermis, and is the main cause of sunburn.
Even people with darker skin tones need to be careful of UV. While natural pigmentation can provide a temporary guard against ultraviolet light, skin is skin, and damage can still occur after extensive exposure.
In the 20th century, sunscreens were developed to reduce the harm caused by UV. They contain many ingredients but are generally divided into two categories based on their active properties.
One of these are "chemical" sunscreens. But scientists are trying to move away from that description because, after all, everything on our planet is made of chemicals.
The term they prefer is "organic sunscreen" because they contain carbon-based active ingredients. These molecules absorb and diminish UV rays when they hit the skin, helping to prevent sunburn.
The other category is sometimes called "physical" or "natural" sunscreens. The active ingredients in these are chemicals too — but they aren't carbon-based. Instead, these use titanium or zinc oxide particles to provide a physical filter.
Both sunscreens absorb and block UV from penetrating and damaging skin. The radiation is released as heat.
While no sunscreen filters out 100% of UV, they are vital at blocking out an overwhelming amount of it. Suncreens are rated using protective factor labels, abbreviated to "SPF' or "UPF,' indicating how much UV is filtered out.
SPF15, for example, filters away 93% of UVB radiation; SPF30 filters 97%, and SPF50 filters 98%.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Health authorities are increasingly vocal about the importance of using sunscreen, and general sun protection, to prevent skin damage and reduce skin cancer rates.
But these messages are also competing with claims, including ones circulated on social media, that sunscreen can do more harm than good. Some of these are falsehoods misrepresenting data.
Bu there are also reasonable concerns about the safety profile of some chemicals that have been used in sunscreen for years. While these have generally been considered safe, some long-approved substances like oxybenzone, avobenzone and octinoxate have been detected in the bloodstream, and may break down into toxic compounds.
The question scientists — and health regulators — are asking is, are these toxins enough to pose a danger?
"What matters is the dose," Young said. "This is also true with concerns about sunscreen pollution into the oceans. The trouble is a lot of the toxicity studies are done with doses that are not going to be achieved, or [are] very difficult to achieve."
Among other recommendations from dermatologists and researchers are for consumers to pay attention to expiry dates, storage conditions and to avoid mixing different sunscreens at the same time. That includes cosmetics that have an SPF rating.
Blackburn's research has shown applying two different types of sunscreen products can diminish their protective benefits.
"We found it actually can reverse the whole process by combining those [different sunscreens] together, and that's very counterintuitive," Blackburn said "You would almost think you're layering and layering and you get better [protection], It's not the case."
But the SPF of these ingredients is usually negligible. Products marketed as "natural" will usually contain chemicals like zinc or titanium oxide to provide adequate protection.
Young warns against do-it-yourself sunscreens.
"The thing about these homemade efforts is that you can't test them. Formulating a sunscreen is quite a technically tricky job to get it both cosmetically appealing, stable and also protective."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
While most sunscreen chemicals, whether skin-aborbed carbon compounds or physical protectors like zinc are the current gold-standard for SPF, scientists are finding new chemicals in nature.
Like many pharmaceuticals, chemical compounds evolved by plants, fungi and other animals could be harnessed to provide health benefits.
"There are natural chemicals that have the potential to be protective," said Young, "And plants in particular produce chemicals to protect their DNA."
Labs like those run by Blackburn are trying to identify, isolate and produce such chemical compounds for use in sunscreens. It could reduce the reliance on lab synthezised chemicals in future sunscreens, though in places like the US, these would still need regulatory approval.
"Everything is chemistry," Blackburn said. "If we can understand from a chemical level and a mechanistic perspective what's working, we can actually improve [sunscreen], look to... plants that can provide the same function."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
a day ago
- DW
Sunscreens and staying safe in summer – DW – 07/25/2025
Summer and sunscreen go together. But how exactly do these products protect against skin damage and lower your cancer risk? Skin cancers, of which more than 300,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, are preventable. And yet cases continue to rise, particularly in regions of the world where numbers have previously been low. As well as avoiding direct sunlight and wearing protective clothing such as hats, long-sleeved shirts and pants, effective sunscreen products have been available for years. But as genuine concerns about product safety mix with myths and falsehoods on social media and elsewhere online, some people may move away from these cancer-preventing products. "The most important thing that I always want to emphasize in any of the research I'm doing is the importance of using [sunscreen]," said Richard Blackburn, a materials scientist at the University of Leeds and Keracol Limited, UK, who researches and develops new sunscreens and skin products. "We should be worried about skin, skin damage, DNA damage, skin aging, so the use of a sunscreen, if you're going to be out, is really, really important." Ultraviolet (UV) light is emitted by the sun, penetrates Earth's atmosphere and reaches the surface. And it's dangerous. "UV damages all living things," said Antony Young, a photobiologist at Kings College London, UK. UV is invisible but the damage it causes to humans when it's absorbed by the skin is obvious. Even a short-term exposure to sunlight — sometimes less than half an hour — can cause sunburn. There are two types of UV light: UVA and UVB. UVA is a longer wavelength form of ultraviolet and reaches deep layers of the skin. UVB usually penetrates the outer skin layers, such as the epidermis, and is the main cause of sunburn. Even people with darker skin tones need to be careful of UV. While natural pigmentation can provide a temporary guard against ultraviolet light, skin is skin, and damage can still occur after extensive exposure. In the 20th century, sunscreens were developed to reduce the harm caused by UV. They contain many ingredients but are generally divided into two categories based on their active properties. One of these are "chemical" sunscreens. But scientists are trying to move away from that description because, after all, everything on our planet is made of chemicals. The term they prefer is "organic sunscreen" because they contain carbon-based active ingredients. These molecules absorb and diminish UV rays when they hit the skin, helping to prevent sunburn. The other category is sometimes called "physical" or "natural" sunscreens. The active ingredients in these are chemicals too — but they aren't carbon-based. Instead, these use titanium or zinc oxide particles to provide a physical filter. Both sunscreens absorb and block UV from penetrating and damaging skin. The radiation is released as heat. While no sunscreen filters out 100% of UV, they are vital at blocking out an overwhelming amount of it. Suncreens are rated using protective factor labels, abbreviated to "SPF' or "UPF,' indicating how much UV is filtered out. SPF15, for example, filters away 93% of UVB radiation; SPF30 filters 97%, and SPF50 filters 98%. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Health authorities are increasingly vocal about the importance of using sunscreen, and general sun protection, to prevent skin damage and reduce skin cancer rates. But these messages are also competing with claims, including ones circulated on social media, that sunscreen can do more harm than good. Some of these are falsehoods misrepresenting data. Bu there are also reasonable concerns about the safety profile of some chemicals that have been used in sunscreen for years. While these have generally been considered safe, some long-approved substances like oxybenzone, avobenzone and octinoxate have been detected in the bloodstream, and may break down into toxic compounds. The question scientists — and health regulators — are asking is, are these toxins enough to pose a danger? "What matters is the dose," Young said. "This is also true with concerns about sunscreen pollution into the oceans. The trouble is a lot of the toxicity studies are done with doses that are not going to be achieved, or [are] very difficult to achieve." Among other recommendations from dermatologists and researchers are for consumers to pay attention to expiry dates, storage conditions and to avoid mixing different sunscreens at the same time. That includes cosmetics that have an SPF rating. Blackburn's research has shown applying two different types of sunscreen products can diminish their protective benefits. "We found it actually can reverse the whole process by combining those [different sunscreens] together, and that's very counterintuitive," Blackburn said "You would almost think you're layering and layering and you get better [protection], It's not the case." But the SPF of these ingredients is usually negligible. Products marketed as "natural" will usually contain chemicals like zinc or titanium oxide to provide adequate protection. Young warns against do-it-yourself sunscreens. "The thing about these homemade efforts is that you can't test them. Formulating a sunscreen is quite a technically tricky job to get it both cosmetically appealing, stable and also protective." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While most sunscreen chemicals, whether skin-aborbed carbon compounds or physical protectors like zinc are the current gold-standard for SPF, scientists are finding new chemicals in nature. Like many pharmaceuticals, chemical compounds evolved by plants, fungi and other animals could be harnessed to provide health benefits. "There are natural chemicals that have the potential to be protective," said Young, "And plants in particular produce chemicals to protect their DNA." Labs like those run by Blackburn are trying to identify, isolate and produce such chemical compounds for use in sunscreens. It could reduce the reliance on lab synthezised chemicals in future sunscreens, though in places like the US, these would still need regulatory approval. "Everything is chemistry," Blackburn said. "If we can understand from a chemical level and a mechanistic perspective what's working, we can actually improve [sunscreen], look to... plants that can provide the same function."


DW
7 days ago
- DW
Fact check: Does sunscreen increase skin cancer risk? – DW – 07/19/2025
Social media posts claiming sunscreen causes cancer are spreading fast—but experts and studies say otherwise. Can sunscreen protect from melanoma, or do they increase the risk of skin cancer? Posts on social media have popped up recently, claiming that applying sunscreen reportedly increases the risk of skin cancer. Even though ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main cause of melanomas, and sunscreen helps protect skin by filtering UV rays, these posts claim that sunscreen itself is doing damage. Claim: "It is an indisputable fact that the countries that use the most sunscreen, have the highest incidence of skin cancer," said this X userin a post with close to 60,000 followers. "And the more sunscreen they use, the greater the prevalence." There are also TikTok videoswarning about sunscreen. DW Fact check: False "There is no scientific evidence that supports the association of sunscreen use with a higher risk of cancer," Brittany Schaefer, Public Information Officer with the Connecticut State Department of Public Healthtold DW. The X post attributed the chart to the Connecticut Tumor Registry (CTR), but Schaefer says that was inaccurate. "The original cancer incidence data likely came from the CT Tumor Registry decades ago, but not the added text boxes regarding sunscreens. We do not know the source of the actual graphic, but it was not from CTR or the Connecticut Department of Public Health," she said. But why is the number of global skin cancer cases on the rise, even though more and more people are using sunscreen? A study across several countries from December 2023involving scientists from the US, Switzerland, Germany and Hungary looked at five hypotheses to get to the bottom of this. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video According to the study, possible reasons for misunderstandings and myths around linking skin cancer risk and sun protection include access to better diagnostics and treatment methods, outdated scientific studies, erratic use of sunscreen and climate change. Rising awareness about skin cancer risks among both patients and doctors has led to an increase in reporting and documenting cases. In contrast to higher skin cancer incidence worldwide, the mortality rate has dropped due to better treatment options, says the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer. According to the World Cancer Research Fund, Australia had the highest age-standardized incidence rate of new cases in 2022: 37 new skin cancer cases per 100,000 people per year, followed by Denmark (31.1), Norway (30.6), New Zealand (29.8) and Sweden (27.4). The US ranked first with 101,388 cases in terms of the total number of skin cancer cases in 2022, while Germany ranked second with 21,976 skin cancer cases, with an identical incidence rate of 16.5. In terms of the number of skin cancer deaths in 2022, the US again took the lead with 7,368 deaths, while Germany ranked fourth with 3,303 cases, behind China and Russia. The following graph also shows that a high incidence rate of skin cancer does not necessarily correspond to a higher mortality rate. Another reason for rising skin cancer rates could also be the fact that people spend more time outside in the sun. Even if they applied sunscreen, that was no guarantee that they used it as intended to protect their skin. The lack of current scientific studies further adds to the problem of reinforcing outdated narratives. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only began regulating sunscreen in 2011. All prior studies examining sunscreen use and the development of melanoma were likely conducted with products that did not offer the same level of protection as those currently on the market. But are people in countries with the highest rates of skin cancer cases such as New Zealand, Australia, Sweden, Norway, Canada and the US really using more sunscreen, as users on social media have claimed? It is true that the global sale of sunscreen is on the rise. And according to the sunscreen industry, the revenue of global sun protection skin care is projected to reach about $13.553 million (€11.594 million) by 2028. The biggest markets are the US, followed by China and South Korea. And then there's the question of how people are using sunscreen. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 38% of people aged 15 years and over said they used SPF30 or higher on most days in the last month. However, 7% said they had experienced sunburn in the last week. Young people aged 15–24 years were more likely to experience sunburn in the last week (about 15%). A poll in the US by Talker Research, published in May of this year, found that less than half (41%) of the 2,000 adults polled said they wear sunscreen more than 60 days of the year. And 13% said they typically don't wear sunscreen at all. In Germany, about half of the people asked in an online poll from August 2024 said they would only use sunscreen in summer or when being directly in the sun. Sybille Kohlstädt, spokesperson for the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), warns against false conclusions due to a lack of valid data regarding sun protection. "In contrast to existing data on the growing global prevalence of skin cancer, there are no country-specific statistics that break down sunscreen use and relate it to skin cancer prevalence."


DW
17-07-2025
- DW
Fact check: Does sunscreen increase skin cancer risk? – DW – 07/17/2025
Social media posts claiming sunscreen causes cancer are spreading fast—but experts and studies say otherwise. Can sunscreen protect from melanoma, or do they increase the risk of skin cancer? Posts on social media have popped up recently, claiming that applying sunscreen reportedly increases the risk of skin cancer. Even though ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main cause of melanomas, and sunscreen helps protect skin by filtering UV rays, these posts claim that sunscreen itself is doing damage. Claim: "It is an indisputable fact that the countries that use the most sunscreen, have the highest incidence of skin cancer," said this X userin a post with close to 60,000 followers. "And the more sunscreen they use, the greater the prevalence." There are also TikTok videoswarning about sunscreen. DW Fact check: False "There is no scientific evidence that supports the association of sunscreen use with a higher risk of cancer," Brittany Schaefer, Public Information Officer with the Connecticut State Department of Public Healthtold DW. The X post attributed the chart to the Connecticut Tumor Registry (CTR), but Schaefer says that was inaccurate. "The original cancer incidence data likely came from the CT Tumor Registry decades ago, but not the added text boxes regarding sunscreens. We do not know the source of the actual graphic, but it was not from CTR or the Connecticut Department of Public Health," she said. But why is the number of global skin cancer cases on the rise, even though more and more people are using sunscreen? A study across several countries from December 2023involving scientists from the US, Switzerland, Germany and Hungary looked at five hypotheses to get to the bottom of this. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video According to the study, possible reasons for misunderstandings and myths around linking skin cancer risk and sun protection include access to better diagnostics and treatment methods, outdated scientific studies, erratic use of sunscreen and climate change. Rising awareness about skin cancer risks among both patients and doctors has led to an increase in reporting and documenting cases. In contrast to higher skin cancer incidence worldwide, the mortality rate has dropped due to better treatment options, says the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer. According to the World Cancer Research Fund, Australia had the highest age-standardized incidence rate of new cases in 2022: 37 new skin cancer cases per 100,000 people per year, followed by Denmark (31.1), Norway (30.6), New Zealand (29.8) and Sweden (27.4). The US ranked first with 101,388 cases in terms of the total number of skin cancer cases in 2022, while Germany ranked second with 21,976 skin cancer cases, with an identical incidence rate of 16.5. In terms of the number of skin cancer deaths in 2022, the US again took the lead with 7,368 deaths, while Germany ranked fourth with 3,303 cases, behind China and Russia. The following graph also shows that a high incidence rate of skin cancer does not necessarily correspond to a higher mortality rate. Another reason for rising skin cancer rates could also be the fact that people spend more time outside in the sun. Even if they applied sunscreen, that was no guarantee that they used it as intended to protect their skin. The lack of current scientific studies further adds to the problem of reinforcing outdated narratives. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only began regulating sunscreen in 2011. All prior studies examining sunscreen use and the development of melanoma were likely conducted with products that did not offer the same level of protection as those currently on the market. But are people in countries with the highest rates of skin cancer cases such as New Zealand, Australia, Sweden, Norway, Canada and the US really using more sunscreen, as users on social media have claimed? It is true that the global sale of sunscreen is on the rise. And according to the sunscreen industry, the revenue of global sun protection skin care is projected to reach about $13.553 million (€11.594 million) by 2028. The biggest markets are the US, followed by China and South Korea. And then there's the question of how people are using sunscreen. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 38% of people aged 15 years and over said they used SPF30 or higher on most days in the last month. However, 7% said they had experienced sunburn in the last week. Young people aged 15–24 years were more likely to experience sunburn in the last week (about 15%). A poll in the US by Talker Research, published in May of this year, found that less than half (41%) of the 2,000 adults polled said they wear sunscreen more than 60 days of the year. And 13% said they typically don't wear sunscreen at all. In Germany, about half of the people asked in an online poll from August 2024 said they would only use sunscreen in summer or when being directly in the sun. Sybille Kohlstädt, spokesperson for the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), warns against false conclusions due to a lack of valid data regarding sun protection. "In contrast to existing data on the growing global prevalence of skin cancer, there are no country-specific statistics that break down sunscreen use and relate it to skin cancer prevalence."