Slovenia bars far-right Israeli ministers for ‘genocidal statements'
Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon declared the pair personae non gratae on Thursday in what she said was a first for a European Union country.
'We are breaking new ground,' she said.
In a statement, the Slovenian government accused Israel's National Security Minister Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Smotrich of inciting 'extreme violence and serious violations of the human rights of Palestinians' with 'their genocidal statements'.
It also noted that both cabinet ministers 'publicly advocate the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, the forced evictions of Palestinians, and call for violence against the civilian Palestinian population'.
There was no immediate reaction from Israel's government.
Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, key coalition partners in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, have drawn international criticism for their hard-line stance on the Gaza war and on illegal settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank.
Smotrich, who lives in a West Bank settlement, has supported the expansion of settlements and has called for the territory's annexation.
Settlements are illegal under international law. Last July, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel's continued presence in occupied Palestinian territory was unlawful, a decision Israel has ignored.
Smotrich has previously called for 'total annihilation' in Gaza and said that a Palestinian town in the West Bank should be 'wiped out'. Ben-Gvir was an open admirer of Baruch Goldstein, an Israeli who massacred 29 Palestinians as they prayed in Hebron in 1994. He has been convicted multiple times by Israeli courts for 'incitement to racism'.
Despite the ministers' positions, Netanyahu relies heavily on support from the two and from their factions in parliament for the survival of his government.
On May 21, Slovenia's President Natasa Pirc Musar told the European Parliament that the EU needed to take stronger action against Israel, condemning 'the genocide' in Gaza.
Fajon said Slovenia had decided to make the move after EU foreign ministers did not agree on joint action against Israel over charges of human rights violations at a meeting in Brussels on Tuesday.
She said other measures were being prepared, without going into detail.
In June, Britain, Norway, Australia, New Zealand and Canada imposed sanctions on the two Israeli ministers, accusing them of inciting violence against Palestinians.
Last year, Slovenia announced it was recognising a Palestinian state, following on the heels of Norway, Spain, and the Republic of Ireland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Could Israel be planning a second war on Iran?
Israel's leadership views its 12-day war with Iran last month as a success – several Iranian military leaders were killed, Iran's defensive military capabilities were weakened, and the United States was convinced to take part in a raid on the Iranian nuclear site at Fordow. But while Israeli leaders were quick to claim victory, they emphasised that they were ready to attack again if necessary, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying he had 'no intention of easing off the gas pedal'. And Israel is already looking for the next opportunity to wage another devastating conflict aimed at bringing down the Islamic Republic in Iran, analysts told Al Jazeera. However, to do so, it would require the 'permission' of the US, which may not be willing to give it. Back in mid-June, a surprise Israeli attack led to the war, in which more than 1,000 Iranians and 29 Israelis were killed. Israel justified the war by claiming that it was acting preemptively and in 'self-defence' to take out Iran's nuclear programme, which Tehran has long said is for civilian purposes. Speaking to Al Jazeera earlier this week, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed doubt over how long the current ceasefire will remain in place. 'We are fully prepared for any new Israeli military move, and our armed forces are ready to strike deep inside Israel again,' he said. Cause for war Despite Israel's emphasis that it was targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, it mainly assassinated high-ranking government and military officials, indicating a clear attempt to weaken and possibly bring down the regime. Trita Parsi, an expert on Iran and the cofounder and executive vice president of the Quincy Institute, a left-wing US think tank, believes Netanyahu is looking for an opportunity to resume that mission. 'The reason the Israelis want to attack again … is because they want to make sure they turn Iran into the next Syria or Lebanon – countries Israel can attack anytime with impunity,' he told Al Jazeera. Israel's next opportunity to muster up a pretext for a war could come after European countries reimpose debilitating sanctions on Iran. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is reported to have held a call with his counterparts from Germany, France and the United Kingdom earlier in July, in which they agreed that United Nations Security Council sanctions would be reimposed if a new nuclear deal was not agreed upon by the end of August. The sanctions had been lifted when Iran and several Western countries agreed on a nuclear deal in 2015. The US pulled out of that deal two years into President Donald Trump's first term in 2018 and restored sanctions as part of a maximum pressure campaign. Now, European parties to the deal could do the same, and that could prompt Iran to walk out of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, warned Parsi. 'That would provide [Israel] with a political window to [attack again],' he told Al Jazeera. Meir Javedanfar, Iran lecturer at Israel's Reichman University, added that Israel would nevertheless have to muster up or present credible intelligence that suggests Iran is rebuilding or repairing its nuclear programme. He warned that, 'to launch such an attack, Israel would need the agreement of the United States and its President Trump', permission he regarded as less likely in light of US concern over Israeli attacks on Syria. Israeli operations While Israeli strikes on Iran may not be imminent, a report in The New York Times on Wednesday suggests that it is carrying out covert operations responsible for sudden explosions and fires across the country. The paper cited three informed officials and a European diplomat who attributed the apparently random fires and explosions at apartment complexes, oil refineries, near an airport and a shoe factory, to acts of sabotage likely carried out by Israel. 'I think Benjamin Netanyahu has found a formula where it is able to attack Iran with impunity despite pushback from Donald Trump,' said Negar Mortazavi, an expert on Iran with the Center for International Policy (CIP), a think tank based in Washington, DC. Any ongoing covert operations are a result of Israel's extensive infiltration of Iranian security and infrastructure that became apparent during the early stages of the June conflict, with individuals targeted through what was presumed to be teams of local intelligence operatives and drones launched against Iranian targets from within Iranian territory. There was no evidence to suggest that Israel's network within Iran had ended with the war, analyst and Iran expert Ori Goldberg said. 'Israel has built a robust [security] system within Iran and, like all such systems, its muscles need flexing occasionally,' he said from Tel Aviv. 'Sometimes this isn't for strategic reasons, so much as tactical ones. As soon as you have infrastructure or people in place within another country, you have a limited time to use them, so if that's setting fires or setting detonations, it's a way of keeping them active and letting Iran know they're there.' Likelihood of new war Few could have predicted the complete absence of restraint with which Netanyahu, previously a figure considered to be somewhat averse to conflict, has attacked neighbouring states, Syria and Lebanon, as well as regional actors, such as Yemen and Iran, while maintaining his brutal assault upon Gaza. But while a renewed offensive upon Israel's historical bogeyman, Iran, might prove popular in the face of growing internal division over Israel's war on Gaza, how well received it might be by his principal ally remains to be seen. 'Trump is a concern and Israel will want to keep on the right side of whatever line he's drawn [on its actions],' Goldberg said. 'But Iran is a consensus issue within Israel. People might argue about Gaza, but never Iran. If Netanyahu feels himself under threat, he's going to want to crack the Iranian whip and unify people behind him.' Iran, for its part, won't be caught flat-footed a second time, say analysts. Mortazavi told Al Jazeera that Iran is expecting Israel to continue its aggression, even as it still holds out hope to reach a deal on its nuclear programme through diplomacy. 'I think they know that a deal will reduce the chances of an Israeli attack,' she said.
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran reaffirms right to enrich uranium ahead of key talks in Turkiye
Iran has reaffirmed its right to enrich uranium on the eve of a key meeting with European powers threatening to reimpose nuclear sanctions. Friday's meeting, set to take place in Istanbul, will bring Iranian officials together with officials from Britain, France and Germany – known as the E3 nations – and will include the European Union's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas. It will be the first since Israel's mid-June attack targeting key Iranian nuclear and military sites led to a 12-day war that ended in a ceasefire on June 24. 'Especially after the recent war, it is important for them [European countries] to understand that the Islamic Republic of Iran's position remains unshakable, and that our uranium enrichment will continue,' the Tasnim news agency quoted Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi as saying on Thursday. The United States joined its ally Israel in the offensive, striking three Iranian nuclear facilities overnight between June 21 and 22. Israel launched its attack on Iran just two days before Tehran and Washington were set to resume negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said on Thursday that Tehran would be prepared to engage in further talks on its nuclear programme with the US if Washington takes meaningful steps to rebuild trust. In a social media post, Gharibabadi also said that for talks to take place with the US, Tehran would seek 'several key principles' to be upheld. These include 'rebuilding Iran's trust – as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States', he said, adding there could be no room 'for hidden agendas such as military action, though Iran remains fully prepared for any scenario'. Britain, France and Germany – alongside China, Russia and the US – are parties to a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which placed major restrictions on its atomic activities in return for the gradual lifting of United Nations sanctions. However, in 2018, the US unilaterally withdrew from the agreement during Donald Trump's first term as president and reimposed its own sanctions. Britain, France and Germany maintained their support for the 2015 accord and sought to continue trade with Iran. But they have since accused Tehran of failing to uphold its commitments and are threatening to reimpose sanctions under a clause in the agreement that expires in October – something Iran is eager to avoid. The IAEA, the UN's nuclear watchdog, says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60 percent – far beyond the 3.67 percent cap set by the 2015 accord. Ninety percent enrichment is required for a nuclear weapon. Western powers, led by the US and backed by Israel, have long accused Tehran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons. Iran has repeatedly denied this, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production. Tehran and Washington had held five rounds of nuclear talks starting in April, but a planned meeting on June 15 was cancelled after Israel launched its strikes on Iran.
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Ukraine's Zelensky introduces bill after anti-corruption protests
Kiev: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has submitted a new draft bill to the country's legislature, in an effort to calm outrage over a previously passed law that critics say paves the way for corruption. The country's anticorruption agencies quickly hailed the bill's introduction on Thursday, saying it would restore their 'procedural powers and guarantees of independence'. The Ukrainian leader has contended with protests and condemnation from both within Ukraine and from its closest European allies after a separate controversial law was passed on Tuesday. That law placed the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct authority of the country's prosecutor general – a position appointed by the president.
