Crystal Palace to know European fate by 11 August after submitting appeal to CAS
The London club, who won last season's FA Cup, were demoted from the Europa League to the Conference League after falling foul of UEFA's rules governing multi-club ownership.
European football's governing body determined that as of 1 March, American businessman John Textor had control or influence in Palace and French club Lyon.
Where one or more club are found to have shared ownership, they cannot play in the same competition, and Lyon held on to the Europa League spot by virtue of their higher league position. Palace's place in the second-tier competition was taken by Nottingham Forest.
Advertisement
Earlier this summer, Drogheda United fell foul of the same rules when Silkeborg took the League of Ireland club's place in the Conference League and they were expelled entirely.
The CAS issued a statement on Tuesday confirming it had received an appeal by Palace and would render an operative decision – without written reasons – on or before August 11. A date for the hearing has not yet been scheduled, the court said.
The CAS confirmed Palace were seeking to take either Forest's or Lyon's place in the Europa League.
Textor has agreed to sell his stake in Palace to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, but the move came too late to satisfy UEFA.
Palace's prospects looked brighter when Lyon were relegated to France's second division by the country's football finance regulator.
Lyon had reached a settlement with UEFA agreeing to be excluded from European competition if their appeal against that sanction failed, but they managed to overturn the initial decision and hold on to their top-flight place.
The CAS said parties were currently exchanging written submissions.
Palace fans have staged protests against the ruling, and club chairman Steve Parish told The Rest Is Football podcast last week: 'We are still fighting. There's an appeal process, so we go to CAS which is the court for arbitration and, you know, we're very hopeful. We think we've got great legal arguments.
'We don't think this is the right decision by any means. We know unequivocally that John didn't have decisive influence over the club.
'We know we proved that beyond all reasonable doubt because it's a fact.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Bitter Spanish press slam Chloe Kelly's ‘cocky' celebration as stars moan they were much BETTER than ‘lucky' England
THE Spanish media have blasted England Women and labelled them as "cocky" and "time wasters" in a bitter attack on the Euro 2025 winners. 4 The Spanish media has hit out at the Lionesses Credit: GETTY 4 They lost on penalties to England Credit: AP 4 The Lionesses became back-to-back European champions on Sunday Credit: EPA 4 Hero Kelly has triggered the Spanish press Credit: Getty Play Dream Team now! Play The Sun Dream Team ahead of the 2025/26 season Free to play Over £100,000 in total prize money Play in Mini Leagues against your mates Submit a team for Gameweek 1 to enter £5,000 prize draw But despite Spain 's media think Basel . Chloe Kelly and her "cocky" gesture after her spot kick, which saw her coolly point a finger at the crowd. The Spanish outlet wrote: "This is unnecessary, my friend: Kelly's cocky gesture to [goalkeeper] Cata Coll after scoring the decisive penalty. "The read more on euro 2025 In their match report, the outlet said: "The dream ends in a nightmare. "Spain lost the European Championship on penalties. England tied a match that Spain largely dominated. " History is made by victories, and also by defeats. Spain fell in the Euro Cup final but left its name sealed in gold. BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK Most read in Football "England robbed them of their dream; the world champions couldn't close the circle they began to write two years ago in Sydney . "They couldn't have been crueler in the penalty shootout, tossing a few dice in the air." Inside Lionesses' boozy Euro 2025 celebrations as stars party with pizzas, beers and loved ones after win over Spain 2023 World Cup winners Spain's players labelled England as "lucky" in their post-match interviews . Captain Irene Paredes told Spanish TV "We tried everything, all the different ways, and then the penalties didn't go our way. I thought we deserved it more but in the end it is not about who deserves it. "It is about having that bit of luck and England had that throughout the whole tournament. We thought we could overcome that but we weren't able to. England are queens of Europe England legend Lucy Bronze reveals she played Player ratings - see how England's finest in Chloe Kelly steals the show after Eagle-eyed fans stunned at where Joyous "I think we had more control of the game than they did, we created more clear chances, we had more possession… But yeah, nothing else." Meanwhile, two-time reigning Ballon d'Or winner Aitana Bonmati thought her side were "far superior". Bonmati, who missed her penalty in the shoot out, told Spainsh outlet I think we've all given up; it's been a long time here, and it's been very cruel . "In terms of play, we were far superior to our opponents, but in football , that's not enough. " She added: "To be a winning team in a tournament like this, you have to have some luck, and they had plenty of luck. "We know how to do it better when it comes to penalties." Mariona Caldentey's first half header was cancelled out by Alessia Russo in the 57th minute, with the score locked all the way to the end of extra time. England's Euro 2022 winning goalscorer Kelly hammered her spot kick into the top left hand corner to avenge her side's World Cup 2023 defeat to Spain and seal victory for her country.
RTÉ News
36 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Is this EU-US trade deal a good one for Ireland?
Yesterday the EU and US reached agreement on a framework deal that ends months of uncertainty and avoids a full-blown trade war between the two blocs. While there is still a lot to be ironed out, there's a decent level of detail that has been announced. What's included in the deal? It introduces a 15% import tariff on most EU goods being exported to the US, which is half the 30% rate US President Donald Trump had threatened. This baseline tariff will apply across the board, including for Europe's crucial car manufacturing sector, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors. However, there will be no tariffs on aircraft and their components, some chemicals and generic drugs, certain agricultural products, and critical raw materials. As part of the agreement, the EU has also committed to buying around €640 billion worth of US energy products over the next three years. This will largely involve purchases of US liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil and nuclear fuels. While Brussels has also said it will spend at least €515 billion on American military equipment. It's unlikely the deal will go much beyond those sectors in terms of what the EU agrees to buy from the US. For example, it's not expected the EU will have to commit to allowing in and buying more US beef as part of the broader agreement. What are we still not sure about? Some important elements of this trade deal still have to be thrashed out, such as what it will mean for the EU's dairy and spirits sector. Dairy and especially spirits, make up a huge chunk of Ireland's near €2 billion in annual food and drink exports to the US, so from an Irish perspective clarity in this area will be crucial. Essentially, we don't know yet for example if Irish whiskey exports to America will be subject to a 15% tariff. If so, that will have significant financial implications for the many distilleries here that rely heavily on the US market. Some sectors are also calling for clarity on whether exports going from Northern Ireland (NI) to the US will be treated differently to Republic of Ireland (ROI) exports to the US. America and the UK agreed a trade deal in May that included a baseline 10% tariff on many goods exported to the US, and this agreement includes goods being exported from NI. However, the dairy industry has pointed out that it operates on an "all island basis" with integrated supply chains and cross-border trade in raw milk, ingredients, and finished products. It says that any divergence in tariff treatment between NI and ROI (for example 10% for NI and 15% for ROI) could create huge issues and added cost for processors and farmers. Who pays the tariff? This means American-based companies will have to pay an extra 15% in tax to the US government on any goods they buy from the EU. These companies can either choose to absorb some or all of the cost of this extra 15% themselves, get discounts from the EU supplier they are buying from to cover the increase, or add the cost onto the price of the product, which would mean US consumers end up paying more. Ultimately though, the Irish and EU companies selling into the US will likely take a hit with this deal. US firms buying their goods may look for discounted prices to cover the new tariff rate, while if their products end up being more expensive in US shops then sales could drop if American consumers decide they are too expensive. So, while EU companies will be impacted financially by the new tariffs, it's worth noting consumers here will not have to pay any more as a result. They would only need to start worrying about higher prices if the EU implemented reciprocal tariffs on US goods. But that's far more unlikely now we have a deal. Is this a good deal for Ireland and the EU? It depends on your perspective. Right away, it takes the threat of an escalating trade war off the table. This adds a degree of certainty for EU businesses that hasn't been there for months. While they were hoping for no tariffs, there was a lingering threat of 30% tariffs - which is now gone. And while there is now a 15% tariff, at least they can makes plans in a more stable economic environment. That's what proponents of the deal are brings much-needed certainty. There are obvious benefits for the bloc's carmakers. Before this agreement there was a 27.5% tariff on cars being exported from the EU to the US, which will drop by 12.5.%. The US has a €200 billion trade deficit with the EU (meaning America buys a lot more from the EU than the other way around). EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has accepted that deficit needs to be cut. "We have to rebalance it," she said. However, not everyone in the EU is happy. Eurosceptic Hungarian PM Viktor Orbán said: "Donald Trump ate Von der Leyen for breakfast." French minister for Europe Benjamin Haddad said the deal is "unbalanced". Critics such as Haddad point out the EU is accepting a 15% tariff, while not placing a tariff on US goods entering the single market, and hasn't leveraged the scale and power of the single market as much as it could have in negotiations. But the dealmakers in Brussels will say the EU had much more to lose if there was no deal, given how much the bloc sells to the US, and that it's worth making compromises to protect more than €1.6 trillion in EU-US trade every year. What happens next? Over the next few weeks, European Commission and American officials will flesh out the agreement made yesterday. This is when we'll get more specifics on the spirits sector and issues around NI/ROI exports to the US for example. Then EU member states will have to approve the deal, which could come into effect before the end of the summer.
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
‘We know how highly Palace think of him' - Dubliner hailed as loan move is done
Leyton Orient chiefs reckon Ireland Under-21 defender Tayo Adaramola's loan move to the League One side can be a stepping stone to first-team football at Premier League side Crystal Palace. Adaramola completed his season-long switch at the weekend, to the delight of the O's manager and director of football, and the player himself. Dubliner Adaramola, who featured for Palace in pre-season, has previously been on loan at Coventry City, Belgian side RWD Molenbeek, Stockport and Bradford, and has made almost 50 first-team appearances. That tally includes two FA Cup displays for Palace - against Hartlepool and Stoke - in 2022. Leyton Orient Director of Football Martin Ling said: 'Tayo has been someone we identified a while back as a player we would love to get in and join what we are building. 'He's athletic, quick, strong on the ball and offers us something different in that full-back role. He was a really important player for Bradford last season as they achieved promotion - and we've beaten a lot of clubs to secure his signature. 'We have used the loan market really well in recent years, and we hope that Tayo can be another example of that. 'We know how highly Crystal Palace think of him, and we're grateful that both they and Tayo have chosen us as the next step in his development.' Orient Head Coach Richie Wellens added: 'Tayo has had a few loans away from Palace now, and he comes here with real pedigree. In his first loan at Coventry, he showed the potential of what he's capable of. 'We played against him last year whilst he was at Stockport, and in the second half of the season, he had a superb loan at Bradford. 'He dealt with the pressure of Bradford's run-in excellently and, for me, he was one of their best performers. He's a proper athlete, gives us a huge amount of pace, and we think we can develop him. 'He's a different profile of full-back to what we already have, and I think he can add a lot to our squad.' As for the 21-year-old former St Kevin's and St Mochta's defender, Adaramola said: 'I'm excited and over the moon to be here. I can't wait to get going. 'I had a great time at Bradford last season, and I want to push on and achieve similar things here. I got my confidence back whilst playing there and it showed on the pitch.' Get the latest sports headlines straight to your inbox by signing up for free email .
