logo
Explained: What is the new 15% US-EU tariff deal and what does it cover?

Explained: What is the new 15% US-EU tariff deal and what does it cover?

US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday, July 27, announced a wide-ranging trade agreement that imposes a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports into the US. The deal, which was finalised during a brief meeting at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, averted the looming threat of a 30 per cent tariff that was set to take effect on August 1.
While the headline tariff rate is fixed at 15 per cent, many of the agreement's finer details are still unclear. The deal includes zero tariffs on select 'strategic goods' such as aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, some agricultural products, and critical raw materials. However, pharmaceuticals, steel, and some farm goods remain outside the scope of this agreement.
What is not included in the deal?
While the agreement removes immediate tariff threats, several issues remain unresolved. Trump confirmed that the existing 50 per cent US tariff on imported steel will stay in place. Talks will continue on setting steel import quotas and reducing overcapacity in the global market.
Pharmaceuticals were not included in this agreement. Von der Leyen clarified that those discussions are ongoing, separate from Sunday's deal. Tariffs on some EU agricultural products also remain unchanged, but with no clear indication of which items are excluded.
What impact will the agreement have?
The 15 per cent tariff is a significant increase from the pre-Trump average US tariff of about 1 per cent on European goods and above the 10 per cent baseline tariff applied during negotiations. For European exporters, the impact could be considerable as many companies will face the difficult choice of either passing the cost on to US consumers or absorbing losses.
The earlier 10 per cent tariff was already enough to prompt the European Commission to slash its growth forecast from 1.3 per cent to 0.9 per cent. Now, with 15 per cent, German industry leaders warn of 'immense negative effects' on export-reliant sectors.
Von der Leyen defended the deal, calling it 'the best we could do' and noting that it secures continued access to the US market and brings a degree of stability.
How are different sectors reacting, especially carmakers?
The car industry, which was gearing for a 30 per cent tariff, sees the 15 per cent rate as a relief. Von der Leyen pointed out that the new rate is significantly lower than the current 27.5 per cent tariff on cars from all countries — which includes Trump's 25 per cent tariff and the pre-existing 2.5 per cent US auto tariff.
Still, European automakers remain under pressure. Volkswagen revealed it had already lost $1.5 billion in profits in the first half of the year due to higher US tariffs. Mercedes-Benz, which produces a significant share of its US-sold vehicles in Alabama, said price hikes are likely for future model years.
What were the key issues dividing the two sides?
Before Trump's presidency, US-EU tariffs were relatively low. According to the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, the US averaged a 1.47 per cent tariff on European goods, while the EU imposed 1.35 per cent on American products, Associated Press reported.
Trump frequently criticised the $235 billion US merchandise trade deficit with the EU, calling the European market unfair — particularly in the automotive sector. However, the EU argues that the US enjoys a substantial surplus in services like cloud computing, travel, and financial services, which helps offset the imbalance.
Despite Trump's stance that the EU 'was formed to screw the United States', both sides have recognised the need to preserve their trading relationship. With $2 trillion in annual commerce, the US and EU form the world's largest bilateral trading bloc.
How did the deal come together?
The last-minute breakthrough came just days before the US deadline to impose new tariffs. Trump and von der Leyen held brief talks at Trump's golf resort in Scotland, joined by top EU trade officials.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the August 1 deadline was firm. 'No extensions, no more grace periods,' he said. Yet he said that Trump remained open to future dialogue.
The EU had prepared its own list of retaliatory tariffs targeting hundreds of US goods, including beef, auto parts, beer, and even Boeing aircraft. Without a deal, everything from French cheese to German electronics could have become more expensive for American consumers.
What are the concerns going forward?
While the agreement avoided an immediate trade war, analysts caution that the deal remains vague in parts. 'There is nothing on paper, yet,' said ING's global chief of macro Carsten Brzeski. He warned that the lack of formal documentation makes enforcement and interpretation difficult.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz praised the outcome for preserving 'core interests' but expressed disappointment that deeper tariff relief wasn't achieved.
(With agency inputs)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelenskiy thanks Europe for its support as Kyiv seeks place at table with Trump and Putin
Zelenskiy thanks Europe for its support as Kyiv seeks place at table with Trump and Putin

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Zelenskiy thanks Europe for its support as Kyiv seeks place at table with Trump and Putin

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads CAPTURED TERRITORY Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy thanked European leaders on Sunday for backing his demand for a seat at the table as Russia and the United States prepare for a summit this week where Kyiv fears they could seek to dictate terms to it for ending the 3-1/2-year war.U.S. President Donald Trump, who for weeks had been threatening new sanctions against Russia for failing to halt the conflict, announced instead last Friday that he would hold an August 15 summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.A White House official said on Saturday that Trump was open to Zelenskiy attending, but that preparations currently were for a bilateral meeting with Kremlin leader last week ruled out meeting Zelenskiy at this point, saying the conditions for such an encounter were "unfortunately still far" from being said a potential deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both (sides)", a statement that compounded Ukrainian alarm that it may face pressure to surrender more says any decisions taken without Ukraine will be "stillborn" and unworkable. On Saturday the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said in a joint statement that any diplomatic solution must protect the vital security interests of Ukraine and Europe."The path to peace cannot be decided without Ukraine," they said, demanding "robust and credible security guarantees" to allow Ukraine to defend its sovereignty and territorial said on Sunday: "The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations."A European official said Europe had come up with a counter-proposal to Trump's, but declined to provide details. Russian officials accused Europe of trying to thwart Trump's efforts to end the war."The Euro-imbeciles are trying to prevent American efforts to help resolve the Ukrainian conflict," former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev posted on social media on Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a vituperative statement that the relationship between Ukraine and the European Union resembled "necrophilia".Roman Alekhin, a Russian war blogger, said Europe had been reduced to the role of a spectator."If Putin and Trump reach an agreement directly, Europe will be faced with a fait accompli. Kyiv - even more so," he details of the proposed territorial swap that Trump alluded to have been officially which mounted a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, holds about a fifth of the country and has claimed the regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia as its own, although it controls only about 70% of the last has also taken pockets of territory in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions and said in recent weeks it has captured villages in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine says it holds a sliver of the Kursk region in western Markov, a pro-Kremlin analyst, said a swap could entail Russia handing over 1,500 sq km to Ukraine and obtaining 7,000 sq km, which he said Russia would capture anyway within about six provided no evidence to back any of those figures. Russia took only about 500 sq km of territory in July, according to Western military analysts who say its grinding advances have come at the cost of very high and its European allies have been haunted for months by the fear that Trump, keen to claim credit for making peace and hoping to seal lucrative joint business deals between the U.S. and Russia, could align with Putin to cut a deal that would be deeply disadvantageous to had drawn some encouragement lately as Trump, having piled heavy pressure on Zelenskiy and berated him publicly in the Oval Office in February, began criticising Putin and expressing disgust as Russia pounded Kyiv and other cities with its heaviest air attacks of the the impending Putin-Trump summit, agreed during a trip to Moscow by Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff last week, has revived fears that Kyiv and Europe could be sidelined."What we will see emerge from Alaska will almost certainly be a catastrophe for Ukraine and Europe," wrote Phillips P. O'Brien, professor of strategic studies at the University of St Andrews in Scotland."And Ukraine will face the most terrible dilemma. Do they accept this humiliating and destructive deal? Or do they go it alone, unsure of the backing of European states?"

Sushmita Sen Celebrates Mom's Birthday With Heartfelt Instagram Post
Sushmita Sen Celebrates Mom's Birthday With Heartfelt Instagram Post

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Sushmita Sen Celebrates Mom's Birthday With Heartfelt Instagram Post

Trump's Big New Announcement On India After PM Modi's Attack On U.S. Tariffs; 'No Relief Until...' US President Donald Trump has announced a halt to trade negotiations with India until a tariff dispute is resolved. The US has doubled tariffs on Indian imports to 50%, citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. An Executive Order outlines the new levies and allows flexibility for future adjustments. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi responded firmly, stating India will not compromise on the interests of its farmers and rural economy. The move escalates tensions between the two nations as global trade and geopolitical dynamics continue to shift. 215.6K views | 2 days ago

Rolling back Roe: How Trump uses the federal courts to bypass political backlash on abortion
Rolling back Roe: How Trump uses the federal courts to bypass political backlash on abortion

First Post

time30 minutes ago

  • First Post

Rolling back Roe: How Trump uses the federal courts to bypass political backlash on abortion

One called abortion a 'barbaric practice.' Another referred to himself as a 'zealot' for the antiabortion movement. Several have played prominent roles in defending their state's abortion restrictions in court and in cases that have had national impact, including on access to medication abortion. read more As President Donald Trump advances his federal judicial nominees through the Senate, a clear pattern is emerging: many appointees hold strong anti-abortion views and have actively defended restrictive abortion laws. This strategy allows the Trump administration to reshape abortion access in the United States through the judiciary, sidestepping the political and public backlash that might accompany direct legislative or executive actions. Nearly half of Trump's 17 judicial nominees in his second term have taken public stances against abortion rights, participated in high-profile legal battles to uphold state restrictions, or are affiliated with conservative anti-abortion groups, a recent AP review found. These lifetime federal appointments promise to influence abortion access long after Trump leaves office, subtly embedding a federal rollback of abortion rights under the guise of state-level decision-making. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bernadette Meyler, a constitutional law expert at Stanford University, explains this judicial nomination strategy as a 'federal shaping' of abortion policy without the drama and visibility of legislation. 'It's a way to cover up a little bit what is happening in the abortion sphere compared to legislation or executive orders that may be more visible, dramatic and spark more backlash,' she said. Despite Trump's public statements favouring state control over abortion laws, the judicial nominees reveal a coordinated federal effort to restrict abortion access nationwide. None of the nominees have records supporting expanded abortion rights, and most hail from states that supported Trump in 2024 and where Republican legislatures have aggressively limited abortion access. Among the most notable nominees: Whitney Hermandorfer, confirmed to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has challenged federal protections for abortion and transgender rights and defended Tennessee's strict abortion ban. She argued abortion deserves 'special scrutiny' as it 'terminates a life.' Maria Lanahan, nominated for a Missouri district court, helped draft lawsuits targeting FDA approval of the abortion pill mifepristone and defended state efforts to cut Planned Parenthood's Medicaid funding. Jordan Pratt, a Florida district court nominee, described abortion as a 'barbaric practice' and supported Florida's bans, including laws now prohibiting abortion as early as six weeks. Joshua Divine, Missouri's deputy solicitor general and a nominee for district judge, co-authored litigation falsely claiming medication abortion 'starves the baby to death,' and has defended abortion restrictions despite a 2024 Missouri ballot amendment protecting abortion rights. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Other nominees have similarly played key roles defending restrictive abortion laws in Kentucky, Montana, and Florida, among others. The White House, in defending these nominees, cites alignment with the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade and emphasises states' rights and the 'sanctity of human life.' Anti-abortion organisations have praised the nominees as fulfilling campaign promises, while abortion rights advocates warn that the administration is systematically embedding anti-abortion ideologues into the federal judiciary, undermining decades of legal protections. Mini Timmaraju, president of Reproductive Freedom for All, said, 'This is a deliberate strategy to dismantle abortion access quietly through the courts, while publicly claiming to defer to states. It threatens to close off legal avenues that advocates have relied on to challenge harsh abortion bans.' As the Trump administration continues to nominate judges, the federal courts are becoming the primary battleground for the future of abortion rights in America—shaping access not through popular debate or elected representatives, but through lifetime judicial appointments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store