Texas Couple Adopt Twins but There's a Double Surprise: 'So Beautiful'
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A couple from Texas always wanted a growing family, but what they didn't expect was that their journey would include not just one—but two—sets of twins.
Baylee and Caleb Cypress, 29 and 32, first adopted twins when their eldest daughter was not yet 2 years old.
Their decision, Baylee said, was rooted in faith. "In scripture, we see that Jesus consistently runs after the marginalized. He values orphans and widows," she told Newsweek.
Parents Baylee and Caleb Cypress pictured playing with part of their family: three daughters and one son.
Parents Baylee and Caleb Cypress pictured playing with part of their family: three daughters and one son.
@bayleecypress
She continued,: "As people who were ourselves adopted into the family of God by no merit of our own, why wouldn't we also value the vulnerable just as he does?"
When the birth mother—who was a family friend—faced a desperate situation, Baylee and Caleb stepped in.
"She was already 27 weeks pregnant, and our oldest was about 20 months at that time," Baylee said. "It was a big decision … plus we knew the legal side would cost money we didn't have … [but] we knew that God would meet us in our need as he always had, so there really was no legitimate reason to say no."
The twins were born eight weeks later. With help from a church-led garage sale and the generosity of their community, the couple raised the funds for the adoption.
"We're so thankful we didn't take the easy path," Baylee said. "Our lives have been richly blessed with them—and their birth family—in it."
But just as the couple was settling into life with three little ones, another surprise rocked their world. Baylee found out she was pregnant—with twins again.
"We laughed, because what else can you do?" she said. "We had just found out I was pregnant and ended up in the emergency room, thinking I was miscarrying.
"We'd just begun wrapping our heads around one more baby, so now knowing there were another set of twins coming, which would mean five under 3 years old, was just too wild not to laugh at."
The early days, Baylee said, were "pure survival mode." The adopted twins were only 11 months old when the newborn twins arrived, and neither was walking yet.
Thankfully, the parents had a lot of extra help.
Baylee said: "My parents and grandmother were coming over consistently, and my dad generously hired my cousin to come help me part of the day while Caleb was at work. Once we got into a good rhythm, it was more manageable … but you definitely learn to let go of expectations and roll with the punches."
And just when life began to feel more settled, Baylee discovered she was pregnant again.
In a post on Instagram, Baylee (@bayleecypress) and Caleb shared a series of photos of their growing clan.
Many users congratulated the couple and called the shots "so beautiful."
In a separate reel caption, Baylee wrote: "We're equally insane and terrible at family planning but we love it."
"We weren't sure we were done having kids, but we knew we wanted to wait a few years," Baylee said. "That's why I made the comment that we're terrible at family planning. I guess my ovulation tracker was a little off."
Still, with a 5-year-old daughter, 3-year-old twins (a girl and boy), 2-year-old twin girls and a another baby on the way, Baylee said she wouldn't have it any other way. "We probably look a little crazy—and maybe irresponsible—to most, but we love having a big family," she added.
"It's wild and chaotic, but we have a lot of fun, and our kids are the sweetest friends. We know there will be seasons of hard, but it's so worth it."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Tears As Spouse Reveals What They Found in Husband's Old Yearbooks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A spouse uncovered their husband's old school yearbooks and left internet users teary-eyed after sharing what they found inside. The Reddit user, u/mshappy, posted about the discovery in the subreddit r/Wellthatsucks, where the entry quickly gained attention, racking up more than 35,000 upvotes. "I just noticed my husband didn't get one yearbook signature from middle to high school," the poster wrote, alongside photos of the blank pages. The Tradition of Yearbooks Yearbooks have long been a staple of school life in the United States, with their origins dating back to the 1800s, according to My Social Book. What began as keepsakes filled with sketches, signatures, and notes from classmates gradually evolved into professionally printed volumes showcasing portraits, class photos, and snapshots of student life. Over time, signing each other's yearbooks became a rite of passage—a way for students to capture friendships and memories before moving on to the next stage of life. For many, yearbooks serve as a tangible piece of nostalgia. But for others, like u/mshappy's husband, they can also be a quiet reminder of experiences that didn't match the typical "social" narrative. Stock image: An over-the-shoulder shot of someone signing a yearbook. Stock image: An over-the-shoulder shot of someone signing a yearbook. itchySan/iStock / Getty Images Plus Reddit Reacts The post struck a chord with thousands of users, sparking a mix of empathy, reflection, and humor. "In middle school, our yearbooks were handed out on the last day. We then got time to meet up and have them signed. In high school, they distributed the yearbooks in October for the previous year. It always felt weird to me to get them signed at that point. We were back in school and seeing everyone on a regular basis and it was from the previous school year," one person wrote. Another reminisced about their class's unique approach: "Lol [laugh out loud] we had space in books. Our grade did tshirts tho. We had everyone sign our shirts. My mother then eventually used it as a rag and was oblivious 'oh i didn't know you wanted to save this'." Others shared how circumstances disrupted the tradition: "I was in Los Angeles, and there was an earthquake that prevented our yearbooks from getting out on time. We had to come in after school was out for the summer to pick them up." While many felt sad at the sight of empty pages, others offered reassurance that not signing a yearbook doesn't necessarily mean someone lacked friends. "I assume he is doing OK. I have some friends who were like this, never understood why they didn't want a pic in the yearbook or signatures, but they had healthy social lives. Sometimes introverts are just a mystery," commented one user. To this, the original poster replied: "He's doing OK! We're both extremely introverted so we mostly stay home but we're happy." That struck a chord with fellow introverts, with one adding: "I look at the lives of social people and it looks like hell. I cannot imagine enjoying any part of that." Others admitted that yearbooks simply weren't a priority for them at all. "Some people just aren't into that type of thing," one person suggested. "I don't even think I cared to pay for a yearbook. If I did, it's literally nowhere to be found," another posted. "I'm in my 30s now. I think my parents have it somewhere at their house. I couldn't care less about it," commented a third. Newsweek reached out to u/mshappy for comment via Reddit. We could not verify the details of the case. Newsweek's "What Should I Do?" offers expert advice to readers. If you have a personal dilemma, let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice on relationships, family, friends, money and work, and your story could be featured on "WSID" at Newsweek.
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Fury at Neighbors Who Complain of 'Male Voices' in Agoraphobic Man's Home
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A man living with agoraphobia is facing an untenable situation with his neighbors. In a Reddit post, he shared that they have been complaining about the presence of his friend—a man who comes over daily to support him. The poster took to Reddit to share his frustration, with a screenshot of a text message from the neighbors complaining about "male talking sounds" disturbing their lives and asking if his friend was "staying indefinitely." Newsweek spoke to Victoria De Paula, a certified couples and trauma therapist, about the situation and what the poster can do next. Stock photo: A couple react to noise from a neighboring apartment. Stock photo: A couple react to noise from a neighboring poster said that, since suffering an "extreme mental breakdown" in January, he has been agoraphobic, and his friend has been helping him as he tries to heal. He told his neighbors that the previous quiet was because he "was literally by myself, but now I have someone here with me and we watch TV together and have conversations." Despite the man's attempts to be accommodating, the complaints have persisted. "We are quite confused, as it's not like we are playing loud music or shouting or anything—literally just relaxing on my couch and talking a little at a normal volume," he wrote. The man, a self-described considerate person, said he feels a mix of frustration and guilt. "This situation is making me feel guilty for laughing at jokes or just enjoying myself—which is the opposite of what I need right now," he added. The Internet Weighs In The Reddit community was quick to express outrage and solidarity with the poster. Many pointed out the unrealistic expectations of living in a shared building. "If you cannot deal with noise from neighbors, then buy a stand-alone home where you don't share any walls with a neighbor," one person wrote. "If you live in a building, there will be noise. Deal with it." The nature of the neighbors' questions also raised suspicion. A commenter asked: "Is this the landlord? They have literally zero right to any information about your guests. You are allowed to use the apartment you pay for." The poster replied that both he and his neighbors own their apartments, making the complaint even more unsettling. An Expert's Perspective De Paula provided professional insight for Newsweek into the situation, explaining that the conflict is more about psychology than noise. "Conflicts between neighbors are often fraught because the perception of a threat to one's environment … can cause a kind of fight-or-flight anxiety response where people react from a defensive position," De Paula said. For someone already dealing with mental-health challenges like the poster, this type of complaint can be especially damaging. De Paula said these complaints "can amplify feelings of anxiety and depression," and leave a person feeling stressed and guilty. De Paula's advice to the poster was to introspect but then set firm boundaries. "It is important that the poster maintain their right to have friends over at their apartment and have conversations as long as those are had at a reasonable volume and aren't happening late at night," De Paula said. She also suggested a face-to-face conversation to foster "more space for human connection." In a poignant piece of advice, De Paula added that the man should use this noise complaint situation as an opportunity for his own healing. "Perhaps the poster and their friend can occasionally leave the apartment together to take a walk and get tea, or sit and talk in a nearby park," De Paula said, adding that a small act of bravery could lead to greater progress in his recovery. Newsweek reached out to u/thegoosenell for comment via Reddit.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
US Army Paratroopers to See Major Pay Change
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Army is restructuring its airborne forces, leading to pay changes for thousands of parachutist positions. According to a report from the American military newspaper Stars and Stripes, an administrative message delivered to service members on July 30 announced that more than 22,000 paratroopers will no longer receive their monthly $150 "jump pay." This is due to reclassifications of paid parachutist positions which will take effect in the upcoming fiscal year. The reduced number which will remain eligible for the payments will comprise those deemed more likely to deploy these capabilities in combat operations in the foreseeable future, Newsweek understands. When approached for comment, U.S. Army Spokesman Major Travis Shaw told Newsweek: "The decision resulted from a 16-week study, which concluded that transformation was needed because the previous structure exceeded the operational requirements." Why It Matters The removal of jump pay for more than 22,000 parachutists—a significant portion of the roughly 50,000 the army keeps on its rolls—signals a major shift in its priorities, emphasizing the need for combat readiness and resource management over the maintenance of a large and permanent airborne force. What To Know Jump pay—also known as Parachute Duty Pay—is an extra monthly bonus awarded to soldiers who are parachute-qualified and actively serving in airborne roles. The upcoming change will allow soldiers to attain their parachuting qualifications but will not require them to keep these up to date or take part in jump operations. Soldiers are generally required to jump once every three months to maintain jump status, a baseline considered inadequate among Army leadership for achieving proficiency. This change was discussed earlier this year. Lieutenant General Gregory Anderson, head of the 18th Airborne Corps, told Army Times in April that dozens of branches had been discussing how to improve the readiness of airborne operations since September. "We started to assume risk with the high-end forces that have to be ready to go tonight," Anderson told the outlet. "This is not about saving money; it's about getting readiness to where we need it." Paratroopers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade of the US Army in Europe take part in the military exercise Swift Response 2025 at the military base in Rukla, Lithuania, on May 16, 2025. Paratroopers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade of the US Army in Europe take part in the military exercise Swift Response 2025 at the military base in Rukla, Lithuania, on May 16, 2025. AFP via Getty Images/Petras Malukas Anderson added that limited aircraft had led to a broad "decline in collective airborne proficiency," and that devoting resources to over 50,000 airborne positions had reduced the readiness of assault forces. "We're trying to prop up a very big structure of 56,000 with dwindling resources, we're spreading those resources out, and we're undermining our own readiness goals," Anderson said during a podcast appearance in April. He added that many of those currently receiving jump pay are not currently meeting their "proficiency requirements." Major Shaw told Newsweek that removing 22,000 from paid active jump status "will refocus training and resources on critical forces to strengthen operational effectiveness." Soldiers who remain eligible will see an increase in this extra monthly allowance, as announced by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in May, with jump pay is set to increase from $150 per month to $200 for paratroopers. In addition, jumpmasters, who are responsible for training and leading airborne operations, "are going to receive an additional $150 a month in incentive pay," Hegseth told the audience of current and active members of the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Major Shaw told Newsweek that this will mean jumpmasters will be paid an additional $350 per month for these duties, and that this pay bump is in recognition of "the essential role of jumpmasters in developing combat-ready forces." What People Are Saying Lieutenant General Gregory Anderson, during an episode of the From the Green Notebook podcast, said: "Here's the big change: we're going to reduce the number of paid parachuter positions by 22,000. So currently, as of today, we have 56,000 paid parachuter positions in the Army. For historical context, the 101st and the 82nd at Normandy dropped fewer than 13,000 into Normandy." "It's not about the money per se, it's literally about—for the forces that will jump in the alpha echelon and fight off a potentially contested drop zone—we want them at the highest level of readiness," he added. "And three jumps … is not going to get us the readiness we need." One Redditor on the r/army forum, a community for current and former recruits as well as enthusiasts, wrote: "Even as someone who was Airborne I think this makes sense. The Army was paying over 20,000 people to be on jump status who realistically weren't going to be used as such. By having them still be Airborne qualified though they can quickly recreate Airborne units by having them go through refresher training if they ever needed. Sounds like they aren't going to save all that money though because they are going to boost the pay for the remaining Airborne troops and jumpmasters." What Happens Next? The changes are set to take effect in the 2026 fiscal year which begins October 1.
