logo
Green energy group pulls out of climate summit over council planning delays

Green energy group pulls out of climate summit over council planning delays

Yahoo14 hours ago

A pioneering eco-initiative aiming to deliver low-cost energy and affordable food to Wiltshire communities has pulled out of the county's upcoming Climate and Environment Summit in protest over prolonged planning delays.
Sustain Wiltshire, which hopes to transform a landfill site on Brinkworth Road, Royal Wootton Bassett, into a waste-powered hub producing heat, electricity and crops, said on Wednesday it would not attend the Wiltshire Council-run summit scheduled for Thursday and Friday, June 20–21.
The decision follows what the group described as nearly a year of frustrating hold-ups by the council in determining planning permission for the project, known as the Super-Midden.
READ MORE: All UK passport holders told to take action 'today' amid travel warning
READ MORE: Glastonbury fans think one act could replace Rod Stewart amid health concerns
The application was submitted in July 2024. Since then, the organisation says it received validation only in February following a six-month wait, with just two site visits taking place in early summer.
Despite being told a decision would be made on June 11, Sustain Wiltshire said that instead, the council posed 31 new questions and revealed that a failure to consult National Highways had triggered a last-minute objection from the agency.
With the planning team now saying it will need at least 16 weeks to review the responses and possibly a further six months to address National Highways' concerns, Sustain Wiltshire said it could not, in good conscience, support the summit while its flagship project remained 'in doubt'.
Nick Ash, director of both Sustain Wiltshire and Crapper and Sons Landfill Ltd, said: 'From our public consultations in 2023 through to last week we had not received a single voice of opposition to the Super-Midden. It is widely regarded as a progressive and innovative solution to the issue of landfill which is capable of removing over 3,800 tonnes of CO2 per year, at the same time as generating sufficient heat and energy to produce affordable fruit and vegetables to meet 80% of the needs of Royal Wootton Bassett, Malmesbury, Purton and Brinkworth.
'Now, at five minutes to midnight, we are faced with further questions, most of which have been addressed in our previous submissions, and a formal objection from the National Highways that could have been addressed months ago if the planning team at Wiltshire Council had done their job.
'That is why we have taken the decision to withdraw from Wiltshire Council's Climate and Environment Summit, where we were due to take part in the Circular Resources panel session focusing on 'Promoting a Low-Waste Culture and Local Share Economy.'
'Sadly, we see no way of being able to participate in an event run by a council that appears to be blocking the very innovations and initiatives that they are looking to celebrate at their summit. By taking this action and boycotting the event by mutual agreement – rather than raising these issues at the conference – we hope to draw attention to the damage being caused by outdated bureaucracy; without detracting from the important messages being addressed at the summit.'
Nick added that the group is urging Wiltshire Council to fast-track the application, warning that if not, it will appeal to the Planning Directorate for non-determination and consider legal action for compensation.
Responding to the decision, councillor Paul Sample JP, cabinet member for environment, climate and waste, said: 'We are disappointed to learn of Sustain Wiltshire's decision to not attend the Climate and Environment Summit this weekend. It is a shame that they do not wish to engage in the event which is completely separate to the planning process and will celebrate businesses working towards carbon neutrality and share best practice and approaches to accelerate their progress towards net zero.
'It would be inappropriate to comment on an ongoing planning application, but the council has a duty to assess the submitted proposals and take into account comments received from internal and external consultees. The council remains keen to work positively with Sustain Wiltshire to resolve the outstanding issues.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sunrun Stock (RUN) Plummets 40% as U.S. Senate Targets Solar Credits
Sunrun Stock (RUN) Plummets 40% as U.S. Senate Targets Solar Credits

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sunrun Stock (RUN) Plummets 40% as U.S. Senate Targets Solar Credits

The solar sector is reeling after the release of the Senate Finance Committee's proposed tax-and-spending bill, which targets renewable energy sources. Sunrun (RUN), a major player in residential solar, was particularly vulnerable to the news, shedding almost 40% of its valuation in the past week. Having traded as high as $13.20 per share in late May, the stock is now languishing at ~$6 following this week's news. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter In my view, the proposed incentive cuts pose a significant threat to Sunrun's viability, particularly given its ongoing inability to generate profits despite these benefits being in place. Without that financial support, a turnaround seems even less likely, leaving me firmly bearish on the stock. For those unfamiliar, Sunrun primarily operates under a third-party ownership (TPO) model. Instead of homeowners purchasing solar systems outright, Sunrun installs and owns the panels, allowing customers to either lease the system for a monthly fee or pay for the electricity it generates at a fixed rate. This model has gained popularity because it enables homeowners to adopt solar with little to no upfront cost. Thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which extended and enhanced the federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC), Sunrun, as the system owner, can claim a tax credit typically worth 30% of the system's cost. This significantly lowers installation expenses and enables Sunrun to pass those savings on to customers, making the model more financially appealing. The Senate Finance Committee has recently proposed eliminating solar tax credits in favor of supporting other energy sectors, such as geothermal, nuclear, and hydropower. If passed, this legislation would require Sunrun to absorb the full cost of its solar systems, which would inevitably be passed on to customers. The result would be a significant squeeze on margins and an acceleration of the company's ongoing cash burn. Senate Republicans are reportedly aiming to pass the bill before the July 4th holiday. Upon closer examination, this appears to mark a broader shift in U.S. energy policy away from residential solar and wind. The market has already begun to react, with notable declines in Sunrun's peers, including Enphase Energy (ENPH) and SolarEdge Technologies (SEDG), underscoring the potential sector-wide impact. There's still hope for solar advocates. The proposed bill faces strong resistance from Democrats, particularly from the original architects of the clean energy tax credits included in the Inflation Reduction Act. The clean energy industry is also mounting an aggressive lobbying effort, warning of potential job losses and higher energy costs. And while the bill is led by the GOP, not all Republicans are aligned in support. The legislation still has a long way to go. It narrowly passed the House in May with a 215–214 vote, and the Senate draft was just introduced on June 16. While the Senate version includes more extended phase-out periods for some clean energy incentives, it still calls for the elimination of Section 48E credits, which are key to residential solar leases. A Senate vote is expected soon, and if proponents can secure a simple majority, the bill could advance to President Trump's desk. For context, the current Senate makeup is 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats, and two Independents. In the near term, Sunrun could experience a temporary boost in demand as customers rush to take advantage of tax credits before they're phased out. However, expectations for 2026 and beyond point to a sharp and sustained decline in demand. A closer look at Sunrun's financials reveals troubling signs. The company has consistently reported negative operating cash flow, with a loss of over $100 million in Q1 2025 and nearly $800 million in total for 2024, highlighting the financial pressure it faces even before potential incentive cuts take effect. Meanwhile, Sunrun, in its pursuit of growth opportunities, is becoming increasingly leveraged, increasing its risk profile should things take a turn for the worse. Moving forward, ongoing tariff pressures and the disappearance of incentive credits spell long-term trouble for solar installers. Analyst sentiment on Sunrun (RUN) stock is mixed. The stock carries a consensus Hold rating, based on seven Buy, six Hold, and four Sell ratings over the past three months. Despite the cautious stance, RUN's average price target of $10.44 suggests significant upside potential—about 70% from current levels. Mizuho analyst Maheep Mandloi has a Buy (Outperform) rating on RUN with a price target of $16. He notes that the House's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' won't derail grandfathered credits until 2028. He also believes that demand for renewable energy will remain high without government incentives because it is 'still the cheapest option.' However, not everyone shares Mandloi's bullish outlook. Jefferies analyst Julien Dumoulin Smith downgraded RUN to Sell (Underperform) with a price target of $5. Due to the same legislation, Smith notes that Sunrun is exposed to 'both near- and long-term headwinds.' He believes that the market is underestimating 'how consequential the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' is uniquely on residential solar.' The so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' poses a major threat to solar companies like Sunrun. The company's growth has heavily relied on tax credits tied to third-party ownership (TPO) systems. Even with those incentives, Sunrun has struggled to achieve consistent profitability. Without them, serious doubts emerge about its ability to maintain its current business model. If the bill passes, Sunrun—and others in the space—will likely be forced to pivot toward new strategies or market segments. That said, the bill could still fail, or be amended in ways that lessen the impact on Sunrun. Additionally, the proposed phase-out period provides a window for the company to adjust. From my perspective, I'd prefer to stay on the sidelines until there is more regulatory clarity. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Green energy group pulls out of climate summit over council planning delays
Green energy group pulls out of climate summit over council planning delays

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Green energy group pulls out of climate summit over council planning delays

A pioneering eco-initiative aiming to deliver low-cost energy and affordable food to Wiltshire communities has pulled out of the county's upcoming Climate and Environment Summit in protest over prolonged planning delays. Sustain Wiltshire, which hopes to transform a landfill site on Brinkworth Road, Royal Wootton Bassett, into a waste-powered hub producing heat, electricity and crops, said on Wednesday it would not attend the Wiltshire Council-run summit scheduled for Thursday and Friday, June 20–21. The decision follows what the group described as nearly a year of frustrating hold-ups by the council in determining planning permission for the project, known as the Super-Midden. READ MORE: All UK passport holders told to take action 'today' amid travel warning READ MORE: Glastonbury fans think one act could replace Rod Stewart amid health concerns The application was submitted in July 2024. Since then, the organisation says it received validation only in February following a six-month wait, with just two site visits taking place in early summer. Despite being told a decision would be made on June 11, Sustain Wiltshire said that instead, the council posed 31 new questions and revealed that a failure to consult National Highways had triggered a last-minute objection from the agency. With the planning team now saying it will need at least 16 weeks to review the responses and possibly a further six months to address National Highways' concerns, Sustain Wiltshire said it could not, in good conscience, support the summit while its flagship project remained 'in doubt'. Nick Ash, director of both Sustain Wiltshire and Crapper and Sons Landfill Ltd, said: 'From our public consultations in 2023 through to last week we had not received a single voice of opposition to the Super-Midden. It is widely regarded as a progressive and innovative solution to the issue of landfill which is capable of removing over 3,800 tonnes of CO2 per year, at the same time as generating sufficient heat and energy to produce affordable fruit and vegetables to meet 80% of the needs of Royal Wootton Bassett, Malmesbury, Purton and Brinkworth. 'Now, at five minutes to midnight, we are faced with further questions, most of which have been addressed in our previous submissions, and a formal objection from the National Highways that could have been addressed months ago if the planning team at Wiltshire Council had done their job. 'That is why we have taken the decision to withdraw from Wiltshire Council's Climate and Environment Summit, where we were due to take part in the Circular Resources panel session focusing on 'Promoting a Low-Waste Culture and Local Share Economy.' 'Sadly, we see no way of being able to participate in an event run by a council that appears to be blocking the very innovations and initiatives that they are looking to celebrate at their summit. By taking this action and boycotting the event by mutual agreement – rather than raising these issues at the conference – we hope to draw attention to the damage being caused by outdated bureaucracy; without detracting from the important messages being addressed at the summit.' Nick added that the group is urging Wiltshire Council to fast-track the application, warning that if not, it will appeal to the Planning Directorate for non-determination and consider legal action for compensation. Responding to the decision, councillor Paul Sample JP, cabinet member for environment, climate and waste, said: 'We are disappointed to learn of Sustain Wiltshire's decision to not attend the Climate and Environment Summit this weekend. It is a shame that they do not wish to engage in the event which is completely separate to the planning process and will celebrate businesses working towards carbon neutrality and share best practice and approaches to accelerate their progress towards net zero. 'It would be inappropriate to comment on an ongoing planning application, but the council has a duty to assess the submitted proposals and take into account comments received from internal and external consultees. The council remains keen to work positively with Sustain Wiltshire to resolve the outstanding issues.'

The Latest: Trump weighing moves against Iran and widens use of military in US
The Latest: Trump weighing moves against Iran and widens use of military in US

San Francisco Chronicle​

time14 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

The Latest: Trump weighing moves against Iran and widens use of military in US

An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids while California's legal challenge continues. The court case could have wider implications as the president vows to expand deployments within the United States while prioritizing deportations from other Democratic-run cities. 'The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom said. 'The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens.' Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told senators the Pentagon is providing options as Trump gave himself a two-week deadline to decide whether to order direct U.S. involvement against Iran, which could risk dragging America into a wider war in the Middle East. The president's press secretary offered the deadline Thursday, saying there is a 'substantial chance' for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program. 11 a.m. — Trump will attend a national security meeting 2 p.m. — He'll travel to Bedminster, NJ 7:30 p.m. — Trump will attend a dinner for the super PAC MAGA Inc. at his golf course Trump extended TikTok ban deadline for a third time, without clear legal basis Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the U.S. for an additional 90 days, giving his administration more time to broker a deal that would bring the social media platform under American ownership. Trump disclosed the executive order on the Truth Social platform Thursday morning. The first extension was through an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court — took effect. The second was in April when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with U.S. ownership that fell apart after China backed out following Trump's tariff announcement. It is not clear how many times Trump can — or will — keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges to fight them. Top Senate Democrats 'deeply concerned' over escalating tensions with Iran Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and the top Democrats on several key committees said in a joint statement Wednesday evening that they are 'deeply concerned about a lack of preparation, strategy, and clearly defined objectives' amid uncertainty about whether President Trump will decide to strike Iran. The Democrats say Trump should seek authorization from Congress if he is 'considering taking the country to war.' They urged Trump to 'prioritize diplomacy and pursue a binding agreement that can prevent a nuclear-armed Iran and reduce the risk to our diplomats, our service members, and the hundreds of thousands of Americans living in the Middle East.' Senior European diplomats are set to hold nuclear talks with Iran in Geneva on Friday Senior European diplomats are set to hold nuclear talks with Iran in Geneva on Friday, according to a European official familiar with the matter. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly, said the high-ranking diplomats from Germany, France and the United Kingdom as well as the European Union's top diplomat will gather for the meeting in Switzerland.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store