
What is the debt ceiling? Here's what's at stake as deadline looms.
What is the debt ceiling? Here's what's at stake as deadline looms.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Bessent says US will 'never default' and will raise debt ceiling
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said they are unclear still of the looming X date, when the U.S. would breach the debt ceiling.
In 2023, a stalemate between then-President Joe Biden and congressional Republicans over the debt ceiling prompted panic among financial analysts and everyday Americans alike. The deal they struck, called the "Fiscal Responsibility Act," capped annual discretionary spending for two years. It also pushed the next action on the federal debt ceiling until after the 2024 presidential election.
Now, that deal has expired. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warns that the federal government will hit the debt ceiling sometime in August, unless Congress acts to raise it. President Trump favors lifting the cap.
Here's what to know about the debt ceiling, why it gets raised, and what happens if we default:
What is the debt ceiling?
The debt ceiling is the limit placed by Congress on the amount of debt the government can accrue. In order to pay its bills to those it borrowed from and dole out money for everything from Medicare benefits to military salaries, the government needs more money, so the debt ceiling has to be raised.
Created in 1917, the legislative cap has to be raised by a majority vote in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. That vote does not pledge any additional spending. It merely raises the limit on the amount of money the government can borrow to pay back commitments already agreed upon by Congress.
However, over the years both parties have tied it to government spending and used the debt ceiling as a cudgel to force the hand of the president.
Republicans, who have a majority in the House, wanted to cut government spending and refused at first to raise the debt ceiling until Biden and Democrats agreed to spending reductions. Biden and Senate Democrats, however, argued that any debate about government spending should be separate from a vote on raising the debt ceiling.
When is the debt ceiling deadline?
The last debt limit suspension ended on Jan. 1, 2025. The agreement allowed a few extra months for the Treasury Department to use 'extraordinary measures' to pay the bills, NBC reported.
What happens if the debt ceiling is reached?
The U.S. did reach the debt ceiling, in late January of 2023. Following that, then-Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said 'extraordinary measures' were taken so the country could pay its bills and avoid default as the two parties battled it out. A default would occur if the U.S. failed to pay bondholders who have lent money to the government.
What happens if the government defaults on the debt?
The United States has never defaulted on its debts. That's part of why U.S. Treasury bonds are viewed as a safe investment and used by some banks as a backstop to counteract risky investments. A default would throw both the domestic and global economies into chaos.
The U.S. Treasury website warns that a default on the debt 'would precipitate another financial crisis and threaten the jobs and savings of everyday Americans.'
In 2013, when the government careened toward default before raising the debt limit at the last minute, the economy lost 1% of GDP.
When was the last time the debt ceiling was raised?
The ceiling is routinely raised to accommodate repayment of the country's debt. The last time it was raised was in 2021. The debt ceiling was suspended in June 2023 and reinstated in January 2025. Where raising the debt limit sets a specific cap, a suspension declines to set a dollar amount.
Days before a looming debt ceiling default in 2023, Biden and then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy struck a deal to suspend the debt ceiling limit in exchange for caps on future spending and other demands from the GOP.
While it has become increasingly politicized, for years it was viewed more as a bureaucratic government business than a mechanism for policy change.
In 2011, then-President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress reached a stalemate, but they agreed on a deal to raise the ceiling just two days before the Treasury would have run out of money.
What does the 14th Amendment have to do with the debt ceiling?
As fear grew in 2023 over the failure to reach a deal on raising the debt ceiling, the White House was said to be considering an option of last resort: an untested legal theory that involves invoking the 14th Amendment.
After a meeting with congressional leaders on May 9, 2023, then-President Biden told reporters he had not ruled it out as an option.
The 14th Amendment deals mainly with equal protections granted to citizens under the law. However, the fourth section reads: "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."
Some legal scholars believed Biden could draw upon this clause to claim that he had the power to authorize the Treasury to repay U.S. debts even if Congress does not raise the ceiling. The move, considered but ruled out by the Obama administration, would likely have gotten caught up in the courts.
How many countries have a debt ceiling?
Denmark also has a debt ceiling. However, it does not share in the same debate or political brinkmanship.
For one, parliament has more principal power in the Danish government, preventing the kind of legislative-executive branch showdown seen in the U.S. Additionally, CNN reports, Denmark is more fiscally conservative than the U.S., so it has less debt and set its original ceiling much higher than its actual debt levels.
What does it mean to raise the debt ceiling?
Raising the debt ceiling means increasing the amount of debt the country can accrue in order to pay its bills.
It is unrelated to future spending and is instead a limit on the amount of money the government can borrow to meet its existing legal obligations like payments to Social Security and Medicare.
U.S. government bonds have long been viewed as a safe investment because debts are always paid back on time. However, if the US were to default and for the first time in history fail to pay back those debts the value of government bonds would depreciate and the global market would enter a tailspin. Treasury bonds are used as collateral for loans internationally as well as to cushion bank losses, among other things.
Just Curious for more? We've got you covered.
USA TODAY is exploring the questions you and others ask every day. From "What is a good credit score?" to "What is food insecurity?" to "What countries border Russia?" – we're striving to find answers to the most common questions you ask every day. Head to our Just Curious section to see what else we can answer for you.
Contributing: Clare Mulroy, Paul Davidson, Daniel de Visé
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How To Stop Living Paycheck to Paycheck When You Make Good Money
According to numerous reports, about half of all Americans say they live paycheck to paycheck. This isn't limited to low- or moderate-income households, either. Almost half of those earning six figures feel the same way. For You: Try This: If you're struggling to make ends meet and feel like you never have enough money to meet your financial goals — like saving for a down payment or paying off debt — you're not alone. But your situation isn't hopeless, either. GOBankingRates reached out to several financial experts about how to stop living paycheck to paycheck when you earn enough money not to. Here's what they said. Sean Fox, president of debt resolution at Achieve, suggested making a spending plan or a budget. 'Most people don't want to 'budget' because it sounds hard, tedious and complicated. It's not. It's just a way to understand your finances in simple terms, with an eye on goals you've set,' Fox said. 'That means taking time to consider what you really want in your life, both in the long run (e.g., retirement, vacations, buying a house) and short run (e.g., a new piece of furniture, clothing, time for your favorite hobby or pastime). Then you can build your spending plan around what it will take to reach those goals.' No matter how much money you earn, you should always keep track of your spending. It's all too easy to fall into the trap of lifestyle inflation, something that occurs when you start spending more because you start earning more. You could be earning $100,000 a year and still have very little to show for it at the end of the month…if you're not tracking your expenses. Knowing how much money you spend and on what can help you figure out where the problem areas are and fix them. 'Keep a record of every single expense (online and off) you and everyone in your household makes for a couple of weeks,' said Fox. 'Most people have some surprises, and are then in a better place to make some decisions on smart spending that's in line with the budget.' Find Out: The Federal Reserve found that 82% of American adults have a credit card, while over 40% regularly carry a balance. While not a guarantee, if you're living paycheck to paycheck while earning a decent income, chances are you have some credit card debt, too. If that's the case, Fox suggested paying off this debt first. 'With interest rates over 20%, this is a huge expense — both in terms of what you're paying to the credit card issuer and the fact that you're effectively paying much more than the purchase price of what you bought,' Fox said. 'Plus, if you are carrying debt and paying all that interest, you have no opportunity to do something positive with that money — like saving for retirement and other goals you've set.' If possible, increase your monthly payments to pay off your debt sooner. If that's not an option, see if you can get a balance transfer card or a low-interest debt consolidation loan instead. Depending on the new interest rate and term, you could end up paying less in interest and getting rid of your debt sooner. There are a lot of reasons why people who make plenty of money live paycheck to paycheck. One of the big ones is that they don't differentiate between wants and needs. 'Whether it's about 'keeping up with the Joneses' or just preferring to not do so, the lack of thinking about whether a given purchase will meet a 'want' or a 'need' fuels overspending and credit card debt,' said Fox. 'It is much easier to simply buy what you want than to develop the habit of stopping to consider each purchase, and whether you really need it in your life.' All of this leads to overspending and living beyond one's means. If you're living beyond your means, take the time to distinguish between your wants and needs. Once you've done that, see if you can take it one step further by living below your means. Living below your means 'provides some cushion, a way to save and insurance that you are not living paycheck to paycheck all the time,' said Fox. Similarly, find ways to limit your discretionary spending. 'Cutting back on nonessential purchases is a great way to stop living paycheck to paycheck,' said a Quicken spokesperson. 'It is important to consider how many nonessential purchases [you are] making each week that you could either go without or make more cheaply at home.' You don't have to do it all at once. You can use a budgeting app or expense tracker to see where your money is going. Or, once a month, you can look through your bank and credit card statements to find out what you spend money on — and start finding small ways to cut back. Having goals, whether they're short or long term, can help motivate you to get a hold of your finances. 'By prioritizing your financial goals and having a time frame in mind, you can maximize your savings, stay motivated and move closer to the finish line,' said the Quicken representative. But don't fall into the trap of trying to achieve those goals all at once. Having that time frame is key. With it, you can avoid taking too long for a certain goal while also keep yourself moving toward it. For example, say you want to save your first $1,000 in an emergency fund. If you don't have quite that much money at the end of the month, that's OK. Start with a smaller sum — like $100, $200 or whatever you're comfortable with. If you know you want to save that amount within three months, break down your monthly savings goals accordingly — $1,000 divided by three. Once you've achieved a few short-term goals, you can start thinking about those long-term goals — like retirement. Joe DiSanto, a financial expert, consultant and the founder of Play Louder, suggested making a 'financial independence roadmap.' 'This is a long-term plan to reach your retirement goal, which includes a savings plan and required levels of investment return,' he said. As you work on your spending and savings habits, it's important to be consistent. 'You need to be consistent and make it part of your life,' said DiSanto. 'You can't 'wing it' or 'go with your gut feelings.' It's like going to the gym or maintaining a healthy diet. I use those examples specifically because most people struggle with that, too.' You can go about this in many different ways. For example, you could get an 'accountabili-buddy,' someone who can help you stay on track financially. Or you can do things like automate your savings or use a budgeting app. Whatever works for you, do it and be as consistent as possible. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on How To Stop Living Paycheck to Paycheck When You Make Good Money


Buzz Feed
35 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump Press Secretary's "Stupid" Comment, Viral Outrage
Ahead of President Donald Trump's US military parade, a press conference was held to address his views on protests, and things got heated. To celebrate the army's 250th anniversary, a huge military parade is expected to be held today in Washington, DC, and is set to include thousands of soldiers marching the streets, tanks, warplanes, army parachutists, and more. Today is also Trump's 79th birthday. "Critics have compared the expensive parade (which reportedly costs a whopping $40 million) to the ones held in Russia and North Korea. To counteract the massive demonstration, his policies, and the recent ICE raids/deportations, protests, known as the No Kings Protests, continue to take place around the country, with some even scheduled to happen today. On Tuesday, Trump spoke out on the country-wide demonstrations and warned that anyone protesting during the anniversary parade will be met with "very heavy force." So, when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt held a daily briefing the following day, it was expected that reporters would have some follow-up questions about his remarks on protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles, which escalated after Trump authorized military forces to protect federal property against the wishes of city and state officials. One interaction in particular has generated a lot of attention online, ultimately going viral for the "aggressive" response Karoline gave NOTUS White House correspondent Jasmine Wright. "The president warned that any protests on Saturday would be met with force," Jasmine began. "Can you clarify what kind of protest President Trump does support or find acceptable?" "The president absolutely supports peaceful protests," Karoline responded. "He supports the First Amendment. He supports the rights of Americans to make their voices heard. He does not support violence of any kind." The First Amendment protects the freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. "He does not support violence of any kind. He does not support assaulting law enforcement officers, who are simply trying to do their job. It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not. Unfortunately, for Democrats, that line has not been made clear, and they've allowed this unrest and this violence to continue, and the president has had to step in." To get some clarification from Karoline, Jasmine asked, "So, if there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the military parade, President Trump would allow that?" To which Karoline responded, "Of course, the president supports peaceful protest. What a stupid question." Jasmine's facial expression said it all, because how rude! The comment was so uncalled for. Not only did Karoline not answer the question, but she threw all professionalism out the window while conversing with Jasmine. Many people online were disgusted by it all: The responses continued to highlight her behavior: Unfortunately, this seems to be a pattern for Karoline. Other correspondents have dealt with similar experiences. You can watch here and here. The parade is set to take place later today at 6:30 p.m. ET in D.C., so only time will tell what will happen with today's protests. What are your thoughts on all of this? Let me know in the comments.


Axios
40 minutes ago
- Axios
Minnesota shootings set off five-alarm fire in Congress
Members of Congress went into this weekend with their nerves already severely frayed. The shooting of two lawmakers in Minnesota on Saturday has sent those tensions over the edge. Why it matters: In discussions with Axios on Saturday, lawmakers in both parties described growing unease on Capitol Hill about the country's increasingly volatile political atmosphere — and what it means for their security. One senior House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive internal discussions, said text chains between members were "on fire" Saturday morning after the news of the shootings broke. Lawmakers "are scared," the senior Democrat said, and want "addresses hidden and security updates. They won't be silenced." A House Republican told Axios they responded to the news by immediately raising the issue of members' security with House leadership. What happened: Minnesota state House Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were shot and killed in their home in what President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi described as a "targeted" attack, Axios' Torey Van Oot, Nick Halter and Kyle Stokes reported. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also shot in their home overnight. The suspect in the shootings was dressed as a police officer and left behind a manifesto naming many lawmakers, law enforcement said. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said the shootings appeared to be a "politically motivated assassination." What they're saying: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said he asked the House sergeant-at-arms and Capitol Police to "ensure the safety of our Minnesota delegation and Members of Congress across the country." "Our country is on edge like never before," he said in a statement. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a post on X: "Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it." A Capitol Police spokesperson told Axios they are "aware of the violence targeting state lawmakers in Minnesota" and "have been working with our federal, state and local partners," but declined to offer further details. What we're hearing: "People are definitely at a heightened attention," a second House Democrat told Axios of their colleagues' states of mind following the shooting. A second House Republican who spoke to Axios said it is "important to wait and not jump to conclusions" until there is more information on the shooter's motive. However, they added, "if it ends up being politically motivated, [in my opinion] ALL Republicans need to come out swinging against political violence." Between the lines: The shootings come just days after Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was held on the ground and handcuffed after attempting to confront Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference in Los Angeles. The incident sent shockwaves through Congress, with one House Democrat even berating a Republican colleague on the floor to "grow a pair of balls" and urge their colleagues denounce the incident. Padilla brief detention came on the heels of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) being indicted over a scuffle with DHS officers and an aide to Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) being briefly handcuffed. Zoom out: While tensions have risen in recent months, members of Congress are no strangers to violence or threats of violence.